The Technical Field "スケジュール" had 845 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-04-30). This is a significantly decreased of -245 filings (-22.5%) over 1,090 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-04-30). This report also includes technical terms related to " 予定 ", " 予定計画 ", " 日程 ", " 時間表 " in the search set.
The highest number of filings in 2018 with 4,190 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 1,351 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 15,179 cases in total) is 2,530, and the median is 3,076. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 2,530 patents |
Std Dev | 1,370 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 1,351 cases | -53.1 % |
2022 year | 2,882 cases | -11.84 % |
2021 year | 3,269 cases | -5.68 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for スケジュール for the period of the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of スケジュール, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of スケジュール over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 30,194 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as スケジュール are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, トヨタ自動車株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2023 to 2025) with 105 cases, followed by 株式会社ディスコ with 55 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 105 cases |
株式会社ディスコ | 55 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 35 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 22 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 22 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 19 cases |
本田技研工業株式会社 | 19 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 16 cases |
富士通株式会社 | 3 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 株式会社ディスコ has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2015 to 2025) with 1,786 cases, followed by トヨタ自動車株式会社 with 1,424 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
株式会社ディスコ | 1,786 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 1,424 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 676 cases |
本田技研工業株式会社 | 565 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 445 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 440 cases |
クゥアルコム・インコーポレイテッド | 344 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 332 cases |
富士通株式会社 | 302 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 279 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 28 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as スケジュール are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Among the top coapplicants, トヨタ自動車株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2023 to 2025) with 105 cases, followed by 株式会社ディスコ with 55 cases.
Among the top coapplicants, 株式会社ディスコ has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2015 to 2025) with 1,786 cases, followed by トヨタ自動車株式会社 with 1,424 cases.
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by スケジュール’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by スケジュール’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
スケジュール filed 279 joint applications with 株式会社東芝 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 124 cases in total) is 20.7, and the median is 23.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2017 with 52 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 16 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 20.7 patents |
Std Dev | 11.0 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 16 cases | -40.7 % |
2022 year | 27 cases | +42.1 % |
2021 year | 19 cases | -32.1 % |
スケジュール filed 445 joint applications with 株式会社日立製作所 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 227 cases in total) is 37.8, and the median is 47.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2017 with 63 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 22 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 37.8 patents |
Std Dev | 20.4 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 22 cases | -62.7 % |
2022 year | 59 cases | +13.46 % |
2021 year | 52 cases | +13.04 % |
スケジュール filed 440 joint applications with 日本電気株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 219 cases in total) is 36.5, and the median is 37.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2020 with 70 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 19 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 36.5 patents |
Std Dev | 22.8 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 19 cases | -52.5 % |
2022 year | 40 cases | +14.29 % |
2021 year | 35 cases | -50.0 % |
スケジュール filed 1,786 joint applications with 株式会社ディスコ for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 746 cases in total) is 124, and the median is 111. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.9, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2018 with 355 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 55 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 124 patents |
Std Dev | 108 |
COV | 0.9 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 55 cases | -46.6 % |
2022 year | 103 cases | -16.26 % |
2021 year | 123 cases | +3.36 % |
スケジュール filed 676 joint applications with 三菱電機株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 363 cases in total) is 60.5, and the median is 76.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2015 with 94 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 34 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 60.5 patents |
Std Dev | 32.2 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 34 cases | -55.3 % |
2022 year | 76 cases | -12.64 % |
2021 year | 87 cases | +12.99 % |
The following shows JP patents held by スケジュール that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and スケジュール’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which スケジュール is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 2 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 2.0 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許4509578 "レーザ加工方法及びレーザ加工装置" (Invalidation Trial day 2022-05-11) , next is 特許4601965 "レーザ加工方法及びレーザ加工装置" (Invalidation Trial day 2022-05-11) .
- | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許4509578 | レーザ加工方法及びレーザ加工装置 | 2022-05-11 |
2 | 特許4601965 | レーザ加工方法及びレーザ加工装置 | 2022-05-11 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 3 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.7. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6407464 "情報処理装置、情報処理方法、情報処理プログラム、端末装置およびその制御方法と制御プログラム" (3 times) , and the next most invalidation trial patent is 特許6335326 "コンジュゲート化莢膜糖類抗原を含む免疫原性組成物およびその使用" (1 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6407464 | 情報処理装置、情報処理方法、情報処理プログラム、端末装置およびその制御方法と制御プログラム | 3 times |
2 | 特許6335326 | コンジュゲート化莢膜糖類抗原を含む免疫原性組成物およびその使用 | 1 times |
3 | 特許6174725 | 肌状態測定分析情報管理システムおよび肌状態測定分析情報管理方法 | 1 times |
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 26 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7502235 "汚泥処理管理装置および汚泥処理管理方法" (Opposition day 2024-11-20) , next is 特許7478018 "跳ね出しスラブの施工方法" (Opposition day 2024-10-02) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7502235 | 汚泥処理管理装置および汚泥処理管理方法 | 2024-11-20 |
2 | 特許7478018 | 跳ね出しスラブの施工方法 | 2024-10-02 |
3 | 特許7445246 | データ処理システム、データ処理方法、及びデータ処理プログラム | 2024-08-14 |
4 | 特許7423729 | 施工位置誘導システム | 2024-06-21 |
5 | 特許7391712 | 保護カバー接続体、接続用カバー部材、及びケーブル配線構造 | 2024-06-05 |
6 | 特許7366132 | 投影装置、収集装置及びこれらを備えた三次元走査システム | 2024-04-19 |
7 | 特許7360197 | 調剤支援装置、調剤支援システム、調剤支援方法および調剤支援プログラム | 2024-04-09 |
8 | 特許7307758 | 検体分析システムの制御方法および検体分析システム | 2024-01-11 |
9 | 特許7284367 | 無方向性電磁鋼板コイル及びその製造方法 | 2023-11-30 |
10 | 特許7268907 | プログラム及び情報処理装置 | 2023-11-07 |
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 72 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.5 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2023-057906 "食肉切断装置" (Protest day 2024-12-27) , next is 特開2024-146662 "情報処理方法、情報処理装置及びプログラム" (Protest day 2024-11-18) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2023-057906 | 食肉切断装置 | 2024-12-27 |
2 | 特開2024-146662 | 情報処理方法、情報処理装置及びプログラム | 2024-11-18 |
3 | 特開2023-075982 | 登録装置及びプログラム | 2024-11-13 |
4 | 特開2024-096164 | 商品データ処理システム、及び商品データ処理方法 | 2024-10-28 |
5 | 特開2024-016157 | 燃料電池システム及び設備管理方法 | 2024-10-10 |
6 | 特開2022-134079 | 労働状況管理システム | 2024-10-08 |
7 | 特許7600495 | 薬剤包装装置 | 2024-10-01 |
8 | 特開2024-045699 | 端末制御方法、プログラム、及び移動体 | 2024-09-02 |
9 | 特開2023-000784 | 会議設定システムサーバおよび会議設定システム | 2024-06-24 |
10 | 特許7550442 | 冷却塔監視システム | 2024-06-24 |
11 | 特許7502235 | 汚泥処理管理装置および汚泥処理管理方法 | 2024-06-03 |
12 | 特開2023-006453 | 印刷機の制御装置および印刷機の運転方法並びに印刷機、印刷システム | 2024-05-27 |
13 | 特開2024-051165 | バックアップ方法、情報処理装置およびプログラム | 2024-05-22 |
14 | 特許7269237 | 溶接方法および溶接装置 | 2024-05-09 |
15 | 特許7514020 | 治療システム | 2024-05-07 |
16 | 特開2022-081224 | 画像生成装置及びプログラム | 2024-05-01 |
17 | 特許7491294 | 情報処理装置、及び情報処理方法 | 2024-04-15 |
18 | 特開2023-175973 | 検体分析システムの制御方法および検体分析システム | 2024-03-29 |
19 | 特開2022-061079 | 照明制御システム | 2024-03-09 |
20 | 特開2023-043080 | 捺染・刺繍システム、捺染・刺繍装置、及び捺染・刺繍システムの刺繍調整方法 | 2024-02-01 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 139 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.4. The most protest patent is 特許6696730 "飲料缶" (6 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許7072536 "飲料缶および缶本体" (5 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6696730 | 飲料缶 | 6 times |
2 | 特許7072536 | 飲料缶および缶本体 | 5 times |
3 | 特許7514020 | 治療システム | 5 times |
4 | 特許7483319 | 貨幣精査システム及び貨幣精査方法 | 4 times |
5 | 特許7469759 | 防音室及び防音室の使用方法 | 3 times |
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 134 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.3 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2023-094649 "端末装置、基地局装置、および、通信方法" (Inspection day 2024-12-11) , next is 特開2023-075982 "登録装置及びプログラム" (Inspection day 2024-12-10) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2023-094649 | 端末装置、基地局装置、および、通信方法 | 2024-12-11 |
2 | 特開2023-075982 | 登録装置及びプログラム | 2024-12-10 |
3 | 特開2023-057906 | 食肉切断装置 | 2024-12-09 |
4 | 特開2022-180516 | 音声に基づく医療評価 | 2024-12-03 |
5 | 特開2024-146662 | 情報処理方法、情報処理装置及びプログラム | 2024-11-29 |
6 | 特開2024-096164 | 商品データ処理システム、及び商品データ処理方法 | 2024-11-25 |
7 | 特開2024-016157 | 燃料電池システム及び設備管理方法 | 2024-11-06 |
8 | 特許7600495 | 薬剤包装装置 | 2024-10-25 |
9 | 特開2022-134079 | 労働状況管理システム | 2024-10-16 |
10 | 特開2024-092970 | デマンドレスポンスシステム | 2024-09-11 |
11 | 特開2024-045699 | 端末制御方法、プログラム、及び移動体 | 2024-09-11 |
12 | 特表2022-532412 | 放射線治療を受けている患者のがん治療のカスタマイズ化を支援するシステム及び方法 | 2024-09-03 |
13 | 特許6953586 | 患者検体の核酸配列の解析方法、解析結果の提示方法、提示装置、提示プログラム、及び患者検体の核酸配列の解析システム | 2024-08-20 |
14 | 特許6249980 | パウチ、内容物封入パウチ、および、その製造方法 | 2024-07-29 |
15 | 特許7550442 | 冷却塔監視システム | 2024-07-29 |
16 | 特開2023-081661 | 包装箱 | 2024-07-11 |
17 | 特許7269237 | 溶接方法および溶接装置 | 2024-06-20 |
18 | 特許7072467 | 乳癌再発の予防のためのワクチン | 2024-06-19 |
19 | 特開2023-006453 | 印刷機の制御装置および印刷機の運転方法並びに印刷機、印刷システム | 2024-06-18 |
20 | 特開2023-146360 | 照明器具 | 2024-06-14 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 317 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.3. The most inspection patent is 特許6444494 "予測データ分析のためのシステムおよび技術" (11 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許5841278 "金融商品取引管理装置、金融商品取引管理システム、金融商品取引管理システムにおける金融商品取引管理方法、プログラム" (11 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6444494 | 予測データ分析のためのシステムおよび技術 | 11 times |
2 | 特許5841278 | 金融商品取引管理装置、金融商品取引管理システム、金融商品取引管理システムにおける金融商品取引管理方法、プログラム | 11 times |
3 | 特許6696730 | 飲料缶 | 7 times |
4 | 特許7514020 | 治療システム | 6 times |
5 | 特許7072536 | 飲料缶および缶本体 | 5 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 8,180 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 3.1. The most cited patent is 特開2017-080049 "遊技機" (312 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6466565 "発語トリガを常時リッスンするための動的閾値" (103 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2017-080049 | 遊技機 | 312 times |
2 | 特許6466565 | 発語トリガを常時リッスンするための動的閾値 | 103 times |
3 | 特許7080087 | 畦造成方法 | 103 times |
4 | 特許6153641 | 遊技機 | 81 times |
5 | 特許6273656 | デマンド型運行管理システムの制御方法及びデマンド型運行管理システム | 77 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International