The Theme Code "業務システム技術" had 1,380 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-03-31). This is a with an decreasing trend transition of -184 filings (-11.8%) over 1,564 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-03-31).
The highest number of filings in 2021 with 5,396 cases, and their lowest number in 2015 with 3,159 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 27,787 cases in total) is 4,631, and the median is 5,110. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.21, and there have been small fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 4,631 patents |
Std Dev | 984 |
COV | 0.21 |
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023).
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 5,207 cases | -3.50 % |
2021 year | 5,396 cases | +1.30 % |
2020 year | 5,327 cases | +6.28 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 業務システム技術[5L050] for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-11-30). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 業務システム技術, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of 業務システム技術 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 41,622 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The patent information of the higher applicant in the technical theme 業務システム技術 is shown below. By comparing the number of patents of each company, you can check the research and development status of each company's past and present technical themes and the position of each company in the technical theme.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, トヨタ自動車株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 475 cases, followed by 株式会社日立製作所 with 281 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 475 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 281 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 175 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 131 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 127 cases |
富士通株式会社 | 85 cases |
株式会社リコー | 70 cases |
大日本印刷株式会社 | 55 cases |
ソニーグループ株式会社 | 11 cases |
日本電信電話株式会社 | 8 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 6 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, トヨタ自動車株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 1,678 cases, followed by 株式会社日立製作所 with 1,387 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 1,678 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 1,387 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 944 cases |
富士通株式会社 | 905 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 834 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 743 cases |
大日本印刷株式会社 | 394 cases |
株式会社リコー | 393 cases |
日本電信電話株式会社 | 316 cases |
ソニーグループ株式会社 | 230 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 40 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The patent information of the higher applicant in the technical theme 業務システム技術 is shown below. By comparing the number of patents of each company, you can check the research and development status of each company's past and present technical themes and the position of each company in the technical theme.
among the top coapplicants, トヨタ自動車株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 475 cases, followed by 株式会社日立製作所 with 281 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 475 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 281 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 175 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 131 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 127 cases |
富士通株式会社 | 85 cases |
日本電信電話株式会社 | 8 cases |
among the top coapplicants, トヨタ自動車株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 1,678 cases, followed by 株式会社日立製作所 with 1,387 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 1,678 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 1,387 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 944 cases |
富士通株式会社 | 905 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 834 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 743 cases |
日本電信電話株式会社 | 316 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 業務システム技術’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 業務システム技術’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
業務システム技術 filed 1,387 joint applications with 株式会社日立製作所 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 904 cases in total) is 151, and the median is 150. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.29, and there have been small fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2022 with 203 cases, and their lowest number in 2017 with 115 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 151 patents |
Std Dev | 44.3 |
COV | 0.29 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 203 cases | +20.83 % |
2021 year | 168 cases | -15.15 % |
2020 year | 198 cases | +50.0 % |
業務システム技術 filed 834 joint applications with 株式会社東芝 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 453 cases in total) is 75.5, and the median is 77.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.21, and there have been small fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2016 with 107 cases, and their lowest number in 2014 with 69 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 75.5 patents |
Std Dev | 15.7 |
COV | 0.21 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 80 cases | -8.05 % |
2021 year | 87 cases | -9.38 % |
2020 year | 96 cases | +29.73 % |
業務システム技術 filed 944 joint applications with 日本電気株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 637 cases in total) is 106, and the median is 99.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2020 with 182 cases, and their lowest number in 2014 with 58 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 106 patents |
Std Dev | 39.9 |
COV | 0.4 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 120 cases | +37.9 % |
2021 year | 87 cases | -52.2 % |
2020 year | 182 cases | +64.0 % |
業務システム技術 filed 905 joint applications with 富士通株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 337 cases in total) is 56.2, and the median is 58.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.3, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 158 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 51 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 56.2 patents |
Std Dev | 17.2 |
COV | 0.3 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 62 cases | +21.57 % |
2021 year | 51 cases | -7.27 % |
2020 year | 55 cases | -19.12 % |
業務システム技術 filed 743 joint applications with 三菱電機株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 494 cases in total) is 82.3, and the median is 91.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.26, and there have been small fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2020 with 100 cases, and their lowest number in 2015 with 52 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 82.3 patents |
Std Dev | 21.5 |
COV | 0.26 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 89 cases | -5.32 % |
2021 year | 94 cases | -6.00 % |
2020 year | 100 cases | +6.38 % |
The following shows JP patents held by 業務システム技術 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 業務システム技術’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 業務システム技術 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 4 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 1.0 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許6934143 "自動車の損傷度を査定する方法" (Invalidation Trial day 2023-10-06) , next is 特許6892656 "精算システム、ホスト端末、精算方法、プログラム及び車両" (Invalidation Trial day 2023-08-04) .
- | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6934143 | 自動車の損傷度を査定する方法 | 2023-10-06 |
2 | 特許6892656 | 精算システム、ホスト端末、精算方法、プログラム及び車両 | 2023-08-04 |
3 | 特許7134301 | 精算システム、ホスト端末、精算方法、プログラム及び車両 | 2023-08-04 |
4 | 特許6894033 | 鑑定証明システム | 2022-09-07 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 14 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.6. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6221028 "コンピュータシステムおよびプログラム" (4 times) , and the next most invalidation trial patent is 特許6142406 "コンピュータシステムおよびプログラム" (3 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6221028 | コンピュータシステムおよびプログラム | 4 times |
2 | 特許6142406 | コンピュータシステムおよびプログラム | 3 times |
3 | 特許6089190 | コンピュータシステムおよびプログラム | 3 times |
4 | 特許6186668 | コンピュータシステムおよびプログラム | 3 times |
5 | 特許6485848 | コンピュータシステムおよびプログラム | 1 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 59 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7461324 "ベルト管理システム" (Opposition day 2024-10-02) , next is 特許7450309 "AI管路劣化予測システム、AI管路劣化予測方法及びAI管路劣化予測プログラム" (Opposition day 2024-09-09) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7461324 | ベルト管理システム | 2024-10-02 |
2 | 特許7450309 | AI管路劣化予測システム、AI管路劣化予測方法及びAI管路劣化予測プログラム | 2024-09-09 |
3 | 特許7448937 | 医薬品製造システム、及び医薬品製造方法 | 2024-07-26 |
4 | 特許7440220 | 板金加工見積作成支援装置及び板金加工見積作成支援方法 | 2024-06-27 |
5 | 特許7413445 | 一組の部品を表す複数の図面データを管理するための装置、方法及びそのためのプログラム | 2024-06-27 |
6 | 特許7351975 | 予測装置、予測方法及び予測プログラム | 2024-03-21 |
7 | 特許7329725 | 生産計画作成方法および生産計画作成装置ならびに生産方法 | 2024-02-20 |
8 | 特許7320693 | 電子小黒板出力システム、判定結果出力方法及びプログラム | 2024-01-19 |
9 | 特許7312637 | クレーン計画支援システム | 2024-01-12 |
10 | 特許7368911 | 情報処理装置、プログラム及び情報処理方法 | 2024-01-09 |
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 81 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.3 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2024-001245 "カードシステム" (Protest day 2024-11-06) , next is 特開2024-086855 "カードシステム" (Protest day 2024-11-06) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2024-001245 | カードシステム | 2024-11-06 |
2 | 特開2024-086855 | カードシステム | 2024-11-06 |
3 | 特開2024-144648 | 穀粒判別システム | 2024-10-24 |
4 | 特開2022-143587 | 摘採日調整システムおよびコンピュータプログラム | 2024-10-17 |
5 | 特開2022-067222 | コインランドリーシステム | 2024-10-15 |
6 | 特開2022-176561 | 情報処理装置および情報処理プログラム | 2024-10-11 |
7 | 特開2024-108857 | ランドリー機器の予約方法およびランドリー機器の予約システム | 2024-09-27 |
8 | 特開2022-072867 | 情報処理システム、情報処理方法及び情報処理プログラム | 2024-09-24 |
9 | 特許7590159 | コンクリートの養生管理装置およびコンクリートの養生管理方法 | 2024-08-28 |
10 | 特開2023-009371 | コインランドリーシステムおよびコインランドリーの制御方法 | 2024-08-23 |
11 | 特開2023-013058 | 機械学習装置、生産計画策定装置、及び、推論装置 | 2024-08-09 |
12 | 特開2022-107358 | 二多段式駐車装置とその制御方法 | 2024-07-24 |
13 | 特開2023-181799 | 受診情報処理システム、受診情報処理装置、及びプログラム | 2024-07-16 |
14 | 特開2022-177641 | 顧客サービスシステムのポイント付与方法およびコインランドリーシステム | 2024-06-27 |
15 | 特開2022-170254 | コインランドリーシステムおよびランドリーアプリケーション | 2024-06-27 |
16 | 特開2023-025558 | コインランドリーのポイント付与方法およびコインランドリーシステム | 2024-06-27 |
17 | 特開2022-129334 | 給電システム、管理装置、給電装置、プログラム、およびシステム | 2024-06-21 |
18 | 特開2023-183479 | 運行管理システム | 2024-06-18 |
19 | 特許7502235 | 汚泥処理管理装置および汚泥処理管理方法 | 2024-06-03 |
20 | 特開2024-004086 | 農業管理システム | 2024-05-30 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 170 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.3. The most protest patent is 特許7142416 "駐車場システム及び駐車場制御装置" (9 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許6837034 "陳列棚" (6 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7142416 | 駐車場システム及び駐車場制御装置 | 9 times |
2 | 特許6837034 | 陳列棚 | 6 times |
3 | 特許6849177 | バーチャルパワープラント | 5 times |
4 | 特許7178019 | 情報システム、出力装置、端末装置、情報処理方法、およびプログラム | 4 times |
5 | 特開2022-067222 | コインランドリーシステム | 3 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 226 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.5 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2024-001245 "カードシステム" (Inspection day 2024-11-13) , next is 特開2024-086855 "カードシステム" (Inspection day 2024-11-13) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2024-001245 | カードシステム | 2024-11-13 |
2 | 特開2024-086855 | カードシステム | 2024-11-13 |
3 | 特開2023-101875 | 鉄筋コンクリート用の鉄筋部材の加工方法、鉄筋部材加工システム、鉄筋コンクリート建物の施工方法、及び、建物設計サーバ | 2024-11-12 |
4 | 特開2022-143587 | 摘採日調整システムおよびコンピュータプログラム | 2024-11-08 |
5 | 特開2022-176561 | 情報処理装置および情報処理プログラム | 2024-11-07 |
6 | 特許7472179 | カードシステム | 2024-11-07 |
7 | 特開2022-067222 | コインランドリーシステム | 2024-11-05 |
8 | 特開2024-108857 | ランドリー機器の予約方法およびランドリー機器の予約システム | 2024-10-22 |
9 | 特開2022-072867 | 情報処理システム、情報処理方法及び情報処理プログラム | 2024-10-09 |
10 | 特開2022-107358 | 二多段式駐車装置とその制御方法 | 2024-09-27 |
11 | 特開2023-009371 | コインランドリーシステムおよびコインランドリーの制御方法 | 2024-09-24 |
12 | 再公表03/030076 | 状況解析表示システム | 2024-09-18 |
13 | 特許7590159 | コンクリートの養生管理装置およびコンクリートの養生管理方法 | 2024-09-09 |
14 | 特許6120426 | 施工体3次元モデル管理プログラム及び施工体3次元モデル管理方法 | 2024-09-03 |
15 | 特許6781439 | コンクリート締固め評価システム及び締固め評価方法 | 2024-09-03 |
16 | 特開2024-000970 | 橋梁リニューアル方法および支援システム | 2024-09-03 |
17 | 特許7381155 | 橋梁架設シミュレーションシステム | 2024-09-03 |
18 | 特開2023-181799 | 受診情報処理システム、受診情報処理装置、及びプログラム | 2024-08-30 |
19 | 特開2023-013058 | 機械学習装置、生産計画策定装置、及び、推論装置 | 2024-08-26 |
20 | 特許6474089 | マッチング支援サーバ、マッチング支援システム、マッチング支援方法およびプログラム | 2024-08-26 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 483 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.3. The most inspection patent is 特許7472179 "カードシステム" (11 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許7178019 "情報システム、出力装置、端末装置、情報処理方法、およびプログラム" (9 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7472179 | カードシステム | 11 times |
2 | 特許7178019 | 情報システム、出力装置、端末装置、情報処理方法、およびプログラム | 9 times |
3 | 特許6588875 | 駐車場管理システム | 9 times |
4 | 特許6837034 | 陳列棚 | 6 times |
5 | 特開2018-018354 | ディープラーニングを用いた飲食品の品質予測方法及び飲食品 | 4 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 11,413 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.9. The most cited patent is 特許6273656 "デマンド型運行管理システムの制御方法及びデマンド型運行管理システム" (77 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特開2017-134689 "各端末のユーザ状態を判定する管理サーバ、システム、プログラム及び方法" (70 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6273656 | デマンド型運行管理システムの制御方法及びデマンド型運行管理システム | 77 times |
2 | 特開2017-134689 | 各端末のユーザ状態を判定する管理サーバ、システム、プログラム及び方法 | 70 times |
3 | 特許6971019 | データ管理システム、情報処理装置、プログラム、及び、データ管理方法 | 56 times |
4 | 特許6993124 | 顔照合装置及び顔照合方法 | 51 times |
5 | 特許7182471 | 作業管理システム及び作業機 | 48 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International