The Technical Field "庭" had 247 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-04-30). This is a significantly decreased of -113 filings (-31.4%) over 360 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-04-30). This report also includes technical terms related to " ガーデン ", " コート ", " 中庭 ", " 庭園 " in the search set.
The highest number of filings in 2016 with 1,761 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 426 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 5,448 cases in total) is 908, and the median is 1,076. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 908 patents |
Std Dev | 513 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 426 cases | -55.9 % |
2022 year | 965 cases | -18.63 % |
2021 year | 1,186 cases | -8.77 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 庭 for the period of the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 庭, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of 庭 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 11,996 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 庭 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, TOPPANホールディングス株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2023 to 2025) with 34 cases, followed by 日東電工株式会社 with 25 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
TOPPANホールディングス株式会社 | 34 cases |
日東電工株式会社 | 25 cases |
コニカミノルタ株式会社 | 12 cases |
大日本印刷株式会社 | 6 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 6 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 6 cases |
セイコーエプソン株式会社 | 5 cases |
東レ株式会社 | 4 cases |
富士フイルム株式会社 | 3 cases |
株式会社リコー | 3 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 1 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 富士フイルム株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2015 to 2025) with 534 cases, followed by 大日本印刷株式会社 with 484 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
富士フイルム株式会社 | 534 cases |
大日本印刷株式会社 | 484 cases |
TOPPANホールディングス株式会社 | 457 cases |
日東電工株式会社 | 253 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 200 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 194 cases |
コニカミノルタ株式会社 | 184 cases |
東レ株式会社 | 114 cases |
株式会社リコー | 91 cases |
セイコーエプソン株式会社 | 62 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 4 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 庭 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Among the top coapplicants, TOPPANホールディングス株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2023 to 2025) with 34 cases, followed by 大日本印刷株式会社 with 6 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
TOPPANホールディングス株式会社 | 34 cases |
大日本印刷株式会社 | 6 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 6 cases |
セイコーエプソン株式会社 | 5 cases |
富士フイルム株式会社 | 3 cases |
株式会社リコー | 3 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 1 cases |
Among the top coapplicants, 富士フイルム株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2015 to 2025) with 534 cases, followed by 大日本印刷株式会社 with 484 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
富士フイルム株式会社 | 534 cases |
大日本印刷株式会社 | 484 cases |
TOPPANホールディングス株式会社 | 457 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 200 cases |
株式会社リコー | 91 cases |
セイコーエプソン株式会社 | 62 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 4 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 庭’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 庭’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
庭 filed 484 joint applications with 大日本印刷株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 182 cases in total) is 30.3, and the median is 36.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.7, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2015 with 87 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 6 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 30.3 patents |
Std Dev | 20.6 |
COV | 0.7 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 6 cases | -80.6 % |
2022 year | 31 cases | -26.19 % |
2021 year | 42 cases | -14.29 % |
庭 filed 457 joint applications with TOPPANホールディングス株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 244 cases in total) is 40.7, and the median is 43.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2016 with 76 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 31 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 40.7 patents |
Std Dev | 20.3 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 31 cases | -52.3 % |
2022 year | 65 cases | +12.07 % |
2021 year | 58 cases | +18.37 % |
庭 filed 534 joint applications with 富士フイルム株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 306 cases in total) is 51.0, and the median is 38.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.0, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2019 with 144 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 2 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 51.0 patents |
Std Dev | 50.1 |
COV | 1.0 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 2 cases | -93.3 % |
2022 year | 30 cases | -34.8 % |
2021 year | 46 cases | -44.6 % |
庭 filed 91 joint applications with 株式会社リコー for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 36 cases in total) is 6.0, and the median is 3.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.9, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 24 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 3 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 6.0 patents |
Std Dev | 5.4 |
COV | 0.9 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 3 cases | 0 |
2022 year | 3 cases | -25.00 % |
2021 year | 4 cases | -60.0 % |
庭 filed 200 joint applications with キヤノン株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 86 cases in total) is 14.3, and the median is 17.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2017 with 33 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 6 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 14.3 patents |
Std Dev | 8.9 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 6 cases | -66.7 % |
2022 year | 18 cases | -33.3 % |
2021 year | 27 cases | +68.8 % |
The following shows JP patents held by 庭 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 庭’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 庭 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 1 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 1.0 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許6065247 "積層型無機系保護コーティング塩化ビニル系タイル及びそのコーティング方法" (Invalidation Trial day 2022-07-07) .
- | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6065247 | 積層型無機系保護コーティング塩化ビニル系タイル及びそのコーティング方法 | 2022-07-07 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 1 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.0. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6577369 "アルミニウムアジュバント含有ワクチンの保存方法" (1 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6577369 | アルミニウムアジュバント含有ワクチンの保存方法 | 1 times |
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 95 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7488863 "ハードコートフィルム" (Opposition day 2024-11-21) , next is 特許7489625 "包装材及び包装材の製造方法" (Opposition day 2024-11-18) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7488863 | ハードコートフィルム | 2024-11-21 |
2 | 特許7489625 | 包装材及び包装材の製造方法 | 2024-11-18 |
3 | 特許7486878 | 反射防止フィルム、偏光板およびディスプレイ装置 | 2024-11-14 |
4 | 特許7483661 | 防眩フィルム | 2024-11-13 |
5 | 特許7481425 | 光学積層体および表示装置 | 2024-10-31 |
6 | 特許7473088 | ガスバリアフィルム、包装フィルム及び包装袋 | 2024-10-15 |
7 | 特許7463749 | 積層体およびそれを用いたスタンディングパウチ | 2024-10-01 |
8 | 特許7457781 | 感光性樹脂組成物、それを用いて製造された感光性樹脂膜およびカラーフィルタ | 2024-09-27 |
9 | 特許7468798 | 包装フィルム、包装容器及び包装製品 | 2024-09-27 |
10 | 特許7442366 | 放射冷却装置及び冷却方法 | 2024-09-03 |
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 168 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.4 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2023-128125 "ガーネット型透明セラミックス及び磁気光学デバイス" (Protest day 2024-12-24) , next is 特開2023-134501 "硬化型クリアインク組成物、インクセット、収容容器、印刷方法、印刷物の製造方法、及び硬化物" (Protest day 2024-12-23) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2023-128125 | ガーネット型透明セラミックス及び磁気光学デバイス | 2024-12-24 |
2 | 特開2023-134501 | 硬化型クリアインク組成物、インクセット、収容容器、印刷方法、印刷物の製造方法、及び硬化物 | 2024-12-23 |
3 | 特開2023-020832 | 断熱シート、断熱シートの製造方法及び組電池 | 2024-12-18 |
4 | 特開2023-036116 | 積層体および積層体の製造方法 | 2024-12-10 |
5 | 特開2023-063170 | バリア性基材、バリア性積層体及び包装容器 | 2024-12-04 |
6 | 特開2023-068706 | 改修方法 | 2024-12-03 |
7 | 特開2023-068707 | 改修方法 | 2024-12-03 |
8 | 特開2023-078745 | 改修方法 | 2024-12-03 |
9 | 特開2023-078746 | 改修方法 | 2024-12-03 |
10 | 特開2023-039591 | 積層ポリエステルフィルム | 2024-11-25 |
11 | 特開2023-045899 | 包装材料用積層体および包装体 | 2024-11-25 |
12 | 特開2023-023639 | バリア性積層体、蓋材及び包装容器 | 2024-11-20 |
13 | 再公表2019/050017 | バイオチップ用基体、バイオチップ、バイオチップの製造方法およびその保存方法 | 2024-11-13 |
14 | 特開2022-113634 | フレキシブルディスプレイ用ポリエステルフィルム、フレキシブルディスプレイ用積層フィルム、フレキシブルディスプレイ及びフレキシブルディスプレイ装置 | 2024-11-07 |
15 | 特開2024-050734 | 積層体、偏光子保護フィルム及び偏光板 | 2024-11-07 |
16 | 特表2024-530146 | 多層構造を有する光学フィルム及びそれを含む表示装置 | 2024-11-06 |
17 | 特開2023-050299 | ガスバリア性積層体、包装フィルム、包装容器及び包装製品 | 2024-11-06 |
18 | 特開2023-095601 | 成形用フィルム積層体、成形品、及び成形品の製造方法 | 2024-11-05 |
19 | 特開2020-157592 | ハードコートフィルム | 2024-10-22 |
20 | 特表2020-522752 | 多層光学フィルム及び薄い接着剤層を含む光学体 | 2024-10-21 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 369 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.3. The most protest patent is 特開2017-088844 "硬化性組成物、硬化物及び積層体" (6 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許7194344 "包装材料及び包装製品" (5 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2017-088844 | 硬化性組成物、硬化物及び積層体 | 6 times |
2 | 特許7194344 | 包装材料及び包装製品 | 5 times |
3 | 特許7092475 | 化粧板 | 5 times |
4 | 再公表2019/050017 | バイオチップ用基体、バイオチップ、バイオチップの製造方法およびその保存方法 | 4 times |
5 | 特許7016605 | タッチパネル用積層体、及び、折り畳み式画像表示装置 | 4 times |
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 193 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.6 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2022-144736 "硬化性組成物、硬化物、積層体" (Inspection day 2024-12-25) , next is 特開2023-068706 "改修方法" (Inspection day 2024-12-19) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2022-144736 | 硬化性組成物、硬化物、積層体 | 2024-12-25 |
2 | 特開2023-068706 | 改修方法 | 2024-12-19 |
3 | 特開2023-036116 | 積層体および積層体の製造方法 | 2024-12-17 |
4 | 特開2022-159102 | ガスバリアフィルム、積層体および包装袋 | 2024-12-13 |
5 | 特開2023-068707 | 改修方法 | 2024-12-10 |
6 | 特開2023-063170 | バリア性基材、バリア性積層体及び包装容器 | 2024-12-09 |
7 | 特開2023-045899 | 包装材料用積層体および包装体 | 2024-12-06 |
8 | 特開2023-078745 | 改修方法 | 2024-12-06 |
9 | 特開2022-120511 | ハードコートフィルム及びこれを用いた化粧シート | 2024-12-06 |
10 | 特開2023-078746 | 改修方法 | 2024-12-06 |
11 | 特開2023-039591 | 積層ポリエステルフィルム | 2024-12-03 |
12 | 特許5199917 | 粘着シートとその製造方法および粘着型機能性フィルム | 2024-12-03 |
13 | 特開2023-023639 | バリア性積層体、蓋材及び包装容器 | 2024-11-26 |
14 | 特開2023-050299 | ガスバリア性積層体、包装フィルム、包装容器及び包装製品 | 2024-11-20 |
15 | 再公表2019/050017 | バイオチップ用基体、バイオチップ、バイオチップの製造方法およびその保存方法 | 2024-11-19 |
16 | 特開2022-113634 | フレキシブルディスプレイ用ポリエステルフィルム、フレキシブルディスプレイ用積層フィルム、フレキシブルディスプレイ及びフレキシブルディスプレイ装置 | 2024-11-14 |
17 | 特開2023-095601 | 成形用フィルム積層体、成形品、及び成形品の製造方法 | 2024-11-13 |
18 | 特開2024-050734 | 積層体、偏光子保護フィルム及び偏光板 | 2024-11-12 |
19 | 特許7522205 | コート紙 | 2024-10-23 |
20 | 特表2020-522752 | 多層光学フィルム及び薄い接着剤層を含む光学体 | 2024-10-22 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 435 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.6. The most inspection patent is 特開2017-088844 "硬化性組成物、硬化物及び積層体" (16 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許7016602 "タッチパネル用ハードコートフィルム、及び、折り畳み式画像表示装置" (14 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2017-088844 | 硬化性組成物、硬化物及び積層体 | 16 times |
2 | 特許7016602 | タッチパネル用ハードコートフィルム、及び、折り畳み式画像表示装置 | 14 times |
3 | 特許7016604 | タッチパネル用積層体、折り畳み式画像表示装置 | 13 times |
4 | 特許7194344 | 包装材料及び包装製品 | 12 times |
5 | 特許7016605 | タッチパネル用積層体、及び、折り畳み式画像表示装置 | 10 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 3,185 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 3.0. The most cited patent is 特許6378166 "磁気テープおよびその製造方法" (62 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6556101 "磁気テープおよび磁気テープ装置" (62 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6378166 | 磁気テープおよびその製造方法 | 62 times |
2 | 特許6556101 | 磁気テープおよび磁気テープ装置 | 62 times |
3 | 特許6549528 | 磁気テープおよび磁気テープ装置 | 59 times |
4 | 特許7336323 | 表示制御装置および表示制御方法、プログラム | 58 times |
5 | 特開2017-102443 | 光学積層体および該光学積層体を用いた有機エレクトロルミネセンス表示装置 | 55 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International