The Technical Field "表面積" had 354 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-04-30). This is a significantly decreased of -286 filings (-44.7%) over 640 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-04-30).
The highest number of filings in 2017 with 2,521 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 635 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 8,863 cases in total) is 1,477, and the median is 1,856. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1,477 patents |
Std Dev | 818 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 635 cases | -64.8 % |
2022 year | 1,804 cases | -5.50 % |
2021 year | 1,909 cases | -5.82 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 表面積 for the period of the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 表面積, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of 表面積 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 18,832 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
A patent aanlysis report on the following synonyms was found in the technical term "表面積".
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 表面積 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 横浜ゴム株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2023 to 2025) with 18 cases, followed by 住友化学株式会社 with 17 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
横浜ゴム株式会社 | 18 cases |
住友化学株式会社 | 17 cases |
デンカ株式会社 | 15 cases |
東レ株式会社 | 11 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 10 cases |
住友ゴム工業株式会社 | 9 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 9 cases |
信越化学工業株式会社 | 5 cases |
株式会社ブリヂストン | 3 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 横浜ゴム株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2015 to 2025) with 368 cases, followed by 住友ゴム工業株式会社 with 358 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
横浜ゴム株式会社 | 368 cases |
住友ゴム工業株式会社 | 358 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 234 cases |
信越化学工業株式会社 | 222 cases |
デンカ株式会社 | 196 cases |
住友化学株式会社 | 185 cases |
株式会社ブリヂストン | 178 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 131 cases |
東レ株式会社 | 117 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 34 cases |
三菱化学株式会社 | 3 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 表面積 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Among the top coapplicants, 横浜ゴム株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2023 to 2025) with 18 cases, followed by トヨタ自動車株式会社 with 10 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
横浜ゴム株式会社 | 18 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 10 cases |
住友ゴム工業株式会社 | 9 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 9 cases |
信越化学工業株式会社 | 5 cases |
株式会社ブリヂストン | 3 cases |
Among the top coapplicants, 横浜ゴム株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2015 to 2025) with 368 cases, followed by 住友ゴム工業株式会社 with 358 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
横浜ゴム株式会社 | 368 cases |
住友ゴム工業株式会社 | 358 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 234 cases |
信越化学工業株式会社 | 222 cases |
株式会社ブリヂストン | 178 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 131 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 34 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 表面積’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 表面積’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
表面積 filed 34 joint applications with パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 21 cases in total) is 3.5, and the median is 3.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.8, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2020 with 8 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 3.5 patents |
Std Dev | 2.9 |
COV | 0.8 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 4 cases | +33.3 % |
2021 year | 3 cases | -62.5 % |
2020 year | 8 cases | +33.3 % |
表面積 filed 368 joint applications with 横浜ゴム株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 164 cases in total) is 27.3, and the median is 19.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.9, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 87 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 18 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 27.3 patents |
Std Dev | 24.6 |
COV | 0.9 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 18 cases | -35.7 % |
2022 year | 28 cases | +40.0 % |
2021 year | 20 cases | +5.26 % |
表面積 filed 358 joint applications with 住友ゴム工業株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 129 cases in total) is 21.5, and the median is 16.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.9, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2018 with 74 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 4 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 21.5 patents |
Std Dev | 20.1 |
COV | 0.9 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 9 cases | +125 % |
2022 year | 4 cases | -83.3 % |
2021 year | 24 cases | -58.6 % |
表面積 filed 131 joint applications with キヤノン株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 74 cases in total) is 12.3, and the median is 10.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2022 with 26 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 7 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 12.3 patents |
Std Dev | 7.8 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 7 cases | -73.1 % |
2022 year | 26 cases | +117 % |
2021 year | 12 cases | +33.3 % |
表面積 filed 234 joint applications with トヨタ自動車株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 116 cases in total) is 19.3, and the median is 23.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2017 with 36 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 10 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 19.3 patents |
Std Dev | 10.9 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 10 cases | -67.7 % |
2022 year | 31 cases | +34.8 % |
2021 year | 23 cases | 0 |
The following shows JP patents held by 表面積 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 表面積’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 表面積 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 2 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 1.0 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許6782238 "絶縁導体、固定子コイル、モータアセンブリ、絶縁導体を製造する方法、中間生成物、絶縁導体を製造するための装置" (Invalidation Trial day 2024-06-28) , next is 特許4683413 "しぼ加工樹脂製食器" (Invalidation Trial day 2024-03-27) .
- | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6782238 | 絶縁導体、固定子コイル、モータアセンブリ、絶縁導体を製造する方法、中間生成物、絶縁導体を製造するための装置 | 2024-06-28 |
2 | 特許4683413 | しぼ加工樹脂製食器 | 2024-03-27 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 1 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.0. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6782238 "絶縁導体、固定子コイル、モータアセンブリ、絶縁導体を製造する方法、中間生成物、絶縁導体を製造するための装置" (1 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6782238 | 絶縁導体、固定子コイル、モータアセンブリ、絶縁導体を製造する方法、中間生成物、絶縁導体を製造するための装置 | 1 times |
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 106 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7486301 "排ガス処理触媒とその製造方法およびこれを用いた排ガス処理方法、並びに触媒の設計方法" (Opposition day 2024-11-18) , next is 特許7479849 "高分散二酸化ケイ素を製造する方法" (Opposition day 2024-11-08) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7486301 | 排ガス処理触媒とその製造方法およびこれを用いた排ガス処理方法、並びに触媒の設計方法 | 2024-11-18 |
2 | 特許7479849 | 高分散二酸化ケイ素を製造する方法 | 2024-11-08 |
3 | 特許7480401 | 食品用包装フィルムおよび食品用包装体 | 2024-11-07 |
4 | 特許7473725 | シリカ粉末 | 2024-10-23 |
5 | 特許7473726 | シリカ粉末 | 2024-10-23 |
6 | 特許7465451 | セメント組成物、モルタル組成物、及び、コンクリート構造物の補修方法 | 2024-10-10 |
7 | 特許7471327 | 軽量不織マット | 2024-09-25 |
8 | 特許7453487 | 導電性顔料ペースト、合材ペースト、及びリチウムイオン電池用電極 | 2024-09-19 |
9 | 特許7438305 | 銀粉 | 2024-08-22 |
10 | 特許7443614 | 樹脂粒子及びその用途 | 2024-08-21 |
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 221 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.5 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2024-035822 "中空シリカ粒子、その製造方法、及び中空シリカ分散液" (Protest day 2024-12-27) , next is 特表2022-553960 "嵩密度が改善されたモリブデンオキシクロリド" (Protest day 2024-12-26) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2024-035822 | 中空シリカ粒子、その製造方法、及び中空シリカ分散液 | 2024-12-27 |
2 | 特表2022-553960 | 嵩密度が改善されたモリブデンオキシクロリド | 2024-12-26 |
3 | 特表2023-511850 | 表面活性が変更されたヒュームドシリカ | 2024-12-20 |
4 | 特開2024-064797 | 酸化マグネシウム顆粒及びそれを含有する酸化マグネシウム錠剤及び細粒剤、並びにそれらの製造方法 | 2024-12-13 |
5 | 特開2022-171159 | 抗菌不織布 | 2024-12-10 |
6 | 特開2024-138514 | 膜構造体、圧電体膜及び超伝導体膜 | 2024-12-10 |
7 | 特開2023-041359 | 成形品、成形品の製造方法および成形品の金属イオン溶出低減方法 | 2024-12-09 |
8 | 特開2024-155234 | 医療用ゴム組成物および医療用ゴム製品 | 2024-11-29 |
9 | 特開2023-165923 | カマンベールチーズ | 2024-11-26 |
10 | 特開2022-073197 | 蓄電素子用正極活物質合剤、蓄電素子用正極及び蓄電素子 | 2024-11-21 |
11 | 特開2022-059742 | ガラスフィラー粉末 | 2024-11-14 |
12 | 特開2022-063234 | カーボンナノチューブ分散液およびその利用 | 2024-11-01 |
13 | 特開2022-082216 | エアロゲル複合成形体 | 2024-10-31 |
14 | 特開2022-150363 | 樹脂シート及び防煙垂壁 | 2024-10-24 |
15 | 特開2023-030913 | モルタル組成物及びその使用方法 | 2024-10-24 |
16 | 特開2023-049176 | 炭酸化硬化体およびその製造方法 | 2024-10-21 |
17 | 特開2024-077729 | 撥水層及び撥水層付きガス拡散層 | 2024-10-21 |
18 | 特許7576994 | セメントクリンカ粉砕物含有粉末 | 2024-10-04 |
19 | 再公表2019/198242 | 封止用樹脂組成物、電子部品装置及び電子部品装置の製造方法 | 2024-10-04 |
20 | 特許7598898 | 球状銀粉、球状銀粉の製造方法、球状銀粉製造装置、及び導電性ペースト | 2024-09-30 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 523 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.4. The most protest patent is 特許6958988 "硬化性組成物、積層体及び自動車ヘッドランプレンズ" (8 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許7321682 "食品用包装フィルムおよび食品用包装体" (6 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6958988 | 硬化性組成物、積層体及び自動車ヘッドランプレンズ | 8 times |
2 | 特許7321682 | 食品用包装フィルムおよび食品用包装体 | 6 times |
3 | 特許7301504 | 食品用包装フィルムおよび食品用包装体 | 5 times |
4 | 特許7569788 | 電解液とクロム層の製造方法 | 5 times |
5 | 再公表2015/186363 | リチウムイオン二次電池電極用バインダー組成物、リチウムイオン二次電池電極用スラリー組成物、リチウムイオン二次電池用電極およびリチウムイオン二次電池 | 5 times |
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 290 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.8 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特許7604861 "炭素材料およびそれを用いてなる導電性組成物、導電膜" (Inspection day 2024-12-24) , next is 特開2024-155234 "医療用ゴム組成物および医療用ゴム製品" (Inspection day 2024-12-24) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7604861 | 炭素材料およびそれを用いてなる導電性組成物、導電膜 | 2024-12-24 |
2 | 特開2024-155234 | 医療用ゴム組成物および医療用ゴム製品 | 2024-12-24 |
3 | 特許7372491 | セメント組成物及びその製造方法 | 2024-12-20 |
4 | 特開2023-041359 | 成形品、成形品の製造方法および成形品の金属イオン溶出低減方法 | 2024-12-20 |
5 | 特開2022-171159 | 抗菌不織布 | 2024-12-17 |
6 | 特開2024-064797 | 酸化マグネシウム顆粒及びそれを含有する酸化マグネシウム錠剤及び細粒剤、並びにそれらの製造方法 | 2024-12-17 |
7 | 特開2023-024691 | 形質導入および細胞プロセシングのための方法 | 2024-12-17 |
8 | 特開2022-152785 | ニッケル粉末及びニッケル粉末の製造方法 | 2024-12-10 |
9 | 特表2022-528344 | トリアシルグリセロール系油からクロロフィル誘導体を除去するためのシリカ吸着剤 | 2024-12-03 |
10 | 特許7598898 | 球状銀粉、球状銀粉の製造方法、球状銀粉製造装置、及び導電性ペースト | 2024-11-29 |
11 | 特表2023-534164 | 高多孔性スパイダーシルク繊維 | 2024-11-28 |
12 | 特開2022-073197 | 蓄電素子用正極活物質合剤、蓄電素子用正極及び蓄電素子 | 2024-11-27 |
13 | 特開2023-030913 | モルタル組成物及びその使用方法 | 2024-11-27 |
14 | 特開2022-178662 | 静電荷像現像剤、プロセスカートリッジ、画像形成装置及び画像形成方法 | 2024-11-26 |
15 | 特表2023-551575 | セラミック物品及びそれを作製する方法 | 2024-11-20 |
16 | 特開2022-059742 | ガラスフィラー粉末 | 2024-11-20 |
17 | 特開2022-063234 | カーボンナノチューブ分散液およびその利用 | 2024-11-14 |
18 | 特開2022-082216 | エアロゲル複合成形体 | 2024-11-12 |
19 | 特許7495976 | 喫煙システム | 2024-10-30 |
20 | 特開2024-077729 | 撥水層及び撥水層付きガス拡散層 | 2024-10-29 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 659 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.5. The most inspection patent is 特許6958988 "硬化性組成物、積層体及び自動車ヘッドランプレンズ" (26 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許6301900 "リチウム金属混合酸化物を含む複合材料およびその製造方法" (10 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6958988 | 硬化性組成物、積層体及び自動車ヘッドランプレンズ | 26 times |
2 | 特許6301900 | リチウム金属混合酸化物を含む複合材料およびその製造方法 | 10 times |
3 | 再公表2015/186363 | リチウムイオン二次電池電極用バインダー組成物、リチウムイオン二次電池電極用スラリー組成物、リチウムイオン二次電池用電極およびリチウムイオン二次電池 | 10 times |
4 | 特許7527658 | 膜構造体、圧電体膜及び超伝導体膜 | 10 times |
5 | 特許6426582 | 多孔質炭素 | 8 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 4,651 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.8. The most cited patent is 特許6608753 "PdRu合金電極材料およびその製造方法" (334 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特開2015-201432 "非水電解液二次電池用正極活物質粒子粉末及びその製造方法、並びに非水電解液二次電池" (53 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6608753 | PdRu合金電極材料およびその製造方法 | 334 times |
2 | 特開2015-201432 | 非水電解液二次電池用正極活物質粒子粉末及びその製造方法、並びに非水電解液二次電池 | 53 times |
3 | 特許6130950 | 塗装機器および塗装方法 | 50 times |
4 | 特許6483508 | 六方晶窒化ホウ素粉末及びその製造方法 | 38 times |
5 | 特開2018-148071 | 記憶装置 | 31 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International