粒度 (JP Patent Analysis Report)
The Technical Field "粒度" had 91 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-02-28). This is a significantly decreased of -62 filings (-40.5%) over 153 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-02-28). This report also includes technical terms related to " 粒子の大きさ ", " 粒子サイズ ", " 粒子大きさ ", " 粒子寸法 " in the search set.
The highest number of filings in 2019 with 1,485 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 999 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 6,728 cases in total) is 1,121, and the median is 1,238. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.3, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 1,121 patents |
| Std Dev | 356 |
| COV | 0.3 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 999 cases | -13.36 % |
| 2021 year | 1,153 cases | -12.92 % |
| 2020 year | 1,324 cases | -10.84 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 粒度 for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-10-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 粒度, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
Introduction
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
粒度, Changes in the Number of JP Patents/Patent Applications
The changes in the number of patent filings of 粒度 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
Search Set (Analysis Patents)
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 12,221 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
粒度
Same industry / competition company information (JP)
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 粒度 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024).
Comparing the number of applications of each company, JFEスチール株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 27 cases, followed by 日本製鉄株式会社 with 22 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| JFEスチール株式会社 | 27 cases |
| 日本製鉄株式会社 | 22 cases |
| 住友金属鉱山株式会社 | 22 cases |
| キヤノン株式会社 | 20 cases |
| 太平洋セメント株式会社 | 12 cases |
| 株式会社リコー | 9 cases |
| 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | 5 cases |
| 富士フイルム株式会社 | 3 cases |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2014 to 2024).
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 住友金属鉱山株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 296 cases, followed by 日本製鉄株式会社 with 239 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| 住友金属鉱山株式会社 | 296 cases |
| 日本製鉄株式会社 | 239 cases |
| キヤノン株式会社 | 168 cases |
| JFEスチール株式会社 | 140 cases |
| 太平洋セメント株式会社 | 115 cases |
| 富士フイルム株式会社 | 99 cases |
| 株式会社リコー | 79 cases |
| 株式会社神戸製鋼所 | 69 cases |
| コニカミノルタ株式会社 | 37 cases |
Same industry / competition company, Change in the Number of JP Patents
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
Top company information (JP)
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 粒度 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024).
Among the top coapplicants, JFEスチール株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 27 cases, followed by 日本製鉄株式会社 with 22 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| JFEスチール株式会社 | 27 cases |
| 日本製鉄株式会社 | 22 cases |
| 住友金属鉱山株式会社 | 22 cases |
| キヤノン株式会社 | 20 cases |
| 株式会社リコー | 9 cases |
| 富士フイルム株式会社 | 3 cases |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2014 to 2024).
Among the top coapplicants, 住友金属鉱山株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 296 cases, followed by 日本製鉄株式会社 with 239 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| 住友金属鉱山株式会社 | 296 cases |
| 日本製鉄株式会社 | 239 cases |
| キヤノン株式会社 | 168 cases |
| JFEスチール株式会社 | 140 cases |
| 富士フイルム株式会社 | 99 cases |
| 株式会社リコー | 79 cases |
Top company, Change in the Number of JP Patents
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 粒度’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 粒度’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Top company Details (JP)
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 日本製鉄株式会社
粒度 filed 239 joint applications with 日本製鉄株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 116 cases in total) is 19.3, and the median is 16.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 37 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 11 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 19.3 patents |
| Std Dev | 8.4 |
| COV | 0.4 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 11 cases | -26.67 % |
| 2021 year | 15 cases | -16.67 % |
| 2020 year | 18 cases | -35.7 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with キヤノン株式会社
粒度 filed 168 joint applications with キヤノン株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 81 cases in total) is 13.5, and the median is 14.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2015 with 27 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 14 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 13.5 patents |
| Std Dev | 4.8 |
| COV | 0.4 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 15 cases | +7.14 % |
| 2021 year | 14 cases | 0 |
| 2020 year | 14 cases | 0 |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with JFEスチール株式会社
粒度 filed 140 joint applications with JFEスチール株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 71 cases in total) is 11.8, and the median is 12.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been increasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 26 cases, and their lowest number in 2020 with 7 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 11.8 patents |
| Std Dev | 4.9 |
| COV | 0.4 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 21 cases | +61.5 % |
| 2021 year | 13 cases | +85.7 % |
| 2020 year | 7 cases | -41.7 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 富士フイルム株式会社
粒度 filed 99 joint applications with 富士フイルム株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 63 cases in total) is 10.5, and the median is 6.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.1, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2019 with 34 cases, and their lowest number in 2017 with 1 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 10.5 patents |
| Std Dev | 11.4 |
| COV | 1.1 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 3 cases | 0 |
| 2021 year | 3 cases | -76.9 % |
| 2020 year | 13 cases | -61.8 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 住友金属鉱山株式会社
粒度 filed 296 joint applications with 住友金属鉱山株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 147 cases in total) is 24.5, and the median is 22.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 43 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 17 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 24.5 patents |
| Std Dev | 12.7 |
| COV | 0.5 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 17 cases | -19.05 % |
| 2021 year | 21 cases | -8.70 % |
| 2020 year | 23 cases | -43.9 % |
Information on important patents (JP)
The following shows JP patents held by 粒度 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 粒度’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 粒度 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
Glossary
- Cited
- Indicates that the patent/patent application has been cited (by Examiners) in notices of reasons for rejection in the examination process of other (Japanese, U.S., or European) patent applications. The higher the number of citations, the more important the patent/patent application is considered to be.
- Request for invalidation trial
- Indicates that a third party has requested a procedure to invalidate the patent. It is likely to affect the business of third parties and is considered to be of high importance.
- Opposition
- Indicates that a third party has filed a petition with the Patent Office to hear the validity of the patent again. Like the trial for invalidation, it is considered to be of high importance.
- Information provision
- Indicates that a third party has provided the Patent Office with useful information for examination for the patent filed. It is usually considered to be of high importance because it is done to prevent the patent from being granted.
- Browsing request
- Indicates that a third party has requested the Patent Office to view the patent bag (a set of documents exchanged between the Patent Office and the applicant). The bag is often checked prior to trial for invalidation, opposition, and provision of information, and is considered to be a highly important patent.
Invalidationed Trial cases
List of latest Invalidationed Trial patents
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 1 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 1.0 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許7194153 "新規製剤" (Invalidation Trial day 2023-07-21) .
| - | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許7194153 | 新規製剤 | 2023-07-21 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Invalidationed Trial
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 1 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.0. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6777824 "オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼及びその製造方法" (1 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6777824 | オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼及びその製造方法 | 1 times |
Oppositioned cases
List of latest Oppositioned patents
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 58 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7438305 "銀粉" (Opposition day 2024-08-22) , next is 特許7426520 "ヨウ化物イオンに非選択的な無機系凝集剤で処理したリサイクル水溶液" (Opposition day 2024-07-26) .
| - | No. | Title | Opposition days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許7438305 | 銀粉 | 2024-08-22 |
| 2 | 特許7426520 | ヨウ化物イオンに非選択的な無機系凝集剤で処理したリサイクル水溶液 | 2024-07-26 |
| 3 | 特許7419412 | 合金線材とその製造方法及び用途 | 2024-07-22 |
| 4 | 特許7416979 | パウチフィルム積層体、パウチ型電池ケースおよびパウチ型二次電池 | 2024-07-16 |
| 5 | 特許7406047 | ニッケル粉及びニッケル粒子の製造方法 | 2024-06-17 |
| 6 | 特許7442700 | 樹脂組成物及び樹脂シート | 2024-06-11 |
| 7 | 特許7374932 | 金属粒子、それを用いた磁性体ペースト、圧粉磁心及びインダクタ、並びに金属粒子の製造方法 | 2024-04-30 |
| 8 | 特許7364703 | 長鎖分岐プロピレンポリマー組成物 | 2024-04-17 |
| 9 | 特許7340728 | ニッケル粒子及びニッケル粒子の製造方法 | 2024-03-05 |
| 10 | 特許7348543 | メッセンジャーＲＮＡのカプセル化 | 2024-02-29 |
Protested cases
List of latest Protested patents
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 149 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.4 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2023-009506 "水酸化アルミニウム粉末およびその製造方法" (Protest day 2024-09-13) , next is 特開2023-035684 "熱硬化性組成物" (Protest day 2024-09-11) .
| - | No. | Title | Protest days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特開2023-009506 | 水酸化アルミニウム粉末およびその製造方法 | 2024-09-13 |
| 2 | 特開2023-035684 | 熱硬化性組成物 | 2024-09-11 |
| 3 | 特開2023-034764 | 可食性植物粉体組成物、及びその製造方法 | 2024-08-23 |
| 4 | 特開2023-159078 | ポリマーセメント組成物及びポリマーセメントモルタル | 2024-08-09 |
| 5 | 特開2021-040132 | シリコン酸化物被覆Ｆｅ系軟磁性粉末およびその製造方法 | 2024-08-02 |
| 6 | 特開2022-120621 | ひよこ豆含有レトルト食品及びひよこ豆含有レトルト食品の製造方法 | 2024-07-19 |
| 7 | 特開2024-052887 | 石膏系建築材料 | 2024-06-13 |
| 8 | 特開2022-076980 | 畜肉様食品組成物、及びそれを用いた畜肉様加工食品 | 2024-06-04 |
| 9 | 特表2023-539508 | 酸化セリウム粒子、これを含む化学的機械的研磨用スラリー組成物および半導体素子の製造方法 | 2024-05-22 |
| 10 | 特許7563177 | 積層インダクタの内部電極形成用銀ペースト | 2024-05-20 |
| 11 | 特開2022-040153 | 再生ポリエステル樹脂及び再生ポリエステル樹脂の製造方法 | 2024-05-17 |
| 12 | 特許7524114 | リチウム二次電池用活物質、リチウム二次電池用電極、リチウム二次電池、電池パック、及び車両 | 2024-05-17 |
| 13 | 特許7487011 | 接合材、接合材の製造方法及び接合方法 | 2024-04-18 |
| 14 | 特表2022-517956 | ジェットミルで粉砕するための方法及びシステム | 2024-04-11 |
| 15 | 特許7573933 | 加工食品生地および加工食品 | 2024-04-05 |
| 16 | 特許7548798 | キャリア芯材 | 2024-03-19 |
| 17 | 特開2022-183790 | 流動状食品 | 2024-03-04 |
| 18 | 特許7500276 | 電極材料、電極、二次電池、電池パック、及び車両 | 2024-02-28 |
| 19 | 特表2023-502137 | プラズマチャンバの低温焼結コーティング | 2024-02-26 |
| 20 | 特開2023-127218 | 合成マイカ粉体 | 2024-02-20 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Protested
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 336 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.3. The most protest patent is 特許7174409 "粉末状の胡麻加工品およびその製造方法" (10 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許6979150 "被覆銀粒子とその製造方法、導電性組成物、および導電体" (5 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許7174409 | 粉末状の胡麻加工品およびその製造方法 | 10 times |
| 2 | 特許6979150 | 被覆銀粒子とその製造方法、導電性組成物、および導電体 | 5 times |
| 3 | 特開2022-040153 | 再生ポリエステル樹脂及び再生ポリエステル樹脂の製造方法 | 4 times |
| 4 | 特許6743694 | 非水電解質二次電池 | 4 times |
| 5 | 特許7500276 | 電極材料、電極、二次電池、電池パック、及び車両 | 4 times |
Inspectioned cases
List of latest Inspectioned patents
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 161 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.6 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特許7487011 "接合材、接合材の製造方法及び接合方法" (Inspection day 2024-09-17) , next is 特許7454108 "粒子、及びその用途" (Inspection day 2024-08-19) .
| - | No. | Title | Inspection days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許7487011 | 接合材、接合材の製造方法及び接合方法 | 2024-09-17 |
| 2 | 特許7454108 | 粒子、及びその用途 | 2024-08-19 |
| 3 | 特開2021-040132 | シリコン酸化物被覆Ｆｅ系軟磁性粉末およびその製造方法 | 2024-08-07 |
| 4 | 特表2023-539508 | 酸化セリウム粒子、これを含む化学的機械的研磨用スラリー組成物および半導体素子の製造方法 | 2024-06-25 |
| 5 | 特表2023-518234 | 伝染病の監視および大流行の検出のためのシステムおよび方法 | 2024-06-18 |
| 6 | 特開2022-076980 | 畜肉様食品組成物、及びそれを用いた畜肉様加工食品 | 2024-06-11 |
| 7 | 特開2022-040153 | 再生ポリエステル樹脂及び再生ポリエステル樹脂の製造方法 | 2024-05-30 |
| 8 | 特許7524114 | リチウム二次電池用活物質、リチウム二次電池用電極、リチウム二次電池、電池パック、及び車両 | 2024-05-24 |
| 9 | 特表2022-508040 | 光透過領域を含むオプトエレクトロニクスデバイス | 2024-05-09 |
| 10 | 特表2022-517956 | ジェットミルで粉砕するための方法及びシステム | 2024-05-01 |
| 11 | 特開2023-130430 | 半連続鋳造（ＤＣ）経路を介して製造される非結晶化展伸材の低減された最終結晶粒度 | 2024-04-19 |
| 12 | 特開2022-112128 | 抗菌・抗ウィルス性繊維とその製造方法および繊維製品 | 2024-04-18 |
| 13 | 特開2024-114670 | ポリマー廃棄物からのポリマー材料の精製方法及び精製されたポリマー材料 | 2024-04-17 |
| 14 | 特許7573933 | 加工食品生地および加工食品 | 2024-04-09 |
| 15 | 特開2022-183790 | 流動状食品 | 2024-03-25 |
| 16 | 特許7500276 | 電極材料、電極、二次電池、電池パック、及び車両 | 2024-03-08 |
| 17 | 特表2023-526710 | 固体ポリマー組成物、自立フィルム及び発光デバイス | 2024-03-01 |
| 18 | 特開2024-000509 | ハニカムフィルタ | 2024-02-20 |
| 19 | 特開2022-118140 | アルロース結晶化用組成物 | 2024-02-13 |
| 20 | 特開2023-074308 | 穀物糖化液およびその製造方法 | 2024-02-05 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Inspectioned
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 405 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.5. The most inspection patent is 特許6301900 "リチウム金属混合酸化物を含む複合材料およびその製造方法" (10 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許7174409 "粉末状の胡麻加工品およびその製造方法" (8 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6301900 | リチウム金属混合酸化物を含む複合材料およびその製造方法 | 10 times |
| 2 | 特許7174409 | 粉末状の胡麻加工品およびその製造方法 | 8 times |
| 3 | 特許7500276 | 電極材料、電極、二次電池、電池パック、及び車両 | 7 times |
| 4 | 特許7101008 | エポキシ樹脂粉体塗料 | 7 times |
| 5 | 特許7486763 | 安定なアジルサルタン微細結晶の製造方法 | 7 times |
Cited cases
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Cited
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 2,564 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.7. The most cited patent is 特許7080087 "畦造成方法" (102 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6193947 "磁気記録媒体および磁気記録媒体用塗料組成物" (79 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許7080087 | 畦造成方法 | 102 times |
| 2 | 特許6193947 | 磁気記録媒体および磁気記録媒体用塗料組成物 | 79 times |
| 3 | 特許6339951 | データ収集システム、データ収集方法、サーバ及びゲートウェイ | 34 times |
| 4 | 特許6165275 | 誘導的に加熱可能なたばこ製品 | 33 times |
| 5 | 特許6640110 | 研磨粒子、及びこれを含む研磨物品 | 27 times |
Providing patent information to the media (newspapers, magazines, etc.)
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
About this Site
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
Please note the following points for use.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
Citation of patent application status and ranking information
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Graphs are image data.
Please note that the various graphs are image data, but we cannot provide them in text data.Scope of coverage for each goal/target
- Based on the description of each goal and target of the SDGs, we have set the scope of technologies to be covered based on our and e-Patent's past experience, etc. (in some cases, the search is based on social issues themselves). Therefore, please note that there is a possibility that this "SDGs Global Company Ranking from Patent Perspective" may not cover 100%.
- A population search formula is clearly indicated for each goal/target (database: Patent Integration). You may use the population search formula as it is, or you may improve it by yourself.
- This search covers patents and utility models, including both published and registered patents (design and design patents are excluded). The unit of count is the number of applications, not the number of patent families.
About the name collation and name control of applicants and right holders
- Company rankings are based on the results calculated by "Patent Integration", with Japanese organizations in Japanese and other companies in English (some are in Japanese).
- Company names may be the names of the companies at the time of application, but the results calculated by Patent Integration are used as is. Company names are used as they were at the time of application.
- Because of the fluctuation in the names of companies (i.e., applicant/right holder names in the patent information), there are cases where the same company appears more than once in the top 10. The number of applications filed by the same company in the top 10 is the total number of applications filed by the company.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
Our Commitment to Safety and Security
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to providing high-quality patent information based on the latest patent data on more than 45 million cases collected from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publication. 
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. collects the patent data from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publications to provide it widely in the form of reports so that anyone can check patent information and patent trends with confidence. 
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to various efforts to enhance the reliability of the information and to allow users to search patent information with confidence.