前処理 (JP Patent Analysis Report)
The Technical Field "前処理" had 98 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-02-28). This is a significantly decreased of -67 filings (-40.6%) over 165 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-02-28). This report also includes technical terms related to " 予備処理 ", " 事前処理 ", " 前処置 " in the search set.
The highest number of filings in 2019 with 1,403 cases, and their lowest number in 2015 with 1,042 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 6,653 cases in total) is 1,109, and the median is 1,264. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.3, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 1,109 patents |
| Std Dev | 350 |
| COV | 0.3 |
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023).
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 1,074 cases | -16.49 % |
| 2021 year | 1,286 cases | +3.46 % |
| 2020 year | 1,243 cases | -11.40 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 前処理 for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-10-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 前処理, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
Introduction
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
前処理, Changes in the Number of JP Patents/Patent Applications
The changes in the number of patent filings of 前処理 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
Search Set (Analysis Patents)
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 11,252 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
前処理
Same industry / competition company information (JP)
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 前処理 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024).
Comparing the number of applications of each company, JFEスチール株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 22 cases, followed by 株式会社リコー with 21 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| JFEスチール株式会社 | 22 cases |
| 株式会社リコー | 21 cases |
| セイコーエプソン株式会社 | 18 cases |
| 株式会社日立製作所 | 15 cases |
| 富士通株式会社 | 15 cases |
| キヤノン株式会社 | 14 cases |
| 三菱電機株式会社 | 14 cases |
| 株式会社東芝 | 11 cases |
| 日本製鉄株式会社 | 7 cases |
| 日本電気株式会社 | 7 cases |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2014 to 2024).
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 株式会社リコー has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 158 cases, followed by キヤノン株式会社 with 135 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| 株式会社リコー | 158 cases |
| キヤノン株式会社 | 135 cases |
| JFEスチール株式会社 | 122 cases |
| 株式会社日立製作所 | 114 cases |
| セイコーエプソン株式会社 | 107 cases |
| 富士通株式会社 | 87 cases |
| 日本製鉄株式会社 | 78 cases |
| 三菱電機株式会社 | 77 cases |
| 日本電気株式会社 | 72 cases |
| 株式会社東芝 | 68 cases |
| パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 7 cases |
Same industry / competition company, Change in the Number of JP Patents
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
Top company information (JP)
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 前処理 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024).
Among the top coapplicants, JFEスチール株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 22 cases, followed by 株式会社リコー with 21 cases.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2014 to 2024).
Among the top coapplicants, 株式会社リコー has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 158 cases, followed by キヤノン株式会社 with 135 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| 株式会社リコー | 158 cases |
| キヤノン株式会社 | 135 cases |
| JFEスチール株式会社 | 122 cases |
| 株式会社日立製作所 | 114 cases |
| 日本製鉄株式会社 | 78 cases |
| 株式会社東芝 | 68 cases |
| パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 7 cases |
Top company, Change in the Number of JP Patents
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 前処理’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 前処理’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Top company Details (JP)
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 株式会社日立製作所
前処理 filed 114 joint applications with 株式会社日立製作所 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 63 cases in total) is 10.5, and the median is 12.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2014 with 17 cases, and their lowest number in 2016 with 7 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 10.5 patents |
| Std Dev | 4.2 |
| COV | 0.4 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 13 cases | -13.33 % |
| 2021 year | 15 cases | +66.7 % |
| 2020 year | 9 cases | -18.18 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 株式会社東芝
前処理 filed 68 joint applications with 株式会社東芝 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 39 cases in total) is 6.5, and the median is 7.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2018 with 11 cases, and their lowest number in 2019 with 2 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 6.5 patents |
| Std Dev | 3.5 |
| COV | 0.5 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 9 cases | 0 |
| 2021 year | 9 cases | +50.0 % |
| 2020 year | 6 cases | +200 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with キヤノン株式会社
前処理 filed 135 joint applications with キヤノン株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 69 cases in total) is 11.5, and the median is 10.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2017 with 30 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 8 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 11.5 patents |
| Std Dev | 5.7 |
| COV | 0.5 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 11 cases | +37.5 % |
| 2021 year | 8 cases | -20.00 % |
| 2020 year | 10 cases | -37.5 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with JFEスチール株式会社
前処理 filed 122 joint applications with JFEスチール株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 58 cases in total) is 9.7, and the median is 10.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.14, and there have been small fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2015 with 21 cases, and their lowest number in 2020 with 7 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 9.7 patents |
| Std Dev | 1.4 |
| COV | 0.14 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 10 cases | -9.09 % |
| 2021 year | 11 cases | +57.1 % |
| 2020 year | 7 cases | -36.4 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 日本製鉄株式会社
前処理 filed 78 joint applications with 日本製鉄株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 39 cases in total) is 6.5, and the median is 6.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 12 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 5 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 6.5 patents |
| Std Dev | 3.5 |
| COV | 0.5 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 5 cases | 0 |
| 2021 year | 5 cases | -28.57 % |
| 2020 year | 7 cases | -22.22 % |
Information on important patents (JP)
The following shows JP patents held by 前処理 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 前処理’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 前処理 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
Glossary
- Cited
- Indicates that the patent/patent application has been cited (by Examiners) in notices of reasons for rejection in the examination process of other (Japanese, U.S., or European) patent applications. The higher the number of citations, the more important the patent/patent application is considered to be.
- Request for invalidation trial
- Indicates that a third party has requested a procedure to invalidate the patent. It is likely to affect the business of third parties and is considered to be of high importance.
- Opposition
- Indicates that a third party has filed a petition with the Patent Office to hear the validity of the patent again. Like the trial for invalidation, it is considered to be of high importance.
- Information provision
- Indicates that a third party has provided the Patent Office with useful information for examination for the patent filed. It is usually considered to be of high importance because it is done to prevent the patent from being granted.
- Browsing request
- Indicates that a third party has requested the Patent Office to view the patent bag (a set of documents exchanged between the Patent Office and the applicant). The bag is often checked prior to trial for invalidation, opposition, and provision of information, and is considered to be a highly important patent.
Invalidationed Trial cases
List of latest Invalidationed Trial patents
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 1 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 1.0 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許6877790 "耕耘爪" (Invalidation Trial day 2022-06-09) .
| - | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6877790 | 耕耘爪 | 2022-06-09 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Invalidationed Trial
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 6 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.0. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6697615 "ダンボール材およびこれを用いたダンボール箱" (1 times) , and the next most invalidation trial patent is 特許6697616 "ダンボール材およびこれを用いたダンボール箱" (1 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6697615 | ダンボール材およびこれを用いたダンボール箱 | 1 times |
| 2 | 特許6697616 | ダンボール材およびこれを用いたダンボール箱 | 1 times |
| 3 | 特許6664439 | 耕耘爪 | 1 times |
| 4 | 特許6697617 | ダンボール材およびこれを用いたダンボール箱 | 1 times |
| 5 | 特許6697613 | ダンボール材およびこれを用いたダンボール箱 | 1 times |
Oppositioned cases
List of latest Oppositioned patents
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 18 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7378584 "耐火繊維一体型モジュールの取り付け方法" (Opposition day 2024-05-10) , next is 特許7340913 "検査前処理容器" (Opposition day 2024-03-04) .
| - | No. | Title | Opposition days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許7378584 | 耐火繊維一体型モジュールの取り付け方法 | 2024-05-10 |
| 2 | 特許7340913 | 検査前処理容器 | 2024-03-04 |
| 3 | 特許7336412 | 有機光電子素子用有機アロイ、有機光電子素子および表示装置 | 2024-02-26 |
| 4 | 特許7323085 | 積層体、包装体、積層体の製造方法 | 2024-02-01 |
| 5 | 特許7300242 | 汚染水処理方法 | 2023-12-27 |
| 6 | 特許7296050 | バリア性積層フィルム及びバリア性積層フィルムの製造方法、並びにバリア性積層フィルムを備える包装材料 | 2023-12-20 |
| 7 | 特許7216854 | 情報処理装置およびプログラム | 2023-08-01 |
| 8 | 特許7192378 | 圧延設備及び鋼板の圧延方法 | 2023-06-19 |
| 9 | 特許7191106 | 改善された接合耐久性を示す、および／またはリン含有表面を有するアルミニウム合金製品、ならびにその作製方法 | 2023-06-14 |
| 10 | 特許7171671 | 超純水製造システム及び超純水製造方法 | 2023-05-12 |
Protested cases
List of latest Protested patents
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 69 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.4 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2021-091202 "ガスバリアフィルム" (Protest day 2024-08-09) , next is 特表2022-522968 "オレフィン合成における再生可能エネルギーの使用" (Protest day 2024-07-31) .
| - | No. | Title | Protest days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特開2021-091202 | ガスバリアフィルム | 2024-08-09 |
| 2 | 特表2022-522968 | オレフィン合成における再生可能エネルギーの使用 | 2024-07-31 |
| 3 | 特開2022-103990 | ソース、ソースの製造方法、及び植物性タンパク臭のマスキング方法 | 2024-07-25 |
| 4 | 特表2023-521432 | 着色プラスチック混合物のケミカルリサイクル | 2024-07-03 |
| 5 | 特開2022-099080 | 畦塗り機 | 2024-07-01 |
| 6 | 特開2021-175387 | 大豆たん白を含有する容器包装詰加圧加熱殺菌食品、及びその製造方法 | 2024-06-26 |
| 7 | 特許7573574 | 粒状酸化マグネシウム | 2024-06-25 |
| 8 | 特表2023-521429 | 湿った細粒を含む様々な供給源からの廃棄プラスチックのケミカルリサイクル | 2024-06-19 |
| 9 | 特表2023-533326 | 高品質の炭化ケイ素種結晶、炭化ケイ素結晶、炭化ケイ素基板およびそれらの製造方法 | 2024-06-12 |
| 10 | 特開2022-106122 | ガスバリアフィルム及びガスバリアフィルムの製造方法 | 2024-06-10 |
| 11 | 特表2022-545090 | テレフタレートポリマーを再利用可能な原材料に解重合するための方法及び反応器システム | 2024-05-27 |
| 12 | 特表2023-507275 | ビス（２－ヒドロキシエチル）テレフタレートの精製方法の製造方法 | 2024-05-14 |
| 13 | 特開2022-180796 | 活性エネルギー線硬化性組成物、硬化物及びフィルム | 2024-05-09 |
| 14 | 特開2023-002956 | 還元用焼成ペレットとその製造方法 | 2024-04-26 |
| 15 | 特開2023-043988 | 水処理システムおよび水処理方法 | 2024-04-22 |
| 16 | 特開2022-102729 | 金属基材の表面処理方法、および表面処理装置 | 2024-04-18 |
| 17 | 特開2021-080378 | デンプン汚れ固着防止剤 | 2024-04-09 |
| 18 | 特許7554451 | 再生骨材生成システム及び再生骨材生成方法 | 2024-04-01 |
| 19 | 特開2023-051699 | 廃リチウムイオン電池からリチウムを回収する方法 | 2024-03-26 |
| 20 | 特開2023-051703 | 廃リチウムイオン電池からリチウムを回収する方法 | 2024-03-26 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Protested
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 125 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.3. The most protest patent is 特開2021-091202 "ガスバリアフィルム" (7 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許6783111 "地盤改良装置" (5 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特開2021-091202 | ガスバリアフィルム | 7 times |
| 2 | 特許6783111 | 地盤改良装置 | 5 times |
| 3 | 特許7068665 | 二軸延伸ポリプロピレンフィルム、金属化フィルム、及び、コンデンサ | 3 times |
| 4 | 特許6846107 | 乳脂肪含有固形物およびその製造方法 | 3 times |
| 5 | 特開2021-175387 | 大豆たん白を含有する容器包装詰加圧加熱殺菌食品、及びその製造方法 | 3 times |
Inspectioned cases
List of latest Inspectioned patents
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 102 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.4 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2024-104139 "構造体の接着方法、複合構造体、及び接着剤組成物" (Inspection day 2024-09-12) , next is 特開2024-076742 "金属回収装置、金属回収方法、元素分析装置、及び元素分析方法" (Inspection day 2024-09-12) .
| - | No. | Title | Inspection days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特開2024-104139 | 構造体の接着方法、複合構造体、及び接着剤組成物 | 2024-09-12 |
| 2 | 特開2024-076742 | 金属回収装置、金属回収方法、元素分析装置、及び元素分析方法 | 2024-09-12 |
| 3 | 特許7167084 | 異常検出システム、異常検出方法、異常検出プログラム及び学習済モデル生成方法 | 2024-09-06 |
| 4 | 特表2022-522968 | オレフィン合成における再生可能エネルギーの使用 | 2024-08-22 |
| 5 | 特開2022-099080 | 畦塗り機 | 2024-07-31 |
| 6 | 特表2023-531165 | 金属基材に接合した前処理組成物及びその製造方法 | 2024-07-23 |
| 7 | 特表2023-521429 | 湿った細粒を含む様々な供給源からの廃棄プラスチックのケミカルリサイクル | 2024-07-19 |
| 8 | 特表2023-533326 | 高品質の炭化ケイ素種結晶、炭化ケイ素結晶、炭化ケイ素基板およびそれらの製造方法 | 2024-07-17 |
| 9 | 特許7573574 | 粒状酸化マグネシウム | 2024-07-16 |
| 10 | 特表2020-530863 | 化石ベースの供給原料との共粉砕によるバイオマスの処理方法 | 2024-07-10 |
| 11 | 特開2023-126860 | 改良されたドロス原料 | 2024-07-01 |
| 12 | 特表2023-514331 | 改善された耐食性及び接合性能のためのアルミニウム合金微細構造の制御 | 2024-07-01 |
| 13 | 特開2022-103990 | ソース、ソースの製造方法、及び植物性タンパク臭のマスキング方法 | 2024-06-25 |
| 14 | 特表2022-545090 | テレフタレートポリマーを再利用可能な原材料に解重合するための方法及び反応器システム | 2024-06-20 |
| 15 | 特表2023-507275 | ビス（２－ヒドロキシエチル）テレフタレートの精製方法の製造方法 | 2024-06-18 |
| 16 | 特開2021-091202 | ガスバリアフィルム | 2024-06-18 |
| 17 | 特開2021-175387 | 大豆たん白を含有する容器包装詰加圧加熱殺菌食品、及びその製造方法 | 2024-05-24 |
| 18 | 特許7498564 | 急性骨髄性白血病治療のための抗－ＣＤ７０抗体ＡＲＧＸ－１１０の使用 | 2024-05-22 |
| 19 | 特開2022-180796 | 活性エネルギー線硬化性組成物、硬化物及びフィルム | 2024-05-14 |
| 20 | 特開2023-002956 | 還元用焼成ペレットとその製造方法 | 2024-05-07 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Inspectioned
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 194 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.3. The most inspection patent is 特開2021-091202 "ガスバリアフィルム" (6 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特開2018-018354 "ディープラーニングを用いた飲食品の品質予測方法及び飲食品" (4 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特開2021-091202 | ガスバリアフィルム | 6 times |
| 2 | 特開2018-018354 | ディープラーニングを用いた飲食品の品質予測方法及び飲食品 | 4 times |
| 3 | 特開2022-103990 | ソース、ソースの製造方法、及び植物性タンパク臭のマスキング方法 | 4 times |
| 4 | 特許6783111 | 地盤改良装置 | 4 times |
| 5 | 特許6846107 | 乳脂肪含有固形物およびその製造方法 | 4 times |
Cited cases
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Cited
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 2,209 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.7. The most cited patent is 特許6522488 "ワークの取り出し動作を学習する機械学習装置、ロボットシステムおよび機械学習方法" (71 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許7075611 "情報処理装置、プログラム及び情報処理方法" (39 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6522488 | ワークの取り出し動作を学習する機械学習装置、ロボットシステムおよび機械学習方法 | 71 times |
| 2 | 特許7075611 | 情報処理装置、プログラム及び情報処理方法 | 39 times |
| 3 | 特許7057951 | 冷間圧延の前処理用組成物及び冷間圧延方法 | 36 times |
| 4 | 特許7148264 | タイヤ内面用離型剤、タイヤ内面用離型剤水分散液、タイヤ内面用離型剤の製造方法、タイヤの製造方法およびタイヤ | 35 times |
| 5 | 特許6631278 | ドライバプログラム、及びドライバプログラムとプリンタとのセット | 34 times |
Providing patent information to the media (newspapers, magazines, etc.)
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
About this Site
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
Please note the following points for use.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
Citation of patent application status and ranking information
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Graphs are image data.
Please note that the various graphs are image data, but we cannot provide them in text data.Scope of coverage for each goal/target
- Based on the description of each goal and target of the SDGs, we have set the scope of technologies to be covered based on our and e-Patent's past experience, etc. (in some cases, the search is based on social issues themselves). Therefore, please note that there is a possibility that this "SDGs Global Company Ranking from Patent Perspective" may not cover 100%.
- A population search formula is clearly indicated for each goal/target (database: Patent Integration). You may use the population search formula as it is, or you may improve it by yourself.
- This search covers patents and utility models, including both published and registered patents (design and design patents are excluded). The unit of count is the number of applications, not the number of patent families.
About the name collation and name control of applicants and right holders
- Company rankings are based on the results calculated by "Patent Integration", with Japanese organizations in Japanese and other companies in English (some are in Japanese).
- Company names may be the names of the companies at the time of application, but the results calculated by Patent Integration are used as is. Company names are used as they were at the time of application.
- Because of the fluctuation in the names of companies (i.e., applicant/right holder names in the patent information), there are cases where the same company appears more than once in the top 10. The number of applications filed by the same company in the top 10 is the total number of applications filed by the company.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
Our Commitment to Safety and Security
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to providing high-quality patent information based on the latest patent data on more than 45 million cases collected from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publication. 
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. collects the patent data from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publications to provide it widely in the form of reports so that anyone can check patent information and patent trends with confidence. 
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to various efforts to enhance the reliability of the information and to allow users to search patent information with confidence.