The Technical Field "金属板" had 526 patent application filings in the most recent period (2022-01-01 to 2022-08-31). This is a with an decreasing trend transition of -109 filings (-17.2%) over 635 they had in the same period of the previous year (2021-01-01 to 2021-08-31). This report also includes technical terms related to " メタルシート ", " メタルプレート ", " 金属シート ", " 金属プレート " in the search set.
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 1,620 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 686 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 5,497 cases in total) is 916, and the median is 1,039. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 916 patents |
Std Dev | 438 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 686 cases | -27.87 % |
2021 year | 951 cases | -15.62 % |
2020 year | 1,127 cases | -12.09 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 金属板 for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-04-30). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 金属板, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of 金属板 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 11,723 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 金属板 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, JFEスチール株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 54 cases, followed by トヨタ自動車株式会社 with 26 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
JFEスチール株式会社 | 54 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 26 cases |
日本製鉄株式会社 | 13 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 12 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 11 cases |
アルプスアルパイン株式会社 | 4 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 1 cases |
パナソニック株式会社 | 1 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 日本製鉄株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 374 cases, followed by JFEスチール株式会社 with 330 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
日本製鉄株式会社 | 374 cases |
JFEスチール株式会社 | 330 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 319 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 263 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 138 cases |
アルプスアルパイン株式会社 | 81 cases |
三洋電機株式会社 | 51 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 30 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 18 cases |
パナソニック株式会社 | 1 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 金属板 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Among the top coapplicants, JFEスチール株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 54 cases, followed by 日本製鉄株式会社 with 13 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
JFEスチール株式会社 | 54 cases |
日本製鉄株式会社 | 13 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 12 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 11 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 1 cases |
Among the top coapplicants, 日本製鉄株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 374 cases, followed by JFEスチール株式会社 with 330 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
日本製鉄株式会社 | 374 cases |
JFEスチール株式会社 | 330 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 263 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 138 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 30 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 18 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 金属板’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 金属板’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
金属板 filed 18 joint applications with パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 10 cases in total) is 1.7, and the median is 1.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.0, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2017 with 7 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1.7 patents |
Std Dev | 1.7 |
COV | 1.0 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2021 year | 2 cases | -60.0 % |
2020 year | 5 cases | +400 % |
2019 year | 1 cases | -50.0 % |
金属板 filed 138 joint applications with 株式会社東芝 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 62 cases in total) is 10.3, and the median is 12.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2016 with 27 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 4 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 10.3 patents |
Std Dev | 6.3 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 11 cases | +175 % |
2021 year | 4 cases | -71.4 % |
2020 year | 14 cases | -17.65 % |
金属板 filed 263 joint applications with 三菱電機株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 125 cases in total) is 20.8, and the median is 24.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2015 with 44 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 12 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 20.8 patents |
Std Dev | 11.5 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 12 cases | -47.8 % |
2021 year | 23 cases | -28.12 % |
2020 year | 32 cases | 0 |
金属板 filed 374 joint applications with 日本製鉄株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 168 cases in total) is 28.0, and the median is 31.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2017 with 56 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 10 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 28.0 patents |
Std Dev | 17.2 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 10 cases | -56.5 % |
2021 year | 23 cases | -41.0 % |
2020 year | 39 cases | -18.75 % |
金属板 filed 30 joint applications with 株式会社日立製作所 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 9 cases in total) is 1.5, and the median is 1.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.1, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2014 with 8 cases, and their lowest number in 2020 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1.5 patents |
Std Dev | 1.7 |
COV | 1.1 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 1 cases | -50.0 % |
2021 year | 2 cases | - |
2020 year | 0 cases | -100 % |
The following shows JP patents held by 金属板 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 金属板’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 金属板 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 2 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 1.5 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許5396145 "ディスク装置用フレキシャ" (Invalidation Trial day 2022-11-25) , next is 特許6145236 "LED照明装置" (Invalidation Trial day 2022-08-10) .
- | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許5396145 | ディスク装置用フレキシャ | 2022-11-25 |
2 | 特許6145236 | LED照明装置 | 2022-08-10 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-05-01 to 2024-04-30), 1 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 2.0. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6145236 "LED照明装置" (2 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6145236 | LED照明装置 | 2 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 47 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7410566 "容器" (Opposition day 2024-01-31) , next is 特許7317816 "金属板の巻回体、巻回体を備える梱包体、巻回体の梱包方法、巻回体の保管方法、巻回体の金属板を用いた蒸着マスクの製造方法及び金属板" (Opposition day 2024-01-30) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7410566 | 容器 | 2024-01-31 |
2 | 特許7317816 | 金属板の巻回体、巻回体を備える梱包体、巻回体の梱包方法、巻回体の保管方法、巻回体の金属板を用いた蒸着マスクの製造方法及び金属板 | 2024-01-30 |
3 | 特許7304167 | 絶縁シートの製造方法、金属ベース回路基板の製造方法、及び絶縁シート | 2024-01-05 |
4 | 特許7304107 | 送信機、送信機群、システム | 2023-12-28 |
5 | 特許7295266 | オフセット値補償方法 | 2023-12-19 |
6 | 特許7280991 | 電気化学セル | 2023-11-08 |
7 | 特許7354402 | 溶接方法および溶接装置 | 2023-11-07 |
8 | 特許7354401 | 溶接方法および溶接装置 | 2023-11-07 |
9 | 特許7269443 | 溶接方法および溶接装置 | 2023-11-07 |
10 | 特許7354400 | 溶接方法および溶接装置 | 2023-11-07 |
In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 60 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.3 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特許7476535 "蒸着マスク、蒸着マスクの製造方法、および、表示装置の製造方法" (Protest day 2024-02-29) , next is 特開2023-047918 "トンネル掘削機およびトンネル掘削機の製造方法" (Protest day 2024-02-20) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7476535 | 蒸着マスク、蒸着マスクの製造方法、および、表示装置の製造方法 | 2024-02-29 |
2 | 特開2023-047918 | トンネル掘削機およびトンネル掘削機の製造方法 | 2024-02-20 |
3 | 特開2023-084025 | 二次電池 | 2024-02-06 |
4 | 特開2023-084066 | 二次電池 | 2024-02-06 |
5 | 特開2022-076198 | 化粧板 | 2024-01-30 |
6 | 特開2022-058493 | 蒸着用マスク及びこれを用いたOLEDパネル | 2024-01-29 |
7 | 特開2023-077210 | 重ね合わせブランク及びその成形方法 | 2024-01-19 |
8 | 特開2022-084172 | 缶用塗料、缶用被覆金属板 | 2023-12-22 |
9 | 特開2022-078567 | 表面処理金属板 | 2023-12-12 |
10 | 特開2022-048749 | ブレーカ | 2023-12-04 |
11 | 特開2022-083864 | 電気機器収納用箱体 | 2023-11-22 |
12 | 特許7427709 | 鉄骨部材の耐火被覆構造 | 2023-11-21 |
13 | 特開2023-093447 | 導電性部材、セル、セルスタック装置、モジュール及びモジュール収容装置 | 2023-10-23 |
14 | 特開2022-063355 | コネクタ及び電子機器 | 2023-09-29 |
15 | 特許7378202 | 建築物外装材用ポリ塩化ビニル被覆金属板 | 2023-08-17 |
16 | 特開2022-068330 | 金属基板およびこれを用いた蒸着用マスク | 2023-08-02 |
17 | 特開2023-006147 | 耐火部材、防火構造 | 2023-07-12 |
18 | 特開2023-041676 | 溶接方法およびレーザ溶接システム | 2023-07-04 |
19 | 特開2023-029489 | 溶接方法およびレーザ溶接システム | 2023-07-04 |
20 | 特開2023-026556 | 溶接方法およびレーザ溶接システム | 2023-07-04 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-05-01 to 2024-04-30), 132 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.3. The most protest patent is 特許7476535 "蒸着マスク、蒸着マスクの製造方法、および、表示装置の製造方法" (4 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許7378202 "建築物外装材用ポリ塩化ビニル被覆金属板" (4 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7476535 | 蒸着マスク、蒸着マスクの製造方法、および、表示装置の製造方法 | 4 times |
2 | 特許7378202 | 建築物外装材用ポリ塩化ビニル被覆金属板 | 4 times |
3 | 特許6455855 | 水性金属表面処理剤 | 4 times |
4 | 特許6466874 | 化粧建築板の製造方法 | 3 times |
5 | 特許6160841 | 照明装置 | 3 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 65 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.3 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2023-084025 "二次電池" (Inspection day 2024-03-14) , next is 特開2023-084066 "二次電池" (Inspection day 2024-03-14) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2023-084025 | 二次電池 | 2024-03-14 |
2 | 特開2023-084066 | 二次電池 | 2024-03-14 |
3 | 特許7432034 | 喫煙具用カートリッジとその製造方法 | 2024-03-13 |
4 | 特開2023-077210 | 重ね合わせブランク及びその成形方法 | 2024-02-16 |
5 | 特開2022-078567 | 表面処理金属板 | 2024-01-23 |
6 | 特開2022-048749 | ブレーカ | 2024-01-04 |
7 | 特開2022-084172 | 缶用塗料、缶用被覆金属板 | 2023-12-26 |
8 | 特開2022-083864 | 電気機器収納用箱体 | 2023-12-14 |
9 | 特許7427709 | 鉄骨部材の耐火被覆構造 | 2023-12-06 |
10 | 特開2023-093447 | 導電性部材、セル、セルスタック装置、モジュール及びモジュール収容装置 | 2023-11-17 |
11 | 特開2022-063355 | コネクタ及び電子機器 | 2023-10-26 |
12 | 特開2023-029489 | 溶接方法およびレーザ溶接システム | 2023-09-04 |
13 | 特開2023-041676 | 溶接方法およびレーザ溶接システム | 2023-08-02 |
14 | 特開2023-026556 | 溶接方法およびレーザ溶接システム | 2023-08-02 |
15 | 特開2022-095262 | メタルカード | 2023-07-31 |
16 | 特開2023-006147 | 耐火部材、防火構造 | 2023-07-21 |
17 | 特許7269434 | 溶接方法およびレーザ溶接システム | 2023-07-19 |
18 | 特開2022-184079 | ビス及び固定構造 | 2023-06-27 |
19 | 特許7299652 | 静電容量センサ | 2023-06-20 |
20 | 特開2020-111765 | 金属板の親水化処理剤及びこれを用いた親水化処理方法 | 2023-06-14 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-05-01 to 2024-04-30), 180 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.3. The most inspection patent is 特許6751284 "肌触りの良い伸縮複合材料" (6 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許6302367 "コーティング剤" (5 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6751284 | 肌触りの良い伸縮複合材料 | 6 times |
2 | 特許6302367 | コーティング剤 | 5 times |
3 | 特許6047139 | 内張断熱パネル | 5 times |
4 | 特許7170629 | 焼結体、基板、回路基板、および焼結体の製造方法 | 4 times |
5 | 特許7378202 | 建築物外装材用ポリ塩化ビニル被覆金属板 | 4 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-05-01 to 2024-04-30), 2,652 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.4. The most cited patent is 特許7185009 "細胞トランスフェクションのエレクトロポレーション装置及び方法" (39 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6617274 "蛍光体ホイール装置、蛍光体ホイール装置収納筐体、および投写型映像表示装置" (37 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7185009 | 細胞トランスフェクションのエレクトロポレーション装置及び方法 | 39 times |
2 | 特許6617274 | 蛍光体ホイール装置、蛍光体ホイール装置収納筐体、および投写型映像表示装置 | 37 times |
3 | 特許6751284 | 肌触りの良い伸縮複合材料 | 35 times |
4 | 特許5641462 | 金属板、金属板の製造方法、および金属板を用いてマスクを製造する方法 | 34 times |
5 | 特許6603981 | 液体吐出ヘッド、液体吐出装置、及び画像形成装置 | 29 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International