The Technical Field "記号" had 572 patent application filings in the most recent period (2022-01-01 to 2022-08-31). This is a significantly decreased of -278 filings (-32.7%) over 850 they had in the same period of the previous year (2021-01-01 to 2021-08-31). This report also includes technical terms related to " シンボル ", " シンボルマーク " in the search set.
The highest number of filings in 2017 with 2,244 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 710 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 7,517 cases in total) is 1,253, and the median is 1,332. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1,253 patents |
Std Dev | 693 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 710 cases | -41.0 % |
2021 year | 1,204 cases | -17.59 % |
2020 year | 1,461 cases | -19.01 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 記号 for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-04-30). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 記号, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of 記号 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 16,068 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 記号 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 富士通株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 15 cases, followed by 三菱電機株式会社 with 13 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
富士通株式会社 | 15 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 13 cases |
クゥアルコム・インコーポレイテッド | 11 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 11 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 9 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 7 cases |
シャープ株式会社 | 5 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 4 cases |
株式会社リコー | 4 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 3 cases |
ソニーグループ株式会社 | 3 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, クゥアルコム・インコーポレイテッド has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 631 cases, followed by 三菱電機株式会社 with 332 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
クゥアルコム・インコーポレイテッド | 631 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 332 cases |
富士通株式会社 | 310 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 287 cases |
シャープ株式会社 | 201 cases |
ソニーグループ株式会社 | 178 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 166 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 147 cases |
株式会社リコー | 111 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 78 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 25 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 記号 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Among the top coapplicants, 富士通株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 15 cases, followed by 三菱電機株式会社 with 13 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
富士通株式会社 | 15 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 13 cases |
クゥアルコム・インコーポレイテッド | 11 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 9 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 7 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 4 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 3 cases |
Among the top coapplicants, クゥアルコム・インコーポレイテッド has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 631 cases, followed by 三菱電機株式会社 with 332 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
クゥアルコム・インコーポレイテッド | 631 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 332 cases |
富士通株式会社 | 310 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 287 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 147 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 78 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 25 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 記号’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 記号’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
記号 filed 287 joint applications with 日本電気株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 98 cases in total) is 16.3, and the median is 18.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.7, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2017 with 66 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 4 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 16.3 patents |
Std Dev | 11.4 |
COV | 0.7 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 4 cases | -71.4 % |
2021 year | 14 cases | -36.4 % |
2020 year | 22 cases | -29.03 % |
記号 filed 25 joint applications with パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 5 cases in total) is 0.8, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.5, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2017 with 7 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 0.8 patents |
Std Dev | 1.2 |
COV | 1.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 3 cases | - |
2021 year | 0 cases | - |
2020 year | 0 cases | - |
記号 filed 332 joint applications with 三菱電機株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 134 cases in total) is 22.3, and the median is 23.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2016 with 54 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 11 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 22.3 patents |
Std Dev | 12.9 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 11 cases | -45.0 % |
2021 year | 20 cases | -25.93 % |
2020 year | 27 cases | -25.00 % |
記号 filed 631 joint applications with クゥアルコム・インコーポレイテッド for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 128 cases in total) is 21.3, and the median is 20.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.8, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 171 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 11 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 21.3 patents |
Std Dev | 16.8 |
COV | 0.8 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 11 cases | -47.6 % |
2021 year | 21 cases | 0 |
2020 year | 21 cases | +5.00 % |
記号 filed 310 joint applications with 富士通株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 120 cases in total) is 20.0, and the median is 16.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2016 with 57 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 12 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 20.0 patents |
Std Dev | 12.3 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 12 cases | -14.29 % |
2021 year | 14 cases | -26.32 % |
2020 year | 19 cases | -48.6 % |
The following shows JP patents held by 記号 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 記号’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 記号 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 3 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 1.3 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許4110140 "チロシンキナーゼの阻害剤" (Invalidation Trial day 2023-08-10) , next is 特許6650912 "コンピューターのソフトウェアのプログラムにおけるストリームデータ処理" (Invalidation Trial day 2021-09-13) .
- | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許4110140 | チロシンキナーゼの阻害剤 | 2023-08-10 |
2 | 特許6650912 | コンピューターのソフトウェアのプログラムにおけるストリームデータ処理 | 2021-09-13 |
3 | 特許6323815 | 有機光電子素子およびこれを含む表示装置 | 2021-07-30 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-05-01 to 2024-04-30), 1 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.0. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6650912 "コンピューターのソフトウェアのプログラムにおけるストリームデータ処理" (1 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6650912 | コンピューターのソフトウェアのプログラムにおけるストリームデータ処理 | 1 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 20 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7252497 "熱間圧延鋼材" (Opposition day 2023-10-05) , next is 特許7246842 "レーザ印字方法" (Opposition day 2023-09-28) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7252497 | 熱間圧延鋼材 | 2023-10-05 |
2 | 特許7246842 | レーザ印字方法 | 2023-09-28 |
3 | 特許7296756 | ステンレス鋼板およびその製造方法 | 2023-08-14 |
4 | 特許7222361 | 光学フィルタおよび撮像装置 | 2023-08-10 |
5 | 特許7099655 | 鋼板およびその製造方法 | 2023-01-12 |
6 | 特許7093817 | 転売防止機能の付いた台本 | 2022-12-19 |
7 | 特許7085942 | 偽造防止構造体、紙葉類、真偽識別装置、真偽識別方法及び紙葉類処理装置 | 2022-12-16 |
8 | 特許7077801 | 低降伏比厚鋼板 | 2022-11-30 |
9 | 特許7060109 | マルテンサイト系ステンレス継目無鋼管 | 2022-10-26 |
10 | 特許7054078 | 二相ステンレスクラッド鋼およびその製造方法 | 2022-10-12 |
In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 34 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.3 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2022-100470 "飲料用缶および飲料用缶の製造方法" (Protest day 2024-02-28) , next is 特開2021-074897 "矯正ヘルメット製作データを生成する方法" (Protest day 2023-12-04) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2022-100470 | 飲料用缶および飲料用缶の製造方法 | 2024-02-28 |
2 | 特開2021-074897 | 矯正ヘルメット製作データを生成する方法 | 2023-12-04 |
3 | 特許7462439 | オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼およびNの上限値の算出方法 | 2023-09-27 |
4 | 特許7388855 | コンベア | 2023-09-13 |
5 | 特開2022-188481 | オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼材および水素用機器 | 2023-08-28 |
6 | 特許7457523 | ゲーム方法、ゲームシステム及びゲームプログラム | 2023-08-21 |
7 | 特開2022-022915 | 鋼材 | 2023-07-21 |
8 | 特開2022-098633 | オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼板、オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼板の製造方法及び自動車排気系部品 | 2023-07-14 |
9 | 特許7356456 | 歯科用接着性組成物 | 2023-06-27 |
10 | 特開2022-043795 | セルフチェックアウト装置 | 2023-06-27 |
11 | 特許7305399 | 金属3Dプリンタによる溶着積層造形用の金属ワイヤ | 2023-04-06 |
12 | 特許7388073 | 情報処理装置、情報処理方法、及び、プログラム | 2023-03-28 |
13 | 特開2021-003732 | ガスシールドアーク溶接用ソリッドワイヤ、及び溶接継手の製造方法 | 2023-03-07 |
14 | 特許7316630 | 車載装置 | 2023-01-19 |
15 | 特表2019-512476 | 有機エレクトロルミネッセンスデバイスのための材料 | 2022-11-18 |
16 | 特許7303136 | 容器およびその製造方法 | 2022-11-17 |
17 | 特許7358244 | 布帛用の樹脂凹版印刷版の製造方法および布帛印刷物の製造方法 | 2022-07-21 |
18 | 特許7263775 | 粘着性樹脂組成物、及びそれからなる積層フィルム | 2022-07-07 |
19 | 特許7201068 | 鋼板およびその製造方法 | 2022-06-23 |
20 | 特許7325919 | 車両用表示装置 | 2022-06-21 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-05-01 to 2024-04-30), 76 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.2. The most protest patent is 特許7101615 "ポリシロキサンマクロモノマー単位を有するコポリマー、該コポリマーの製造方法、ならびに該コポリマーの、コーティング組成物およびポリマー成形コンパウンドにおける使用" (4 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許6477720 "繊維強化プラスチック及びその製造方法" (3 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7101615 | ポリシロキサンマクロモノマー単位を有するコポリマー、該コポリマーの製造方法、ならびに該コポリマーの、コーティング組成物およびポリマー成形コンパウンドにおける使用 | 4 times |
2 | 特許6477720 | 繊維強化プラスチック及びその製造方法 | 3 times |
3 | 特許7106211 | パンツ型使い捨ておむつ | 2 times |
4 | 特許7388855 | コンベア | 2 times |
5 | 特許6388849 | 操作パネル、およびその操作パネルを備えた医療用診療装置 | 2 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 98 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.6 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特許6214572 "制御デバイスの構成設定のための方法及び装置" (Inspection day 2024-03-08) , next is 特許4222450 "C−グリコシド誘導体又はその塩" (Inspection day 2024-02-06) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6214572 | 制御デバイスの構成設定のための方法及び装置 | 2024-03-08 |
2 | 特許4222450 | C−グリコシド誘導体又はその塩 | 2024-02-06 |
3 | 特開2021-074897 | 矯正ヘルメット製作データを生成する方法 | 2023-12-12 |
4 | 特許7232891 | 通信システムにおけるパケットの受信装置、及び、送信装置 | 2023-12-11 |
5 | 特許7101615 | ポリシロキサンマクロモノマー単位を有するコポリマー、該コポリマーの製造方法、ならびに該コポリマーの、コーティング組成物およびポリマー成形コンパウンドにおける使用 | 2023-11-30 |
6 | 特許7460619 | マルチビーム電力制御方法およびシステム | 2023-11-24 |
7 | 特開2023-046414 | マルテンサイト系ステンレス鋼板およびマルテンサイト系ステンレス鋼部材 | 2023-11-22 |
8 | 特表2022-500524 | ポリアリーレンエーテルスルホン | 2023-10-23 |
9 | 特許7467426 | ポリアリーレンエーテルコポリマー | 2023-10-23 |
10 | 特表2022-500525 | ポリアリーレンエーテル | 2023-10-23 |
11 | 特許7462439 | オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼およびNの上限値の算出方法 | 2023-10-17 |
12 | 特許7388855 | コンベア | 2023-10-11 |
13 | 特許7473549 | 離散スペクトルを使用するための技法 | 2023-09-22 |
14 | 特開2022-188481 | オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼材および水素用機器 | 2023-09-05 |
15 | 特開2022-022915 | 鋼材 | 2023-08-23 |
16 | 特開2022-098633 | オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼板、オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼板の製造方法及び自動車排気系部品 | 2023-08-08 |
17 | 特開2022-076320 | 抗ウィルス性積層体及び抗ウィルス性容器 | 2023-07-31 |
18 | 特開2022-102173 | 抗ウィルス性積層体及び抗ウィルス性容器 | 2023-07-31 |
19 | 特開2022-043795 | セルフチェックアウト装置 | 2023-07-24 |
20 | 特許7356456 | 歯科用接着性組成物 | 2023-07-18 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-05-01 to 2024-04-30), 242 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.3. The most inspection patent is 特許6477720 "繊維強化プラスチック及びその製造方法" (6 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許7101615 "ポリシロキサンマクロモノマー単位を有するコポリマー、該コポリマーの製造方法、ならびに該コポリマーの、コーティング組成物およびポリマー成形コンパウンドにおける使用" (6 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6477720 | 繊維強化プラスチック及びその製造方法 | 6 times |
2 | 特許7101615 | ポリシロキサンマクロモノマー単位を有するコポリマー、該コポリマーの製造方法、ならびに該コポリマーの、コーティング組成物およびポリマー成形コンパウンドにおける使用 | 6 times |
3 | 特表2017-516698 | サイドウォールにハイコントラストのマトリックス記号が施されたタイヤ | 6 times |
4 | 特許5936284 | 会計処理装置、会計処理方法及び会計処理プログラム | 5 times |
5 | 特許7388855 | コンベア | 4 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-05-01 to 2024-04-30), 3,332 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.6. The most cited patent is 特開2018-047306 "遊技機" (102 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特開2016-115356 "自動運転制御装置および自動運転制御方法、並びにプログラム" (61 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2018-047306 | 遊技機 | 102 times |
2 | 特開2016-115356 | 自動運転制御装置および自動運転制御方法、並びにプログラム | 61 times |
3 | 特許6437021 | 遊技機 | 56 times |
4 | 特許6247651 | メニュー操作方法及びこれを行うタッチ入力装置を含むメニュー操作装置 | 51 times |
5 | 特許6320212 | 走行作業機及びそれに用いられる自動操舵システム | 49 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International