The Technical Field "関節リウマチ" had 80 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-02-28). This is a significantly decreased of -93 filings (-53.8%) over 173 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-02-28). This report also includes technical terms related to " リウマチ性関節炎 ", " リウマチ関節症 ", " リューマチ性関節炎 ", " 慢性関節リウマチ ", " 慢性関節リューマチ ", " 関節リューマチ ", " RA " in the search set.
The highest number of filings in 2016 with 1,904 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 1,080 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 7,488 cases in total) is 1,248, and the median is 1,336. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1,248 patents |
Std Dev | 501 |
COV | 0.4 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 1,080 cases | -15.16 % |
2021 year | 1,273 cases | -9.01 % |
2020 year | 1,399 cases | -18.99 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 関節リウマチ for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-10-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 関節リウマチ, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of 関節リウマチ over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 14,773 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 関節リウマチ are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 東レ株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 26 cases, followed by キヤノン株式会社 with 24 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
東レ株式会社 | 26 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 24 cases |
JFEスチール株式会社 | 20 cases |
大日本印刷株式会社 | 13 cases |
富士フイルム株式会社 | 12 cases |
日本製鉄株式会社 | 11 cases |
株式会社リコー | 6 cases |
京セラ株式会社 | 5 cases |
コニカミノルタ株式会社 | 3 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 1 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 富士フイルム株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 370 cases, followed by 大日本印刷株式会社 with 225 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
富士フイルム株式会社 | 370 cases |
大日本印刷株式会社 | 225 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 208 cases |
日本製鉄株式会社 | 136 cases |
東レ株式会社 | 132 cases |
京セラ株式会社 | 111 cases |
コニカミノルタ株式会社 | 109 cases |
JFEスチール株式会社 | 91 cases |
株式会社リコー | 80 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 4 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 関節リウマチ are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Among the top coapplicants, 東レ株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 26 cases, followed by キヤノン株式会社 with 24 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
東レ株式会社 | 26 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 24 cases |
大日本印刷株式会社 | 13 cases |
富士フイルム株式会社 | 12 cases |
日本製鉄株式会社 | 11 cases |
株式会社リコー | 6 cases |
コニカミノルタ株式会社 | 3 cases |
Among the top coapplicants, 富士フイルム株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 370 cases, followed by 大日本印刷株式会社 with 225 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
富士フイルム株式会社 | 370 cases |
大日本印刷株式会社 | 225 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 208 cases |
日本製鉄株式会社 | 136 cases |
東レ株式会社 | 132 cases |
コニカミノルタ株式会社 | 109 cases |
株式会社リコー | 80 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 関節リウマチ’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 関節リウマチ’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
関節リウマチ filed 370 joint applications with 富士フイルム株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 175 cases in total) is 29.2, and the median is 27.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.7, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2019 with 66 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 10 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 29.2 patents |
Std Dev | 21.0 |
COV | 0.7 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 10 cases | -61.5 % |
2021 year | 26 cases | -38.1 % |
2020 year | 42 cases | -36.4 % |
関節リウマチ filed 208 joint applications with キヤノン株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 116 cases in total) is 19.3, and the median is 20.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2019 with 32 cases, and their lowest number in 2020 with 13 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 19.3 patents |
Std Dev | 8.4 |
COV | 0.4 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 17 cases | -29.17 % |
2021 year | 24 cases | +84.6 % |
2020 year | 13 cases | -59.4 % |
関節リウマチ filed 109 joint applications with コニカミノルタ株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 32 cases in total) is 5.3, and the median is 3.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.8, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2014 with 25 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 2 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 5.3 patents |
Std Dev | 4.2 |
COV | 0.8 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 2 cases | 0 |
2021 year | 2 cases | -60.0 % |
2020 year | 5 cases | -58.3 % |
関節リウマチ filed 132 joint applications with 東レ株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 87 cases in total) is 14.5, and the median is 16.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.21, and there have been small fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2018 with 18 cases, and their lowest number in 2014 with 5 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 14.5 patents |
Std Dev | 3.0 |
COV | 0.21 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 16 cases | +33.3 % |
2021 year | 12 cases | -25.00 % |
2020 year | 16 cases | 0 |
関節リウマチ filed 80 joint applications with 株式会社リコー for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 34 cases in total) is 5.7, and the median is 5.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2014 with 20 cases, and their lowest number in 2017 with 3 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 5.7 patents |
Std Dev | 3.3 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 5 cases | +25.00 % |
2021 year | 4 cases | -33.3 % |
2020 year | 6 cases | -50.0 % |
The following shows JP patents held by 関節リウマチ that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 関節リウマチ’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 関節リウマチ is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 3 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 1.0 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許4786866 "クロライドチャンネルオープナーとしてのプロスタグランジンアナログ" (Invalidation Trial day 2024-04-03) , next is 特許4332353 "15−ケト−プロスタグランジン類を含む薬物誘発性便秘処置用組成物" (Invalidation Trial day 2023-12-09) .
- | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許4786866 | クロライドチャンネルオープナーとしてのプロスタグランジンアナログ | 2024-04-03 |
2 | 特許4332353 | 15−ケト−プロスタグランジン類を含む薬物誘発性便秘処置用組成物 | 2023-12-09 |
3 | 特許5474043 | (+)−2−[1−(3−エトキシ−4−メトキシフェニル)−2−メチルスルホニルエチル]−4−アセチルアミノイソインドリン−1,3−ジオンを含む固形物形態、その組成物およびその使用 | 2023-05-31 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 2 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.0. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6074462 "抗−TNFα抗体の投与方法" (1 times) , and the next most invalidation trial patent is 特許6302529 "抗−TNFα抗体の投与方法" (1 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6074462 | 抗−TNFα抗体の投与方法 | 1 times |
2 | 特許6302529 | 抗−TNFα抗体の投与方法 | 1 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 47 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7436371 "発光装置" (Opposition day 2024-08-13) , next is 特許7420555 "セラミックス回路基板" (Opposition day 2024-07-18) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7436371 | 発光装置 | 2024-08-13 |
2 | 特許7420555 | セラミックス回路基板 | 2024-07-18 |
3 | 特許7391858 | ポリ硫酸化多糖類を用いた術後関節痛の処置 | 2024-05-24 |
4 | 特許7373671 | 耐食性、耐かじり性、加工性及び表面品質に優れためっき鋼板、及びその製造方法 | 2024-04-12 |
5 | 特許7358949 | 絶縁電線 | 2024-04-09 |
6 | 特許7355648 | 積層体および積層体の製造方法 | 2024-04-03 |
7 | 特許7357461 | ボールペンリフィル及びボールペン | 2024-03-14 |
8 | 特許7338768 | 化粧シート | 2024-03-05 |
9 | 特許7334624 | 積層体 | 2024-02-28 |
10 | 特許7315316 | 歯科用ミルブランクアセンブリ | 2024-01-25 |
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 84 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.5 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2023-033396 "樹脂発泡シート及び粘着テープ" (Protest day 2024-09-20) , next is 特開2023-133333 "ガラス板" (Protest day 2024-09-13) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2023-033396 | 樹脂発泡シート及び粘着テープ | 2024-09-20 |
2 | 特開2023-133333 | ガラス板 | 2024-09-13 |
3 | 特開2023-013587 | 保持装置 | 2024-09-13 |
4 | 特許7315316 | 歯科用ミルブランクアセンブリ | 2024-09-04 |
5 | 再公表2020/129863 | 接合方法および接合体 | 2024-09-03 |
6 | 特開2023-124219 | 機能性膜及び機能性膜の製造方法 | 2024-08-07 |
7 | 特表2024-508601 | 多層経口薄フィルム | 2024-07-26 |
8 | 特開2022-002894 | 記録媒体 | 2024-07-01 |
9 | 特開2023-104910 | 衛生陶器 | 2024-05-31 |
10 | 特開2023-104911 | 衛生陶器 | 2024-05-31 |
11 | 特許7538212 | ポリマーフィルムおよび通信用基板 | 2024-05-28 |
12 | 特開2022-078782 | 積層塗膜及び塗装物 | 2024-05-20 |
13 | 特開2022-078781 | 積層塗膜及び塗装物 | 2024-05-20 |
14 | 特許7513305 | 3次元培養された幹細胞から細胞外小胞体を製造する方法 | 2024-05-02 |
15 | 特開2022-059554 | PET容器及びその製造方法 | 2024-04-23 |
16 | 特開2023-171485 | 可搬型溶接ロボットの制御方法、及び溶接システム | 2024-04-23 |
17 | 特開2022-068330 | 金属基板およびこれを用いた蒸着用マスク | 2024-04-05 |
18 | 特表2023-523223 | ヘテロ環化合物、それを含む有機発光素子、その製造方法、および有機物層用組成物 | 2024-03-28 |
19 | 特開2020-169240 | 防霜用積層体、該積層体を備える熱交換器、及び防霜用コーティング剤 | 2024-03-14 |
20 | 特開2022-143400 | 換気装置及び換気方法 | 2024-03-08 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 181 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.3. The most protest patent is 再公表2020/129863 "接合方法および接合体" (6 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特開2020-169240 "防霜用積層体、該積層体を備える熱交換器、及び防霜用コーティング剤" (5 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 再公表2020/129863 | 接合方法および接合体 | 6 times |
2 | 特開2020-169240 | 防霜用積層体、該積層体を備える熱交換器、及び防霜用コーティング剤 | 5 times |
3 | 特許7234921 | 熱プレス積層体、および、熱プレス積層体の製造方法 | 4 times |
4 | 特許6906888 | ヒートシール性樹脂フィルムおよびその製造方法、積層体、包装材料、ならびに成形ロール | 4 times |
5 | 特許7237828 | エポキシ樹脂組成物、電子部品実装構造体およびその製造方法 | 3 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 195 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.7 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2023-133333 "ガラス板" (Inspection day 2024-09-24) , next is 特表2024-524458 "トランスグルタミナーゼの阻害剤" (Inspection day 2024-09-19) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2023-133333 | ガラス板 | 2024-09-24 |
2 | 特表2024-524458 | トランスグルタミナーゼの阻害剤 | 2024-09-19 |
3 | 再公表2020/129863 | 接合方法および接合体 | 2024-09-10 |
4 | 特開2023-124219 | 機能性膜及び機能性膜の製造方法 | 2024-09-05 |
5 | 特許7460333 | 化粧シート及び化粧シートの製造方法 | 2024-09-04 |
6 | 特許7555346 | 疾患の治療のためのロイシン、アセチルロイシン、及び関連類似体 | 2024-08-30 |
7 | 特開2022-141699 | 疼痛を治療するためのKV3チャネルのモジュレーター | 2024-08-30 |
8 | 特表2023-518552 | LNP023の結晶形態 | 2024-08-27 |
9 | 特表2023-548848 | ループスを処置するための方法および組成物 | 2024-08-14 |
10 | 特許7538212 | ポリマーフィルムおよび通信用基板 | 2024-08-09 |
11 | 特開2022-002894 | 記録媒体 | 2024-07-29 |
12 | 特許7509690 | 結晶化インジウムスズ複合酸化物膜、透明導電性フィルムおよびその製造方法 | 2024-07-25 |
13 | 特開2022-078782 | 積層塗膜及び塗装物 | 2024-07-19 |
14 | 特開2022-078781 | 積層塗膜及び塗装物 | 2024-07-19 |
15 | 特開2022-084946 | 様々な疾患および障害の治療のためにMASP-1および/またはMASP-2および/またはMASP-3を阻害する組成物および方法 | 2024-07-11 |
16 | 特表2021-500413 | 一部の肉腫の治療に使用するためのIL−8阻害薬 | 2024-07-09 |
17 | 特開2022-069555 | オキシステロールおよびその使用方法 | 2024-07-03 |
18 | 特開2024-000505 | PTX3の発現制御剤;関節リウマチ、自己免疫疾患に伴う血管炎または皮膚硬化の予防薬または治療薬、あるいはそれらの改善方法 | 2024-07-02 |
19 | 特表2024-528427 | ヒトインターロイキン-2変異体およびその使用 | 2024-07-01 |
20 | 特開2022-110130 | 新規の阻害剤 | 2024-06-27 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 418 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.4. The most inspection patent is 再公表2020/129863 "接合方法および接合体" (11 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許6906888 "ヒートシール性樹脂フィルムおよびその製造方法、積層体、包装材料、ならびに成形ロール" (9 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 再公表2020/129863 | 接合方法および接合体 | 11 times |
2 | 特許6906888 | ヒートシール性樹脂フィルムおよびその製造方法、積層体、包装材料、ならびに成形ロール | 9 times |
3 | 特許7287060 | セラミックスボール | 8 times |
4 | 特開2020-169240 | 防霜用積層体、該積層体を備える熱交換器、及び防霜用コーティング剤 | 7 times |
5 | 特許7247585 | 二軸配向熱可塑性樹脂フィルム | 6 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 2,868 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.8. The most cited patent is 特許6318108 "磁気テープ" (64 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6378166 "磁気テープおよびその製造方法" (62 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6318108 | 磁気テープ | 64 times |
2 | 特許6378166 | 磁気テープおよびその製造方法 | 62 times |
3 | 特許6556101 | 磁気テープおよび磁気テープ装置 | 61 times |
4 | 特許6549528 | 磁気テープおよび磁気テープ装置 | 59 times |
5 | 特許6316248 | 磁気テープおよびその製造方法 | 44 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International