The Technical Field "原稿" had 157 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-04-30). This is a weakly transition of -11 filings (-6.5%) over 168 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-04-30). This report also includes technical terms related to " マニュスクリプト ", " 原稿(as Topic) ", " 生原稿 ", " 草稿 " in the search set.
The highest number of filings in 2016 with 1,168 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 259 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 2,779 cases in total) is 463, and the median is 477. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 463 patents |
Std Dev | 283 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 259 cases | -37.1 % |
2022 year | 412 cases | -23.99 % |
2021 year | 542 cases | -21.45 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 原稿 for the period of the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 原稿, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of 原稿 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 6,995 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
A patent aanlysis report on the following synonyms was found in the technical term "原稿".
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 原稿 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, キヤノン株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2023 to 2025) with 61 cases, followed by 京セラドキュメントソリューションズ株式会社 with 54 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
キヤノン株式会社 | 61 cases |
京セラドキュメントソリューションズ株式会社 | 54 cases |
株式会社リコー | 24 cases |
富士フイルムビジネスイノベーション株式会社 | 24 cases |
ブラザー工業株式会社 | 21 cases |
シャープ株式会社 | 18 cases |
コニカミノルタ株式会社 | 9 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, キヤノン株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2015 to 2025) with 1,806 cases, followed by 京セラドキュメントソリューションズ株式会社 with 1,513 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
キヤノン株式会社 | 1,806 cases |
京セラドキュメントソリューションズ株式会社 | 1,513 cases |
ブラザー工業株式会社 | 558 cases |
株式会社リコー | 491 cases |
コニカミノルタ株式会社 | 467 cases |
シャープ株式会社 | 434 cases |
富士フイルムビジネスイノベーション株式会社 | 345 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 27 cases |
村田機械株式会社 | 2 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 原稿 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Among the top coapplicants, キヤノン株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2023 to 2025) with 61 cases, followed by 京セラドキュメントソリューションズ株式会社 with 54 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
キヤノン株式会社 | 61 cases |
京セラドキュメントソリューションズ株式会社 | 54 cases |
株式会社リコー | 24 cases |
富士フイルムビジネスイノベーション株式会社 | 24 cases |
ブラザー工業株式会社 | 21 cases |
シャープ株式会社 | 18 cases |
Among the top coapplicants, キヤノン株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2015 to 2025) with 1,806 cases, followed by 京セラドキュメントソリューションズ株式会社 with 1,513 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
キヤノン株式会社 | 1,806 cases |
京セラドキュメントソリューションズ株式会社 | 1,513 cases |
ブラザー工業株式会社 | 558 cases |
株式会社リコー | 491 cases |
シャープ株式会社 | 434 cases |
富士フイルムビジネスイノベーション株式会社 | 345 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 27 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 原稿’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 原稿’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
原稿 filed 1,806 joint applications with キヤノン株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 815 cases in total) is 136, and the median is 124. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.7, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2019 with 317 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 60 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 136 patents |
Std Dev | 100.0 |
COV | 0.7 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 60 cases | -47.4 % |
2022 year | 114 cases | -15.56 % |
2021 year | 135 cases | -28.19 % |
原稿 filed 491 joint applications with 株式会社リコー for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 161 cases in total) is 26.8, and the median is 27.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 119 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 23 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 26.8 patents |
Std Dev | 13.7 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 23 cases | -17.86 % |
2022 year | 28 cases | +7.69 % |
2021 year | 26 cases | -35.0 % |
原稿 filed 1,513 joint applications with 京セラドキュメントソリューションズ株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 517 cases in total) is 86.2, and the median is 81.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.7, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2016 with 313 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 45 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 86.2 patents |
Std Dev | 57.9 |
COV | 0.7 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 54 cases | +20.00 % |
2022 year | 45 cases | -58.3 % |
2021 year | 108 cases | -32.1 % |
原稿 filed 434 joint applications with シャープ株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 218 cases in total) is 36.3, and the median is 42.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2015 with 68 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 18 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 36.3 patents |
Std Dev | 22.0 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 18 cases | -45.5 % |
2022 year | 33 cases | -48.4 % |
2021 year | 64 cases | +23.08 % |
原稿 filed 345 joint applications with 富士フイルムビジネスイノベーション株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 145 cases in total) is 24.2, and the median is 27.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 62 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 18 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 24.2 patents |
Std Dev | 12.9 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 24 cases | -41.5 % |
2022 year | 41 cases | +128 % |
2021 year | 18 cases | -40.0 % |
The following shows JP patents held by 原稿 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 原稿’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 原稿 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 1 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.0. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6055971 "画像形成装置" (1 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6055971 | 画像形成装置 | 1 times |
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 3 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7485341 "ヒンジ装置並びにこのヒンジ装置を備えた各種機器" (Opposition day 2024-08-15) , next is 特許7450302 "開閉支持装置並びにこの開閉支持装置を用いた事務機器" (Opposition day 2024-07-03) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7485341 | ヒンジ装置並びにこのヒンジ装置を備えた各種機器 | 2024-08-15 |
2 | 特許7450302 | 開閉支持装置並びにこの開閉支持装置を用いた事務機器 | 2024-07-03 |
3 | 特許7390763 | 開閉支持装置並びにこの開閉支持装置を用いた事務機器 | 2024-06-03 |
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 10 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.3 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2023-035180 "原稿圧着板開閉装置並びにこの原稿圧着板開閉装置を備えた事務機器" (Protest day 2024-11-12) , next is 特開2023-019067 "ヒンジ並びにこのヒンジを用いた事務機器" (Protest day 2024-10-08) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2023-035180 | 原稿圧着板開閉装置並びにこの原稿圧着板開閉装置を備えた事務機器 | 2024-11-12 |
2 | 特開2023-019067 | ヒンジ並びにこのヒンジを用いた事務機器 | 2024-10-08 |
3 | 特開2022-190573 | ヒンジ並びにこのヒンジを用いた事務機器 | 2024-08-09 |
4 | 特許7544468 | 防災設備 | 2024-07-31 |
5 | 特開2022-070476 | 原稿圧着板開閉装置及び事務機器 | 2024-01-09 |
6 | 特許7594277 | ヒンジ並びにこのヒンジを用いた事務機器 | 2024-01-09 |
7 | 特開2022-082174 | 画像読取装置 | 2022-12-05 |
8 | 特開2022-096422 | ヒンジ及びヒンジを備えた事務機器の原稿圧着板及びヒンジを備えた電子機器 | 2022-11-25 |
9 | 特開2022-082463 | 画像読取装置 | 2022-11-25 |
10 | 特許7201060 | 記録装置 | 2022-01-27 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 14 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.3. The most protest patent is 特許7544468 "防災設備" (4 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許7223400 "原稿圧着板開閉装置並びにこの原稿圧着板開閉装置を備えた事務機器" (2 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7544468 | 防災設備 | 4 times |
2 | 特許7223400 | 原稿圧着板開閉装置並びにこの原稿圧着板開閉装置を備えた事務機器 | 2 times |
3 | 特許7201060 | 記録装置 | 1 times |
4 | 特許7290397 | 画像形成装置 | 1 times |
5 | 特開2022-096422 | ヒンジ及びヒンジを備えた事務機器の原稿圧着板及びヒンジを備えた電子機器 | 1 times |
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 13 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.2 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2023-035180 "原稿圧着板開閉装置並びにこの原稿圧着板開閉装置を備えた事務機器" (Inspection day 2024-11-14) , next is 特開2023-019067 "ヒンジ並びにこのヒンジを用いた事務機器" (Inspection day 2024-10-17) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2023-035180 | 原稿圧着板開閉装置並びにこの原稿圧着板開閉装置を備えた事務機器 | 2024-11-14 |
2 | 特開2023-019067 | ヒンジ並びにこのヒンジを用いた事務機器 | 2024-10-17 |
3 | 特開2022-190573 | ヒンジ並びにこのヒンジを用いた事務機器 | 2024-08-19 |
4 | 特許7544468 | 防災設備 | 2024-05-22 |
5 | 特開2023-046855 | 画像形成装置または画像形成装置の制御方法 | 2024-04-02 |
6 | 特開2022-070476 | 原稿圧着板開閉装置及び事務機器 | 2024-01-18 |
7 | 特許7594277 | ヒンジ並びにこのヒンジを用いた事務機器 | 2024-01-15 |
8 | 特開2015-220546 | 読取装置および制御方法 | 2023-10-31 |
9 | 特開2022-082463 | 画像読取装置 | 2022-12-27 |
10 | 特開2022-082174 | 画像読取装置 | 2022-12-27 |
11 | 特開2022-096422 | ヒンジ及びヒンジを備えた事務機器の原稿圧着板及びヒンジを備えた電子機器 | 2022-12-21 |
12 | 特許6978168 | 認証装置および認証システム、ワンタイムパスワード生成認証装置および擬似乱数生成器、暗号化データ復号システム、ログインまたは入場または解錠システムまたはアクセス制御システム | 2022-09-15 |
13 | 特許7201060 | 記録装置 | 2022-02-10 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 23 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.2. The most inspection patent is 特許7544468 "防災設備" (3 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許6978168 "認証装置および認証システム、ワンタイムパスワード生成認証装置および擬似乱数生成器、暗号化データ復号システム、ログインまたは入場または解錠システムまたはアクセス制御システム" (2 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7544468 | 防災設備 | 3 times |
2 | 特許6978168 | 認証装置および認証システム、ワンタイムパスワード生成認証装置および擬似乱数生成器、暗号化データ復号システム、ログインまたは入場または解錠システムまたはアクセス制御システム | 2 times |
3 | 特許7223400 | 原稿圧着板開閉装置並びにこの原稿圧着板開閉装置を備えた事務機器 | 2 times |
4 | 特許5933059 | 画像形成装置 | 1 times |
5 | 特許6055971 | 画像形成装置 | 1 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 1,594 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.1. The most cited patent is 特許6665671 "画像検査装置、画像形成装置及びプログラム" (29 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許7505561 "画像読取装置および画像形成装置" (28 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6665671 | 画像検査装置、画像形成装置及びプログラム | 29 times |
2 | 特許7505561 | 画像読取装置および画像形成装置 | 28 times |
3 | 特許7013806 | 画像読取装置及びプログラム | 26 times |
4 | 特許6452594 | インクジェット記録装置 | 22 times |
5 | 特開2015-215878 | 画像処理装置及び画像処理システム | 21 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International