The Technical Field "ダンパ" had 63 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-02-28). This is a significantly decreased of -22 filings (-25.9%) over 85 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-02-28). This report also includes technical terms related to " ダンパユニット ", " ダンパー ", " ダンパーユニット ", " ダンパー器 ", " ダンパー装置 ", " ダンパ器 ", " ダンパ装置 ", " 制振器 ", " 吸振器 " in the search set.
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 1,112 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 570 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 3,995 cases in total) is 666, and the median is 674. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 666 patents |
Std Dev | 269 |
COV | 0.4 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 570 cases | -10.66 % |
2021 year | 638 cases | -10.01 % |
2020 year | 709 cases | -18.32 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for ダンパ for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-10-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of ダンパ, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of ダンパ over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 8,144 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as ダンパ are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, トヨタ自動車株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 38 cases, followed by 三菱電機株式会社 with 15 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 38 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 15 cases |
三菱重工業株式会社 | 13 cases |
カヤバ株式会社 | 12 cases |
本田技研工業株式会社 | 11 cases |
清水建設株式会社 | 9 cases |
株式会社デンソー | 7 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 3 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 3 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, トヨタ自動車株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 216 cases, followed by 本田技研工業株式会社 with 202 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 216 cases |
本田技研工業株式会社 | 202 cases |
カヤバ株式会社 | 165 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 157 cases |
三菱重工業株式会社 | 88 cases |
清水建設株式会社 | 86 cases |
株式会社デンソー | 66 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 38 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 21 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 18 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as ダンパ are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Among the top coapplicants, トヨタ自動車株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 38 cases, followed by 三菱電機株式会社 with 15 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 38 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 15 cases |
三菱重工業株式会社 | 13 cases |
本田技研工業株式会社 | 11 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 3 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 3 cases |
Among the top coapplicants, トヨタ自動車株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 216 cases, followed by 本田技研工業株式会社 with 202 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 216 cases |
本田技研工業株式会社 | 202 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 157 cases |
三菱重工業株式会社 | 88 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 38 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 21 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 18 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by ダンパ’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by ダンパ’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
ダンパ filed 157 joint applications with 三菱電機株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 84 cases in total) is 14.0, and the median is 15.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2014 with 23 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 10 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 14.0 patents |
Std Dev | 5.2 |
COV | 0.4 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 10 cases | -52.4 % |
2021 year | 21 cases | +31.2 % |
2020 year | 16 cases | +6.67 % |
ダンパ filed 202 joint applications with 本田技研工業株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 84 cases in total) is 14.0, and the median is 14.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2014 with 41 cases, and their lowest number in 2020 with 8 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 14.0 patents |
Std Dev | 8.2 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 9 cases | -57.1 % |
2021 year | 21 cases | +162 % |
2020 year | 8 cases | -57.9 % |
ダンパ filed 88 joint applications with 三菱重工業株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 60 cases in total) is 10.0, and the median is 9.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.3, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2019 with 15 cases, and their lowest number in 2016 with 2 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 10.0 patents |
Std Dev | 3.5 |
COV | 0.3 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 9 cases | -30.8 % |
2021 year | 13 cases | +44.4 % |
2020 year | 9 cases | -40.0 % |
ダンパ filed 18 joint applications with パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 10 years (2013 to 2023, 23 cases in total) is 2.1, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.5, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2017 with 9 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 2.1 patents |
Std Dev | 3.2 |
COV | 1.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2017 year | 9 cases | +28.57 % |
2016 year | 7 cases | - |
2015 year | 0 cases | -100 % |
ダンパ filed 216 joint applications with トヨタ自動車株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 120 cases in total) is 20.0, and the median is 20.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 35 cases, and their lowest number in 2019 with 14 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 20.0 patents |
Std Dev | 8.9 |
COV | 0.4 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 33 cases | +65.0 % |
2021 year | 20 cases | -25.93 % |
2020 year | 27 cases | +92.9 % |
The following shows JP patents held by ダンパ that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and ダンパ’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which ダンパ is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 1 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 1.0 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許5667716 "弾塑性履歴型ダンパ" (Invalidation Trial day 2022-03-25) .
- | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許5667716 | 弾塑性履歴型ダンパ | 2022-03-25 |
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 2 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7154328 "制振建物" (Opposition day 2023-01-20) , next is 特許6923732 "振動アクチュエータ" (Opposition day 2022-02-24) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7154328 | 制振建物 | 2023-01-20 |
2 | 特許6923732 | 振動アクチュエータ | 2022-02-24 |
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 11 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.2 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2022-190573 "ヒンジ並びにこのヒンジを用いた事務機器" (Protest day 2024-08-09) , next is 特開2023-110295 "制震装置" (Protest day 2024-05-17) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2022-190573 | ヒンジ並びにこのヒンジを用いた事務機器 | 2024-08-09 |
2 | 特開2023-110295 | 制震装置 | 2024-05-17 |
3 | 特開2023-182118 | 原子炉システム | 2024-05-09 |
4 | 特許7559138 | 降雪装置、人工気象室及び降雪方法 | 2023-08-28 |
5 | 特開2020-165630 | 露点温度調節用除湿装置 | 2023-01-23 |
6 | 特許7264420 | ヒンジ | 2023-01-04 |
7 | 特開2022-082463 | 画像読取装置 | 2022-11-25 |
8 | 特許7191315 | 茶葉の乾燥装置及び乾燥方法 | 2022-06-09 |
9 | 特許7142248 | 空気調和機 | 2022-06-06 |
10 | 特許7118183 | 金属ダイアフラム、金属ダンパ、及びこれらを備えた燃料ポンプ | 2022-05-27 |
11 | 特許7208311 | 振動アクチュエータ | 2022-02-07 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 36 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.2. The most protest patent is 特許7246128 "シート積重装置、カウンタエゼクタ、製函機" (3 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許6310026 "燃料の圧力脈動低減機構、及びそれを備えた内燃機関の高圧燃料供給ポンプ" (2 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7246128 | シート積重装置、カウンタエゼクタ、製函機 | 3 times |
2 | 特許6310026 | 燃料の圧力脈動低減機構、及びそれを備えた内燃機関の高圧燃料供給ポンプ | 2 times |
3 | 特許6694672 | 制振装置及びこれを備えた建物 | 2 times |
4 | 特許7118183 | 金属ダイアフラム、金属ダンパ、及びこれらを備えた燃料ポンプ | 2 times |
5 | 特開2015-120939 | 熱可塑性樹脂組成物及び成形品 | 2 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 24 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.1 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2023-110295 "制震装置" (Inspection day 2024-08-28) , next is 特開2022-190573 "ヒンジ並びにこのヒンジを用いた事務機器" (Inspection day 2024-08-19) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2023-110295 | 制震装置 | 2024-08-28 |
2 | 特開2022-190573 | ヒンジ並びにこのヒンジを用いた事務機器 | 2024-08-19 |
3 | 特開2023-182118 | 原子炉システム | 2024-05-22 |
4 | 特許5902405 | エレベータ装置 | 2024-03-26 |
5 | 特開2022-087013 | 振動ダンパを備える測定装置及び測定装置を振動から保護する方法 | 2023-09-14 |
6 | 特許7559138 | 降雪装置、人工気象室及び降雪方法 | 2023-09-05 |
7 | 特許6698490 | 冷却ユニット | 2023-06-16 |
8 | 特開2020-165630 | 露点温度調節用除湿装置 | 2023-02-03 |
9 | 特許7264420 | ヒンジ | 2023-01-24 |
10 | 特開2022-082463 | 画像読取装置 | 2022-12-27 |
11 | 特表2022-528978 | 個人化された口腔ケアのためのシステムおよび方法 | 2022-10-25 |
12 | 特許7574156 | ダンパー用アッパーマウント、およびサスペンション装置 | 2022-09-08 |
13 | 特開2023-069345 | 懸架装置 | 2022-09-08 |
14 | 特許7574154 | ダンパー用アッパーマウント、およびサスペンション装置 | 2022-09-08 |
15 | 特許7574155 | ダンパー用アッパーマウント、およびサスペンション装置 | 2022-09-08 |
16 | 特許7108211 | 回転往復駆動アクチュエータ | 2022-08-05 |
17 | 特許7142248 | 空気調和機 | 2022-06-29 |
18 | 特許7118183 | 金属ダイアフラム、金属ダンパ、及びこれらを備えた燃料ポンプ | 2022-06-27 |
19 | 特許7208311 | 振動アクチュエータ | 2022-03-10 |
20 | 特許7388987 | 冷蔵庫 | 2022-02-21 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 57 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.2. The most inspection patent is 特許7246128 "シート積重装置、カウンタエゼクタ、製函機" (6 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許6310026 "燃料の圧力脈動低減機構、及びそれを備えた内燃機関の高圧燃料供給ポンプ" (2 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7246128 | シート積重装置、カウンタエゼクタ、製函機 | 6 times |
2 | 特許6310026 | 燃料の圧力脈動低減機構、及びそれを備えた内燃機関の高圧燃料供給ポンプ | 2 times |
3 | 特許7118183 | 金属ダイアフラム、金属ダンパ、及びこれらを備えた燃料ポンプ | 2 times |
4 | 特開2015-120939 | 熱可塑性樹脂組成物及び成形品 | 2 times |
5 | 特許7559138 | 降雪装置、人工気象室及び降雪方法 | 2 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 1,643 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.4. The most cited patent is 特許6312612 "動吸振器" (52 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許7306155 "車両用動力伝達装置" (41 times) .
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International