Last Updated: 2024/05/06

コンシステンシー (JP Patent Analysis Report) (JP SDGs Patent Report)

The Technical Field "コンシステンシー" had 789 patent application filings in the most recent period (2022-01-01 to 2022-08-31). This is a significantly decreased of -454 filings (-36.5%) over 1,243 they had in the same period of the previous year (2021-01-01 to 2021-08-31). This report also includes technical terms related to " フロウ ", " フロー ", " 粘ちょう度 ", " 粘稠度 " in the search set.

The highest number of filings in 2017 with 2,398 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 947 cases.

The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 9,291 cases in total) is 1,548, and the median is 1,897. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.

Filing information for the last 5 years (2018 to 2023)
Index Value
Average 1,548 patents
Std Dev 749
COV 0.5

Filing trends for the last 3 years
Year Cases YOY
2022 year 947 cases -48.0 %
2021 year 1,820 cases -7.80 %
2020 year 1,974 cases -8.06 %

This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for コンシステンシー for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-04-30). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.

This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.

This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of コンシステンシー, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.

Article supervision: Patent attorney Yoshiyuki Ose
Article supervised by: Yoshiyuki Ose (Japanese Patent Attorney)    

He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.

After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..

Introduction

The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.

An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.

IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.

After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.

Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.

Foreign Patent Analysis Report

By clicking, you can check the patent application trends in each country of コンシステンシー.

Patent Filing Trends in Each Country

Foreign Patent Analysis Report

The following foreign patent analysis reports have been found for コンシステンシー. The trends of patent filings of コンシステンシー for each country can be found by clicking on the Applicant/Patent Holder name next to each country.

Patent Filing Trends in Each Country
Country Applicant / Patent Holder

コンシステンシー, Changes in the Number of JP Patents/Patent Applications

The changes in the number of patent filings of コンシステンシー over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.

The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.

In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.

Counting of the Number of Cases using the Patent Mapping Function

By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology.

You can select a graph type from the menu on the upper left. Data can be output as a file to the clipboard, or in CSV format or TSV format. You can also output graph images as files in the SVG, PNG, and JPG formats. For the terms of use when using the data, please see "About this Site."

Search Set (Analysis Patents)

This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 18,496 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.

Patent Database
JP Publications/Granted Patents
Patent Search Formula
Technical Field:
コンシステンシー
Patent Analysis Period
2014-01-01〜2024-04-30
Number of Patents
18,496 patents

Analysis results are determined on the basis of patent gazette data issued by the patent office in each country.

Same industry / competition company information (JP)

The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as コンシステンシー are shown below.

Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.

It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.

If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.

Introduction of patent search function

Competitive analysis can be performed in a short time by using various search functions such as applicant, filing date, and similar patent search.

Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024).

Comparing the number of applications of each company, 株式会社日立製作所 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 19 cases, followed by キヤノン株式会社 with 19 cases.

Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2014 to 2024).

Comparing the number of applications of each company, 日本電気株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 281 cases, followed by キヤノン株式会社 with 271 cases.

Same industry / competition company, Change in the Number of JP Patents

Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.

You can select a graph type from the menu on the upper left. Data can be output as a file to the clipboard, or in CSV format or TSV format. You can also output graph images as files in the SVG, PNG, and JPG formats. For the terms of use when using the data, please see "About this Site."

Top company information (JP)

The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as コンシステンシー are shown below.

Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.

It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.

If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.

Search for Coapplicants

Patent integration allows you to find coapplicants in a short amount of time.

Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024).

Among the top coapplicants, 株式会社日立製作所 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 19 cases, followed by キヤノン株式会社 with 19 cases.

Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024).
Name Cases
株式会社日立製作所 19 cases
キヤノン株式会社 19 cases
富士通株式会社 13 cases
株式会社リコー 13 cases
日本電気株式会社 4 cases
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 1 cases

Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2014 to 2024).

Among the top coapplicants, 日本電気株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 281 cases, followed by キヤノン株式会社 with 271 cases.

Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2014 to 2024).
Name Cases
日本電気株式会社 281 cases
キヤノン株式会社 271 cases
株式会社リコー 254 cases
株式会社日立製作所 240 cases
富士通株式会社 201 cases
株式会社東芝 65 cases
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 4 cases

Top company, Change in the Number of JP Patents

Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by コンシステンシー’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.

Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by コンシステンシー’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.

You can select a graph type from the menu on the upper left. Data can be output as a file to the clipboard, or in CSV format or TSV format. You can also output graph images as files in the SVG, PNG, and JPG formats. For the terms of use when using the data, please see "About this Site."

Top company Details (JP)

Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 株式会社日立製作所

コンシステンシー filed 240 joint applications with 株式会社日立製作所 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).

The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 117 cases in total) is 19.5, and the median is 21.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.

The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 39 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 19 cases.

Filing information for the last 5 years (2018 to 2023)
Index Value
Average 19.5 patents
Std Dev 9.7
COV 0.5
Filing trends for the last 3 years
Year Cases YOY
2022 year 19 cases 0
2021 year 19 cases -20.83 %
2020 year 24 cases -25.00 %

Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 日本電気株式会社

コンシステンシー filed 281 joint applications with 日本電気株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).

The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 76 cases in total) is 12.7, and the median is 11.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.8, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.

The highest number of filings in 2014 with 59 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 4 cases.

Filing information for the last 5 years (2018 to 2023)
Index Value
Average 12.7 patents
Std Dev 9.9
COV 0.8
Filing trends for the last 3 years
Year Cases YOY
2022 year 4 cases -55.6 %
2021 year 9 cases -30.8 %
2020 year 13 cases -38.1 %

Trends in filing of joint patent applications with キヤノン株式会社

コンシステンシー filed 271 joint applications with キヤノン株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).

The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 133 cases in total) is 22.2, and the median is 23.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.

The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2017 with 39 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 17 cases.

Filing information for the last 5 years (2018 to 2023)
Index Value
Average 22.2 patents
Std Dev 12.0
COV 0.5
Filing trends for the last 3 years
Year Cases YOY
2022 year 18 cases +5.88 %
2021 year 17 cases -39.3 %
2020 year 28 cases -6.67 %

Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 株式会社東芝

コンシステンシー filed 65 joint applications with 株式会社東芝 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).

The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 21 cases in total) is 3.5, and the median is 3.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.9, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.

The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2014 with 22 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.

Filing information for the last 5 years (2018 to 2023)
Index Value
Average 3.5 patents
Std Dev 3.2
COV 0.9
Filing trends for the last 3 years
Year Cases YOY
2021 year 3 cases -50.0 %
2020 year 6 cases +100 %
2019 year 3 cases -66.7 %

Trends in filing of joint patent applications with パナソニックホールディングス株式会社

コンシステンシー filed 4 joint applications with パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).

The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 3 cases in total) is 0.5, and the median is 0.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.0, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.

The highest number of filings in 2017 with 1 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.

Filing information for the last 5 years (2018 to 2023)
Index Value
Average 0.5 patents
Std Dev 0.5
COV 1.0
Filing trends for the last 3 years
Year Cases YOY
2022 year 0 cases -100 %
2021 year 1 cases -
2020 year 0 cases -100 %

Information on important patents (JP)

The following shows JP patents held by コンシステンシー that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and コンシステンシー’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.

By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which コンシステンシー is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.

If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.

Search for Information on Important Patents

You can quickly search for important patents/patent applications, such as patents/patent applications that were cited many times and patents that have had invalidation trials demanded against them many times.

Glossary

Cited
Indicates that the patent/patent application has been cited (by Examiners) in notices of reasons for rejection in the examination process of other (Japanese, U.S., or European) patent applications. The higher the number of citations, the more important the patent/patent application is considered to be.
Request for invalidation trial
Indicates that a third party has requested a procedure to invalidate the patent. It is likely to affect the business of third parties and is considered to be of high importance.
Opposition
Indicates that a third party has filed a petition with the Patent Office to hear the validity of the patent again. Like the trial for invalidation, it is considered to be of high importance.
Information provision
Indicates that a third party has provided the Patent Office with useful information for examination for the patent filed. It is usually considered to be of high importance because it is done to prevent the patent from being granted.
Browsing request
Indicates that a third party has requested the Patent Office to view the patent bag (a set of documents exchanged between the Patent Office and the applicant). The bag is often checked prior to trial for invalidation, opposition, and provision of information, and is considered to be a highly important patent.

Invalidationed Trial cases

List of latest Invalidationed Trial patents

In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 3 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 1.3 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許7025518 "逆流防止弁" (Invalidation Trial day 2023-06-20) , next is 特許6896700 "ワクチン組成物" (Invalidation Trial day 2023-01-27) .

Most recent Invalidation Trial (2021-05-01 to 2024-04-30)
- No. Title Invalidation Trial days
1 特許7025518 逆流防止弁 2023-06-20
2 特許6896700 ワクチン組成物 2023-01-27
3 特許5976320 塗装機器および塗装方法 2021-05-28

Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Invalidationed Trial

Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-05-01 to 2024-04-30), 2 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.0. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6896700 "ワクチン組成物" (1 times) , and the next most invalidation trial patent is 特許7025518 "逆流防止弁" (1 times) .

Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Invalidation Trial over a Period of 10 Years (2014-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30)
- No. Title
1 特許6896700 ワクチン組成物 1 times
2 特許7025518 逆流防止弁 1 times

Oppositioned cases

List of latest Oppositioned patents

In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 24 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7300317 "ログ解析システム及びログ解析方法" (Opposition day 2023-12-21) , next is 特許7228653 "嫌気性消化槽の立ち上げ方法及び嫌気性消化システム" (Opposition day 2023-08-23) .

Most recent Opposition (2021-05-01 to 2024-04-30)
- No. Title Opposition days
1 特許7300317 ログ解析システム及びログ解析方法 2023-12-21
2 特許7228653 嫌気性消化槽の立ち上げ方法及び嫌気性消化システム 2023-08-23
3 特許7175889 進歩した多孔性炭素質材料およびそれらの調製方法 2023-05-19
4 特許7177143 排気ガス浄化用途のための低ウォッシュコート充填量単層触媒 2023-05-16
5 特許7136209 クロマトグラフィー用検出器 2023-03-10
6 特許7116768 高構造カーボンブラックを有する電極、組成物、及びデバイス 2023-02-10
7 特許7112179 半導体封止材用球状シリカ質粉末、およびその製造方法 2023-02-02
8 特許7088165 ヘテロファジックプロピレン重合材料及びプロピレン系樹脂組成物 2022-12-21
9 特許7086162 ASCの前にSCR触媒を備えるシステム内でDOCとして作用するASCを有する、DOCを伴わない排気システム 2022-12-16
10 特許7060772 炭素質材料及びその製造方法、並びに、含フッ素有機化合物除去材、浄水用フィルター及び浄水器 2022-10-21

Show 5 patents  

Protested cases

List of latest Protested patents

In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 66 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.4 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2021-187715 "勾配面施工用速硬性モルタル組成物及び勾配面施工用速硬性モルタル" (Protest day 2024-03-25) , next is 特開2022-186756 "アルロース結晶の製造方法" (Protest day 2024-03-20) .

Most recent Protest (2021-05-01 to 2024-04-30)
- No. Title Protest days
1 特開2021-187715 勾配面施工用速硬性モルタル組成物及び勾配面施工用速硬性モルタル 2024-03-25
2 特開2022-186756 アルロース結晶の製造方法 2024-03-20
3 特開2023-164269 軒樋、受け具、及び、軒樋支持構造 2024-03-18
4 特表2022-552052 抗VEGFタンパク質組成物及びその製造方法 2024-03-12
5 特開2024-004178 構真柱の建て込み工法 2024-02-27
6 特表2023-544184 接着細胞からのウイルスのバイオリアクター生成 2024-02-01
7 特表2023-517332 レバウジオシドM甘味料組成物 2023-12-22
8 特開2022-025722 高濃度高分散スラリー組成物及びその製造方法 2023-12-21
9 特開2022-087482 便器装置 2023-11-27
10 特許7430147 繊維補強モルタルの押出積層方法 2023-11-08
11 特開2022-110920 樹脂組成物及び樹脂組成物充填済みシリンジ 2023-10-04
12 特開2021-162323 疾患鑑別支援方法、疾患鑑別支援装置、及び疾患鑑別支援コンピュータプログラム 2023-09-01
13 特許7394194 グラウトモルタル 2023-08-22
14 特開2023-036582 がんのための治療方法及び診断方法 2023-06-26
15 特開2023-011753 チロシン硫酸化抗体変異体の除去のための精製方法;精製された組成物 2023-06-01
16 特許7371149 冷凍・冷蔵ショーケース 2023-04-24
17 特許7390885 造形用セメント組成物 2023-04-20
18 特開2020-124663 フロー式有機合成システム及びフロー式有機合成方法 2023-04-19
19 特許7302331 樹脂組成物 2023-04-04
20 特許7388073 情報処理装置、情報処理方法、及び、プログラム 2023-03-28

Show 15 patents  

Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Protested

Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-05-01 to 2024-04-30), 138 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.3. The most protest patent is 特許6795281 "DI缶の製造方法" (6 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許6405339 "簡易メンブレンアッセイ法及びキット" (4 times) .

Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Protest over a Period of 10 Years (2014-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30)
- No. Title
1 特許6795281 DI缶の製造方法 6 times
2 特許6405339 簡易メンブレンアッセイ法及びキット 4 times
3 特許7302331 樹脂組成物 4 times
4 特許7118527 グラウト 4 times
5 特許6405269 簡易メンブレンアッセイ法及びキット 3 times

Inspectioned cases

List of latest Inspectioned patents

In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 152 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.3 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特許7471044 "情報処理方法、プログラム及び情報処理システム" (Inspection day 2024-04-18) , next is 特表2022-552052 "抗VEGFタンパク質組成物及びその製造方法" (Inspection day 2024-04-11) .

Most recent Inspection (2021-05-01 to 2024-04-30)
- No. Title Inspection days
1 特許7471044 情報処理方法、プログラム及び情報処理システム 2024-04-18
2 特表2022-552052 抗VEGFタンパク質組成物及びその製造方法 2024-04-11
3 特開2023-164269 軒樋、受け具、及び、軒樋支持構造 2024-04-10
4 特開2022-186756 アルロース結晶の製造方法 2024-04-04
5 特開2022-065089 ジフテリア毒素-インターロイキン-3コンジュゲートに基づく方法及び組成物 2024-04-01
6 特開2024-004178 構真柱の建て込み工法 2024-03-13
7 特開2022-120133 デジタルPCR検出器、デジタルPCR定量検出方法、異なる体積のデジタルPCRの定量解析方法、デジタルPCR検出方法、核酸検出微小球、核酸検出微小球製造方法、核酸検出微小球試薬キット及びハイスループット核酸検出方法 2024-03-12
8 特許7197744 コンテンツの出力方法 2024-03-08
9 特開2022-088444 単一の光源、2光学チャネル配列決定 2024-03-06
10 特表2023-544184 接着細胞からのウイルスのバイオリアクター生成 2024-02-09
11 特表2022-547652 抗VEGFタンパク質組成物及びその製造方法 2024-02-07
12 特許7022936 送信方法、受信方法、送信装置及び受信装置 2024-01-29
13 特許7117562 送信方法、受信方法、送信装置及び受信装置 2024-01-29
14 特表2023-517332 レバウジオシドM甘味料組成物 2024-01-23
15 特許7025518 逆流防止弁 2023-12-21
16 特表2021-519280 クロマトグラフィー法によるVWFとVWFプロペプチドの分離 2023-12-19
17 特表2021-502077 免疫療法のためのT細胞におけるCBLBのCRISPR−CAS9編集のための方法、組成物および構成要素 2023-12-19
18 特許7475685 ヒト真皮線維芽細胞の単離方法 2023-12-18
19 特表2022-548818 抗VEGFタンパク質組成物及びその製造方法 2023-12-12
20 特開2022-087482 便器装置 2023-12-05

Show 15 patents  

Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Inspectioned

Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-05-01 to 2024-04-30), 379 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.3. The most inspection patent is 特許6405339 "簡易メンブレンアッセイ法及びキット" (21 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許6405269 "簡易メンブレンアッセイ法及びキット" (18 times) .

Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Inspection over a Period of 10 Years (2014-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30)
- No. Title
1 特許6405339 簡易メンブレンアッセイ法及びキット 21 times
2 特許6405269 簡易メンブレンアッセイ法及びキット 18 times
3 特許6693127 ビニル重合体粉体の製造方法 7 times
4 特許7302331 樹脂組成物 6 times
5 特開2017-078723 簡易メンブレンアッセイ法及びキット 6 times

Cited cases

Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Cited

Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-05-01 to 2024-04-30), 3,659 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.5. The most cited patent is 特許5956511 "自動アシスタントによるユーザ要求と結果の言い換え" (176 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6577064 "デジタルアシスタントとのアプリケーション統合" (47 times) .

Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Cited over a Period of 10 Years (2014-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30)
- No. Title
1 特許5956511 自動アシスタントによるユーザ要求と結果の言い換え 176 times
2 特許6577064 デジタルアシスタントとのアプリケーション統合 47 times
3 特許6490106 電子たばこデバイスおよびその部品 42 times
4 特許6584145 車載光学レンズの洗浄システムおよび洗浄方法 32 times
5 特許6346128 最適な操作条件を算出できる射出成形システム及び機械学習器 29 times

Providing patent information to the media (newspapers, magazines, etc.)

"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.

The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.

We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.

About this Site

All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.

Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.

If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.

All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.

Please note the following points for use.

e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).

Citation of patent application status and ranking information

There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.

Graphs are image data.

Please note that the various graphs are image data, but we cannot provide them in text data.

Scope of coverage for each goal/target

  • Based on the description of each goal and target of the SDGs, we have set the scope of technologies to be covered based on our and e-Patent's past experience, etc. (in some cases, the search is based on social issues themselves). Therefore, please note that there is a possibility that this "SDGs Global Company Ranking from Patent Perspective" may not cover 100%.
  • A population search formula is clearly indicated for each goal/target (database: Patent Integration). You may use the population search formula as it is, or you may improve it by yourself.
  • This search covers patents and utility models, including both published and registered patents (design and design patents are excluded). The unit of count is the number of applications, not the number of patent families.

About the name collation and name control of applicants and right holders

  • Company rankings are based on the results calculated by "Patent Integration", with Japanese organizations in Japanese and other companies in English (some are in Japanese).
  • Company names may be the names of the companies at the time of application, but the results calculated by Patent Integration are used as is. Company names are used as they were at the time of application.
  • Because of the fluctuation in the names of companies (i.e., applicant/right holder names in the patent information), there are cases where the same company appears more than once in the top 10. The number of applications filed by the same company in the top 10 is the total number of applications filed by the company.

Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International

Our Commitment to Safety and Security

Patent Office Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to providing high-quality patent information based on the latest patent data on more than 45 million cases collected from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publication.
patent information Patent Integration Co., Ltd. collects the patent data from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publications to provide it widely in the form of reports so that anyone can check patent information and patent trends with confidence.
reliability of the information Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to various efforts to enhance the reliability of the information and to allow users to search patent information with confidence.