The Technical Field "内圧" had 54 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-02-28). This is a significantly decreased of -18 filings (-25.0%) over 72 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-02-28). This report also includes technical terms related to " 内圧力 ", " 内部圧 ", " 内部圧力 " in the search set.
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 1,021 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 576 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 3,854 cases in total) is 642, and the median is 704. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 642 patents |
Std Dev | 229 |
COV | 0.4 |
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023).
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 576 cases | -19.78 % |
2021 year | 718 cases | +3.91 % |
2020 year | 691 cases | -17.44 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 内圧 for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-10-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 内圧, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of 内圧 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 7,826 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 内圧 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, トヨタ自動車株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 55 cases, followed by 住友ゴム工業株式会社 with 54 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 55 cases |
住友ゴム工業株式会社 | 54 cases |
株式会社ブリヂストン | 24 cases |
横浜ゴム株式会社 | 12 cases |
本田技研工業株式会社 | 11 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 6 cases |
三菱重工業株式会社 | 6 cases |
株式会社デンソー | 4 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 3 cases |
日産自動車株式会社 | 2 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, トヨタ自動車株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 563 cases, followed by 住友ゴム工業株式会社 with 322 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 563 cases |
住友ゴム工業株式会社 | 322 cases |
株式会社ブリヂストン | 258 cases |
横浜ゴム株式会社 | 167 cases |
本田技研工業株式会社 | 126 cases |
株式会社デンソー | 120 cases |
三菱重工業株式会社 | 45 cases |
日産自動車株式会社 | 41 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 25 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 24 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 10 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 内圧 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Among the top coapplicants, トヨタ自動車株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 55 cases, followed by 住友ゴム工業株式会社 with 54 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 55 cases |
住友ゴム工業株式会社 | 54 cases |
株式会社ブリヂストン | 24 cases |
本田技研工業株式会社 | 11 cases |
株式会社デンソー | 4 cases |
日産自動車株式会社 | 2 cases |
Among the top coapplicants, トヨタ自動車株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 563 cases, followed by 住友ゴム工業株式会社 with 322 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 563 cases |
住友ゴム工業株式会社 | 322 cases |
株式会社ブリヂストン | 258 cases |
本田技研工業株式会社 | 126 cases |
株式会社デンソー | 120 cases |
日産自動車株式会社 | 41 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 10 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 内圧’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 内圧’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
内圧 filed 563 joint applications with トヨタ自動車株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 177 cases in total) is 29.5, and the median is 30.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been increasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2014 with 120 cases, and their lowest number in 2020 with 21 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 29.5 patents |
Std Dev | 14.3 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 50 cases | +78.6 % |
2021 year | 28 cases | +33.3 % |
2020 year | 21 cases | -34.4 % |
内圧 filed 258 joint applications with 株式会社ブリヂストン for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 146 cases in total) is 24.3, and the median is 25.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.7, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2019 with 55 cases, and their lowest number in 2020 with 4 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 24.3 patents |
Std Dev | 18.1 |
COV | 0.7 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 22 cases | -35.3 % |
2021 year | 34 cases | +750 % |
2020 year | 4 cases | -92.7 % |
内圧 filed 322 joint applications with 住友ゴム工業株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 192 cases in total) is 32.0, and the median is 30.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2020 with 57 cases, and their lowest number in 2019 with 20 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 32.0 patents |
Std Dev | 14.6 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 42 cases | +44.8 % |
2021 year | 29 cases | -49.1 % |
2020 year | 57 cases | +185 % |
内圧 filed 126 joint applications with 本田技研工業株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 59 cases in total) is 9.8, and the median is 10.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2016 with 21 cases, and their lowest number in 2020 with 6 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 9.8 patents |
Std Dev | 5.1 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 10 cases | -9.09 % |
2021 year | 11 cases | +83.3 % |
2020 year | 6 cases | -60.0 % |
内圧 filed 120 joint applications with 株式会社デンソー for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 37 cases in total) is 6.2, and the median is 4.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.0, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 40 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 2 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 6.2 patents |
Std Dev | 6.0 |
COV | 1.0 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 4 cases | +100 % |
2021 year | 2 cases | -50.0 % |
2020 year | 4 cases | -55.6 % |
The following shows JP patents held by 内圧 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 内圧’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 内圧 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 14 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7426166 "フェライト粒子、電子写真現像剤用キャリア、電子写真現像剤及びフェライト粒子の製造方法" (Opposition day 2024-07-23) , next is 特許7391060 "バッテリパック" (Opposition day 2024-06-04) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7426166 | フェライト粒子、電子写真現像剤用キャリア、電子写真現像剤及びフェライト粒子の製造方法 | 2024-07-23 |
2 | 特許7391060 | バッテリパック | 2024-06-04 |
3 | 特許7383910 | 電子レンジ加熱用蓋付容器及び電子レンジ加熱容器用の蓋体 | 2024-05-20 |
4 | 特許7423996 | 電子レンジ用パウチ | 2024-04-04 |
5 | 特許7300922 | 耐圧ボトル | 2023-12-26 |
6 | 特許7229677 | トイレ用定量噴射型エアゾール製品およびトイレ用定量噴射型エアゾール製品の使用方法 | 2023-08-24 |
7 | 特許7215818 | エアゾール型染毛用又は毛髪脱色用化粧品 | 2023-07-26 |
8 | 特許7146335 | ベンティング装置 | 2023-04-04 |
9 | 特許7090969 | 二次電池及びその二次電池を含む電池パック | 2022-12-27 |
10 | 特許7082929 | キャップ付ボトル缶及びその密栓方法 | 2022-12-01 |
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 40 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.4 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特許7565995 "二酸化炭素製造装置、二酸化炭素製造方法、二酸化炭素製造装置の設計方法" (Protest day 2024-07-03) , next is 特開2021-031181 "缶体" (Protest day 2024-06-25) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7565995 | 二酸化炭素製造装置、二酸化炭素製造方法、二酸化炭素製造装置の設計方法 | 2024-07-03 |
2 | 特開2021-031181 | 缶体 | 2024-06-25 |
3 | 特開2022-069984 | 空気入りタイヤ | 2024-05-21 |
4 | 特許7571397 | タイヤ | 2024-04-22 |
5 | 特開2022-109747 | 排圧配管 | 2024-04-16 |
6 | 特開2022-139076 | 蓄電セル | 2024-02-24 |
7 | 特開2022-157355 | 凝集体の製造方法および粉粒体の製造方法 | 2024-01-23 |
8 | 特許7566715 | 雨水排水配管構造 | 2024-01-09 |
9 | 特許7540848 | 二次電池 | 2023-09-29 |
10 | 特開2021-075289 | 電子レンジ用パウチ | 2023-09-05 |
11 | 特許7377591 | ベンティング部が付着されたパウチ型電池セル及びその製造方法 | 2023-07-12 |
12 | 特開2022-187023 | ガス処理システム及びこれを含む船舶 | 2023-07-07 |
13 | 特許7331765 | 電池セルを用いた組電池 | 2023-06-30 |
14 | 特許7297012 | エアゾール製品 | 2023-05-31 |
15 | 特許7397657 | タイヤ・ホイール組立体 | 2023-05-16 |
16 | 特開2021-098384 | タイヤ・ホイール組立体 | 2023-05-16 |
17 | 特許7391060 | バッテリパック | 2023-04-27 |
18 | 特許7568397 | タイヤ・ホイール組立体 | 2023-04-12 |
19 | 特許7568396 | タイヤ・ホイール組立体 | 2023-04-12 |
20 | 特許7270931 | ガスを排出可能な二次電池用パウチ型ケース | 2022-12-27 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 90 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.5. The most protest patent is 特許6978183 "毛髪化粧料" (5 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許7215818 "エアゾール型染毛用又は毛髪脱色用化粧品" (5 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6978183 | 毛髪化粧料 | 5 times |
2 | 特許7215818 | エアゾール型染毛用又は毛髪脱色用化粧品 | 5 times |
3 | 特許7378200 | 缶体 | 4 times |
4 | 特許7236207 | エアゾール型染毛用又は毛髪脱色用化粧品 | 4 times |
5 | 特許7270931 | ガスを排出可能な二次電池用パウチ型ケース | 4 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 56 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.4 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特許6190456 "メタンの生成" (Inspection day 2024-08-22) , next is 特開2021-098384 "タイヤ・ホイール組立体" (Inspection day 2024-08-08) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6190456 | メタンの生成 | 2024-08-22 |
2 | 特開2021-098384 | タイヤ・ホイール組立体 | 2024-08-08 |
3 | 特許7565995 | 二酸化炭素製造装置、二酸化炭素製造方法、二酸化炭素製造装置の設計方法 | 2024-08-05 |
4 | 特開2021-031181 | 缶体 | 2024-07-02 |
5 | 特開2022-069984 | 空気入りタイヤ | 2024-06-18 |
6 | 特許7473938 | 減圧用装置及び減圧用装置を用いた容器内部の減圧方法 | 2024-04-25 |
7 | 特許7571397 | タイヤ | 2024-04-23 |
8 | 特開2022-109747 | 排圧配管 | 2024-04-19 |
9 | 特開2022-139076 | 蓄電セル | 2024-04-01 |
10 | 特開2022-157355 | 凝集体の製造方法および粉粒体の製造方法 | 2024-02-16 |
11 | 特表2021-529015 | ハイブリッドな画像−侵襲性−圧力血行動態機能評価 | 2024-02-14 |
12 | 特許7566715 | 雨水排水配管構造 | 2024-02-01 |
13 | 特許7540848 | 二次電池 | 2023-10-25 |
14 | 特開2021-075289 | 電子レンジ用パウチ | 2023-10-23 |
15 | 特許7378200 | 缶体 | 2023-08-25 |
16 | 特許7562410 | 心不全患者の体液過剰を軽減するための直接ナトリウム除去方法、溶液、及び装置 | 2023-08-21 |
17 | 特許7377591 | ベンティング部が付着されたパウチ型電池セル及びその製造方法 | 2023-08-10 |
18 | 特許7507555 | 芳香カートリッジと芳香生成体 | 2023-07-19 |
19 | 特開2020-063058 | 弁及びこれを備える包装体 | 2023-07-14 |
20 | 特許7331765 | 電池セルを用いた組電池 | 2023-07-04 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 130 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.5. The most inspection patent is 特許7215818 "エアゾール型染毛用又は毛髪脱色用化粧品" (11 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許7236207 "エアゾール型染毛用又は毛髪脱色用化粧品" (7 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7215818 | エアゾール型染毛用又は毛髪脱色用化粧品 | 11 times |
2 | 特許7236207 | エアゾール型染毛用又は毛髪脱色用化粧品 | 7 times |
3 | 特許7209453 | ライナ付キャップ及びキャップ付容器 | 5 times |
4 | 特許7270931 | ガスを排出可能な二次電池用パウチ型ケース | 5 times |
5 | 特許6978183 | 毛髪化粧料 | 4 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 1,678 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.4. The most cited patent is 特許7310426 "蓄電装置" (36 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6735074 "パウチ型リチウム二次電池のベンティングシステム" (32 times) .
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International