The Technical Field "インピーダンス" had 616 patent application filings in the most recent period (2022-01-01 to 2022-08-31). This is a with an decreasing trend transition of -131 filings (-17.5%) over 747 they had in the same period of the previous year (2021-01-01 to 2021-08-31).
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 1,734 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 775 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 6,093 cases in total) is 1,016, and the median is 1,167. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1,016 patents |
Std Dev | 474 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 775 cases | -30.7 % |
2021 year | 1,119 cases | -7.90 % |
2020 year | 1,215 cases | -14.86 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for インピーダンス for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-04-30). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of インピーダンス, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of インピーダンス over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 12,679 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
A patent aanlysis report on the following synonyms was found in the technical term "インピーダンス".
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as インピーダンス are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 株式会社デンソー has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 32 cases, followed by 三菱電機株式会社 with 19 cases.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 株式会社村田製作所 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 469 cases, followed by 三菱電機株式会社 with 376 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
株式会社村田製作所 | 469 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 376 cases |
株式会社デンソー | 319 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 258 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 196 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 121 cases |
富士通株式会社 | 98 cases |
ソニーグループ株式会社 | 54 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 41 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 21 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as インピーダンス are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Among the top coapplicants, 三菱電機株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 19 cases, followed by 株式会社村田製作所 with 12 cases.
Among the top coapplicants, 株式会社村田製作所 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 469 cases, followed by 三菱電機株式会社 with 376 cases.
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by インピーダンス’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by インピーダンス’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
インピーダンス filed 21 joint applications with パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 6 cases in total) is 1.0, and the median is 1.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.0, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 7 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1.0 patents |
Std Dev | 1.0 |
COV | 1.0 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2020 year | 2 cases | 0 |
2019 year | 2 cases | 0 |
2018 year | 2 cases | -33.3 % |
インピーダンス filed 376 joint applications with 三菱電機株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 184 cases in total) is 30.7, and the median is 38.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2017 with 52 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 17 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 30.7 patents |
Std Dev | 15.8 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 17 cases | -56.4 % |
2021 year | 39 cases | +2.63 % |
2020 year | 38 cases | -15.56 % |
インピーダンス filed 196 joint applications with 株式会社東芝 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 73 cases in total) is 12.2, and the median is 13.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 50 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 11 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 12.2 patents |
Std Dev | 6.2 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 11 cases | 0 |
2021 year | 11 cases | -26.67 % |
2020 year | 15 cases | -11.76 % |
インピーダンス filed 121 joint applications with 株式会社日立製作所 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 48 cases in total) is 8.0, and the median is 8.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2016 with 25 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 4 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 8.0 patents |
Std Dev | 5.1 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 4 cases | -42.9 % |
2021 year | 7 cases | -30.0 % |
2020 year | 10 cases | -37.5 % |
インピーダンス filed 41 joint applications with 日本電気株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 9 cases in total) is 1.5, and the median is 1.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.9, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 12 cases, and their lowest number in 2018 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1.5 patents |
Std Dev | 1.4 |
COV | 0.9 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 2 cases | 0 |
2021 year | 2 cases | +100 % |
2020 year | 1 cases | -75.0 % |
The following shows JP patents held by インピーダンス that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and インピーダンス’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which インピーダンス is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 10 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7295483 "ノイズ低減回路、負荷システム、電力変換装置及び冷凍装置" (Opposition day 2023-12-13) , next is 特許7288206 "ノイズ低減回路、電力変換装置及び冷凍装置" (Opposition day 2023-12-04) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7295483 | ノイズ低減回路、負荷システム、電力変換装置及び冷凍装置 | 2023-12-13 |
2 | 特許7288206 | ノイズ低減回路、電力変換装置及び冷凍装置 | 2023-12-04 |
3 | 特許7252376 | 電圧又は電流を補償する装置 | 2023-09-25 |
4 | 特許7208696 | センサ | 2023-07-14 |
5 | 特許7193526 | 浴室環境で使用するバイオモニタリング・デバイス、方法、及びシステム | 2023-06-20 |
6 | 特許7138272 | PLCアダプタ及びこれを用いた電力線通信システム | 2023-03-07 |
7 | 特許7030694 | 電磁波吸収体 | 2022-09-06 |
8 | 特許6933416 | システム及び装置 | 2022-03-08 |
9 | 特許6919861 | 喫煙材を加熱するための装置 | 2022-02-16 |
10 | 特許6885562 | 喫煙材を加熱するための装置 | 2021-12-15 |
In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 18 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.5 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2022-052205 "タイヤおよび摩耗度検出システム" (Protest day 2024-02-15) , next is 特表2023-507637 "鋼板表面材質検査装置及び方法" (Protest day 2023-11-15) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2022-052205 | タイヤおよび摩耗度検出システム | 2024-02-15 |
2 | 特表2023-507637 | 鋼板表面材質検査装置及び方法 | 2023-11-15 |
3 | 特表2022-522999 | 濃縮された粒界を有する多結晶金属酸化物 | 2023-07-06 |
4 | 特開2023-041841 | 粘着剤組成物、及び粘着テープ | 2023-06-16 |
5 | 特表2022-521214 | バスルーム環境におけるユーザ検出及び識別 | 2023-05-26 |
6 | 特開2022-007515 | 電池診断システム | 2023-05-05 |
7 | 特許7288206 | ノイズ低減回路、電力変換装置及び冷凍装置 | 2023-04-26 |
8 | 特許7295483 | ノイズ低減回路、負荷システム、電力変換装置及び冷凍装置 | 2023-04-26 |
9 | 特開2021-106077 | 高周波電源装置 | 2022-12-13 |
10 | 特許7234175 | 排泄物センサーキット、及びセンサーシートの使用方法 | 2022-12-05 |
11 | 特許7268520 | 磁性粉末、磁性粉末の製造方法、圧粉磁心およびコイル部品 | 2022-10-28 |
12 | 特許7343516 | 自動車用遮音材 | 2022-10-13 |
13 | 特許7410937 | インピーダンス測定の評価 | 2022-10-11 |
14 | 再公表2019/066060 | 粘着剤組成物、及び粘着テープ | 2022-07-12 |
15 | 特許7314082 | 排泄物センサーキット、及びセンサーシートの使用方法 | 2022-05-31 |
16 | 特開2021-081240 | 電気信号検出装置 | 2022-02-21 |
17 | 特開2022-000610 | 電圧計測機器 | 2022-01-18 |
18 | 特許7127963 | 分電システム | 2021-08-06 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-05-01 to 2024-04-30), 41 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.3. The most protest patent is 特許7343516 "自動車用遮音材" (5 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許7127963 "分電システム" (3 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7343516 | 自動車用遮音材 | 5 times |
2 | 特許7127963 | 分電システム | 3 times |
3 | 特許6729705 | ナノ結晶合金磁心、磁心ユニットおよびナノ結晶合金磁心の製造方法 | 3 times |
4 | 再公表2019/066060 | 粘着剤組成物、及び粘着テープ | 2 times |
5 | 特開2021-081240 | 電気信号検出装置 | 2 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 56 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.2 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2021-072834 "ポリマー単位を含むポリマーの解析" (Inspection day 2024-03-28) , next is 特許6505490 "分子インプリンティング膜、その製造方法、鋳型化合物、およびステロイドホルモン化合物の検出方法" (Inspection day 2024-03-26) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2021-072834 | ポリマー単位を含むポリマーの解析 | 2024-03-28 |
2 | 特許6505490 | 分子インプリンティング膜、その製造方法、鋳型化合物、およびステロイドホルモン化合物の検出方法 | 2024-03-26 |
3 | 特開2022-052205 | タイヤおよび摩耗度検出システム | 2024-03-13 |
4 | 特開2020-062154 | 治療器 | 2024-03-13 |
5 | 特表2022-535369 | マイクロ波加熱ユニットおよび方法 | 2024-02-21 |
6 | 特表2019-532741 | 向上した組成物送達のための方法及び装置 | 2023-12-12 |
7 | 特開2023-093465 | 疾患状態および障害の治療のための方法、装置、およびシステム | 2023-10-16 |
8 | 特許7461881 | 疾患状態および障害の治療のための方法、装置、およびシステム | 2023-10-16 |
9 | 特開2022-109958 | ジェネレータ、電極付きのカテーテル、及び肺通路の治療方法 | 2023-10-16 |
10 | 特開2021-197679 | ICタグ及びICタグの設計方法 | 2023-09-14 |
11 | 特開2022-173148 | 無線周波数フロントエンド素子に整合する入出力インピーダンスを有する横方向励起フィルムバルク音響共振器マトリックスフィルタ | 2023-08-16 |
12 | 特表2022-522999 | 濃縮された粒界を有する多結晶金属酸化物 | 2023-08-10 |
13 | 特開2023-041841 | 粘着剤組成物、及び粘着テープ | 2023-06-20 |
14 | 特許7288206 | ノイズ低減回路、電力変換装置及び冷凍装置 | 2023-05-12 |
15 | 特許7295483 | ノイズ低減回路、負荷システム、電力変換装置及び冷凍装置 | 2023-05-12 |
16 | 特開2022-007515 | 電池診断システム | 2023-05-09 |
17 | 特許7267311 | ゆらぎ周波数でのインビボチャネル検知及びインジェスティブルセンサ検出用の低電力レシーバー | 2023-04-14 |
18 | 特許7349129 | 生体内物質の可視化装置 | 2023-04-07 |
19 | 特許7337183 | スプリングプローブ | 2023-03-15 |
20 | 特許7086094 | 電池式エアロゾル発生装置用の電力管理の方法およびシステム | 2023-03-07 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-05-01 to 2024-04-30), 126 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.2. The most inspection patent is 特許7343516 "自動車用遮音材" (5 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許6857793 "キャビティ内共振器を伴うキャビティ付スロットアンテナ" (3 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7343516 | 自動車用遮音材 | 5 times |
2 | 特許6857793 | キャビティ内共振器を伴うキャビティ付スロットアンテナ | 3 times |
3 | 特許6363635 | 低電力で組織をシーリングする装置及び方法 | 3 times |
4 | 特許6729705 | ナノ結晶合金磁心、磁心ユニットおよびナノ結晶合金磁心の製造方法 | 3 times |
5 | 特許6187566 | 非水系電解液及び非水系電解液二次電池 | 3 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-05-01 to 2024-04-30), 2,838 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.5. The most cited patent is 特許6080987 "誘導加熱装置、誘導加熱装置を備えるエアロゾル送達システム、および同左を操作する方法" (46 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許5910763 "弾性波装置" (33 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6080987 | 誘導加熱装置、誘導加熱装置を備えるエアロゾル送達システム、および同左を操作する方法 | 46 times |
2 | 特許5910763 | 弾性波装置 | 33 times |
3 | 特許6190049 | 閉回路eコマースを操作するための信号の組み合わせを伝搬するための方法および装置 | 32 times |
4 | 特許6833155 | 喫煙材を加熱するための装置 | 31 times |
5 | 特許6145824 | 電池診断装置および電池診断方法 | 28 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International