The Technical Field "伸び" had 787 patent application filings in the most recent period (2022-01-01 to 2022-09-30). This is a significantly decreased of -229 filings (-22.5%) over 1,016 they had in the same period of the previous year (2021-01-01 to 2021-09-30). This report also includes technical terms related to " 延び ", " 引っ張り伸び ", " 引っ張り延び ", " 引っ張伸び ", " 引っ張延び ", " 引張り伸び ", " 引張り延び ", " 引張伸び ", " 引張延び " in the search set.
The highest number of filings in 2017 with 1,900 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 925 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 7,598 cases in total) is 1,266, and the median is 1,440. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1,266 patents |
Std Dev | 601 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 925 cases | -31.0 % |
2021 year | 1,341 cases | -12.92 % |
2020 year | 1,540 cases | -15.43 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 伸び for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-05-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 伸び, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of 伸び over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 14,816 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 伸び are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, JFEスチール株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 28 cases, followed by 住友ゴム工業株式会社 with 18 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
JFEスチール株式会社 | 28 cases |
住友ゴム工業株式会社 | 18 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 16 cases |
本田技研工業株式会社 | 13 cases |
横浜ゴム株式会社 | 9 cases |
日本製鉄株式会社 | 7 cases |
株式会社ブリヂストン | 7 cases |
株式会社神戸製鋼所 | 4 cases |
住友電気工業株式会社 | 3 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 2 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, JFEスチール株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 317 cases, followed by 住友電気工業株式会社 with 249 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
JFEスチール株式会社 | 317 cases |
住友電気工業株式会社 | 249 cases |
日本製鉄株式会社 | 240 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 230 cases |
横浜ゴム株式会社 | 208 cases |
住友ゴム工業株式会社 | 206 cases |
本田技研工業株式会社 | 132 cases |
株式会社ブリヂストン | 106 cases |
株式会社神戸製鋼所 | 98 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 63 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 30 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 伸び are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Among the top coapplicants, JFEスチール株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 28 cases, followed by トヨタ自動車株式会社 with 16 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
JFEスチール株式会社 | 28 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 16 cases |
本田技研工業株式会社 | 13 cases |
日本製鉄株式会社 | 7 cases |
株式会社ブリヂストン | 7 cases |
住友電気工業株式会社 | 3 cases |
Among the top coapplicants, JFEスチール株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 317 cases, followed by 住友電気工業株式会社 with 249 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
JFEスチール株式会社 | 317 cases |
住友電気工業株式会社 | 249 cases |
日本製鉄株式会社 | 240 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 230 cases |
本田技研工業株式会社 | 132 cases |
株式会社ブリヂストン | 106 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 30 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 伸び’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 伸び’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
伸び filed 317 joint applications with JFEスチール株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 149 cases in total) is 24.8, and the median is 27.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2015 with 64 cases, and their lowest number in 2018 with 22 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 24.8 patents |
Std Dev | 10.1 |
COV | 0.4 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 23 cases | -25.81 % |
2021 year | 31 cases | -8.82 % |
2020 year | 34 cases | 0 |
伸び filed 240 joint applications with 日本製鉄株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 95 cases in total) is 15.8, and the median is 16.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2016 with 49 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 7 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 15.8 patents |
Std Dev | 10.3 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 7 cases | -50.0 % |
2021 year | 14 cases | -22.22 % |
2020 year | 18 cases | -35.7 % |
伸び filed 230 joint applications with トヨタ自動車株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 123 cases in total) is 20.5, and the median is 18.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2018 with 39 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 16 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 20.5 patents |
Std Dev | 12.5 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 16 cases | -20.00 % |
2021 year | 20 cases | +25.00 % |
2020 year | 16 cases | -50.0 % |
伸び filed 249 joint applications with 住友電気工業株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 92 cases in total) is 15.3, and the median is 16.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.7, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2016 with 43 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 3 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 15.3 patents |
Std Dev | 11.0 |
COV | 0.7 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 3 cases | -80.0 % |
2021 year | 15 cases | -16.67 % |
2020 year | 18 cases | -40.0 % |
伸び filed 106 joint applications with 株式会社ブリヂストン for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 45 cases in total) is 7.5, and the median is 5.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.8, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2017 with 18 cases, and their lowest number in 2020 with 3 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 7.5 patents |
Std Dev | 6.1 |
COV | 0.8 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 7 cases | -50.0 % |
2021 year | 14 cases | +367 % |
2020 year | 3 cases | -25.00 % |
The following shows JP patents held by 伸び that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 伸び’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 伸び is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2021-06-01 ~ 2024-05-31), there were 2 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 1.0 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許6889970 "土木工事用不織布およびその製造方法" (Invalidation Trial day 2022-07-08) , next is 特許6707274 "パワーコンディショナ" (Invalidation Trial day 2022-03-11) .
- | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6889970 | 土木工事用不織布およびその製造方法 | 2022-07-08 |
2 | 特許6707274 | パワーコンディショナ | 2022-03-11 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-06-01 to 2024-05-31), 2 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.0. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6889970 "土木工事用不織布およびその製造方法" (1 times) , and the next most invalidation trial patent is 特許6707274 "パワーコンディショナ" (1 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6889970 | 土木工事用不織布およびその製造方法 | 1 times |
2 | 特許6707274 | パワーコンディショナ | 1 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-06-01 ~ 2024-05-31), there were 59 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7351360 "保護フィルム" (Opposition day 2024-02-29) , next is 特許7317437 "注入支援システム及び方法、並びにプログラム" (Opposition day 2024-01-30) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7351360 | 保護フィルム | 2024-02-29 |
2 | 特許7317437 | 注入支援システム及び方法、並びにプログラム | 2024-01-30 |
3 | 特許7306542 | 樹脂組成物、半導体用配線層積層体及び半導体装置 | 2023-12-27 |
4 | 特許7294803 | ストレッチ布帛およびその繊維製品 | 2023-12-18 |
5 | 特許7287583 | 空気入りタイヤ | 2023-12-06 |
6 | 特許7273615 | 管接続部材撤去装置および管接続部材撤去方法 | 2023-11-07 |
7 | 特許7259907 | 樹脂組成物、半導体用配線層積層体及び半導体装置 | 2023-10-05 |
8 | 特許7256148 | 膜分離活性汚泥処理用半透膜用支持体及びその製造方法 | 2023-10-05 |
9 | 特許7262172 | 高Mnオーステナイト系ステンレス鋼 | 2023-10-05 |
10 | 特許7240388 | 熱可塑性粉末組成物及びそのような組成物の3D印刷により製造された強化三次元物体 | 2023-09-15 |
In the last 3 years (2021-06-01 ~ 2024-05-31), there were 152 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.4 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2021-067363 "ダイヤフラムの製造方法、バルブ用ダイヤフラム及びこれを備えるダイヤフラムバルブ" (Protest day 2024-04-16) , next is 特開2022-120926 "活性エネルギー線硬化性組成物、硬化物、積層体" (Protest day 2024-04-01) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2021-067363 | ダイヤフラムの製造方法、バルブ用ダイヤフラム及びこれを備えるダイヤフラムバルブ | 2024-04-16 |
2 | 特開2022-120926 | 活性エネルギー線硬化性組成物、硬化物、積層体 | 2024-04-01 |
3 | 特開2022-050246 | 液体金属脆化感受性の評価方法 | 2024-03-27 |
4 | 特開2022-130776 | 乳化化粧料 | 2024-03-19 |
5 | 特開2021-191827 | 接着剤、及び接着体 | 2024-03-18 |
6 | 特許7477444 | 発泡耐火シート | 2024-02-22 |
7 | 特開2023-096145 | 包装用紙 | 2024-02-20 |
8 | 特開2023-184450 | ポリエステルフィルムおよびそれを含むフォルダブルディスプレイ装置 | 2024-02-13 |
9 | 特開2023-013250 | 無機薄膜層形成用の積層フィルム | 2024-02-09 |
10 | 特開2022-176949 | リサイクルされたアルミニウムスクラップの鋳造 | 2024-01-15 |
11 | 特開2023-054045 | 積層体 | 2023-12-26 |
12 | 特開2023-109890 | 顔料、化粧料、インキ、塗料、トナー、及び成形物 | 2023-12-08 |
13 | 特表2023-513579 | 組換えシルク固体及びフィルム | 2023-12-07 |
14 | 特表2022-537190 | 高強度冷間圧延鋼ストリップを熱処理する方法 | 2023-12-07 |
15 | 特表2022-537037 | 冷間圧延鋼ストリップを熱処理する方法 | 2023-12-07 |
16 | 特開2023-096150 | 包装用紙 | 2023-12-05 |
17 | 特開2021-000626 | 被膜形成方法 | 2023-12-04 |
18 | 特開2021-000627 | 被膜形成方法 | 2023-12-04 |
19 | 特開2021-000628 | 被膜形成方法 | 2023-12-04 |
20 | 特開2022-108117 | 予測装置、学習装置、予測プログラム、及び学習プログラム | 2023-11-06 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-06-01 to 2024-05-31), 316 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.4. The most protest patent is 特許6810528 "ライセンスプレート用グラフィックフィルム及びライセンスプレート、並びにそれらの製造方法" (7 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許7394178 "保持装置" (6 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6810528 | ライセンスプレート用グラフィックフィルム及びライセンスプレート、並びにそれらの製造方法 | 7 times |
2 | 特許7394178 | 保持装置 | 6 times |
3 | 特許7179460 | ホース用樹脂材料、ホース管及びホース | 5 times |
4 | 特許6662041 | インク組成物および画像又は三次元造形物形成方法 | 5 times |
5 | 特許7240805 | ポリアミド樹脂組成物およびその成形体 | 5 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-06-01 ~ 2024-05-31), there were 180 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.9 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2022-120926 "活性エネルギー線硬化性組成物、硬化物、積層体" (Inspection day 2024-04-09) , next is 特開2021-191827 "接着剤、及び接着体" (Inspection day 2024-04-08) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2022-120926 | 活性エネルギー線硬化性組成物、硬化物、積層体 | 2024-04-09 |
2 | 特開2021-191827 | 接着剤、及び接着体 | 2024-04-08 |
3 | 特開2022-050246 | 液体金属脆化感受性の評価方法 | 2024-04-05 |
4 | 特表2020-534926 | 容器並びに結合及び形成方法 | 2024-03-11 |
5 | 特開2020-186503 | ポリエステル複合仮撚糸、ストレッチ性織編物、およびこれらの製造方法 | 2024-02-27 |
6 | 特開2022-176949 | リサイクルされたアルミニウムスクラップの鋳造 | 2024-02-14 |
7 | 特開2023-052333 | 容器並びに結合及び形成方法 | 2024-02-13 |
8 | 特許7382058 | 固形粉末化粧料の製造方法 | 2024-02-05 |
9 | 特開2023-109890 | 顔料、化粧料、インキ、塗料、トナー、及び成形物 | 2024-01-09 |
10 | 特開2022-130776 | 乳化化粧料 | 2024-01-05 |
11 | 特表2020-521552 | 非らせんカット配列を有する微細加工医療デバイス | 2024-01-05 |
12 | 特開2023-013250 | 無機薄膜層形成用の積層フィルム | 2023-12-26 |
13 | 特表2023-513579 | 組換えシルク固体及びフィルム | 2023-12-12 |
14 | 特表2022-537190 | 高強度冷間圧延鋼ストリップを熱処理する方法 | 2023-12-12 |
15 | 特表2022-537037 | 冷間圧延鋼ストリップを熱処理する方法 | 2023-12-12 |
16 | 特開2021-000626 | 被膜形成方法 | 2023-12-07 |
17 | 特開2021-000627 | 被膜形成方法 | 2023-12-06 |
18 | 特開2021-000628 | 被膜形成方法 | 2023-12-06 |
19 | 特開2022-108117 | 予測装置、学習装置、予測プログラム、及び学習プログラム | 2023-11-30 |
20 | 特開2022-191275 | 透明硬質熱可塑性ポリウレタンの製造方法 | 2023-11-28 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-06-01 to 2024-05-31), 369 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.6. The most inspection patent is 特表2020-534926 "容器並びに結合及び形成方法" (12 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許6662041 "インク組成物および画像又は三次元造形物形成方法" (9 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特表2020-534926 | 容器並びに結合及び形成方法 | 12 times |
2 | 特許6662041 | インク組成物および画像又は三次元造形物形成方法 | 9 times |
3 | 特許6909447 | 静電チャック | 8 times |
4 | 特許6754933 | フレキシブル液晶パネルに適応可能な液晶シール剤 | 8 times |
5 | 特許6810528 | ライセンスプレート用グラフィックフィルム及びライセンスプレート、並びにそれらの製造方法 | 8 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-06-01 to 2024-05-31), 3,338 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.5. The most cited patent is 特許7059702 "タイヤ用ゴム組成物及び空気入りタイヤ" (97 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6496705 "抄紙シート及び抄紙シートの製造方法" (37 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7059702 | タイヤ用ゴム組成物及び空気入りタイヤ | 97 times |
2 | 特許6496705 | 抄紙シート及び抄紙シートの製造方法 | 37 times |
3 | 特許6691141 | 多層構造及びそれを含む物品 | 36 times |
4 | 特許6751284 | 肌触りの良い伸縮複合材料 | 36 times |
5 | 特許7011043 | 電池、電池パック、蓄電装置、車両及び飛翔体 | 33 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International