The Theme Code "管理・経営技術" had 293 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-02-28). This is a with an decreasing trend transition of -60 filings (-17.0%) over 353 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-02-28).
The highest number of filings in 2021 with 2,693 cases, and their lowest number in 2014 with 1,061 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 13,162 cases in total) is 2,194, and the median is 2,394. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.27, and there have been small fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 2,194 patents |
Std Dev | 591 |
COV | 0.27 |
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023).
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 2,445 cases | -9.21 % |
2021 year | 2,693 cases | +1.32 % |
2020 year | 2,658 cases | +13.40 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 管理・経営技術[5L010] for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-10-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 管理・経営技術, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of 管理・経営技術 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 18,491 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The patent information of the higher applicant in the technical theme 管理・経営技術 is shown below. By comparing the number of patents of each company, you can check the research and development status of each company's past and present technical themes and the position of each company in the technical theme.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 株式会社日立製作所 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 199 cases, followed by トヨタ自動車株式会社 with 164 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
株式会社日立製作所 | 199 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 164 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 69 cases |
富士通株式会社 | 65 cases |
株式会社リコー | 61 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 56 cases |
富士フイルムビジネスイノベーション株式会社 | 54 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 42 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 26 cases |
日本電信電話株式会社 | 7 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 株式会社日立製作所 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 891 cases, followed by トヨタ自動車株式会社 with 611 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
株式会社日立製作所 | 891 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 611 cases |
富士通株式会社 | 539 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 475 cases |
富士フイルムビジネスイノベーション株式会社 | 462 cases |
株式会社リコー | 430 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 376 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 264 cases |
日本電信電話株式会社 | 214 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 148 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 10 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The patent information of the higher applicant in the technical theme 管理・経営技術 is shown below. By comparing the number of patents of each company, you can check the research and development status of each company's past and present technical themes and the position of each company in the technical theme.
among the top coapplicants, 株式会社日立製作所 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 199 cases, followed by 三菱電機株式会社 with 69 cases.
among the top coapplicants, 株式会社日立製作所 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 891 cases, followed by 富士通株式会社 with 539 cases.
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 管理・経営技術’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 管理・経営技術’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
管理・経営技術 filed 891 joint applications with 株式会社日立製作所 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 662 cases in total) is 110, and the median is 112. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.3, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been increasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2022 with 157 cases, and their lowest number in 2014 with 41 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 110 patents |
Std Dev | 36.1 |
COV | 0.3 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 157 cases | +14.60 % |
2021 year | 137 cases | +17.09 % |
2020 year | 117 cases | +10.38 % |
管理・経営技術 filed 539 joint applications with 富士通株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 307 cases in total) is 51.2, and the median is 54.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2020 with 74 cases, and their lowest number in 2015 with 44 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 51.2 patents |
Std Dev | 19.5 |
COV | 0.4 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 54 cases | +5.88 % |
2021 year | 51 cases | -31.1 % |
2020 year | 74 cases | +34.5 % |
管理・経営技術 filed 475 joint applications with 日本電気株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 283 cases in total) is 47.2, and the median is 50.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2017 with 81 cases, and their lowest number in 2014 with 16 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 47.2 patents |
Std Dev | 17.3 |
COV | 0.4 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 42 cases | -14.29 % |
2021 year | 49 cases | -31.0 % |
2020 year | 71 cases | +26.79 % |
管理・経営技術 filed 264 joint applications with 株式会社東芝 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 170 cases in total) is 28.3, and the median is 31.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2019 with 40 cases, and their lowest number in 2014 with 15 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 28.3 patents |
Std Dev | 10.2 |
COV | 0.4 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 34 cases | 0 |
2021 year | 34 cases | +17.24 % |
2020 year | 29 cases | -27.50 % |
管理・経営技術 filed 430 joint applications with 株式会社リコー for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 249 cases in total) is 41.5, and the median is 46.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.3, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2016 with 57 cases, and their lowest number in 2017 with 25 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 41.5 patents |
Std Dev | 13.1 |
COV | 0.3 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 40 cases | -23.08 % |
2021 year | 52 cases | -3.70 % |
2020 year | 54 cases | 0 |
The following shows JP patents held by 管理・経営技術 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 管理・経営技術’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 管理・経営技術 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 1 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 1.0 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許6934143 "自動車の損傷度を査定する方法" (Invalidation Trial day 2023-10-06) .
- | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6934143 | 自動車の損傷度を査定する方法 | 2023-10-06 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 1 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.0. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6934143 "自動車の損傷度を査定する方法" (1 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6934143 | 自動車の損傷度を査定する方法 | 1 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 23 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7450309 "AI管路劣化予測システム、AI管路劣化予測方法及びAI管路劣化予測プログラム" (Opposition day 2024-09-09) , next is 特許7445400 "情報処理装置、情報処理システム、什器管理システム、情報処理方法、およびプログラム" (Opposition day 2024-09-02) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7450309 | AI管路劣化予測システム、AI管路劣化予測方法及びAI管路劣化予測プログラム | 2024-09-09 |
2 | 特許7445400 | 情報処理装置、情報処理システム、什器管理システム、情報処理方法、およびプログラム | 2024-09-02 |
3 | 特許7395048 | 表示装置、表示方法及び表示プログラム | 2024-05-31 |
4 | 特許7384587 | 情報処理装置、情報処理システム、情報処理方法、およびプログラム | 2024-05-14 |
5 | 特許7364924 | エリア通知システム | 2024-04-16 |
6 | 特許7361667 | 行動変容のための認知的刺激を生成する装置、モデル及び刺激情報生成・提示方法 | 2024-04-10 |
7 | 特許7351975 | 予測装置、予測方法及び予測プログラム | 2024-03-21 |
8 | 特許7265054 | 情報処理装置及びプログラム | 2023-10-24 |
9 | 特許7233047 | 情報管理装置及び情報管理方法 | 2023-09-06 |
10 | 特許7209766 | 業務活動分析装置、業務活動分析方法、及びプログラム。 | 2023-07-18 |
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 34 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.2 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2022-134079 "労働状況管理システム" (Protest day 2024-10-08) , next is 特開2024-108857 "ランドリー機器の予約方法およびランドリー機器の予約システム" (Protest day 2024-09-27) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2022-134079 | 労働状況管理システム | 2024-10-08 |
2 | 特開2024-108857 | ランドリー機器の予約方法およびランドリー機器の予約システム | 2024-09-27 |
3 | 特開2024-097621 | 受付装置、本人確認方法、及び、コンピュータプログラム | 2024-09-06 |
4 | 特開2023-100412 | 船舶システム、表示装置、及び船舶プログラム | 2024-07-22 |
5 | 特開2023-000784 | 会議設定システムサーバおよび会議設定システム | 2024-06-24 |
6 | 特開2023-114578 | 電子帳票作成支援装置、方法及びプログラム | 2024-06-14 |
7 | 特開2023-108961 | プログラム、表示方法、制御方法および端末装置 | 2024-06-10 |
8 | 特開2022-147839 | 学習モデル生成方法、情報処理装置、予測方法、情報処理プログラム、および、化粧品の製造方法 | 2024-04-15 |
9 | 特開2022-158476 | 運搬方法及び運搬システム | 2024-03-28 |
10 | 特開2022-124934 | 設備予約装置 | 2024-01-26 |
11 | 特許7384588 | 情報処理装置、情報処理システム、情報処理方法、およびプログラム | 2023-09-20 |
12 | 特許7437998 | 水処理システム、水処理システムの運転管理支援システム及び水処理システムの運転方法 | 2023-08-31 |
13 | 特許7432490 | オンライン接客システム、端末装置及びオンライン接客方法 | 2023-08-28 |
14 | 特開2021-033897 | 荷物運搬システム | 2023-08-07 |
15 | 特許7445400 | 情報処理装置、情報処理システム、什器管理システム、情報処理方法、およびプログラム | 2023-06-13 |
16 | 特許7453749 | 予約情報送信装置 | 2023-04-27 |
17 | 特許7496050 | 塗料有効利用方法及び塗料有効利用システム | 2023-03-22 |
18 | 特許7440259 | 情報処理装置、情報処理方法、プログラム | 2023-03-01 |
19 | 特開2021-163312 | 車両整備予約システム | 2023-03-01 |
20 | 特開2022-092308 | 設計支援装置、設計支援方法及び設計支援プログラム | 2023-02-21 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 49 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.2. The most protest patent is 特許6474257 "駐車場の予約システム" (3 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許7060339 "運送受付システム" (2 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6474257 | 駐車場の予約システム | 3 times |
2 | 特許7060339 | 運送受付システム | 2 times |
3 | 特開2020-061045 | 多店舗管理システム、多店舗管理システムのプログラム | 2 times |
4 | 特許6444494 | 予測データ分析のためのシステムおよび技術 | 2 times |
5 | 特開2021-033897 | 荷物運搬システム | 2 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 86 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.2 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2024-108857 "ランドリー機器の予約方法およびランドリー機器の予約システム" (Inspection day 2024-10-22) , next is 特開2022-134079 "労働状況管理システム" (Inspection day 2024-10-16) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2024-108857 | ランドリー機器の予約方法およびランドリー機器の予約システム | 2024-10-22 |
2 | 特開2022-134079 | 労働状況管理システム | 2024-10-16 |
3 | 特許7456544 | 取引管理装置、取引管理システム、ユーザ端末、取引管理方法、表示制御方法、およびプログラム | 2024-08-29 |
4 | 特許6556969 | 営業支援装置及び営業先リスト作成装置 | 2024-07-12 |
5 | 特許7173507 | 営業支援装置、営業支援方法及びプログラム | 2024-07-12 |
6 | 特許6560477 | 営業支援装置及び営業先リスト作成装置 | 2024-07-12 |
7 | 特表2021-527204 | 配送多目的サービス実行のためのシステムおよび方法 | 2024-06-26 |
8 | 特開2022-134135 | 配送多目的サービス実行のためのシステムおよび方法 | 2024-06-26 |
9 | 特許7541717 | 会議評価装置、会議評価システム、及び会議評価プログラム | 2024-06-19 |
10 | 特開2022-147839 | 学習モデル生成方法、情報処理装置、予測方法、情報処理プログラム、および、化粧品の製造方法 | 2024-06-03 |
11 | 特許7471696 | 貯蓄シミュレーション装置 | 2024-05-01 |
12 | 特許7462175 | 二者間のコミュニケーションにおいて個々人への関わり方を改善するためのコンピュータシステム、方法、およびプログラム | 2024-03-25 |
13 | 特開2022-092297 | 設計支援装置、設計支援方法及び設計支援プログラム | 2024-02-15 |
14 | 特表2022-534811 | ビークル特性に基づく経路指定 | 2024-02-13 |
15 | 特開2024-124120 | 情報処理装置、方法、プログラム、およびシステム | 2024-02-01 |
16 | 特表2021-519466 | 配管破損を予測するデータの処理 | 2023-12-04 |
17 | 特開2024-038574 | 特車情報管理方法、特車情報管理装置、及び特車情報管理プログラム | 2023-11-30 |
18 | 特許7443265 | 原水を処理するための凝固剤の用量を決定する方法 | 2023-11-27 |
19 | 特開2024-097453 | 作業工程動画公開装置、方法及びシステム | 2023-11-27 |
20 | 特開2022-016202 | 倉庫作業支援システム | 2023-11-22 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 164 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.3. The most inspection patent is 特許6444494 "予測データ分析のためのシステムおよび技術" (11 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許5878262 "配送管理システム及び配送管理方法" (5 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6444494 | 予測データ分析のためのシステムおよび技術 | 11 times |
2 | 特許5878262 | 配送管理システム及び配送管理方法 | 5 times |
3 | 特開2018-018354 | ディープラーニングを用いた飲食品の品質予測方法及び飲食品 | 4 times |
4 | 特許6941200 | 店舗における荷物預かりのための装置、方法及びそのためのプログラム | 4 times |
5 | 特許6534179 | コミュニケーションについてのアドバイスを提供するコンピュータシステム、プログラム、方法 | 4 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 4,911 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.8. The most cited patent is 特許6028118 "共有フォルダを支援する統合ワークスペース" (67 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許7046546 "会議支援システムおよび会議支援プログラム" (61 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6028118 | 共有フォルダを支援する統合ワークスペース | 67 times |
2 | 特許7046546 | 会議支援システムおよび会議支援プログラム | 61 times |
3 | 特許7272012 | 情報処理装置、情報処理プログラム及び検品システム | 32 times |
4 | 特許6324360 | 冷蔵庫及びそれを含むネットワークシステム | 31 times |
5 | 特許6739907 | 機器特定方法、機器特定装置及びプログラム | 29 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International