選別 (JP Patent Analysis Report)
The Technical Field "選別" had 64 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-02-28). This is a significantly decreased of -16 filings (-20.0%) over 80 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-02-28).
The highest number of filings in 2017 with 855 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 565 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 3,871 cases in total) is 645, and the median is 744. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.3, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 645 patents |
| Std Dev | 205 |
| COV | 0.3 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 565 cases | -22.50 % |
| 2021 year | 729 cases | -6.90 % |
| 2020 year | 783 cases | -3.57 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 選別 for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-10-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 選別, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
Introduction
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
選別, Changes in the Number of JP Patents/Patent Applications
The changes in the number of patent filings of 選別 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
Search Set (Analysis Patents)
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 7,092 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
選別
Related Patent Analysis Report
A patent aanlysis report on the following synonyms was found in the technical term "選別".
- 選別 (Main page / Including the following synonyms)
Same industry / competition company information (JP)
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 選別 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024).
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 株式会社クボタ has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 20 cases, followed by 井関農機株式会社 with 19 cases.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2014 to 2024).
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 井関農機株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 322 cases, followed by 株式会社クボタ with 172 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| 井関農機株式会社 | 322 cases |
| 株式会社クボタ | 172 cases |
| 三菱電機株式会社 | 81 cases |
| ヤンマーパワーテクノロジー株式会社 | 81 cases |
| 株式会社日立製作所 | 56 cases |
| 日本電気株式会社 | 51 cases |
| 株式会社東芝 | 34 cases |
| ソニーグループ株式会社 | 10 cases |
| パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 3 cases |
Same industry / competition company, Change in the Number of JP Patents
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
Top company information (JP)
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 選別 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024).
Among the top coapplicants, 株式会社クボタ has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 20 cases, followed by 井関農機株式会社 with 19 cases.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2014 to 2024).
Among the top coapplicants, 井関農機株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 322 cases, followed by 株式会社クボタ with 172 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| 井関農機株式会社 | 322 cases |
| 株式会社クボタ | 172 cases |
| 三菱電機株式会社 | 81 cases |
| 株式会社日立製作所 | 56 cases |
| 日本電気株式会社 | 51 cases |
| ソニーグループ株式会社 | 10 cases |
| パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 3 cases |
Top company, Change in the Number of JP Patents
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 選別’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 選別’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Top company Details (JP)
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 井関農機株式会社
選別 filed 322 joint applications with 井関農機株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 146 cases in total) is 24.3, and the median is 23.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2017 with 64 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 16 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 24.3 patents |
| Std Dev | 13.4 |
| COV | 0.5 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 16 cases | -20.00 % |
| 2021 year | 20 cases | -52.4 % |
| 2020 year | 42 cases | +61.5 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 株式会社クボタ
選別 filed 172 joint applications with 株式会社クボタ for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 120 cases in total) is 20.0, and the median is 21.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2020 with 36 cases, and their lowest number in 2015 with 10 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 20.0 patents |
| Std Dev | 11.6 |
| COV | 0.6 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 20 cases | +66.7 % |
| 2021 year | 12 cases | -66.7 % |
| 2020 year | 36 cases | +24.14 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 日本電気株式会社
選別 filed 51 joint applications with 日本電気株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 19 cases in total) is 3.2, and the median is 3.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2014 with 12 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 2 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 3.2 patents |
| Std Dev | 1.3 |
| COV | 0.4 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 3 cases | +50.0 % |
| 2021 year | 2 cases | -50.0 % |
| 2020 year | 4 cases | 0 |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 三菱電機株式会社
選別 filed 81 joint applications with 三菱電機株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 43 cases in total) is 7.2, and the median is 7.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.3, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 11 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 7 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 7.2 patents |
| Std Dev | 2.2 |
| COV | 0.3 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 7 cases | 0 |
| 2021 year | 7 cases | 0 |
| 2020 year | 7 cases | -30.0 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 株式会社日立製作所
選別 filed 56 joint applications with 株式会社日立製作所 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 38 cases in total) is 6.3, and the median is 6.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2020 with 11 cases, and their lowest number in 2015 with 2 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 6.3 patents |
| Std Dev | 3.0 |
| COV | 0.5 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 9 cases | +28.57 % |
| 2021 year | 7 cases | -36.4 % |
| 2020 year | 11 cases | +175 % |
Information on important patents (JP)
The following shows JP patents held by 選別 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 選別’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 選別 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
Glossary
- Cited
- Indicates that the patent/patent application has been cited (by Examiners) in notices of reasons for rejection in the examination process of other (Japanese, U.S., or European) patent applications. The higher the number of citations, the more important the patent/patent application is considered to be.
- Request for invalidation trial
- Indicates that a third party has requested a procedure to invalidate the patent. It is likely to affect the business of third parties and is considered to be of high importance.
- Opposition
- Indicates that a third party has filed a petition with the Patent Office to hear the validity of the patent again. Like the trial for invalidation, it is considered to be of high importance.
- Information provision
- Indicates that a third party has provided the Patent Office with useful information for examination for the patent filed. It is usually considered to be of high importance because it is done to prevent the patent from being granted.
- Browsing request
- Indicates that a third party has requested the Patent Office to view the patent bag (a set of documents exchanged between the Patent Office and the applicant). The bag is often checked prior to trial for invalidation, opposition, and provision of information, and is considered to be a highly important patent.
Oppositioned cases
List of latest Oppositioned patents
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 16 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7412028 "検査選別装置及び選別装置" (Opposition day 2024-07-10) , next is 特許7385891 "生海苔異物分離除去装置のクリアランスの構造" (Opposition day 2024-05-24) .
| - | No. | Title | Opposition days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許7412028 | 検査選別装置及び選別装置 | 2024-07-10 |
| 2 | 特許7385891 | 生海苔異物分離除去装置のクリアランスの構造 | 2024-05-24 |
| 3 | 特許7355287 | ばね部材用金属箔、電子機器用ばね部材、ばね部材用金属箔の製造方法、および、電子機器用ばね部材の製造方法 | 2024-04-01 |
| 4 | 特許7355191 | ばね部材用金属箔、ばね部材用金属箔の製造方法、および、電子機器用ばね部材 | 2024-04-01 |
| 5 | 特許7355192 | ばね部材用金属箔、ばね部材用金属箔の製造方法、および、電子機器用ばね部材 | 2024-04-01 |
| 6 | 特許7349924 | 石膏ボード廃材から金属を回収する方法 | 2024-03-25 |
| 7 | 特許7344565 | 未分化細胞検出法 | 2024-03-13 |
| 8 | 特許7303729 | 廃石膏ボードの処理方法 | 2023-12-28 |
| 9 | 特許7269062 | 保持パッド及びその製造方法 | 2023-10-18 |
| 10 | 特許7180166 | 包装材、包装容器及び蓋体 | 2023-05-27 |
Protested cases
List of latest Protested patents
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 56 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.3 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2024-088332 "豆類選別機" (Protest day 2024-08-28) , next is 特開2024-062844 "ブラスト加工装置における集塵機の制御方法及びブラスト加工装置" (Protest day 2024-08-27) .
| - | No. | Title | Protest days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特開2024-088332 | 豆類選別機 | 2024-08-28 |
| 2 | 特開2024-062844 | ブラスト加工装置における集塵機の制御方法及びブラスト加工装置 | 2024-08-27 |
| 3 | 特開2023-014800 | 食器選別装置 | 2024-08-02 |
| 4 | 特開2024-063953 | 識別装置、選別装置、及び識別方法 | 2024-07-29 |
| 5 | 特開2024-073403 | 自動食品検査装置 | 2024-07-29 |
| 6 | 特開2022-068217 | プラスチック積層体をリサイクル原料に再生するためのリサイクルシステム、リサイクル方法、及び積層体の分離回収方法 | 2024-07-17 |
| 7 | 特開2022-108063 | 粒状体検査装置 | 2024-06-28 |
| 8 | 特表2023-521429 | 湿った細粒を含む様々な供給源からの廃棄プラスチックのケミカルリサイクル | 2024-06-19 |
| 9 | 特表2023-505820 | 自動剥皮システム | 2024-06-10 |
| 10 | 特開2023-021389 | 混合セメント組成物、及びその製造方法 | 2024-06-08 |
| 11 | 特許7573482 | 廃棄物中の有価金属の回収方法 | 2024-06-05 |
| 12 | 特表2023-549183 | リサイクル単量体を含むポリエステル共重合体 | 2024-05-31 |
| 13 | 特開2022-182724 | 有価物の選別方法 | 2024-04-17 |
| 14 | 特開2024-029916 | 粗選装置 | 2024-04-11 |
| 15 | 特開2024-004088 | 粒状体選別装置 | 2024-04-02 |
| 16 | 特開2022-129667 | 莢果選別システム及び莢果選別装置 | 2024-03-27 |
| 17 | 特許7493443 | 色彩選別機 | 2024-03-19 |
| 18 | 特許7568665 | 正極の製造方法および二次電池の製造方法 | 2024-02-07 |
| 19 | 特開2022-151122 | 検査選別装置、検査装置及び選別装置 | 2024-01-29 |
| 20 | 特表2023-524143 | 根菜類収穫機 | 2024-01-17 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Protested
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 151 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.3. The most protest patent is 特開2022-108063 "粒状体検査装置" (3 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許6758627 "碾茶炉およびこれを用いた荒茶製造方法" (3 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特開2022-108063 | 粒状体検査装置 | 3 times |
| 2 | 特許6758627 | 碾茶炉およびこれを用いた荒茶製造方法 | 3 times |
| 3 | 特許7423910 | 廃電池からの有価物の回収方法、粉砕設備 | 3 times |
| 4 | 特許7287750 | 廃棄物のリサイクル方法 | 3 times |
| 5 | 特許6536192 | 合成石英ガラス基板の製造方法 | 3 times |
Inspectioned cases
List of latest Inspectioned patents
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 65 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.3 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2024-062844 "ブラスト加工装置における集塵機の制御方法及びブラスト加工装置" (Inspection day 2024-09-17) , next is 特開2024-063953 "識別装置、選別装置、及び識別方法" (Inspection day 2024-08-28) .
| - | No. | Title | Inspection days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特開2024-062844 | ブラスト加工装置における集塵機の制御方法及びブラスト加工装置 | 2024-09-17 |
| 2 | 特開2024-063953 | 識別装置、選別装置、及び識別方法 | 2024-08-28 |
| 3 | 特開2023-014800 | 食器選別装置 | 2024-08-07 |
| 4 | 特開2022-068217 | プラスチック積層体をリサイクル原料に再生するためのリサイクルシステム、リサイクル方法、及び積層体の分離回収方法 | 2024-07-23 |
| 5 | 特表2023-521429 | 湿った細粒を含む様々な供給源からの廃棄プラスチックのケミカルリサイクル | 2024-07-19 |
| 6 | 特開2023-021389 | 混合セメント組成物、及びその製造方法 | 2024-07-05 |
| 7 | 特開2023-126860 | 改良されたドロス原料 | 2024-07-01 |
| 8 | 特表2023-549183 | リサイクル単量体を含むポリエステル共重合体 | 2024-06-28 |
| 9 | 特許7573482 | 廃棄物中の有価金属の回収方法 | 2024-06-14 |
| 10 | 特表2024-518140 | リチウム含有金属珪素の調製方法、リチウム含有金属珪素、リチウム含有ＳｉＯおよびその応用 | 2024-06-07 |
| 11 | 特開2022-182724 | 有価物の選別方法 | 2024-06-04 |
| 12 | 特表2023-524143 | 根菜類収穫機 | 2024-02-27 |
| 13 | 特開2022-129667 | 莢果選別システム及び莢果選別装置 | 2024-02-15 |
| 14 | 特開2022-129668 | 莢果選別システム及び莢果選別装置 | 2024-02-15 |
| 15 | 特開2022-129666 | 莢果選別システム及び莢果選別装置 | 2024-02-15 |
| 16 | 特許7568665 | 正極の製造方法および二次電池の製造方法 | 2024-02-08 |
| 17 | 特許6000239 | 未変性Ｃｏｃｈｌｉｎ−ｔｏｍｏｐｒｏｔｅｉｎ（ＣＴＰ）に反応する抗体及びそれを用いたＣＴＰの測定方法 | 2024-02-08 |
| 18 | 特開2022-049182 | 蓄電デバイス用外装材、蓄電デバイス及び蓄電デバイス用外装材の製造方法 | 2023-12-21 |
| 19 | 特許7475685 | ヒト真皮線維芽細胞の単離方法 | 2023-12-18 |
| 20 | 特許7423910 | 廃電池からの有価物の回収方法、粉砕設備 | 2023-11-24 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Inspectioned
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 171 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.3. The most inspection patent is 特許6981481 "セメント組成物およびその製造方法" (7 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許6672862 "セメント組成物およびその製造方法" (7 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6981481 | セメント組成物およびその製造方法 | 7 times |
| 2 | 特許6672862 | セメント組成物およびその製造方法 | 7 times |
| 3 | 特許7281768 | 情報処理装置、情報処理プログラム、および情報処理方法 | 6 times |
| 4 | 特許6676999 | セメント組成物およびその製造方法 | 5 times |
| 5 | 特許6758627 | 碾茶炉およびこれを用いた荒茶製造方法 | 4 times |
Cited cases
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Cited
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 1,399 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.5. The most cited patent is 特許7121598 "収穫機" (47 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許5969685 "廃棄物選別システム及びその選別方法" (30 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許7121598 | 収穫機 | 47 times |
| 2 | 特許5969685 | 廃棄物選別システム及びその選別方法 | 30 times |
| 3 | 特許6602031 | コンバイン | 27 times |
| 4 | 特開2017-109197 | 廃棄物選別システム及びその選別方法 | 26 times |
| 5 | 特開2016-063824 | マイクロ流体システム内のインビトロ進化 | 25 times |
Providing patent information to the media (newspapers, magazines, etc.)
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
About this Site
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
Please note the following points for use.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
Citation of patent application status and ranking information
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Graphs are image data.
Please note that the various graphs are image data, but we cannot provide them in text data.Scope of coverage for each goal/target
- Based on the description of each goal and target of the SDGs, we have set the scope of technologies to be covered based on our and e-Patent's past experience, etc. (in some cases, the search is based on social issues themselves). Therefore, please note that there is a possibility that this "SDGs Global Company Ranking from Patent Perspective" may not cover 100%.
- A population search formula is clearly indicated for each goal/target (database: Patent Integration). You may use the population search formula as it is, or you may improve it by yourself.
- This search covers patents and utility models, including both published and registered patents (design and design patents are excluded). The unit of count is the number of applications, not the number of patent families.
About the name collation and name control of applicants and right holders
- Company rankings are based on the results calculated by "Patent Integration", with Japanese organizations in Japanese and other companies in English (some are in Japanese).
- Company names may be the names of the companies at the time of application, but the results calculated by Patent Integration are used as is. Company names are used as they were at the time of application.
- Because of the fluctuation in the names of companies (i.e., applicant/right holder names in the patent information), there are cases where the same company appears more than once in the top 10. The number of applications filed by the same company in the top 10 is the total number of applications filed by the company.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
Our Commitment to Safety and Security
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to providing high-quality patent information based on the latest patent data on more than 45 million cases collected from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publication. 
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. collects the patent data from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publications to provide it widely in the form of reports so that anyone can check patent information and patent trends with confidence. 
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to various efforts to enhance the reliability of the information and to allow users to search patent information with confidence.