The Technical Field "回折" had 339 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-04-30). This is a significantly decreased of -226 filings (-40.0%) over 565 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-04-30).
The highest number of filings in 2018 with 2,421 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 593 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 8,195 cases in total) is 1,366, and the median is 1,652. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1,366 patents |
Std Dev | 762 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 593 cases | -62.3 % |
2022 year | 1,571 cases | -9.35 % |
2021 year | 1,733 cases | -11.17 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 回折 for the period of the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 回折, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of 回折 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 17,333 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
A patent aanlysis report on the following synonyms was found in the technical term "回折".
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 回折 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, キヤノン株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2023 to 2025) with 24 cases, followed by 大日本印刷株式会社 with 14 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
キヤノン株式会社 | 24 cases |
大日本印刷株式会社 | 14 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 6 cases |
株式会社リコー | 3 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 1 cases |
ソニーグループ株式会社 | 1 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, キヤノン株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2015 to 2025) with 437 cases, followed by 大日本印刷株式会社 with 294 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
キヤノン株式会社 | 437 cases |
大日本印刷株式会社 | 294 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 138 cases |
株式会社ニコン | 119 cases |
日本電信電話株式会社 | 105 cases |
株式会社リコー | 100 cases |
ソニーグループ株式会社 | 75 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 26 cases |
シャープ株式会社 | 26 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 24 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 23 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 回折 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Among the top coapplicants, キヤノン株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2023 to 2025) with 24 cases, followed by 大日本印刷株式会社 with 14 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
キヤノン株式会社 | 24 cases |
大日本印刷株式会社 | 14 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 6 cases |
株式会社リコー | 3 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 1 cases |
ソニーグループ株式会社 | 1 cases |
Among the top coapplicants, キヤノン株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2015 to 2025) with 437 cases, followed by 大日本印刷株式会社 with 294 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
キヤノン株式会社 | 437 cases |
大日本印刷株式会社 | 294 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 138 cases |
株式会社ニコン | 119 cases |
株式会社リコー | 100 cases |
ソニーグループ株式会社 | 75 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 24 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 回折’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 回折’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
回折 filed 437 joint applications with キヤノン株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 186 cases in total) is 31.0, and the median is 32.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2015 with 78 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 20 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 31.0 patents |
Std Dev | 17.3 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 20 cases | -39.4 % |
2022 year | 33 cases | -10.81 % |
2021 year | 37 cases | +19.35 % |
回折 filed 24 joint applications with パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 17 cases in total) is 2.8, and the median is 3.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2018 with 6 cases, and their lowest number in 2017 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 2.8 patents |
Std Dev | 1.8 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 1 cases | -66.7 % |
2022 year | 3 cases | -25.00 % |
2021 year | 4 cases | -20.00 % |
回折 filed 100 joint applications with 株式会社リコー for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 27 cases in total) is 4.5, and the median is 4.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.7, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2018 with 24 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 3 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 4.5 patents |
Std Dev | 3.4 |
COV | 0.7 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 3 cases | 0 |
2022 year | 3 cases | -72.7 % |
2021 year | 11 cases | +120 % |
回折 filed 119 joint applications with 株式会社ニコン for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 27 cases in total) is 4.5, and the median is 4.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.9, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2017 with 31 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 4.5 patents |
Std Dev | 4.2 |
COV | 0.9 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 3 cases | -40.0 % |
2021 year | 5 cases | -28.57 % |
2020 year | 7 cases | -41.7 % |
回折 filed 294 joint applications with 大日本印刷株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 112 cases in total) is 18.7, and the median is 22.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2017 with 59 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 13 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 18.7 patents |
Std Dev | 9.1 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 13 cases | -51.9 % |
2022 year | 27 cases | +28.57 % |
2021 year | 21 cases | -12.50 % |
The following shows JP patents held by 回折 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 回折’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 回折 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 1 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 1.0 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許5474043 "(+)−2−[1−(3−エトキシ−4−メトキシフェニル)−2−メチルスルホニルエチル]−4−アセチルアミノイソインドリン−1,3−ジオンを含む固形物形態、その組成物およびその使用" (Invalidation Trial day 2023-05-31) .
- | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許5474043 | (+)−2−[1−(3−エトキシ−4−メトキシフェニル)−2−メチルスルホニルエチル]−4−アセチルアミノイソインドリン−1,3−ジオンを含む固形物形態、その組成物およびその使用 | 2023-05-31 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 3 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.0. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許5697067 "グラフェン前駆体として用いられる黒鉛系炭素素材" (1 times) , and the next most invalidation trial patent is 特許6093829 "ランタン化合物を含む医薬組成物" (1 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許5697067 | グラフェン前駆体として用いられる黒鉛系炭素素材 | 1 times |
2 | 特許6093829 | ランタン化合物を含む医薬組成物 | 1 times |
3 | 特許6320582 | 半導体発光素子 | 1 times |
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 87 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7487011 "接合材、接合材の製造方法及び接合方法" (Opposition day 2024-11-19) , next is 特許7487851 "包装用の積層体及び包装袋" (Opposition day 2024-11-18) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7487011 | 接合材、接合材の製造方法及び接合方法 | 2024-11-19 |
2 | 特許7487851 | 包装用の積層体及び包装袋 | 2024-11-18 |
3 | 特許7486878 | 反射防止フィルム、偏光板およびディスプレイ装置 | 2024-11-14 |
4 | 特許7473725 | シリカ粉末 | 2024-10-23 |
5 | 特許7473726 | シリカ粉末 | 2024-10-23 |
6 | 特許7468137 | 表示体 | 2024-10-15 |
7 | 特許7466951 | 樹脂組成物 | 2024-10-11 |
8 | 特許7470639 | 溶接方法および溶接装置 | 2024-10-11 |
9 | 特許7468544 | ホログラム記録用組成物、ホログラム記録媒体、ホログラム、及びこれを用いた光学装置、光学部品 | 2024-10-10 |
10 | 特許7478632 | 酸化マグネシウム粉末、フィラー組成物、樹脂組成物、及び放熱部品 | 2024-10-09 |
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 165 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.5 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2024-128010 "リチウムイオン二次電池" (Protest day 2024-11-09) , next is 特開2022-154083 "銀焼結体、半導体装置、銀含有組成物、及び銀焼結体の製造方法" (Protest day 2024-11-01) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2024-128010 | リチウムイオン二次電池 | 2024-11-09 |
2 | 特開2022-154083 | 銀焼結体、半導体装置、銀含有組成物、及び銀焼結体の製造方法 | 2024-11-01 |
3 | 特開2024-137811 | 撥剤 | 2024-10-31 |
4 | 特開2024-137808 | 撥剤 | 2024-10-31 |
5 | 特開2022-051945 | 導電性粒子、導電性粒子の製造方法、導電材料及び接続構造体 | 2024-10-18 |
6 | 特許7576994 | セメントクリンカ粉砕物含有粉末 | 2024-10-04 |
7 | 特開2022-070936 | 熱可塑性液晶ポリマーフィルム、積層体、および成形体、ならびにそれらの製造方法 | 2024-09-30 |
8 | 特許7598898 | 球状銀粉、球状銀粉の製造方法、球状銀粉製造装置、及び導電性ペースト | 2024-09-30 |
9 | 特開2023-009506 | 水酸化アルミニウム粉末およびその製造方法 | 2024-09-13 |
10 | 特開2022-161735 | X線回折測定装置及びX線回折測定ロボット | 2024-09-04 |
11 | 特許7610467 | 金属疲労評価装置、該方法および該プログラム | 2024-09-04 |
12 | 特開2022-071278 | 酢酸ナトリウム結晶 | 2024-09-02 |
13 | 特開2023-034764 | 可食性植物粉体組成物、及びその製造方法 | 2024-08-23 |
14 | 特開2024-057044 | 溶接方法および溶接装置 | 2024-08-23 |
15 | 特表2022-531500 | ガラス貫通ビアの効率的な製造に有用なケイ酸塩ガラス組成物 | 2024-08-13 |
16 | 特開2023-069017 | カーボンナノチューブ分散組成物、およびそれを用いた樹脂組成物、電極膜、二次電池、車両 | 2024-08-09 |
17 | 特開2023-124219 | 機能性膜及び機能性膜の製造方法 | 2024-08-07 |
18 | 特開2021-040132 | シリコン酸化物被覆Fe系軟磁性粉末およびその製造方法 | 2024-08-02 |
19 | 特許7563636 | 包装材料、包装体及び包装物品 | 2024-07-18 |
20 | 特許7563640 | 包装材料、包装体及び包装物品 | 2024-07-18 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 330 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.4. The most protest patent is 特開2017-088844 "硬化性組成物、硬化物及び積層体" (6 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許6777405 "導電性粒子、導電性粒子の製造方法、導電材料及び接続構造体" (5 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2017-088844 | 硬化性組成物、硬化物及び積層体 | 6 times |
2 | 特許6777405 | 導電性粒子、導電性粒子の製造方法、導電材料及び接続構造体 | 5 times |
3 | 特許7274816 | 金スパッタリングターゲットとその製造方法 | 4 times |
4 | 特許6743694 | 非水電解質二次電池 | 4 times |
5 | 特許6923435 | 繊維強化樹脂材料成形体、繊維強化樹脂材料成形体の製造方法及び繊維強化樹脂材料の製造方法 | 4 times |
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 260 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.9 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特許7604861 "炭素材料およびそれを用いてなる導電性組成物、導電膜" (Inspection day 2024-12-24) , next is 特表2020-533396 "GSK1278863の結晶形及びその製造方法並びに医薬用途" (Inspection day 2024-12-19) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7604861 | 炭素材料およびそれを用いてなる導電性組成物、導電膜 | 2024-12-24 |
2 | 特表2020-533396 | GSK1278863の結晶形及びその製造方法並びに医薬用途 | 2024-12-19 |
3 | 特許5199917 | 粘着シートとその製造方法および粘着型機能性フィルム | 2024-12-03 |
4 | 特許7598898 | 球状銀粉、球状銀粉の製造方法、球状銀粉製造装置、及び導電性ペースト | 2024-11-29 |
5 | 特開2022-105619 | 反射性流動可能材料によって形成された反射性層を有する導波管 | 2024-11-25 |
6 | 特開2022-154083 | 銀焼結体、半導体装置、銀含有組成物、及び銀焼結体の製造方法 | 2024-11-20 |
7 | 特開2022-051945 | 導電性粒子、導電性粒子の製造方法、導電材料及び接続構造体 | 2024-11-12 |
8 | 特開2024-128010 | リチウムイオン二次電池 | 2024-11-12 |
9 | 特開2024-137811 | 撥剤 | 2024-11-12 |
10 | 特開2024-137808 | 撥剤 | 2024-11-12 |
11 | 特開2021-146478 | 耐欠損性にすぐれた表面被覆切削工具 | 2024-10-22 |
12 | 特開2023-009506 | 水酸化アルミニウム粉末およびその製造方法 | 2024-10-17 |
13 | 特開2022-070936 | 熱可塑性液晶ポリマーフィルム、積層体、および成形体、ならびにそれらの製造方法 | 2024-10-15 |
14 | 特許7524114 | リチウム二次電池用活物質、リチウム二次電池用電極、リチウム二次電池、電池パック、及び車両 | 2024-10-03 |
15 | 特開2022-176961 | {[5-(3-クロロフェニル)-3-ヒドロキシピリジン-2-カルボニル]アミノ}酢酸の固体形態、組成物、及びその使用 | 2024-09-27 |
16 | 特開2024-057044 | 溶接方法および溶接装置 | 2024-09-20 |
17 | 特許7487011 | 接合材、接合材の製造方法及び接合方法 | 2024-09-17 |
18 | 特許7610467 | 金属疲労評価装置、該方法および該プログラム | 2024-09-10 |
19 | 特表2022-538009 | コハク酸プロドラッグ、コハク酸プロドラッグを含有する組成物、及びその使用 | 2024-09-06 |
20 | 特開2023-124219 | 機能性膜及び機能性膜の製造方法 | 2024-09-05 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 544 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.7. The most inspection patent is 特許6142892 "経口投与用医薬組成物" (30 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許7343391 "成膜装置及び成膜方法" (17 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6142892 | 経口投与用医薬組成物 | 30 times |
2 | 特許7343391 | 成膜装置及び成膜方法 | 17 times |
3 | 特開2017-088844 | 硬化性組成物、硬化物及び積層体 | 16 times |
4 | 特許6484465 | 2,2’−ビス(2−ヒドロキシエトキシ)−1,1’−ビナフタレンの結晶多形体およびその製造方法 | 10 times |
5 | 特表2018-502165 | エフィナコナゾールの結晶形態 | 9 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 4,067 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 3.1. The most cited patent is 特許6598269 "導波管ディスプレイ" (90 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6680793 "導波路回折格子デバイス" (76 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6598269 | 導波管ディスプレイ | 90 times |
2 | 特許6680793 | 導波路回折格子デバイス | 76 times |
3 | 特許6863896 | 導波路から異なる波長の光を出力する構造および方法 | 65 times |
4 | 特許6734933 | 構造化光投影のためのホログラフィック導波管装置 | 65 times |
5 | 特許6895451 | 偏光選択ホログラフィー導波管デバイスを提供するための方法および装置 | 61 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International