The Technical Field "骨" had 726 patent application filings in the most recent period (2022-01-01 to 2022-07-31). This is a significantly decreased of -250 filings (-25.6%) over 976 they had in the same period of the previous year (2021-01-01 to 2021-07-31). This report also includes technical terms related to " ほね " in the search set.
The highest number of filings in 2016 with 2,380 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 897 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 9,222 cases in total) is 1,537, and the median is 1,834. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1,537 patents |
Std Dev | 781 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 897 cases | -45.8 % |
2021 year | 1,654 cases | -17.87 % |
2020 year | 2,014 cases | -7.40 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 骨 for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-03-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 骨, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of 骨 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 18,520 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 骨 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 太平洋セメント株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 19 cases, followed by 花王株式会社 with 17 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
太平洋セメント株式会社 | 19 cases |
花王株式会社 | 17 cases |
デンカ株式会社 | 7 cases |
日本製鉄株式会社 | 2 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 1 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 太平洋セメント株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 258 cases, followed by 花王株式会社 with 114 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
太平洋セメント株式会社 | 258 cases |
花王株式会社 | 114 cases |
デンカ株式会社 | 85 cases |
UBE株式会社 | 62 cases |
ウォーソー・オーソペディック・インコーポレーテッド | 44 cases |
日本製鉄株式会社 | 34 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 30 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 16 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 13 cases |
三菱重工業株式会社 | 2 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 骨 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Among the top coapplicants, 太平洋セメント株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 19 cases, followed by 花王株式会社 with 17 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
太平洋セメント株式会社 | 19 cases |
花王株式会社 | 17 cases |
デンカ株式会社 | 7 cases |
日本製鉄株式会社 | 2 cases |
Among the top coapplicants, 太平洋セメント株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 258 cases, followed by 花王株式会社 with 114 cases.
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 骨’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 骨’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
骨 filed 258 joint applications with 太平洋セメント株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 106 cases in total) is 17.7, and the median is 17.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 56 cases, and their lowest number in 2020 with 14 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 17.7 patents |
Std Dev | 9.7 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 19 cases | -32.1 % |
2021 year | 28 cases | +100 % |
2020 year | 14 cases | -51.7 % |
骨 filed 30 joint applications with 株式会社日立製作所 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 7 cases in total) is 1.2, and the median is 1.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.9, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2016 with 7 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1.2 patents |
Std Dev | 1.1 |
COV | 0.9 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2021 year | 1 cases | -50.0 % |
2020 year | 2 cases | +100 % |
2019 year | 1 cases | -66.7 % |
骨 filed 16 joint applications with 株式会社東芝 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 4 cases in total) is 0.7, and the median is 1.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.7, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 8 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 0.7 patents |
Std Dev | 0.5 |
COV | 0.7 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2021 year | 1 cases | 0 |
2020 year | 1 cases | 0 |
2019 year | 1 cases | 0 |
骨 filed 85 joint applications with デンカ株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 46 cases in total) is 7.7, and the median is 6.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2016 with 17 cases, and their lowest number in 2015 with 3 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 7.7 patents |
Std Dev | 4.9 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 6 cases | -60.0 % |
2021 year | 15 cases | +275 % |
2020 year | 4 cases | -69.2 % |
骨 filed 114 joint applications with 花王株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 74 cases in total) is 12.3, and the median is 14.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2021 with 21 cases, and their lowest number in 2015 with 6 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 12.3 patents |
Std Dev | 6.4 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 16 cases | -23.81 % |
2021 year | 21 cases | +40.0 % |
2020 year | 15 cases | +87.5 % |
The following shows JP patents held by 骨 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 骨’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 骨 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2021-04-01 ~ 2024-03-31), there were 3 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 1.0 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許6830123 "透水性構造体" (Invalidation Trial day 2024-01-10) , next is 特許5474043 "(+)−2−[1−(3−エトキシ−4−メトキシフェニル)−2−メチルスルホニルエチル]−4−アセチルアミノイソインドリン−1,3−ジオンを含む固形物形態、その組成物およびその使用" (Invalidation Trial day 2023-05-31) .
- | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6830123 | 透水性構造体 | 2024-01-10 |
2 | 特許5474043 | (+)−2−[1−(3−エトキシ−4−メトキシフェニル)−2−メチルスルホニルエチル]−4−アセチルアミノイソインドリン−1,3−ジオンを含む固形物形態、その組成物およびその使用 | 2023-05-31 |
3 | 特許6738314 | BCMAおよびCD3に対する結合分子 | 2021-07-02 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-04-01 to 2024-03-31), 11 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.1. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6198346 "1回当たり100〜200単位のPTHが週1回投与されることを特徴とする、PTH含有骨粗鬆症治療/予防剤" (2 times) , and the next most invalidation trial patent is 特許5910698 "リセドロネート組成物およびその使用方法" (1 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6198346 | 1回当たり100〜200単位のPTHが週1回投与されることを特徴とする、PTH含有骨粗鬆症治療/予防剤 | 2 times |
2 | 特許5910698 | リセドロネート組成物およびその使用方法 | 1 times |
3 | 特許6274634 | 骨粗鬆症治療剤ないし予防剤 | 1 times |
4 | 特許6466538 | 治療薬のCNS送達 | 1 times |
5 | 特許6043008 | 1回当たり100〜200単位のPTHが週1回投与されることを特徴とする、PTH含有骨粗鬆症治療/予防剤 | 1 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-04-01 ~ 2024-03-31), there were 21 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7321057 "ポリマーセメント組成物及びポリマーセメントモルタル" (Opposition day 2024-02-05) , next is 特許7298844 "細胞培養物の製造方法" (Opposition day 2023-12-26) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7321057 | ポリマーセメント組成物及びポリマーセメントモルタル | 2024-02-05 |
2 | 特許7298844 | 細胞培養物の製造方法 | 2023-12-26 |
3 | 特許7299050 | 粒状色材含有塗料の塗装方法 | 2023-12-26 |
4 | 特許7291217 | 足場非依存性細胞およびその使用 | 2023-12-14 |
5 | 特許7162542 | 食品因子センシング関連遺伝子発現促進用食品組成物及び食品因子センシング関連遺伝子発現促進剤 | 2023-04-19 |
6 | 特許7154012 | 画像処理プログラム、画像処理装置、および画像処理方法 | 2023-04-14 |
7 | 特許7137467 | 非鉄金属製造の際に生じる改質スラグ | 2023-03-14 |
8 | 特許7093918 | 自動車乗員のバイタルサインの非接触の検知および監視システム | 2023-01-04 |
9 | 特許7095896 | 水硬性石灰を用いた成形体およびその製造方法 | 2022-12-27 |
10 | 特許7085050 | セメント混和材、急硬モルタルコンクリート材料、急硬モルタルコンクリート組成物、及び硬化体 | 2022-12-14 |
In the last 3 years (2021-04-01 ~ 2024-03-31), there were 124 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.4 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2022-032977 "ポリマー繊維を生産するためのデバイス及び方法、ならびにそのポリマー繊維の使用" (Protest day 2024-03-06) , next is 特開2023-047847 "二酸化炭素固定化システム及び二酸化炭素固定化方法" (Protest day 2024-02-20) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2022-032977 | ポリマー繊維を生産するためのデバイス及び方法、ならびにそのポリマー繊維の使用 | 2024-03-06 |
2 | 特開2023-047847 | 二酸化炭素固定化システム及び二酸化炭素固定化方法 | 2024-02-20 |
3 | 特開2023-048136 | 床版の接続構造及び接続工法 | 2024-02-15 |
4 | 特開2021-135199 | 骨材の品質推定方法およびコンクリート製造方法 | 2024-02-07 |
5 | 特開2023-052609 | 細胞培養物の製造方法 | 2024-01-23 |
6 | 特表2021-500373 | 線維芽細胞活性化タンパク質α(FAP−α)を標的とする撮像剤および放射線療法用薬剤 | 2024-01-12 |
7 | 特許7474627 | 耐塩性グラウト組成物及び耐塩性グラウト | 2023-12-05 |
8 | 特許7427709 | 鉄骨部材の耐火被覆構造 | 2023-11-21 |
9 | 特許7394736 | 被膜形成方法、及び被覆材 | 2023-10-30 |
10 | 特開2022-163614 | 推定装置、方法およびプログラム | 2023-10-27 |
11 | 特開2022-139211 | 推定装置、方法およびプログラム | 2023-10-27 |
12 | 特開2022-140050 | 推定装置、方法およびプログラム | 2023-10-27 |
13 | 特開2022-139212 | 推定装置、方法およびプログラム | 2023-10-27 |
14 | 特開2022-140051 | 推定装置、方法およびプログラム | 2023-10-27 |
15 | 特開2022-146459 | 二液混合型モルタル組成物及び吐出装置 | 2023-10-25 |
16 | 特開2023-049714 | セメント組成物及びそれを用いた補修方法、並びに、コンクリート構造物 | 2023-10-25 |
17 | 特開2021-187715 | 勾配面施工用速硬性モルタル組成物及び勾配面施工用速硬性モルタル | 2023-10-23 |
18 | 特許7437207 | 強化コンクリート用モルタル及び強化コンクリートの補強方法 | 2023-10-03 |
19 | 特開2021-155229 | 繊維補強モルタル組成物及び繊維補強モルタル | 2023-10-03 |
20 | 特許7402394 | シーリング材組成物 | 2023-09-25 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-04-01 to 2024-03-31), 230 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.5. The most protest patent is 特許6521607 "高耐久性モルタル及び高耐久性コンクリート" (23 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特表2018-514359 "上腕骨用釘" (7 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6521607 | 高耐久性モルタル及び高耐久性コンクリート | 23 times |
2 | 特表2018-514359 | 上腕骨用釘 | 7 times |
3 | 特許5981969 | コンクリート部材の製造方法 | 6 times |
4 | 特許7112180 | 建築材料 | 4 times |
5 | 特許7118527 | グラウト | 4 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-04-01 ~ 2024-03-31), there were 279 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.5 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特表2022-508807 "腫瘍内注射製剤" (Inspection day 2024-03-19) , next is 特表2021-516049 "組換えT細胞受容体遺伝子を用いて細胞ベースの治療薬を製造するための技法" (Inspection day 2024-03-19) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特表2022-508807 | 腫瘍内注射製剤 | 2024-03-19 |
2 | 特表2021-516049 | 組換えT細胞受容体遺伝子を用いて細胞ベースの治療薬を製造するための技法 | 2024-03-19 |
3 | 特表2023-525436 | ビグアニド系化合物、及びフラボン、ヒドロキシフラボン、フラバノン、フラボン誘導体、ヒドロキシフラボン誘導体、フラバノン誘導体の複合剤を有効成分として含有する癌の予防または治療用薬学的組成物 | 2024-03-18 |
4 | 特表2023-528059 | 抗ウイルス剤及び抗うつ剤を有効成分として含有する癌の予防または治療用薬学的組成物 | 2024-03-18 |
5 | 特開2022-032977 | ポリマー繊維を生産するためのデバイス及び方法、ならびにそのポリマー繊維の使用 | 2024-03-14 |
6 | 特表2021-529821 | イムノグロブリンを除去又は減少させるための遺伝子治療ベクターの形質導入を増加または増強するための組成物および方法 | 2024-03-13 |
7 | 特開2022-081543 | 抗TREM2抗体及びその使用方法 | 2024-02-27 |
8 | 特表2021-516222 | 副甲状腺ホルモンポリペプチドコンジュゲートおよびその使用方法 | 2024-02-20 |
9 | 特表2020-524139 | 骨髄増殖性腫瘍関連骨髄線維症及び貧血を治療するための方法 | 2024-02-16 |
10 | 特許6204638 | 骨折内固定具 | 2024-02-15 |
11 | 特開2023-052609 | 細胞培養物の製造方法 | 2024-01-25 |
12 | 特表2021-500373 | 線維芽細胞活性化タンパク質α(FAP−α)を標的とする撮像剤および放射線療法用薬剤 | 2024-01-19 |
13 | 特開2022-033938 | 胎盤幹細胞を使用する疼痛の治療 | 2024-01-15 |
14 | 特表2020-523173 | 細胞生着のためのパッチグラフト組成物 | 2024-01-12 |
15 | 特許6830123 | 透水性構造体 | 2023-12-26 |
16 | 特許7474627 | 耐塩性グラウト組成物及び耐塩性グラウト | 2023-12-19 |
17 | 特許6640275 | グリシル−L−2−メチルプロリル−L−グルタミン酸を用いる自閉症スペクトラム障害の治療 | 2023-12-15 |
18 | 特許6342459 | グリシル−L−2−メチルプロピル−L−グルタミン酸を用いる自閉症スペクトラム障害の治療 | 2023-12-15 |
19 | 特開2019-074083 | 液体を調量する弁、特に燃料噴射弁 | 2023-12-12 |
20 | 特許7427709 | 鉄骨部材の耐火被覆構造 | 2023-12-06 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-04-01 to 2024-03-31), 518 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.5. The most inspection patent is 特許6901451 "前立腺特異的膜抗原(PSMA)の標識インヒビター、前立腺癌の治療のための画像化剤および薬剤としてのその使用" (30 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許6198346 "1回当たり100〜200単位のPTHが週1回投与されることを特徴とする、PTH含有骨粗鬆症治療/予防剤" (18 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6901451 | 前立腺特異的膜抗原(PSMA)の標識インヒビター、前立腺癌の治療のための画像化剤および薬剤としてのその使用 | 30 times |
2 | 特許6198346 | 1回当たり100〜200単位のPTHが週1回投与されることを特徴とする、PTH含有骨粗鬆症治療/予防剤 | 18 times |
3 | 特許6521607 | 高耐久性モルタル及び高耐久性コンクリート | 16 times |
4 | 特許6150846 | 1回当たり100〜200単位のPTHが週1回投与されることを特徴とする、PTH含有骨粗鬆症治療/予防剤 | 15 times |
5 | 特許6043008 | 1回当たり100〜200単位のPTHが週1回投与されることを特徴とする、PTH含有骨粗鬆症治療/予防剤 | 11 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-04-01 to 2024-03-31), 3,443 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.4. The most cited patent is 特許7080087 "畦造成方法" (102 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6521977 "免疫調節剤としての1,2,4−オキサジアゾール誘導体" (39 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7080087 | 畦造成方法 | 102 times |
2 | 特許6521977 | 免疫調節剤としての1,2,4−オキサジアゾール誘導体 | 39 times |
3 | 特許6734709 | 車体の下部構造 | 37 times |
4 | 特許6043318 | 仮脛骨プロテーゼ装置 | 36 times |
5 | 特許6395765 | 配列操作のための改善された系、方法および酵素組成物のエンジニアリングおよび最適化 | 33 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International