スクリーン (JP Patent Analysis Report)
The Technical Field "スクリーン" had 496 patent application filings in the most recent period (2022-01-01 to 2022-08-31). This is a significantly decreased of -286 filings (-36.6%) over 782 they had in the same period of the previous year (2021-01-01 to 2021-08-31).
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 2,486 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 616 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 6,768 cases in total) is 1,128, and the median is 1,260. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 1,128 patents |
| Std Dev | 616 |
| COV | 0.5 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 616 cases | -46.0 % |
| 2021 year | 1,140 cases | -17.33 % |
| 2020 year | 1,379 cases | -13.05 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for スクリーン for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-04-30). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of スクリーン, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
- Table of Contents
- Foreign Patent Analysis Report
- Patent Filing Summary for スクリーン
- Search Set (Search Formula/Analysis Patents)
- Related Patent Analysis Report
- Competitors Information
- Top company Information
- • Information on Important Patents
- Provision of patent information to the media
- About this Site
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
Introduction
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
スクリーン, Changes in the Number of JP Patents/Patent Applications
The changes in the number of patent filings of スクリーン over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
Search Set (Analysis Patents)
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 16,064 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
スクリーン
Related Patent Analysis Report
A patent aanlysis report on the following synonyms was found in the technical term "スクリーン".
- スクリーン (Main page / Including the following synonyms)
Same industry / competition company information (JP)
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as スクリーン are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024).
Comparing the number of applications of each company, キヤノン株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 14 cases, followed by 大日本印刷株式会社 with 5 cases.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2014 to 2024).
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 大日本印刷株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 276 cases, followed by キヤノン株式会社 with 238 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| 大日本印刷株式会社 | 276 cases |
| キヤノン株式会社 | 238 cases |
| セイコーエプソン株式会社 | 216 cases |
| 株式会社リコー | 201 cases |
| 三菱電機株式会社 | 113 cases |
| コーニンクレッカフィリップスエヌヴェ | 109 cases |
| ソニーグループ株式会社 | 83 cases |
| 株式会社東芝 | 42 cases |
| 株式会社日立製作所 | 23 cases |
| パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 7 cases |
Same industry / competition company, Change in the Number of JP Patents
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
Top company information (JP)
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as スクリーン are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024).
Among the top coapplicants, キヤノン株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 14 cases, followed by 大日本印刷株式会社 with 5 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| キヤノン株式会社 | 14 cases |
| 大日本印刷株式会社 | 5 cases |
| 株式会社日立製作所 | 4 cases |
| セイコーエプソン株式会社 | 3 cases |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2014 to 2024).
Among the top coapplicants, 大日本印刷株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 276 cases, followed by キヤノン株式会社 with 238 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| 大日本印刷株式会社 | 276 cases |
| キヤノン株式会社 | 238 cases |
| セイコーエプソン株式会社 | 216 cases |
| ソニーグループ株式会社 | 83 cases |
| 株式会社東芝 | 42 cases |
| 株式会社日立製作所 | 23 cases |
| パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 7 cases |
Top company, Change in the Number of JP Patents
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by スクリーン’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by スクリーン’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Top company Details (JP)
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with パナソニックホールディングス株式会社
スクリーン filed 7 joint applications with パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 3 cases in total) is 0.5, and the median is 0.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.0, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2015 with 2 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 0.5 patents |
| Std Dev | 0.5 |
| COV | 1.0 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 year | 1 cases | 0 |
| 2019 year | 1 cases | 0 |
| 2018 year | 1 cases | - |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with セイコーエプソン株式会社
スクリーン filed 216 joint applications with セイコーエプソン株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 62 cases in total) is 10.3, and the median is 13.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2015 with 54 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 3 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 10.3 patents |
| Std Dev | 6.6 |
| COV | 0.6 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 3 cases | -81.2 % |
| 2021 year | 16 cases | -5.88 % |
| 2020 year | 17 cases | +54.5 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 株式会社東芝
スクリーン filed 42 joint applications with 株式会社東芝 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 7 cases in total) is 1.2, and the median is 0.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.5, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 19 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 1.2 patents |
| Std Dev | 1.8 |
| COV | 1.5 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 year | 1 cases | 0 |
| 2020 year | 1 cases | - |
| 2019 year | 0 cases | -100 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with ソニーグループ株式会社
スクリーン filed 83 joint applications with ソニーグループ株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 36 cases in total) is 6.0, and the median is 3.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.1, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2019 with 16 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 6.0 patents |
| Std Dev | 6.4 |
| COV | 1.1 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2021 year | 1 cases | -83.3 % |
| 2020 year | 6 cases | -62.5 % |
| 2019 year | 16 cases | +23.08 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with キヤノン株式会社
スクリーン filed 238 joint applications with キヤノン株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 76 cases in total) is 12.7, and the median is 10.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.7, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been increasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 51 cases, and their lowest number in 2020 with 7 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 12.7 patents |
| Std Dev | 8.8 |
| COV | 0.7 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 13 cases | +62.5 % |
| 2021 year | 8 cases | +14.29 % |
| 2020 year | 7 cases | -63.2 % |
Information on important patents (JP)
The following shows JP patents held by スクリーン that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and スクリーン’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which スクリーン is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
Glossary
- Cited
- Indicates that the patent/patent application has been cited (by Examiners) in notices of reasons for rejection in the examination process of other (Japanese, U.S., or European) patent applications. The higher the number of citations, the more important the patent/patent application is considered to be.
- Request for invalidation trial
- Indicates that a third party has requested a procedure to invalidate the patent. It is likely to affect the business of third parties and is considered to be of high importance.
- Opposition
- Indicates that a third party has filed a petition with the Patent Office to hear the validity of the patent again. Like the trial for invalidation, it is considered to be of high importance.
- Information provision
- Indicates that a third party has provided the Patent Office with useful information for examination for the patent filed. It is usually considered to be of high importance because it is done to prevent the patent from being granted.
- Browsing request
- Indicates that a third party has requested the Patent Office to view the patent bag (a set of documents exchanged between the Patent Office and the applicant). The bag is often checked prior to trial for invalidation, opposition, and provision of information, and is considered to be a highly important patent.
Invalidationed Trial cases
List of latest Invalidationed Trial patents
In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 1 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 3.0 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許4192197 "メタルマスク及びその製造方法" (Invalidation Trial day 2022-02-14) .
| - | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許4192197 | メタルマスク及びその製造方法 | 2022-02-14 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Invalidationed Trial
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-05-01 to 2024-04-30), 3 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.0. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6386646 "移動通信端末機の活性化時に，特定動作が行われるようにするための方法，システム及び移動通信端末機" (1 times) , and the next most invalidation trial patent is 特許6235754 "移動通信端末機の活性化時に，特定動作が行われるようにするための方法，システム及び移動通信端末機" (1 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6386646 | 移動通信端末機の活性化時に，特定動作が行われるようにするための方法，システム及び移動通信端末機 | 1 times |
| 2 | 特許6235754 | 移動通信端末機の活性化時に，特定動作が行われるようにするための方法，システム及び移動通信端末機 | 1 times |
| 3 | 特許6280283 | 移動通信端末機の活性化時に，特定動作が行われるようにするための方法，システム及び移動通信端末機 | 1 times |
Oppositioned cases
List of latest Oppositioned patents
In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 15 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7333098 "廃電池からの有価金属回収方法" (Opposition day 2023-11-08) , next is 特許7243888 "セラミックス基板、セラミックス分割基板、及びセラミックス基板の製造方法" (Opposition day 2023-09-05) .
| - | No. | Title | Opposition days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許7333098 | 廃電池からの有価金属回収方法 | 2023-11-08 |
| 2 | 特許7243888 | セラミックス基板、セラミックス分割基板、及びセラミックス基板の製造方法 | 2023-09-05 |
| 3 | 特許7227688 | プリーツスクリーン | 2023-08-08 |
| 4 | 特許7197514 | 非晶質シリカ粉末およびその製造方法、用途 | 2023-06-26 |
| 5 | 特許7193526 | 浴室環境で使用するバイオモニタリング・デバイス、方法、及びシステム | 2023-06-20 |
| 6 | 特許7118394 | スクリーンマスクの製造方法 | 2023-02-15 |
| 7 | 特許7101491 | ロールスクリーン | 2023-01-11 |
| 8 | 特許7088165 | ヘテロファジックプロピレン重合材料及びプロピレン系樹脂組成物 | 2022-12-21 |
| 9 | 特許7065767 | 非フッ素化表面効果コーティングに用いる疎水性エクステンダー | 2022-11-10 |
| 10 | 特許6997562 | 遮蔽装置 | 2022-07-13 |
Protested cases
List of latest Protested patents
In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 58 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.3 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2022-024818 "再生骨材生成システム及び再生骨材生成方法" (Protest day 2024-04-01) , next is 特開2021-169577 "セルロース繊維乾燥体及びその製造方法、並びに樹脂複合体の製造方法" (Protest day 2024-01-31) .
| - | No. | Title | Protest days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特開2022-024818 | 再生骨材生成システム及び再生骨材生成方法 | 2024-04-01 |
| 2 | 特開2021-169577 | セルロース繊維乾燥体及びその製造方法、並びに樹脂複合体の製造方法 | 2024-01-31 |
| 3 | 特開2022-125778 | 汚泥脱水機、汚泥処理設備、汚泥脱水方法 | 2023-12-26 |
| 4 | 特開2023-027387 | 遮蔽装置 | 2023-11-30 |
| 5 | 特開2023-085265 | 低粒子含有量をもつ調合物 | 2023-10-31 |
| 6 | 特表2021-521284 | 電子デバイスで使用するためのポリマー | 2023-10-27 |
| 7 | 特許6033824 | マルチタッチ端末のためのタッチ制御方法及び装置 | 2023-10-12 |
| 8 | 特開2022-162927 | 乾式分離装置及び乾式分離方法 | 2023-09-29 |
| 9 | 特開2020-164781 | フッ素樹脂及びその製造方法 | 2023-09-11 |
| 10 | 特許7477216 | バッテリから材料を回収するためのプロセス、装置、およびシステム | 2023-08-24 |
| 11 | 特開2022-012974 | 廃棄物処理システム及び廃棄物処理方法 | 2023-08-04 |
| 12 | 特表2022-505606 | 耐疲労性を向上させた、フラットガラス繊維（Ｂ）を含有するポリアミド組成物 | 2023-07-04 |
| 13 | 特許7197514 | 非晶質シリカ粉末およびその製造方法、用途 | 2022-11-14 |
| 14 | 特許7335614 | スクリーンマスク、スクリーンマスクの製造方法及び印刷物の製造方法 | 2022-10-28 |
| 15 | 特許7386514 | スクリーン印刷版 | 2022-10-27 |
| 16 | 特許7454762 | スクリーン印刷装置およびスクリーン印刷方法 | 2022-08-25 |
| 17 | 特開2021-037718 | スクリーンマスク及びスクリーンマスクの製造方法 | 2022-08-11 |
| 18 | 特開2022-033904 | 高強度の超薄ガラスおよびその製造方法 | 2022-08-08 |
| 19 | 特許7346874 | 微細繊維状セルロース含有分散液の製造方法及び微細繊維状セルロース含有シートの製造方法 | 2022-07-04 |
| 20 | 特表2021-523870 | 耐衝撃性を有する超薄ガラス | 2022-06-22 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Protested
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-05-01 to 2024-04-30), 137 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.4. The most protest patent is 特許6522378 "ドームスクリーン投映施設" (4 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許7036507 "アクリルポリビニルアセタールグラフィックフィルム" (4 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6522378 | ドームスクリーン投映施設 | 4 times |
| 2 | 特許7036507 | アクリルポリビニルアセタールグラフィックフィルム | 4 times |
| 3 | 特開2017-188482 | タッチスクリーンパネル用導電粒子、およびこれを含む導電材料 | 4 times |
| 4 | 特許5987878 | レーザーエッチング加工用導電性ペースト、電気回路およびタッチパネル | 4 times |
| 5 | 特許6783995 | 硬化性樹脂組成物 | 4 times |
Inspectioned cases
List of latest Inspectioned patents
In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 84 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.3 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2022-024818 "再生骨材生成システム及び再生骨材生成方法" (Inspection day 2024-04-16) , next is 特許5593381 "照明制御デバイス" (Inspection day 2024-03-08) .
| - | No. | Title | Inspection days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特開2022-024818 | 再生骨材生成システム及び再生骨材生成方法 | 2024-04-16 |
| 2 | 特許5593381 | 照明制御デバイス | 2024-03-08 |
| 3 | 特開2021-169577 | セルロース繊維乾燥体及びその製造方法、並びに樹脂複合体の製造方法 | 2024-02-21 |
| 4 | 特表2022-551292 | タンデムなビジョン窓およびメディア表示装置 | 2024-02-14 |
| 5 | 特開2022-125778 | 汚泥脱水機、汚泥処理設備、汚泥脱水方法 | 2024-01-25 |
| 6 | 特許7342026 | 画素配列構造、表示パネル及び表示装置 | 2023-11-24 |
| 7 | 再公表2010/100807 | 液晶ブラインド装置とその使用方法 | 2023-11-16 |
| 8 | 特許6955127 | 六方晶窒化ホウ素粉末及びその製造方法 | 2023-11-16 |
| 9 | 特開2023-085265 | 低粒子含有量をもつ調合物 | 2023-11-09 |
| 10 | 特表2021-521284 | 電子デバイスで使用するためのポリマー | 2023-11-07 |
| 11 | 特開2020-164781 | フッ素樹脂及びその製造方法 | 2023-10-03 |
| 12 | 特許7477216 | バッテリから材料を回収するためのプロセス、装置、およびシステム | 2023-09-20 |
| 13 | 特開2021-130262 | レーザー発色性カード | 2023-09-14 |
| 14 | 特許6778341 | 超音波画像観賞システム、プログラムおよび超音波画像提供方法 | 2023-09-13 |
| 15 | 特開2022-012974 | 廃棄物処理システム及び廃棄物処理方法 | 2023-08-31 |
| 16 | 特開2022-015180 | 貼り替え防止用ラベルおよびその読み取り判定方法 | 2023-07-20 |
| 17 | 特許6442002 | 廃棄合成樹脂の再生方法 | 2023-06-16 |
| 18 | 特表2020-534805 | 農業施設に設置可能な太陽光発電プラント | 2023-06-02 |
| 19 | 特許7356965 | 流れ減衰装置 | 2023-05-09 |
| 20 | 特許7356464 | バックチャネル伝送を利用する車両機器制御の複雑性の軽減 | 2023-04-25 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Inspectioned
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-05-01 to 2024-04-30), 259 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.4. The most inspection patent is 特許6522378 "ドームスクリーン投映施設" (27 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許6509121 "歩留り剤およびそれを用いた紙の製造方法" (6 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6522378 | ドームスクリーン投映施設 | 27 times |
| 2 | 特許6509121 | 歩留り剤およびそれを用いた紙の製造方法 | 6 times |
| 3 | 特許6783995 | 硬化性樹脂組成物 | 6 times |
| 4 | 特許6619403 | 高圧力安定性、光透過性、および自己修復特性を伴う易滑性表面 | 5 times |
| 5 | 特許7064104 | 液肥生成システム | 4 times |
Cited cases
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Cited
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-05-01 to 2024-04-30), 3,821 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.7. The most cited patent is 特許6778739 "インテリジェントなデバイス識別" (94 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6291147 "ボイストリガに応答する競合デバイス" (76 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6778739 | インテリジェントなデバイス識別 | 94 times |
| 2 | 特許6291147 | ボイストリガに応答する競合デバイス | 76 times |
| 3 | 特許6513344 | 演出用ユニット及びこれを備えた遊技機 | 53 times |
| 4 | 特許6554703 | システム | 37 times |
| 5 | 特許5964929 | タッチスクリーンパネル一体型表示装置及びその駆動方法 | 35 times |
Providing patent information to the media (newspapers, magazines, etc.)
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
About this Site
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
Please note the following points for use.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
Citation of patent application status and ranking information
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Graphs are image data.
Please note that the various graphs are image data, but we cannot provide them in text data.Scope of coverage for each goal/target
- Based on the description of each goal and target of the SDGs, we have set the scope of technologies to be covered based on our and e-Patent's past experience, etc. (in some cases, the search is based on social issues themselves). Therefore, please note that there is a possibility that this "SDGs Global Company Ranking from Patent Perspective" may not cover 100%.
- A population search formula is clearly indicated for each goal/target (database: Patent Integration). You may use the population search formula as it is, or you may improve it by yourself.
- This search covers patents and utility models, including both published and registered patents (design and design patents are excluded). The unit of count is the number of applications, not the number of patent families.
About the name collation and name control of applicants and right holders
- Company rankings are based on the results calculated by "Patent Integration", with Japanese organizations in Japanese and other companies in English (some are in Japanese).
- Company names may be the names of the companies at the time of application, but the results calculated by Patent Integration are used as is. Company names are used as they were at the time of application.
- Because of the fluctuation in the names of companies (i.e., applicant/right holder names in the patent information), there are cases where the same company appears more than once in the top 10. The number of applications filed by the same company in the top 10 is the total number of applications filed by the company.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
Our Commitment to Safety and Security
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to providing high-quality patent information based on the latest patent data on more than 45 million cases collected from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publication. 
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. collects the patent data from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publications to provide it widely in the form of reports so that anyone can check patent information and patent trends with confidence. 
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to various efforts to enhance the reliability of the information and to allow users to search patent information with confidence.