リスク (JP Patent Analysis Report)
The Technical Field "リスク" had 1,493 patent application filings in the most recent period (2022-01-01 to 2022-09-30). This is a significantly decreased of -528 filings (-26.1%) over 2,021 they had in the same period of the previous year (2021-01-01 to 2021-09-30). This report also includes technical terms related to " 危険 ", " 危険さ ", " 危険度 ", " 危険性 " in the search set.
The highest number of filings in 2019 with 2,730 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 1,765 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 12,564 cases in total) is 2,094, and the median is 2,583. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 2,094 patents |
| Std Dev | 904 |
| COV | 0.4 |
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023).
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 1,765 cases | -32.5 % |
| 2021 year | 2,616 cases | +2.59 % |
| 2020 year | 2,550 cases | -6.59 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for リスク for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-05-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of リスク, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
Introduction
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
リスク, Changes in the Number of JP Patents/Patent Applications
The changes in the number of patent filings of リスク over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
Search Set (Analysis Patents)
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 22,270 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
リスク
Same industry / competition company information (JP)
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as リスク are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024).
Comparing the number of applications of each company, トヨタ自動車株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 79 cases, followed by 株式会社日立製作所 with 56 cases.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2014 to 2024).
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 株式会社日立製作所 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 364 cases, followed by トヨタ自動車株式会社 with 348 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| 株式会社日立製作所 | 364 cases |
| トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 348 cases |
| 三菱電機株式会社 | 272 cases |
| 株式会社デンソー | 248 cases |
| 日本電気株式会社 | 238 cases |
| 富士通株式会社 | 184 cases |
| キヤノン株式会社 | 170 cases |
| 株式会社東芝 | 158 cases |
| 三菱重工業株式会社 | 88 cases |
| 日産自動車株式会社 | 73 cases |
| パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 16 cases |
Same industry / competition company, Change in the Number of JP Patents
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
Top company information (JP)
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as リスク are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024).
Among the top coapplicants, トヨタ自動車株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 79 cases, followed by 株式会社日立製作所 with 56 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 79 cases |
| 株式会社日立製作所 | 56 cases |
| 三菱電機株式会社 | 26 cases |
| 株式会社東芝 | 16 cases |
| 株式会社デンソー | 14 cases |
| 日本電気株式会社 | 13 cases |
| パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 2 cases |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2014 to 2024).
Among the top coapplicants, 株式会社日立製作所 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 364 cases, followed by トヨタ自動車株式会社 with 348 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| 株式会社日立製作所 | 364 cases |
| トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 348 cases |
| 三菱電機株式会社 | 272 cases |
| 株式会社デンソー | 248 cases |
| 日本電気株式会社 | 238 cases |
| 株式会社東芝 | 158 cases |
| パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 16 cases |
Top company, Change in the Number of JP Patents
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by リスク’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by リスク’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Top company Details (JP)
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 株式会社日立製作所
リスク filed 364 joint applications with 株式会社日立製作所 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 240 cases in total) is 40.0, and the median is 44.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2021 with 56 cases, and their lowest number in 2016 with 27 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 40.0 patents |
| Std Dev | 19.2 |
| COV | 0.5 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 56 cases | 0 |
| 2021 year | 56 cases | +12.00 % |
| 2020 year | 50 cases | +28.21 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 株式会社東芝
リスク filed 158 joint applications with 株式会社東芝 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 88 cases in total) is 14.7, and the median is 15.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2020 with 27 cases, and their lowest number in 2019 with 12 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 14.7 patents |
| Std Dev | 8.1 |
| COV | 0.6 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 16 cases | +14.29 % |
| 2021 year | 14 cases | -48.1 % |
| 2020 year | 27 cases | +125 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 三菱電機株式会社
リスク filed 272 joint applications with 三菱電機株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 180 cases in total) is 30.0, and the median is 33.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2019 with 44 cases, and their lowest number in 2016 with 20 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 30.0 patents |
| Std Dev | 14.4 |
| COV | 0.5 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 24 cases | -45.5 % |
| 2021 year | 44 cases | +46.7 % |
| 2020 year | 30 cases | -31.8 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with パナソニックホールディングス株式会社
リスク filed 16 joint applications with パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 8 cases in total) is 1.3, and the median is 1.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.1, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2017 with 4 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 0 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 1.3 patents |
| Std Dev | 1.5 |
| COV | 1.1 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 2 cases | - |
| 2021 year | 0 cases | - |
| 2020 year | 0 cases | -100 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with トヨタ自動車株式会社
リスク filed 348 joint applications with トヨタ自動車株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 271 cases in total) is 45.2, and the median is 49.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2022 with 78 cases, and their lowest number in 2014 with 9 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 45.2 patents |
| Std Dev | 25.3 |
| COV | 0.6 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 78 cases | +62.5 % |
| 2021 year | 48 cases | -27.27 % |
| 2020 year | 66 cases | +29.41 % |
Information on important patents (JP)
The following shows JP patents held by リスク that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and リスク’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which リスク is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
Glossary
- Cited
- Indicates that the patent/patent application has been cited (by Examiners) in notices of reasons for rejection in the examination process of other (Japanese, U.S., or European) patent applications. The higher the number of citations, the more important the patent/patent application is considered to be.
- Request for invalidation trial
- Indicates that a third party has requested a procedure to invalidate the patent. It is likely to affect the business of third parties and is considered to be of high importance.
- Opposition
- Indicates that a third party has filed a petition with the Patent Office to hear the validity of the patent again. Like the trial for invalidation, it is considered to be of high importance.
- Information provision
- Indicates that a third party has provided the Patent Office with useful information for examination for the patent filed. It is usually considered to be of high importance because it is done to prevent the patent from being granted.
- Browsing request
- Indicates that a third party has requested the Patent Office to view the patent bag (a set of documents exchanged between the Patent Office and the applicant). The bag is often checked prior to trial for invalidation, opposition, and provision of information, and is considered to be a highly important patent.
Invalidationed Trial cases
List of latest Invalidationed Trial patents
In the last 3 years (2021-06-01 ~ 2024-05-31), there were 12 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 1.1 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許6811203 "経口又は非経口抗糖尿病薬による治療にもかかわらず不十分な血糖調節の患者の糖尿病の治療" (Invalidation Trial day 2024-03-19) , next is 特許6995822 "ＤＰＰ ＩＶインヒビターの使用" (Invalidation Trial day 2024-03-19) .
| - | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6811203 | 経口又は非経口抗糖尿病薬による治療にもかかわらず不十分な血糖調節の患者の糖尿病の治療 | 2024-03-19 |
| 2 | 特許6995822 | ＤＰＰ ＩＶインヒビターの使用 | 2024-03-19 |
| 3 | 特許6556767 | ＤＰＰ−４阻害剤（リナグリプチン）を任意で他の抗糖尿病薬と組み合わせて含む抗糖尿病薬 | 2024-03-19 |
| 4 | 特許6143809 | ＤＰＰＩＶインヒビターの使用 | 2024-02-29 |
| 5 | 特許6262023 | 経口又は非経口抗糖尿病薬による治療にもかかわらず不十分な血糖調節の患者の糖尿病の治療 | 2024-01-31 |
| 6 | 特許6189374 | 糖尿病療法 | 2024-01-31 |
| 7 | 特許6662970 | ＤＰＰ ＩＶインヒビターの使用 | 2023-09-04 |
| 8 | 特許4960929 | 自動二輪車のブレーキ制御装置及び挙動解析装置 | 2023-08-10 |
| 9 | 特許5927146 | ＤＰＰ ＩＶインヒビターの使用 | 2023-07-10 |
| 10 | 特許7185426 | Ｓ１Ｐ受容体モジュレーターの投与計画 | 2023-07-10 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Invalidationed Trial
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-06-01 to 2024-05-31), 6 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.2. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6143809 "ＤＰＰＩＶインヒビターの使用" (2 times) , and the next most invalidation trial patent is 特許6662970 "ＤＰＰ ＩＶインヒビターの使用" (1 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6143809 | ＤＰＰＩＶインヒビターの使用 | 2 times |
| 2 | 特許6662970 | ＤＰＰ ＩＶインヒビターの使用 | 1 times |
| 3 | 特許5826909 | 金融商品取引管理装置、金融商品取引管理システムおよびプログラム | 1 times |
| 4 | 特許6189374 | 糖尿病療法 | 1 times |
| 5 | 特許6025267 | サーベイ（眺望）型ナビゲーションシステム | 1 times |
Oppositioned cases
List of latest Oppositioned patents
In the last 3 years (2021-06-01 ~ 2024-05-31), there were 21 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7339261 "低アレルゲン性の乳児用調製乳及びそれを調製する方法" (Opposition day 2024-03-05) , next is 特許7331187 "情報処理装置、情報処理方法及びプログラム" (Opposition day 2024-02-21) .
| - | No. | Title | Opposition days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許7339261 | 低アレルゲン性の乳児用調製乳及びそれを調製する方法 | 2024-03-05 |
| 2 | 特許7331187 | 情報処理装置、情報処理方法及びプログラム | 2024-02-21 |
| 3 | 特許7315316 | 歯科用ミルブランクアセンブリ | 2024-01-25 |
| 4 | 特許7260839 | プラント管理方法、プラント管理装置およびプラント管理プログラム | 2023-10-19 |
| 5 | 特許7250670 | ショベル | 2023-10-02 |
| 6 | 特許7271397 | 緊急時活動レベルの管理支援装置、方法及びプログラム | 2023-09-07 |
| 7 | 特許7237875 | リスク管理システム、方法及びプログラム | 2023-08-29 |
| 8 | 特許7211588 | 包装用積層体及びこれを用いた包装袋 | 2023-07-24 |
| 9 | 特許7210036 | アルツハイマー病および他の神経変性障害のためのバイオマーカーおよび診断方法 | 2023-07-20 |
| 10 | 特許7126294 | イチゴ苗の生育方法 | 2023-02-20 |
Protested cases
List of latest Protested patents
In the last 3 years (2021-06-01 ~ 2024-05-31), there were 56 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.2 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2023-038303 "塗膜剥離組成物及び塗膜の剥離方法" (Protest day 2024-05-02) , next is 特表2023-542971 "二次電池用パウチフィルムおよびその製造方法" (Protest day 2024-02-29) .
| - | No. | Title | Protest days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特開2023-038303 | 塗膜剥離組成物及び塗膜の剥離方法 | 2024-05-02 |
| 2 | 特表2023-542971 | 二次電池用パウチフィルムおよびその製造方法 | 2024-02-29 |
| 3 | 特開2023-086543 | 剥離剤組成物 | 2024-02-26 |
| 4 | 特開2023-175853 | 疾患診断および健康評価のための個々の対象の低分子生化学プロファイリングの方法 | 2024-02-16 |
| 5 | 特表2023-534047 | オリゴ糖組成物及び使用方法 | 2024-02-07 |
| 6 | 特表2022-504702 | 緩衝塩及びアミノ酸を含有する粉末、そのような粉末の栄養製品への再構成、並びにそのような栄養製品を使用する方法 | 2024-01-30 |
| 7 | 特開2021-107912 | ＥＵＶリソグラフィ用途のための鎖切断レジスト組成物 | 2023-12-11 |
| 8 | 特開2023-156423 | 危険性チェックシステム、危険度チェック方法及びプログラム | 2023-11-22 |
| 9 | 特開2023-099034 | 危険性チェックシステム、危険度チェック方法及びプログラム | 2023-11-20 |
| 10 | 特表2022-534665 | 動物において健康効果をもたらすためのＭＣＴベースの栄養ブレンド | 2023-11-13 |
| 11 | 特開2022-163614 | 推定装置、方法およびプログラム | 2023-10-27 |
| 12 | 特開2022-139211 | 推定装置、方法およびプログラム | 2023-10-27 |
| 13 | 特開2022-140050 | 推定装置、方法およびプログラム | 2023-10-27 |
| 14 | 特開2021-033412 | ＩＣタグ | 2023-09-21 |
| 15 | 特開2023-093482 | Ｓ１Ｐ受容体モジュレーターの投与計画 | 2023-08-28 |
| 16 | 特表2022-504497 | 自動化資産管理及び計画 | 2023-07-28 |
| 17 | 特開2022-186579 | 鋼板およびその製造方法 | 2023-06-27 |
| 18 | 特開2022-183209 | エアゾール洗浄剤組成物 | 2023-06-21 |
| 19 | 特開2023-038304 | 塗膜剥離組成物及び塗膜の剥離方法 | 2023-06-07 |
| 20 | 特許7297012 | エアゾール製品 | 2023-05-31 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Protested
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-06-01 to 2024-05-31), 113 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.3. The most protest patent is 特許6587556 "情報処理装置及び情報処理方法" (5 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特表2019-528113 "機械学習モデルを使用した眼底画像の処理" (5 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6587556 | 情報処理装置及び情報処理方法 | 5 times |
| 2 | 特表2019-528113 | 機械学習モデルを使用した眼底画像の処理 | 5 times |
| 3 | 特許6827693 | 液状食品組成物 | 3 times |
| 4 | 特表2017-516085 | 疾患診断および健康評価のための個々の対象の低分子生化学プロファイリングの方法 | 3 times |
| 5 | 特許6606482 | 情報処理装置及び情報処理方法 | 3 times |
Inspectioned cases
List of latest Inspectioned patents
In the last 3 years (2021-06-01 ~ 2024-05-31), there were 213 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.3 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特許6097888 "新規使用" (Inspection day 2024-05-21) , next is 特開2023-038303 "塗膜剥離組成物及び塗膜の剥離方法" (Inspection day 2024-05-16) .
| - | No. | Title | Inspection days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6097888 | 新規使用 | 2024-05-21 |
| 2 | 特開2023-038303 | 塗膜剥離組成物及び塗膜の剥離方法 | 2024-05-16 |
| 3 | 特許7494277 | ダパグリフロジンを用いて、駆出率が低下した心不全を治療する方法 | 2024-05-15 |
| 4 | 特許7185426 | Ｓ１Ｐ受容体モジュレーターの投与計画 | 2024-05-15 |
| 5 | 特表2021-522273 | ＣＮＳ変性のための遺伝子治療法 | 2024-05-02 |
| 6 | 特表2023-531869 | 神経保護を誘導するための化合物及び組成物 | 2024-04-26 |
| 7 | 特開2023-018038 | シヌクレイン病の治療のための投与レジメン | 2024-04-12 |
| 8 | 特許7479068 | ニューレグリン調合剤の処方 | 2024-04-11 |
| 9 | 特表2023-542971 | 二次電池用パウチフィルムおよびその製造方法 | 2024-03-28 |
| 10 | 特開2023-086543 | 剥離剤組成物 | 2024-03-19 |
| 11 | 特開2023-175853 | 疾患診断および健康評価のための個々の対象の低分子生化学プロファイリングの方法 | 2024-03-11 |
| 12 | 特開2022-081543 | 抗ＴＲＥＭ２抗体及びその使用方法 | 2024-02-27 |
| 13 | 特許6204638 | 骨折内固定具 | 2024-02-15 |
| 14 | 特表2022-504702 | 緩衝塩及びアミノ酸を含有する粉末、そのような粉末の栄養製品への再構成、並びにそのような栄養製品を使用する方法 | 2024-02-09 |
| 15 | 特開2019-035180 | 電子マネーチップを内蔵した光る抗菌性リストバンド類 | 2024-02-05 |
| 16 | 特表2020-522489 | 養子細胞療法を用いる処置のための製造物品および方法 | 2024-01-30 |
| 17 | 特表2021-515801 | 神経変性疾患における転倒および転倒頻度に関連する処置のための組成物および方法 | 2024-01-22 |
| 18 | 特開2023-065396 | 神経変性疾患における転倒および転倒頻度に関連する処置のための組成物および方法 | 2024-01-22 |
| 19 | 特許5841998 | ブルトン型チロシンキナーゼ（Ｂｔｋ）の阻害剤の使用 | 2024-01-10 |
| 20 | 特許6598985 | 新規の使用 | 2024-01-09 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Inspectioned
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-06-01 to 2024-05-31), 458 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.3. The most inspection patent is 特許6827693 "液状食品組成物" (14 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許5826909 "金融商品取引管理装置、金融商品取引管理システムおよびプログラム" (11 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6827693 | 液状食品組成物 | 14 times |
| 2 | 特許5826909 | 金融商品取引管理装置、金融商品取引管理システムおよびプログラム | 11 times |
| 3 | 特開2015-028065 | 骨の靭性、及び、剛性を増し、骨折を減少させる方法 | 9 times |
| 4 | 特許6100822 | プロカルシトニンの検出のためのイムノアッセイ | 8 times |
| 5 | 特許6143809 | ＤＰＰＩＶインヒビターの使用 | 7 times |
Cited cases
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Cited
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-06-01 to 2024-05-31), 4,503 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.8. The most cited patent is 特許6256360 "永久磁石およびその製造方法" (91 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6062475 "遊技機" (84 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6256360 | 永久磁石およびその製造方法 | 91 times |
| 2 | 特許6062475 | 遊技機 | 84 times |
| 3 | 特開2016-115356 | 自動運転制御装置および自動運転制御方法、並びにプログラム | 62 times |
| 4 | 特許6451111 | 走行支援装置及び走行支援方法 | 51 times |
| 5 | 特開2017-158658 | 情報処理装置およびゲームプログラム | 50 times |
Providing patent information to the media (newspapers, magazines, etc.)
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
About this Site
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
Please note the following points for use.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
Citation of patent application status and ranking information
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Graphs are image data.
Please note that the various graphs are image data, but we cannot provide them in text data.Scope of coverage for each goal/target
- Based on the description of each goal and target of the SDGs, we have set the scope of technologies to be covered based on our and e-Patent's past experience, etc. (in some cases, the search is based on social issues themselves). Therefore, please note that there is a possibility that this "SDGs Global Company Ranking from Patent Perspective" may not cover 100%.
- A population search formula is clearly indicated for each goal/target (database: Patent Integration). You may use the population search formula as it is, or you may improve it by yourself.
- This search covers patents and utility models, including both published and registered patents (design and design patents are excluded). The unit of count is the number of applications, not the number of patent families.
About the name collation and name control of applicants and right holders
- Company rankings are based on the results calculated by "Patent Integration", with Japanese organizations in Japanese and other companies in English (some are in Japanese).
- Company names may be the names of the companies at the time of application, but the results calculated by Patent Integration are used as is. Company names are used as they were at the time of application.
- Because of the fluctuation in the names of companies (i.e., applicant/right holder names in the patent information), there are cases where the same company appears more than once in the top 10. The number of applications filed by the same company in the top 10 is the total number of applications filed by the company.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
Our Commitment to Safety and Security
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to providing high-quality patent information based on the latest patent data on more than 45 million cases collected from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publication. 
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. collects the patent data from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publications to provide it widely in the form of reports so that anyone can check patent information and patent trends with confidence. 
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to various efforts to enhance the reliability of the information and to allow users to search patent information with confidence.