コンテンツ (JP Patent Analysis Report)
The Technical Field "コンテンツ" had 518 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-04-30). This is a significantly decreased of -146 filings (-22.0%) over 664 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-04-30).
The highest number of filings in 2015 with 3,239 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 957 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 10,231 cases in total) is 1,705, and the median is 2,078. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 1,705 patents |
| Std Dev | 865 |
| COV | 0.5 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 year | 957 cases | -53.7 % |
| 2022 year | 2,068 cases | -0.91 % |
| 2021 year | 2,087 cases | -9.77 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for コンテンツ for the period of the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of コンテンツ, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
- Table of Contents
- Foreign Patent Analysis Report
- Patent Filing Summary for コンテンツ
- Search Set (Search Formula/Analysis Patents)
- Related Patent Analysis Report
- Competitors Information
- Top company Information
- • Information on Important Patents
- Provision of patent information to the media
- About this Site
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
Introduction
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
コンテンツ, Changes in the Number of JP Patents/Patent Applications
The changes in the number of patent filings of コンテンツ over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
Search Set (Analysis Patents)
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 22,484 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
コンテンツ
Related Patent Analysis Report
A patent aanlysis report on the following synonyms was found in the technical term "コンテンツ".
- コンテンツ (Main page / Including the following synonyms)
Same industry / competition company information (JP)
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as コンテンツ are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2023 to 2025).
Comparing the number of applications of each company, LINEヤフー株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2023 to 2025) with 88 cases, followed by キヤノン株式会社 with 42 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| LINEヤフー株式会社 | 88 cases |
| キヤノン株式会社 | 42 cases |
| シャープ株式会社 | 14 cases |
| 株式会社日立製作所 | 7 cases |
| 富士通株式会社 | 7 cases |
| 日本電気株式会社 | 6 cases |
| ソニーグループ株式会社 | 5 cases |
| 株式会社東芝 | 2 cases |
| パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 1 cases |
| 日本電信電話株式会社 | 1 cases |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2015 to 2025).
Comparing the number of applications of each company, LINEヤフー株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2015 to 2025) with 738 cases, followed by ソニーグループ株式会社 with 644 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| LINEヤフー株式会社 | 738 cases |
| ソニーグループ株式会社 | 644 cases |
| キヤノン株式会社 | 568 cases |
| シャープ株式会社 | 399 cases |
| 富士通株式会社 | 213 cases |
| 日本電信電話株式会社 | 178 cases |
| 日本電気株式会社 | 171 cases |
| 株式会社東芝 | 120 cases |
| 株式会社日立製作所 | 81 cases |
| コーニンクレッカフィリップスエヌヴェ | 56 cases |
| パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 22 cases |
Same industry / competition company, Change in the Number of JP Patents
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
Top company information (JP)
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as コンテンツ are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2023 to 2025).
Among the top coapplicants, キヤノン株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2023 to 2025) with 42 cases, followed by シャープ株式会社 with 14 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| キヤノン株式会社 | 42 cases |
| シャープ株式会社 | 14 cases |
| 日本電気株式会社 | 6 cases |
| ソニーグループ株式会社 | 5 cases |
| 株式会社東芝 | 2 cases |
| パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 1 cases |
| 日本電信電話株式会社 | 1 cases |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2015 to 2025).
Among the top coapplicants, ソニーグループ株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2015 to 2025) with 644 cases, followed by キヤノン株式会社 with 568 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| ソニーグループ株式会社 | 644 cases |
| キヤノン株式会社 | 568 cases |
| シャープ株式会社 | 399 cases |
| 日本電信電話株式会社 | 178 cases |
| 日本電気株式会社 | 171 cases |
| 株式会社東芝 | 120 cases |
| パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 22 cases |
Top company, Change in the Number of JP Patents
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by コンテンツ’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by コンテンツ’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Top company Details (JP)
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with ソニーグループ株式会社
コンテンツ filed 644 joint applications with ソニーグループ株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 169 cases in total) is 28.2, and the median is 20.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.9, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2015 with 142 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 5 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 28.2 patents |
| Std Dev | 25.0 |
| COV | 0.9 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 year | 5 cases | -73.7 % |
| 2022 year | 19 cases | -13.64 % |
| 2021 year | 22 cases | -60.0 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with パナソニックホールディングス株式会社
コンテンツ filed 22 joint applications with パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 3 cases in total) is 0.5, and the median is 0.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.0, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2017 with 8 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 0.5 patents |
| Std Dev | 0.5 |
| COV | 1.0 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 year | 1 cases | - |
| 2022 year | 0 cases | - |
| 2021 year | 0 cases | -100 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 株式会社東芝
コンテンツ filed 120 joint applications with 株式会社東芝 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 35 cases in total) is 5.8, and the median is 4.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.9, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2018 with 34 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 2 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 5.8 patents |
| Std Dev | 5.0 |
| COV | 0.9 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 year | 2 cases | -77.8 % |
| 2022 year | 9 cases | +200 % |
| 2021 year | 3 cases | -50.0 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with シャープ株式会社
コンテンツ filed 399 joint applications with シャープ株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 121 cases in total) is 20.2, and the median is 22.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2017 with 84 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 13 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 20.2 patents |
| Std Dev | 11.4 |
| COV | 0.6 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 year | 13 cases | -60.6 % |
| 2022 year | 33 cases | +120 % |
| 2021 year | 15 cases | -50.0 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with キヤノン株式会社
コンテンツ filed 568 joint applications with キヤノン株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 233 cases in total) is 38.8, and the median is 37.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2018 with 100 cases, and their lowest number in 2020 with 31 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 38.8 patents |
| Std Dev | 21.1 |
| COV | 0.5 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 year | 40 cases | -42.9 % |
| 2022 year | 70 cases | +100 % |
| 2021 year | 35 cases | +12.90 % |
Information on important patents (JP)
The following shows JP patents held by コンテンツ that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and コンテンツ’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which コンテンツ is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
Glossary
- Cited
- Indicates that the patent/patent application has been cited (by Examiners) in notices of reasons for rejection in the examination process of other (Japanese, U.S., or European) patent applications. The higher the number of citations, the more important the patent/patent application is considered to be.
- Request for invalidation trial
- Indicates that a third party has requested a procedure to invalidate the patent. It is likely to affect the business of third parties and is considered to be of high importance.
- Opposition
- Indicates that a third party has filed a petition with the Patent Office to hear the validity of the patent again. Like the trial for invalidation, it is considered to be of high importance.
- Information provision
- Indicates that a third party has provided the Patent Office with useful information for examination for the patent filed. It is usually considered to be of high importance because it is done to prevent the patent from being granted.
- Browsing request
- Indicates that a third party has requested the Patent Office to view the patent bag (a set of documents exchanged between the Patent Office and the applicant). The bag is often checked prior to trial for invalidation, opposition, and provision of information, and is considered to be a highly important patent.
Invalidationed Trial cases
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Invalidationed Trial
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 3 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.0. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6386646 "移動通信端末機の活性化時に，特定動作が行われるようにするための方法，システム及び移動通信端末機" (1 times) , and the next most invalidation trial patent is 特許6235754 "移動通信端末機の活性化時に，特定動作が行われるようにするための方法，システム及び移動通信端末機" (1 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6386646 | 移動通信端末機の活性化時に，特定動作が行われるようにするための方法，システム及び移動通信端末機 | 1 times |
| 2 | 特許6235754 | 移動通信端末機の活性化時に，特定動作が行われるようにするための方法，システム及び移動通信端末機 | 1 times |
| 3 | 特許6280283 | 移動通信端末機の活性化時に，特定動作が行われるようにするための方法，システム及び移動通信端末機 | 1 times |
Oppositioned cases
List of latest Oppositioned patents
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 12 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7428134 "情報処理装置及び情報処理装置、並びに情報処理システム" (Opposition day 2024-08-02) , next is 特許7361667 "行動変容のための認知的刺激を生成する装置、モデル及び刺激情報生成・提示方法" (Opposition day 2024-04-10) .
| - | No. | Title | Opposition days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許7428134 | 情報処理装置及び情報処理装置、並びに情報処理システム | 2024-08-02 |
| 2 | 特許7361667 | 行動変容のための認知的刺激を生成する装置、モデル及び刺激情報生成・提示方法 | 2024-04-10 |
| 3 | 特許7265078 | コンテンツ配信装置及びコンテンツ配信方法 | 2023-10-20 |
| 4 | 特許7182765 | 月経に伴う身体的及び／又は精神的不快症状の改善システム | 2023-06-02 |
| 5 | 特許7174935 | 車両 | 2023-05-18 |
| 6 | 特許7121820 | グラフィカル・インディケータ | 2023-02-20 |
| 7 | 特許7121880 | コンピュータシステム及びサービス提供方法 | 2023-02-16 |
| 8 | 特許7089734 | 情報処理装置 | 2022-12-22 |
| 9 | 特許7042543 | 制御プログラム、制御装置および制御方法、ならびに、視聴質出力プログラム、視聴質出力装置および視聴質出力方法 | 2022-09-27 |
| 10 | 特許6976528 | 情報管理装置及びコンピュータプログラム | 2022-06-08 |
Protested cases
List of latest Protested patents
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 9 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.4 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2023-156880 "情報処理装置、情報処理方法及び情報処理プログラム" (Protest day 2024-11-28) , next is 特開2022-093187 "情報処理装置、情報処理方法及び情報処理プログラム" (Protest day 2024-09-09) .
| - | No. | Title | Protest days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特開2023-156880 | 情報処理装置、情報処理方法及び情報処理プログラム | 2024-11-28 |
| 2 | 特開2022-093187 | 情報処理装置、情報処理方法及び情報処理プログラム | 2024-09-09 |
| 3 | 特表2022-552395 | 再生可能な樹脂組成物およびこれにより製造された物品 | 2023-02-14 |
| 4 | 特許7242674 | 電子機器、電子機器を駆動する方法、及び、データ記録アプリケーションを制御する方法 | 2022-10-28 |
| 5 | 特許7320253 | 絵コンテ制作装置及びプログラム | 2022-09-29 |
| 6 | 特許7347944 | インターホンシステム | 2022-05-02 |
| 7 | 特許7347945 | サーバ装置 | 2022-05-02 |
| 8 | 特開2019-134494 | コンテンツの受信装置および配信装置 | 2022-03-03 |
| 9 | 特開2020-150565 | コンテンツの受信装置および配信装置 | 2022-03-03 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Protested
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 24 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.2. The most protest patent is 特許6522378 "ドームスクリーン投映施設" (4 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特開2019-134494 "コンテンツの受信装置および配信装置" (2 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6522378 | ドームスクリーン投映施設 | 4 times |
| 2 | 特開2019-134494 | コンテンツの受信装置および配信装置 | 2 times |
| 3 | 特許7242674 | 電子機器、電子機器を駆動する方法、及び、データ記録アプリケーションを制御する方法 | 2 times |
| 4 | 特許7347944 | インターホンシステム | 1 times |
| 5 | 特許6607589 | 情報提供システム及び情報提供方法 | 1 times |
Inspectioned cases
List of latest Inspectioned patents
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 217 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.2 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2023-156880 "情報処理装置、情報処理方法及び情報処理プログラム" (Inspection day 2024-12-24) , next is 特許7428850 "コンテンツ保護処理方法" (Inspection day 2024-12-04) .
| - | No. | Title | Inspection days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特開2023-156880 | 情報処理装置、情報処理方法及び情報処理プログラム | 2024-12-24 |
| 2 | 特許7428850 | コンテンツ保護処理方法 | 2024-12-04 |
| 3 | 特開2022-093187 | 情報処理装置、情報処理方法及び情報処理プログラム | 2024-12-04 |
| 4 | 特許7428851 | コンテンツ保護処理方法 | 2024-12-04 |
| 5 | 特許7395692 | コンテンツ保護処理方法 | 2024-12-04 |
| 6 | 特許6539389 | 送信装置、受信装置および限定受信システム | 2024-11-26 |
| 7 | 特許6596133 | 送信装置、受信装置および限定受信システム | 2024-11-26 |
| 8 | 特許6400992 | 送信装置、受信装置および限定受信システム | 2024-11-26 |
| 9 | 特許5233749 | 拠点サーバ装置、通信方法、通信制御プログラム、配信システム及び通信システム | 2024-09-13 |
| 10 | 特許7563793 | 制御プログラム、コンピュータ及び制御方法 | 2024-09-10 |
| 11 | 特許6310109 | 放送サービス再送信システムおよび視聴用携帯端末 | 2024-09-06 |
| 12 | 特許7147824 | 情報処理装置及びプログラム | 2024-09-04 |
| 13 | 特許7478316 | 受信装置、及び受信方法 | 2024-09-03 |
| 14 | 特許7457773 | コンテンツの保護方法 | 2024-08-15 |
| 15 | 特許7167266 | 受信装置 | 2024-08-15 |
| 16 | 特許7387852 | 受信装置 | 2024-08-15 |
| 17 | 特許7410107 | 受信方法、及び、受信装置 | 2024-08-09 |
| 18 | 特許7549581 | 最適なマルチコーデックＡＢＲラダー設計 | 2024-07-23 |
| 19 | 特開2024-146828 | 自律車両フィードバックシステム及び自律車両を動作させる方法 | 2024-07-18 |
| 20 | 特許7584393 | プログラム、視聴者端末、動画配信装置、表示制御方法、動画配信方法、および、システム | 2024-07-04 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Inspectioned
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 755 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.2. The most inspection patent is 特許6522378 "ドームスクリーン投映施設" (27 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許6974774 "遊戯用撮影装置" (5 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6522378 | ドームスクリーン投映施設 | 27 times |
| 2 | 特許6974774 | 遊戯用撮影装置 | 5 times |
| 3 | 特許6613392 | 音響再生装置 | 5 times |
| 4 | 特許6613429 | 映像音響再生装置 | 5 times |
| 5 | 特許6338720 | コンテンツ提供装置及びコンテンツ提供方法 | 5 times |
Cited cases
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Cited
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 5,796 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 3.0. The most cited patent is 特許6466565 "発語トリガを常時リッスンするための動的閾値" (107 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6535349 "以前の対話行為を使用する自然言語処理における文脈解釈" (94 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6466565 | 発語トリガを常時リッスンするための動的閾値 | 107 times |
| 2 | 特許6535349 | 以前の対話行為を使用する自然言語処理における文脈解釈 | 94 times |
| 3 | 特許6680793 | 導波路回折格子デバイス | 76 times |
| 4 | 特許6028118 | 共有フォルダを支援する統合ワークスペース | 67 times |
| 5 | 特許6416806 | コンテンツアイテムテンプレート | 64 times |
Providing patent information to the media (newspapers, magazines, etc.)
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
About this Site
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
Please note the following points for use.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
Citation of patent application status and ranking information
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Graphs are image data.
Please note that the various graphs are image data, but we cannot provide them in text data.Scope of coverage for each goal/target
- Based on the description of each goal and target of the SDGs, we have set the scope of technologies to be covered based on our and e-Patent's past experience, etc. (in some cases, the search is based on social issues themselves). Therefore, please note that there is a possibility that this "SDGs Global Company Ranking from Patent Perspective" may not cover 100%.
- A population search formula is clearly indicated for each goal/target (database: Patent Integration). You may use the population search formula as it is, or you may improve it by yourself.
- This search covers patents and utility models, including both published and registered patents (design and design patents are excluded). The unit of count is the number of applications, not the number of patent families.
About the name collation and name control of applicants and right holders
- Company rankings are based on the results calculated by "Patent Integration", with Japanese organizations in Japanese and other companies in English (some are in Japanese).
- Company names may be the names of the companies at the time of application, but the results calculated by Patent Integration are used as is. Company names are used as they were at the time of application.
- Because of the fluctuation in the names of companies (i.e., applicant/right holder names in the patent information), there are cases where the same company appears more than once in the top 10. The number of applications filed by the same company in the top 10 is the total number of applications filed by the company.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
Our Commitment to Safety and Security
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to providing high-quality patent information based on the latest patent data on more than 45 million cases collected from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publication. 
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. collects the patent data from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publications to provide it widely in the form of reports so that anyone can check patent information and patent trends with confidence. 
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to various efforts to enhance the reliability of the information and to allow users to search patent information with confidence.