The Technical Field "捜索" had 119 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-02-28). This is a significantly decreased of -56 filings (-32.0%) over 175 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-02-28). This report also includes technical terms related to " 探索 " in the search set.
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 1,682 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 1,083 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 6,967 cases in total) is 1,161, and the median is 1,284. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.3, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1,161 patents |
Std Dev | 383 |
COV | 0.3 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 1,083 cases | -9.22 % |
2021 year | 1,193 cases | -13.24 % |
2020 year | 1,375 cases | -4.18 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 捜索 for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-10-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 捜索, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of 捜索 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 13,362 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 捜索 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 富士通株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 70 cases, followed by 株式会社日立製作所 with 69 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
富士通株式会社 | 70 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 69 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 65 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 53 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 49 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 30 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 23 cases |
株式会社デンソー | 23 cases |
日本電信電話株式会社 | 10 cases |
ソニーグループ株式会社 | 3 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, キヤノン株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 699 cases, followed by 富士通株式会社 with 592 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
キヤノン株式会社 | 699 cases |
富士通株式会社 | 592 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 442 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 441 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 380 cases |
日本電信電話株式会社 | 339 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 293 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 256 cases |
株式会社デンソー | 236 cases |
ソニーグループ株式会社 | 135 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 22 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 捜索 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Among the top coapplicants, 富士通株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 70 cases, followed by 株式会社日立製作所 with 69 cases.
Among the top coapplicants, キヤノン株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 699 cases, followed by 富士通株式会社 with 592 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
キヤノン株式会社 | 699 cases |
富士通株式会社 | 592 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 442 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 441 cases |
日本電信電話株式会社 | 339 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 293 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 22 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 捜索’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 捜索’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
捜索 filed 293 joint applications with 日本電気株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 145 cases in total) is 24.2, and the median is 23.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2014 with 43 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 13 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 24.2 patents |
Std Dev | 12.8 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 15 cases | +15.38 % |
2021 year | 13 cases | -69.8 % |
2020 year | 43 cases | +26.47 % |
捜索 filed 441 joint applications with 三菱電機株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 247 cases in total) is 41.2, and the median is 45.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.3, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2014 with 62 cases, and their lowest number in 2016 with 37 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 41.2 patents |
Std Dev | 13.4 |
COV | 0.3 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 40 cases | -16.67 % |
2021 year | 48 cases | +14.29 % |
2020 year | 42 cases | -22.22 % |
捜索 filed 592 joint applications with 富士通株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 322 cases in total) is 53.7, and the median is 57.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 75 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 55 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 53.7 patents |
Std Dev | 20.8 |
COV | 0.4 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 56 cases | +1.82 % |
2021 year | 55 cases | -19.12 % |
2020 year | 68 cases | -9.33 % |
捜索 filed 442 joint applications with 株式会社日立製作所 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 255 cases in total) is 42.5, and the median is 47.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.3, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2014 with 56 cases, and their lowest number in 2019 with 38 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 42.5 patents |
Std Dev | 12.9 |
COV | 0.3 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 53 cases | +15.22 % |
2021 year | 46 cases | -13.21 % |
2020 year | 53 cases | +39.5 % |
捜索 filed 699 joint applications with キヤノン株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 298 cases in total) is 49.7, and the median is 45.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2014 with 117 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 40 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 49.7 patents |
Std Dev | 19.5 |
COV | 0.4 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 44 cases | +10.00 % |
2021 year | 40 cases | -13.04 % |
2020 year | 46 cases | -28.12 % |
The following shows JP patents held by 捜索 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 捜索’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 捜索 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 1 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 2.0 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許6300215 "植物の特性を増強する方法" (Invalidation Trial day 2023-02-03) .
- | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6300215 | 植物の特性を増強する方法 | 2023-02-03 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 2 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.5. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6300215 "植物の特性を増強する方法" (2 times) , and the next most invalidation trial patent is 特許6331164 "水道配管における漏水位置検知装置" (1 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6300215 | 植物の特性を増強する方法 | 2 times |
2 | 特許6331164 | 水道配管における漏水位置検知装置 | 1 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 8 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7288207 "低分子化合物探索方法、プログラム、装置、およびシステム" (Opposition day 2023-12-06) , next is 特許7287416 "厚鋼板の製造仕様決定支援装置および製造仕様探索方法、コンピュータプログラム、コンピュータ読み取り可能な記録媒体ならびに厚鋼板の製造方法" (Opposition day 2023-12-06) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7288207 | 低分子化合物探索方法、プログラム、装置、およびシステム | 2023-12-06 |
2 | 特許7287416 | 厚鋼板の製造仕様決定支援装置および製造仕様探索方法、コンピュータプログラム、コンピュータ読み取り可能な記録媒体ならびに厚鋼板の製造方法 | 2023-12-06 |
3 | 特許7197037 | 金属材料の製造仕様決定方法、製造方法、および製造仕様決定装置 | 2023-06-23 |
4 | 特許7161813 | 移動体通行管理システム、及び移動体通行管理方法 | 2023-04-25 |
5 | 特許7088399 | ノボラック型フェノール樹脂の探索方法、情報処理装置、及びプログラム | 2022-12-19 |
6 | 特許7056592 | 金属材料の製造仕様決定方法、製造方法、および製造仕様決定装置 | 2022-10-19 |
7 | 特許7046469 | ケーソンの状態予測システム及びプログラム | 2022-10-03 |
8 | 特許6995555 | ケーソンの状態予測システム及びプログラム | 2022-07-11 |
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 8 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.2 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2022-166350 "材料プロセス探索装置、材料プロセス探索システム、および、相関モデル生成方法" (Protest day 2024-06-03) , next is 特開2022-187349 "含硫化合物臭の抑制剤の探索方法" (Protest day 2024-02-17) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2022-166350 | 材料プロセス探索装置、材料プロセス探索システム、および、相関モデル生成方法 | 2024-06-03 |
2 | 特開2022-187349 | 含硫化合物臭の抑制剤の探索方法 | 2024-02-17 |
3 | 特開2023-174085 | アンモニア臭の抑制剤の探索方法 | 2024-02-17 |
4 | 特許7419120 | 角層剥離改善剤及びそのスクリーニング方法 | 2023-11-29 |
5 | 特許7447399 | 映像配信制御装置、映像配信制御方法、およびプログラム | 2023-07-25 |
6 | 特許7443135 | 情報処理装置およびデータベース生成方法 | 2023-07-19 |
7 | 特許7252943 | 航空機のための対象物検出及び回避 | 2022-09-13 |
8 | 特許7075218 | 錠剤検査方法および錠剤検査装置 | 2022-01-17 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 24 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.3. The most protest patent is 特許6348077 "Perlolyrineを含有する呈味改善剤、hTRPV1の活性化剤または食品。" (4 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特開2017-002035 "ソフトコンタクトレンズが装用されたドライアイ患者の眼に点眼されるように用いられることを特徴とするドライアイ治療剤" (2 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6348077 | Perlolyrineを含有する呈味改善剤、hTRPV1の活性化剤または食品。 | 4 times |
2 | 特開2017-002035 | ソフトコンタクトレンズが装用されたドライアイ患者の眼に点眼されるように用いられることを特徴とするドライアイ治療剤 | 2 times |
3 | 特許6499910 | 電力取引支援装置及び方法、または応用装置 | 2 times |
4 | 特許7075218 | 錠剤検査方法および錠剤検査装置 | 2 times |
5 | 特許7252943 | 航空機のための対象物検出及び回避 | 2 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 45 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.1 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2022-187349 "含硫化合物臭の抑制剤の探索方法" (Inspection day 2024-09-18) , next is 特開2023-174085 "アンモニア臭の抑制剤の探索方法" (Inspection day 2024-09-18) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2022-187349 | 含硫化合物臭の抑制剤の探索方法 | 2024-09-18 |
2 | 特開2023-174085 | アンモニア臭の抑制剤の探索方法 | 2024-09-18 |
3 | 特許7564274 | 結合剤 | 2024-08-09 |
4 | 特開2022-166350 | 材料プロセス探索装置、材料プロセス探索システム、および、相関モデル生成方法 | 2024-06-11 |
5 | 特許7468770 | 予測プログラム、情報処理装置、および予測方法 | 2024-05-13 |
6 | 特許6758736 | 光学測定システムおよび光学測定方法 | 2024-05-09 |
7 | 特許7371843 | 遺失物管理システム、及びプログラム | 2024-05-09 |
8 | 特開2023-012913 | 計測装置、及び、計測方法 | 2024-03-18 |
9 | 特許7248174 | 熱硬化性エポキシ樹脂組成物の探索方法、情報処理装置、及びプログラム | 2024-01-16 |
10 | 特許6588666 | イミダゾールジペプチドを含む剤 | 2023-10-30 |
11 | 特許7101372 | イミダゾールジペプチドを含む剤 | 2023-10-30 |
12 | 特開2021-005267 | 情報処理装置、情報処理方法、並びにプログラム | 2023-10-04 |
13 | 特表2019-526111 | 幾何ファセットを使用する直接的なブーリアン演算の方法 | 2023-09-27 |
14 | 特許7442480 | 多アンテナMU-MIMOシステムのための制御チャネル設計 | 2023-09-12 |
15 | 特許5065297 | MMC/SDデバイスからホストデバイスをブートする方法,MMC/SDデバイスからブート可能なホストデバイス及びホストデバイスをブートできるMMC/SDデバイス | 2023-09-07 |
16 | 特許7443135 | 情報処理装置およびデータベース生成方法 | 2023-08-08 |
17 | 特許7447399 | 映像配信制御装置、映像配信制御方法、およびプログラム | 2023-08-02 |
18 | 特許7293257 | 低パワー、高帯域幅、低遅延データバス | 2023-06-06 |
19 | 特開2023-135648 | 掃引容積の変形 | 2023-04-14 |
20 | 特許7389513 | 広告システム、広告方法、広告プログラム | 2023-03-17 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 120 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.2. The most inspection patent is 特開2017-002035 "ソフトコンタクトレンズが装用されたドライアイ患者の眼に点眼されるように用いられることを特徴とするドライアイ治療剤" (8 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許6300215 "植物の特性を増強する方法" (4 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2017-002035 | ソフトコンタクトレンズが装用されたドライアイ患者の眼に点眼されるように用いられることを特徴とするドライアイ治療剤 | 8 times |
2 | 特許6300215 | 植物の特性を増強する方法 | 4 times |
3 | 特許6348077 | Perlolyrineを含有する呈味改善剤、hTRPV1の活性化剤または食品。 | 3 times |
4 | 特許6804282 | 振動子駆動装置及び振動発生装置 | 3 times |
5 | 特許6725207 | 皮膚色素沈着抑制剤 | 3 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 3,259 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 3.0. The most cited patent is 特許6605249 "歯牙解析装置およびそのプログラム" (56 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6413664 "自動配車システム、センタ装置" (50 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6605249 | 歯牙解析装置およびそのプログラム | 56 times |
2 | 特許6413664 | 自動配車システム、センタ装置 | 50 times |
3 | 特開2016-196285 | 走行制御装置及び走行制御方法 | 47 times |
4 | 特許6776513 | 車両制御装置と車両制御方法と情報処理装置および交通情報提供システム | 47 times |
5 | 特許5858507 | 仮想通貨管理プログラム、及び仮想通貨管理方法 | 44 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International