カルボキシル基 (JP Patent Analysis Report)
The Technical Field "カルボキシル基" had 839 patent application filings in the most recent period (2022-01-01 to 2022-08-31). This is a significantly decreased of -230 filings (-21.5%) over 1,069 they had in the same period of the previous year (2021-01-01 to 2021-08-31). This report also includes technical terms related to " カルボキシ基 ", " カルボン酸基 " in the search set.
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 2,811 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 1,072 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 9,491 cases in total) is 1,582, and the median is 1,727. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 1,582 patents |
| Std Dev | 761 |
| COV | 0.5 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 1,072 cases | -33.4 % |
| 2021 year | 1,609 cases | -12.79 % |
| 2020 year | 1,845 cases | -19.57 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for カルボキシル基 for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-04-30). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of カルボキシル基, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
- Table of Contents
- Foreign Patent Analysis Report
- Patent Filing Summary for カルボキシル基
- Search Set (Search Formula/Analysis Patents)
- Related Patent Analysis Report
- Competitors Information
- Top company Information
- • Information on Important Patents
- Provision of patent information to the media
- About this Site
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
Introduction
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
カルボキシル基, Changes in the Number of JP Patents/Patent Applications
The changes in the number of patent filings of カルボキシル基 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
Search Set (Analysis Patents)
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 20,327 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
カルボキシル基
Same industry / competition company information (JP)
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as カルボキシル基 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024).
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 東レ株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 45 cases, followed by ARTIENCE株式会社 with 35 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| 東レ株式会社 | 45 cases |
| ARTIENCE株式会社 | 35 cases |
| DIC株式会社 | 34 cases |
| キヤノン株式会社 | 31 cases |
| 花王株式会社 | 22 cases |
| 住友化学株式会社 | 18 cases |
| 富士フイルム株式会社 | 6 cases |
| 株式会社レゾナック | 6 cases |
| コニカミノルタ株式会社 | 4 cases |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2014 to 2024).
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 富士フイルム株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 773 cases, followed by ARTIENCE株式会社 with 525 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| 富士フイルム株式会社 | 773 cases |
| ARTIENCE株式会社 | 525 cases |
| 東レ株式会社 | 519 cases |
| DIC株式会社 | 412 cases |
| 株式会社レゾナック | 374 cases |
| 花王株式会社 | 370 cases |
| キヤノン株式会社 | 338 cases |
| 住友化学株式会社 | 336 cases |
| コニカミノルタ株式会社 | 118 cases |
| 三菱化学株式会社 | 10 cases |
Same industry / competition company, Change in the Number of JP Patents
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
Top company information (JP)
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as カルボキシル基 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024).
Among the top coapplicants, 東レ株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 45 cases, followed by ARTIENCE株式会社 with 35 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| 東レ株式会社 | 45 cases |
| ARTIENCE株式会社 | 35 cases |
| DIC株式会社 | 34 cases |
| 住友化学株式会社 | 18 cases |
| 富士フイルム株式会社 | 6 cases |
| 株式会社レゾナック | 6 cases |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2014 to 2024).
Among the top coapplicants, 富士フイルム株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 773 cases, followed by ARTIENCE株式会社 with 525 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| 富士フイルム株式会社 | 773 cases |
| ARTIENCE株式会社 | 525 cases |
| 東レ株式会社 | 519 cases |
| DIC株式会社 | 412 cases |
| 株式会社レゾナック | 374 cases |
| 住友化学株式会社 | 336 cases |
Top company, Change in the Number of JP Patents
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by カルボキシル基’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by カルボキシル基’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Top company Details (JP)
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 富士フイルム株式会社
カルボキシル基 filed 773 joint applications with 富士フイルム株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 356 cases in total) is 59.3, and the median is 74.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.7, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2015 with 127 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 5 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 59.3 patents |
| Std Dev | 42.1 |
| COV | 0.7 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 5 cases | -92.2 % |
| 2021 year | 64 cases | -29.67 % |
| 2020 year | 91 cases | -18.02 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with DIC株式会社
カルボキシル基 filed 412 joint applications with DIC株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 223 cases in total) is 37.2, and the median is 39.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2014 with 66 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 27 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 37.2 patents |
| Std Dev | 17.0 |
| COV | 0.5 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 27 cases | -37.2 % |
| 2021 year | 43 cases | +22.86 % |
| 2020 year | 35 cases | -34.0 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 東レ株式会社
カルボキシル基 filed 519 joint applications with 東レ株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 263 cases in total) is 43.8, and the median is 46.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2016 with 81 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 32 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 43.8 patents |
| Std Dev | 19.7 |
| COV | 0.4 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 34 cases | +6.25 % |
| 2021 year | 32 cases | -44.8 % |
| 2020 year | 58 cases | -10.77 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 住友化学株式会社
カルボキシル基 filed 336 joint applications with 住友化学株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 137 cases in total) is 22.8, and the median is 23.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2017 with 77 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 9 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 22.8 patents |
| Std Dev | 11.2 |
| COV | 0.5 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 9 cases | -75.0 % |
| 2021 year | 36 cases | +63.6 % |
| 2020 year | 22 cases | -8.33 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 株式会社レゾナック
カルボキシル基 filed 374 joint applications with 株式会社レゾナック for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 151 cases in total) is 25.2, and the median is 18.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.9, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 60 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 4 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 25.2 patents |
| Std Dev | 21.9 |
| COV | 0.9 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 4 cases | -66.7 % |
| 2021 year | 12 cases | -52.0 % |
| 2020 year | 25 cases | -49.0 % |
Information on important patents (JP)
The following shows JP patents held by カルボキシル基 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and カルボキシル基’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which カルボキシル基 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
Glossary
- Cited
- Indicates that the patent/patent application has been cited (by Examiners) in notices of reasons for rejection in the examination process of other (Japanese, U.S., or European) patent applications. The higher the number of citations, the more important the patent/patent application is considered to be.
- Request for invalidation trial
- Indicates that a third party has requested a procedure to invalidate the patent. It is likely to affect the business of third parties and is considered to be of high importance.
- Opposition
- Indicates that a third party has filed a petition with the Patent Office to hear the validity of the patent again. Like the trial for invalidation, it is considered to be of high importance.
- Information provision
- Indicates that a third party has provided the Patent Office with useful information for examination for the patent filed. It is usually considered to be of high importance because it is done to prevent the patent from being granted.
- Browsing request
- Indicates that a third party has requested the Patent Office to view the patent bag (a set of documents exchanged between the Patent Office and the applicant). The bag is often checked prior to trial for invalidation, opposition, and provision of information, and is considered to be a highly important patent.
Invalidationed Trial cases
List of latest Invalidationed Trial patents
In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 2 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 1.5 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許4110140 "チロシンキナーゼの阻害剤" (Invalidation Trial day 2023-08-10) , next is 特許6323815 "有機光電子素子およびこれを含む表示装置" (Invalidation Trial day 2021-07-30) .
| - | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許4110140 | チロシンキナーゼの阻害剤 | 2023-08-10 |
| 2 | 特許6323815 | 有機光電子素子およびこれを含む表示装置 | 2021-07-30 |
Oppositioned cases
List of latest Oppositioned patents
In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 97 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7342917 "接着性樹脂シート、プリント配線板および、電子機器。" (Opposition day 2024-02-19) , next is 特許7300257 "硫化水素吸収フィルム" (Opposition day 2024-01-04) .
| - | No. | Title | Opposition days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許7342917 | 接着性樹脂シート、プリント配線板および、電子機器。 | 2024-02-19 |
| 2 | 特許7300257 | 硫化水素吸収フィルム | 2024-01-04 |
| 3 | 特許7306542 | 樹脂組成物、半導体用配線層積層体及び半導体装置 | 2023-12-27 |
| 4 | 特許7307521 | 塗装体の補修塗装方法 | 2023-12-26 |
| 5 | 特許7299526 | 紙用耐油剤 | 2023-12-26 |
| 6 | 特許7303794 | セルロースナノファイバー乾燥固形物の製造方法 | 2023-12-21 |
| 7 | 特許7294819 | 透明導電性フィルム用基材および透明導電性フィルム | 2023-12-20 |
| 8 | 特許7294555 | 易開封性包装材及び包装袋 | 2023-12-20 |
| 9 | 特許7291502 | 粘着フィルム | 2023-12-14 |
| 10 | 特許7290809 | フォトクロミック組成物、フォトクロミック物品及び眼鏡 | 2023-12-11 |
Protested cases
List of latest Protested patents
In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 327 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.5 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2021-025143 "パルプシート" (Protest day 2024-03-25) , next is 再公表2020/116544 "ガスバリア性フィルム" (Protest day 2024-03-25) .
| - | No. | Title | Protest days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特開2021-025143 | パルプシート | 2024-03-25 |
| 2 | 再公表2020/116544 | ガスバリア性フィルム | 2024-03-25 |
| 3 | 特許7469537 | ポリイミドの製造方法 | 2024-03-19 |
| 4 | 特開2021-120436 | セルロース繊維複合体 | 2024-03-05 |
| 5 | 特開2022-066262 | 発泡成形用マスターバッチ及び発泡成形体 | 2024-02-29 |
| 6 | 特開2022-088712 | 成形フィルム用導電性組成物、成形フィルム、及びその製造方法、並びに、成形体及びその製造方法 | 2024-02-26 |
| 7 | 特開2020-111739 | 粘着テープ | 2024-02-21 |
| 8 | 特開2022-071804 | 液晶配向剤、液晶配向膜、液晶素子及び液晶素子の製造方法 | 2024-02-19 |
| 9 | 特表2023-534848 | 高吸水性樹脂の製造方法 | 2024-02-16 |
| 10 | 特開2022-084400 | 導電性ペースト及び積層セラミックコンデンサ | 2024-02-14 |
| 11 | 特開2023-095363 | 水性塗料組成物および塗装物の製造方法 | 2024-02-08 |
| 12 | 特開2022-157070 | 硬化性組成物及び硬化物 | 2024-02-07 |
| 13 | 特許7464493 | 黒色感光性樹脂組成物、パターン化された硬化物の製造方法、パターン化された硬化物、及びブラックマトリクス | 2024-02-07 |
| 14 | 特開2021-113315 | 粘着テープ | 2024-02-05 |
| 15 | 特開2021-053748 | 研磨パッド及び研磨加工物の製造方法 | 2024-02-02 |
| 16 | 特表2020-525622 | 車両タイヤを製造する方法、その方法によって製造される車両タイヤ及び処理された強化支持材の使用 | 2024-01-29 |
| 17 | 特開2021-194822 | ガスバリア性フィルム | 2024-01-24 |
| 18 | 特許7457491 | プレキャスト用セメント混和剤組成物 | 2024-01-23 |
| 19 | 特許7456946 | 水性塗料組成物 | 2024-01-19 |
| 20 | 特許7474115 | 非水系二次電池用セパレータ及び非水系二次電池 | 2024-01-19 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Protested
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-05-01 to 2024-04-30), 663 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.5. The most protest patent is 特許6810528 "ライセンスプレート用グラフィックフィルム及びライセンスプレート、並びにそれらの製造方法" (7 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特開2018-140544 "金属張積層板、接着シート、接着性ポリイミド樹脂組成物及び回路基板" (6 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6810528 | ライセンスプレート用グラフィックフィルム及びライセンスプレート、並びにそれらの製造方法 | 7 times |
| 2 | 特開2018-140544 | 金属張積層板、接着シート、接着性ポリイミド樹脂組成物及び回路基板 | 6 times |
| 3 | 特許6741442 | 撥水助剤、非フッ素系撥水剤組成物、及び撥水性繊維製品の製造方法 | 6 times |
| 4 | 特開2019-065181 | ポリイミドの製造方法 | 6 times |
| 5 | 特開2016-011363 | 粘着剤組成物、粘着シート、及び、光学部材 | 5 times |
Inspectioned cases
List of latest Inspectioned patents
In the last 3 years (2021-05-01 ~ 2024-04-30), there were 376 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 2.0 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2022-084400 "導電性ペースト及び積層セラミックコンデンサ" (Inspection day 2024-03-22) , next is 特開2021-113315 "粘着テープ" (Inspection day 2024-03-19) .
| - | No. | Title | Inspection days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特開2022-084400 | 導電性ペースト及び積層セラミックコンデンサ | 2024-03-22 |
| 2 | 特開2021-113315 | 粘着テープ | 2024-03-19 |
| 3 | 特許7457491 | プレキャスト用セメント混和剤組成物 | 2024-03-14 |
| 4 | 特開2021-120436 | セルロース繊維複合体 | 2024-03-12 |
| 5 | 特開2023-095363 | 水性塗料組成物および塗装物の製造方法 | 2024-03-07 |
| 6 | 特開2022-066262 | 発泡成形用マスターバッチ及び発泡成形体 | 2024-03-07 |
| 7 | 特開2020-111739 | 粘着テープ | 2024-02-27 |
| 8 | 特開2023-168652 | 電解金めっき液及びその製造方法並びに該めっき液を用いためっき方法 | 2024-02-20 |
| 9 | 特開2023-069822 | 酸性電解銅めっき液、プリフォーム層の形成方法、接合用シートの製造方法、接合用基板の製造方法及び接合体の製造方法 | 2024-02-20 |
| 10 | 特開2022-157070 | 硬化性組成物及び硬化物 | 2024-02-19 |
| 11 | 特許7474115 | 非水系二次電池用セパレータ及び非水系二次電池 | 2024-02-19 |
| 12 | 特開2021-053748 | 研磨パッド及び研磨加工物の製造方法 | 2024-02-15 |
| 13 | 特表2023-545035 | ポストＣＭＰ洗浄組成物 | 2024-02-13 |
| 14 | 特開2021-194822 | ガスバリア性フィルム | 2024-02-07 |
| 15 | 特許4128138 | ジアミン誘導体 | 2024-02-06 |
| 16 | 特許4109288 | ジアミン誘導体 | 2024-02-06 |
| 17 | 特許7478173 | フラックス組成物、およびはんだ組成物 | 2024-01-25 |
| 18 | 特開2020-152786 | 活性エネルギー線硬化型樹脂組成物、活性エネルギー線硬化型エマルジョン組成物およびコーティング剤組成物ならびにウレタン（メタ）アクリレート系化合物 | 2024-01-24 |
| 19 | 特開2019-065181 | ポリイミドの製造方法 | 2024-01-23 |
| 20 | 特開2022-026676 | 樹脂組成物及び樹脂組成物の製造方法 | 2024-01-22 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Inspectioned
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-05-01 to 2024-04-30), 763 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.7. The most inspection patent is 特許7036774 "前立腺特異的膜抗原（ＰＳＭＡ）の標識インヒビター、前立腺癌の治療のための画像化剤および薬剤としてのその使用" (32 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許7376250 "皮膚外用組成物" (30 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許7036774 | 前立腺特異的膜抗原（ＰＳＭＡ）の標識インヒビター、前立腺癌の治療のための画像化剤および薬剤としてのその使用 | 32 times |
| 2 | 特許7376250 | 皮膚外用組成物 | 30 times |
| 3 | 特許6662041 | インク組成物および画像又は三次元造形物形成方法 | 9 times |
| 4 | 特許6810528 | ライセンスプレート用グラフィックフィルム及びライセンスプレート、並びにそれらの製造方法 | 8 times |
| 5 | 特開2015-146038 | 樹脂硬化膜パターンの形成方法、感光性樹脂組成物、感光性エレメント、タッチパネルの製造方法及び樹脂硬化膜 | 7 times |
Cited cases
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Cited
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-05-01 to 2024-04-30), 5,140 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 3.0. The most cited patent is 特許6193947 "磁気記録媒体および磁気記録媒体用塗料組成物" (79 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6318108 "磁気テープ" (64 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6193947 | 磁気記録媒体および磁気記録媒体用塗料組成物 | 79 times |
| 2 | 特許6318108 | 磁気テープ | 64 times |
| 3 | 特許6603445 | 改変された発光スペクトルを有する蛍光性四座配位金属錯体 | 53 times |
| 4 | 特許6984993 | 自発光感光性樹脂組成物、これから製造されたカラーフィルタおよび前記カラーフィルタを含む画像表示装置 | 53 times |
| 5 | 特許7295636 | ポリエステル樹脂組成物及びその製造方法 | 42 times |
Providing patent information to the media (newspapers, magazines, etc.)
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
About this Site
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
Please note the following points for use.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
Citation of patent application status and ranking information
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Graphs are image data.
Please note that the various graphs are image data, but we cannot provide them in text data.Scope of coverage for each goal/target
- Based on the description of each goal and target of the SDGs, we have set the scope of technologies to be covered based on our and e-Patent's past experience, etc. (in some cases, the search is based on social issues themselves). Therefore, please note that there is a possibility that this "SDGs Global Company Ranking from Patent Perspective" may not cover 100%.
- A population search formula is clearly indicated for each goal/target (database: Patent Integration). You may use the population search formula as it is, or you may improve it by yourself.
- This search covers patents and utility models, including both published and registered patents (design and design patents are excluded). The unit of count is the number of applications, not the number of patent families.
About the name collation and name control of applicants and right holders
- Company rankings are based on the results calculated by "Patent Integration", with Japanese organizations in Japanese and other companies in English (some are in Japanese).
- Company names may be the names of the companies at the time of application, but the results calculated by Patent Integration are used as is. Company names are used as they were at the time of application.
- Because of the fluctuation in the names of companies (i.e., applicant/right holder names in the patent information), there are cases where the same company appears more than once in the top 10. The number of applications filed by the same company in the top 10 is the total number of applications filed by the company.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
Our Commitment to Safety and Security
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to providing high-quality patent information based on the latest patent data on more than 45 million cases collected from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publication. 
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. collects the patent data from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publications to provide it widely in the form of reports so that anyone can check patent information and patent trends with confidence. 
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to various efforts to enhance the reliability of the information and to allow users to search patent information with confidence.