The Technical Field "前駆体" had 926 patent application filings in the most recent period (2022-01-01 to 2022-09-30). This is a significantly decreased of -344 filings (-27.1%) over 1,270 they had in the same period of the previous year (2021-01-01 to 2021-09-30). This report also includes technical terms related to " 先駆体 ", " 先駆物質 ", " 前駆物質 " in the search set.
The highest number of filings in 2017 with 2,468 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 1,068 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 9,356 cases in total) is 1,559, and the median is 1,792. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1,559 patents |
Std Dev | 736 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 1,068 cases | -38.0 % |
2021 year | 1,723 cases | -7.37 % |
2020 year | 1,860 cases | -13.77 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 前駆体 for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-05-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 前駆体, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of 前駆体 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 18,611 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 前駆体 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, アプライドマテリアルズインコーポレイテッド has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 44 cases, followed by トヨタ自動車株式会社 with 42 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
アプライドマテリアルズインコーポレイテッド | 44 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 42 cases |
東レ株式会社 | 21 cases |
三菱ケミカル株式会社 | 17 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 11 cases |
富士フイルム株式会社 | 9 cases |
株式会社リコー | 6 cases |
セイコーエプソン株式会社 | 4 cases |
スリーエムイノベイティブプロパティズカンパニー | 4 cases |
三菱製紙株式会社 | 2 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, アプライドマテリアルズインコーポレイテッド has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 469 cases, followed by 東レ株式会社 with 312 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
アプライドマテリアルズインコーポレイテッド | 469 cases |
東レ株式会社 | 312 cases |
富士フイルム株式会社 | 294 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 276 cases |
三菱ケミカル株式会社 | 221 cases |
スリーエムイノベイティブプロパティズカンパニー | 189 cases |
株式会社リコー | 91 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 89 cases |
三菱製紙株式会社 | 75 cases |
セイコーエプソン株式会社 | 63 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 前駆体 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Among the top coapplicants, アプライドマテリアルズインコーポレイテッド has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 44 cases, followed by 東レ株式会社 with 21 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
アプライドマテリアルズインコーポレイテッド | 44 cases |
東レ株式会社 | 21 cases |
三菱ケミカル株式会社 | 17 cases |
富士フイルム株式会社 | 9 cases |
セイコーエプソン株式会社 | 4 cases |
三菱製紙株式会社 | 2 cases |
Among the top coapplicants, アプライドマテリアルズインコーポレイテッド has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 469 cases, followed by 東レ株式会社 with 312 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
アプライドマテリアルズインコーポレイテッド | 469 cases |
東レ株式会社 | 312 cases |
富士フイルム株式会社 | 294 cases |
三菱ケミカル株式会社 | 221 cases |
三菱製紙株式会社 | 75 cases |
セイコーエプソン株式会社 | 63 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 前駆体’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 前駆体’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
前駆体 filed 312 joint applications with 東レ株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 152 cases in total) is 25.3, and the median is 21.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2019 with 56 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 13 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 25.3 patents |
Std Dev | 15.6 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 13 cases | -40.9 % |
2021 year | 22 cases | +4.76 % |
2020 year | 21 cases | -62.5 % |
前駆体 filed 63 joint applications with セイコーエプソン株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 18 cases in total) is 3.0, and the median is 3.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2014 with 12 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 2 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 3.0 patents |
Std Dev | 1.9 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 4 cases | +100 % |
2021 year | 2 cases | -50.0 % |
2020 year | 4 cases | -33.3 % |
前駆体 filed 294 joint applications with 富士フイルム株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 154 cases in total) is 25.7, and the median is 29.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2019 with 45 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 9 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 25.7 patents |
Std Dev | 16.5 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 9 cases | -64.0 % |
2021 year | 25 cases | -40.5 % |
2020 year | 42 cases | -6.67 % |
前駆体 filed 75 joint applications with 三菱製紙株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 21 cases in total) is 3.5, and the median is 1.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.0, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2015 with 15 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 1 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 3.5 patents |
Std Dev | 3.6 |
COV | 1.0 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 2 cases | +100 % |
2021 year | 1 cases | 0 |
2020 year | 1 cases | -88.9 % |
前駆体 filed 469 joint applications with アプライドマテリアルズインコーポレイテッド for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 354 cases in total) is 59.0, and the median is 68.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2021 with 93 cases, and their lowest number in 2015 with 21 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 59.0 patents |
Std Dev | 30.4 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 44 cases | -52.7 % |
2021 year | 93 cases | +47.6 % |
2020 year | 63 cases | -13.70 % |
The following shows JP patents held by 前駆体 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 前駆体’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 前駆体 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-06-01 to 2024-05-31), 2 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.0. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許5697067 "グラフェン前駆体として用いられる黒鉛系炭素素材" (1 times) , and the next most invalidation trial patent is 特許5688669 "グラフェン前駆体として用いられる黒鉛系炭素素材、これを含有するグラフェン分散液及びグラフェン複合体並びにこれを製造する方法" (1 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許5697067 | グラフェン前駆体として用いられる黒鉛系炭素素材 | 1 times |
2 | 特許5688669 | グラフェン前駆体として用いられる黒鉛系炭素素材、これを含有するグラフェン分散液及びグラフェン複合体並びにこれを製造する方法 | 1 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-06-01 ~ 2024-05-31), there were 44 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7346700 "オキシハロゲン化物前駆体" (Opposition day 2024-03-19) , next is 特許7278951 "バリア基板層と内向きバリア材料層とを含むバリア層を備える寸法安定性食品容器を製造するためのシート状複合体" (Opposition day 2023-11-20) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7346700 | オキシハロゲン化物前駆体 | 2024-03-19 |
2 | 特許7278951 | バリア基板層と内向きバリア材料層とを含むバリア層を備える寸法安定性食品容器を製造するためのシート状複合体 | 2023-11-20 |
3 | 特許7275313 | アルカリベースのプロモーターが導入された燃料極を含む固体酸化物燃料電池 | 2023-09-25 |
4 | 特許7250612 | 水系の殺菌方法、および水系のニトロソアミン化合物の除去方法 | 2023-09-21 |
5 | 特許7227291 | 改善された疎水性エアロゲル材料 | 2023-08-21 |
6 | 特許7206762 | 電極及びその製造方法、電極素子、非水電解液蓄電素子 | 2023-07-12 |
7 | 特許7191489 | 電極活物質の製造方法 | 2023-06-13 |
8 | 特許7183377 | ポリイミド系樹脂 | 2023-06-02 |
9 | 特許7180459 | アルカリ可溶性樹脂溶液の製造方法 | 2023-05-29 |
10 | 特許7245527 | 光電子素子 | 2023-05-22 |
In the last 3 years (2021-06-01 ~ 2024-05-31), there were 100 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.3 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2021-176629 "樹脂組成物の製造方法、多孔質膜の製造方法、及び多孔質膜" (Protest day 2024-05-28) , next is 特開2023-073417 "炭素化方法及び炭素繊維の製造方法" (Protest day 2024-05-23) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2021-176629 | 樹脂組成物の製造方法、多孔質膜の製造方法、及び多孔質膜 | 2024-05-28 |
2 | 特開2023-073417 | 炭素化方法及び炭素繊維の製造方法 | 2024-05-23 |
3 | 特表2023-503325 | 多孔質ポリマー粉末、その組成物、その使用及びそれを含む組成物 | 2024-05-20 |
4 | 特開2023-169188 | 防眩フィルム並びにその製造方法及び用途 | 2024-04-23 |
5 | 特開2022-082836 | 触媒の製造方法 | 2024-04-22 |
6 | 特開2021-182621 | 積層体、組成物及び積層体の製造方法 | 2024-04-16 |
7 | 特表2021-527040 | カンプトテシンコンジュゲート | 2024-03-25 |
8 | 特開2022-154119 | 炭素繊維の製造方法 | 2024-03-22 |
9 | 特開2019-172975 | 樹脂組成物、樹脂シート、硬化膜 | 2024-03-05 |
10 | 特表2023-542727 | 固体イオン伝導体化合物、それを含む固体電解質、それを含む電気化学セル、及びその製造方法 | 2024-03-01 |
11 | 特表2023-525856 | ATI消化のための方法及び組成物 | 2024-02-28 |
12 | 特開2022-069001 | 繊維強化複合材料の製造方法 | 2024-02-05 |
13 | 特表2023-548433 | MoO2 Cl2の製造 | 2024-01-31 |
14 | 特表2023-532367 | リチウムイオン電池正極活性材料及びその製造方法 | 2024-01-23 |
15 | 特開2022-137752 | 吸着構造体、吸着装置、吸着構造体の造形方法 | 2024-01-17 |
16 | 特表2022-525206 | 分岐状分岐状硬質共重合体および軟質ブロック共重合体 | 2023-12-18 |
17 | 特表2022-528286 | 反応器追加によるポリエステルの再生のためのプロセス | 2023-12-11 |
18 | 特開2022-096210 | 炭素繊維の製造方法 | 2023-11-07 |
19 | 特開2022-090764 | 炭素繊維前駆体繊維およびその製造方法 | 2023-10-25 |
20 | 特開2023-022061 | 感光性樹脂組成物の製造方法 | 2023-10-25 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-06-01 to 2024-05-31), 251 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.3. The most protest patent is 特開2019-172975 "樹脂組成物、樹脂シート、硬化膜" (5 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許7149176 "CVDを用いたTaCコーティング層の製造方法及びそれを用いて製造したTaCの物性" (4 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2019-172975 | 樹脂組成物、樹脂シート、硬化膜 | 5 times |
2 | 特許7149176 | CVDを用いたTaCコーティング層の製造方法及びそれを用いて製造したTaCの物性 | 4 times |
3 | 特許6739981 | ニッケルリチウム金属複合酸化物の製造方法 | 4 times |
4 | 特開2019-199615 | ミリ波アンテナ用フィルム | 4 times |
5 | 特許6951022 | 成長速度が遅くアスペクト比が低い水酸化マグネシウム粒子およびその製造方法 | 4 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-06-01 ~ 2024-05-31), there were 195 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.3 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2022-120692 "繊維強化複合材料の製造方法" (Inspection day 2024-05-24) , next is 特表2023-502846 "多孔性触媒担体粒子およびそれを形成する方法" (Inspection day 2024-05-14) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2022-120692 | 繊維強化複合材料の製造方法 | 2024-05-24 |
2 | 特表2023-502846 | 多孔性触媒担体粒子およびそれを形成する方法 | 2024-05-14 |
3 | 特開2023-169188 | 防眩フィルム並びにその製造方法及び用途 | 2024-05-10 |
4 | 特開2022-082836 | 触媒の製造方法 | 2024-05-08 |
5 | 特表2021-513357 | ネコMcDonough肉腫(FMS)様チロシンキナーゼ3受容体リガンド(FLT3L)に対する抗体並びに自己免疫疾患及び炎症性疾患を治療するためのそれらの使用 | 2024-05-02 |
6 | 特開2023-139148 | ネコMcDonough肉腫(FMS)様チロシンキナーゼ3受容体リガンド(FLT3L)に対する抗体並びに自己免疫疾患及び炎症性疾患を治療するためのそれらの使用 | 2024-05-02 |
7 | 特表2023-548433 | MoO2 Cl2の製造 | 2024-04-30 |
8 | 特表2021-515005 | 標識オキシトシンならびに製造および使用の方法 | 2024-04-25 |
9 | 特開2022-154119 | 炭素繊維の製造方法 | 2024-04-02 |
10 | 特表2022-540572 | 眼疾患を治療するための組成物および方法 | 2024-03-28 |
11 | 特表2021-527040 | カンプトテシンコンジュゲート | 2024-03-27 |
12 | 特開2022-058729 | 反応性付加製造 | 2024-03-26 |
13 | 特表2023-542727 | 固体イオン伝導体化合物、それを含む固体電解質、それを含む電気化学セル、及びその製造方法 | 2024-03-15 |
14 | 特開2019-172975 | 樹脂組成物、樹脂シート、硬化膜 | 2024-03-12 |
15 | 特開2022-069001 | 繊維強化複合材料の製造方法 | 2024-03-05 |
16 | 特開2023-148331 | PZT強誘電体膜形成用液組成物の改質方法、改質された液組成物及びこの液組成物を用いたPZT強誘電体膜の形成方法 | 2024-02-20 |
17 | 特開2022-137752 | 吸着構造体、吸着装置、吸着構造体の造形方法 | 2024-01-24 |
18 | 特表2022-525206 | 分岐状分岐状硬質共重合体および軟質ブロック共重合体 | 2024-01-18 |
19 | 特許7079227 | 溶剤可溶性ポリイミド樹脂の製造方法 | 2024-01-16 |
20 | 特表2020-523173 | 細胞生着のためのパッチグラフト組成物 | 2024-01-12 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-06-01 to 2024-05-31), 459 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.4. The most inspection patent is 特許6301900 "リチウム金属混合酸化物を含む複合材料およびその製造方法" (10 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許6274628 "炭素蒸着アルカリ金属ホスホシリケートカソード材料、及び二つの乾燥高エネルギーミリングステップを含むそれの製造方法" (10 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6301900 | リチウム金属混合酸化物を含む複合材料およびその製造方法 | 10 times |
2 | 特許6274628 | 炭素蒸着アルカリ金属ホスホシリケートカソード材料、及び二つの乾燥高エネルギーミリングステップを含むそれの製造方法 | 10 times |
3 | 特開2016-130325 | ポリイミド及びポリイミド前駆体 | 7 times |
4 | 特許6206446 | フレキシブルデバイス基板形成用ポリイミド前駆体樹脂組成物及びそれを用いたフレキシブルデバイスの製造方法、フレキシブルデバイス | 5 times |
5 | 特許7387102 | 膜構造体及びその製造方法 | 5 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-06-01 to 2024-05-31), 3,861 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.8. The most cited patent is 特開2017-070140 "折り曲げにより形成された円筒形状のコイル体、該コイル体の製造方法、及び該コイル体を用いた回転電機" (60 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6784670 "有機金属溶液に基づいた高解像度パターニング組成物および対応する方法" (41 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2017-070140 | 折り曲げにより形成された円筒形状のコイル体、該コイル体の製造方法、及び該コイル体を用いた回転電機 | 60 times |
2 | 特許6784670 | 有機金属溶液に基づいた高解像度パターニング組成物および対応する方法 | 41 times |
3 | 特許6508806 | 正極活物質、その製造方法、それを採用した正極及びリチウム二次電池 | 37 times |
4 | 特許6359651 | ゼオライト及びゼオ型を製造する方法 | 33 times |
5 | 特許6805244 | 有機スズオキシドヒドロキシドのパターン形成組成物、前駆体およびパターン形成 | 32 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International