The Theme Code "コア、コイル、磁石の製造技術" had 48 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-03-31). This is a significantly decreased of -35 filings (-42.2%) over 83 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-03-31).
The highest number of filings in 2016 with 411 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 234 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 1,666 cases in total) is 278, and the median is 284. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.3, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 278 patents |
Std Dev | 95.3 |
COV | 0.3 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 234 cases | -13.65 % |
2021 year | 271 cases | -8.45 % |
2020 year | 296 cases | -24.68 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for コア、コイル、磁石の製造技術[5E062] for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-11-30). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of コア、コイル、磁石の製造技術, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of コア、コイル、磁石の製造技術 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
Patent landscaping is a visualization of the distribution of patent filings (application focus areas) for each technical keyword. Mountains and islands indicated by heatmap contours represent clusters of patent applications filed, and red areas on the heatmap indicate many patent filings relating to the keyword.
The patent landscape for コア、コイル、磁石の製造技術 gives an intuitive understanding of what patent filings they have made and what technical position is to be established. By selecting filing year checkboxes and filtering, you can track their past filing trends (what technical area they have focused on).
By selecting applicant/patent holder checkboxes and filtering, you can visually grasp the technical areas of the filings for each applicant and the partnerships or alliances formed. Please use it as a guide for patent analysis and IP landscaping.
In addition, by visually representing the patent data in this manner, you can convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
In Patent Integration, you can check the specifics of a patent filing by clicking anywhere on the patent landscape screen. You can also quickly check the position of each applicant for each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. You can use it as a guide when considering hypotheses about each company's IP strategy on the IP Landscape. You can also use it for higher-grade intellectual property activities. It has reasonable pricing and a simple user interface that is easy for beginners to handle.
The following is a list of words (characteristic terms) often used in コア、コイル、磁石の製造技術 patent applications. Characteristic terms with a higher importance are used in more patents/patent applications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 3,252 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The patent information of the higher applicant in the technical theme コア、コイル、磁石の製造技術 is shown below. By comparing the number of patents of each company, you can check the research and development status of each company's past and present technical themes and the position of each company in the technical theme.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 株式会社プロテリアル has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 51 cases, followed by TDK株式会社 with 30 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
株式会社プロテリアル | 51 cases |
TDK株式会社 | 30 cases |
株式会社村田製作所 | 25 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 20 cases |
太陽誘電株式会社 | 18 cases |
株式会社トーキン | 3 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 株式会社村田製作所 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 418 cases, followed by 株式会社プロテリアル with 326 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
株式会社村田製作所 | 418 cases |
株式会社プロテリアル | 326 cases |
TDK株式会社 | 298 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 154 cases |
太陽誘電株式会社 | 100 cases |
株式会社トーキン | 29 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 9 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 7 cases |
セイコーエプソン株式会社 | 6 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The patent information of the higher applicant in the technical theme コア、コイル、磁石の製造技術 is shown below. By comparing the number of patents of each company, you can check the research and development status of each company's past and present technical themes and the position of each company in the technical theme.
among the top coapplicants, 株式会社プロテリアル has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 51 cases, followed by TDK株式会社 with 30 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
株式会社プロテリアル | 51 cases |
TDK株式会社 | 30 cases |
株式会社村田製作所 | 25 cases |
株式会社トーキン | 3 cases |
among the top coapplicants, 株式会社村田製作所 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 418 cases, followed by 株式会社プロテリアル with 326 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
株式会社村田製作所 | 418 cases |
株式会社プロテリアル | 326 cases |
TDK株式会社 | 298 cases |
株式会社トーキン | 29 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 9 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 7 cases |
セイコーエプソン株式会社 | 6 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by コア、コイル、磁石の製造技術’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by コア、コイル、磁石の製造技術’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
コア、コイル、磁石の製造技術 filed 298 joint applications with TDK株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 156 cases in total) is 26.0, and the median is 24.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2017 with 47 cases, and their lowest number in 2020 with 18 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 26.0 patents |
Std Dev | 12.1 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 21 cases | -22.22 % |
2021 year | 27 cases | +50.0 % |
2020 year | 18 cases | -58.1 % |
コア、コイル、磁石の製造技術 filed 418 joint applications with 株式会社村田製作所 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 195 cases in total) is 32.5, and the median is 31.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2016 with 63 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 17 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 32.5 patents |
Std Dev | 20.7 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 24 cases | +41.2 % |
2021 year | 17 cases | -56.4 % |
2020 year | 39 cases | -36.1 % |
コア、コイル、磁石の製造技術 filed 326 joint applications with 株式会社プロテリアル for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 195 cases in total) is 32.5, and the median is 32.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.23, and there have been small fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2016 with 45 cases, and their lowest number in 2014 with 17 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 32.5 patents |
Std Dev | 7.4 |
COV | 0.23 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 32 cases | +6.67 % |
2021 year | 30 cases | -30.2 % |
2020 year | 43 cases | +13.16 % |
コア、コイル、磁石の製造技術 filed 9 joint applications with 株式会社東芝 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 2 cases in total) is 0.3, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 2.2, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 4 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 0.3 patents |
Std Dev | 0.7 |
COV | 2.2 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2020 year | 2 cases | - |
2019 year | 0 cases | - |
2018 year | 0 cases | - |
コア、コイル、磁石の製造技術 filed 7 joint applications with パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 3 cases in total) is 0.5, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.5, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2016 with 2 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 0.5 patents |
Std Dev | 0.8 |
COV | 1.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2019 year | 1 cases | -50.0 % |
2018 year | 2 cases | 0 |
2017 year | 2 cases | 0 |
The following shows JP patents held by コア、コイル、磁石の製造技術 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and コア、コイル、磁石の製造技術’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which コア、コイル、磁石の製造技術 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 1 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 1.0 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許6462780 "無線電力受信装置及びその製造方法" (Invalidation Trial day 2023-05-09) .
- | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6462780 | 無線電力受信装置及びその製造方法 | 2023-05-09 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 1 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.0. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6462780 "無線電力受信装置及びその製造方法" (1 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6462780 | 無線電力受信装置及びその製造方法 | 1 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 8 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7400150 "順送り金型装置及び鉄心薄板の製造方法" (Opposition day 2024-06-18) , next is 特許7298804 "磁性成形体の製造方法、及び異方性ボンド磁石の製造方法" (Opposition day 2023-12-26) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7400150 | 順送り金型装置及び鉄心薄板の製造方法 | 2024-06-18 |
2 | 特許7298804 | 磁性成形体の製造方法、及び異方性ボンド磁石の製造方法 | 2023-12-26 |
3 | 特許7243936 | 無方向性電磁鋼板、鉄心、鉄心の製造方法、モータ、およびモータの製造方法 | 2023-09-21 |
4 | 特許7243938 | 無方向性電磁鋼板、鉄心、鉄心の製造方法、モータ、およびモータの製造方法 | 2023-09-21 |
5 | 特許7184226 | 回転電機、ステータの鉄心およびロータの鉄心のセット、回転電機の製造方法、無方向性電磁鋼板の製造方法、回転電機のロータおよびステータの製造方法並びに無方向性電磁鋼板のセット | 2023-06-05 |
6 | 特許7091562 | 希土類磁石、希土類スパッタリング磁石、希土類拡散磁石及びその製造方法 | 2022-12-26 |
7 | 特許7052109 | 積層鉄心の製造装置及び製造方法 | 2022-10-07 |
8 | 特許6939336 | 拡散源 | 2022-03-18 |
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 15 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.1 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2024-109665 "皮膜除去方法および皮膜除去装置" (Protest day 2024-10-07) , next is 特表2024-501248 "電磁鋼板およびその積層体" (Protest day 2024-08-28) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2024-109665 | 皮膜除去方法および皮膜除去装置 | 2024-10-07 |
2 | 特表2024-501248 | 電磁鋼板およびその積層体 | 2024-08-28 |
3 | 特許7560795 | 無方向性電磁鋼板、鉄心およびモータコア、ならびに鉄心およびモータコアの製造方法 | 2023-10-26 |
4 | 特許7530393 | 合金粉末、及びその製造方法 | 2023-06-09 |
5 | 特許7406064 | 方向性電磁鋼板の製造方法及び巻鉄芯の製造方法 | 2023-05-11 |
6 | 特許7527378 | 回転電機、ステータの鉄心及びロータの鉄心のセット、ステータ用無方向性電磁鋼板及びロータ用無方向性電磁鋼板の製造方法、ステータ及びロータの製造方法、及び、無方向性電磁鋼板のセット | 2023-05-11 |
7 | 特開2022-018470 | 電磁鋼板積層鉄心用接着剤、および電磁鋼板積層鉄心 | 2023-04-25 |
8 | 特開2022-099246 | 熱間加工磁石用の押出し金型およびそれを用いた熱間加工磁石の製造方法 | 2023-03-01 |
9 | 特許7352057 | 無方向性電磁鋼板およびその製造方法、並びにモータコアおよびその製造方法 | 2022-12-12 |
10 | 特許7454613 | 電磁コイル、金型及び電磁コイルの製造方法 | 2022-12-02 |
11 | 特許7382962 | 積層コア、積層コアの製造方法、および回転電機 | 2022-06-08 |
12 | 特許7511324 | インダクタ成形用樹脂組成物および一体型インダクタ | 2022-05-19 |
13 | 特開2020-147842 | 磁場中熱処理装置、電磁鋼板、モータ、モータ製造方法 | 2022-05-18 |
14 | 特許7287037 | R-T-B系焼結磁石の表面処理方法および製造方法 | 2022-03-31 |
15 | 特表2021-528557 | 合金、磁性材料、ボンド磁石、及びその製造方法 | 2022-01-17 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 27 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.2. The most protest patent is 特許6729705 "ナノ結晶合金磁心、磁心ユニットおよびナノ結晶合金磁心の製造方法" (3 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許6508023 "電子部品及び電子部品の製造方法" (2 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6729705 | ナノ結晶合金磁心、磁心ユニットおよびナノ結晶合金磁心の製造方法 | 3 times |
2 | 特許6508023 | 電子部品及び電子部品の製造方法 | 2 times |
3 | 特許7352057 | 無方向性電磁鋼板およびその製造方法、並びにモータコアおよびその製造方法 | 2 times |
4 | 再公表2018/163967 | Sm−Fe−N系結晶粒子を含む磁石粉末およびそれから製造される焼結磁石ならびにそれらの製造方法 | 2 times |
5 | 特許6849023 | ナノ結晶合金磁心の製造方法 | 2 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 24 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.2 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2024-109665 "皮膜除去方法および皮膜除去装置" (Inspection day 2024-11-06) , next is 特開2023-042818 "積層鉄心の製造装置及び製造方法" (Inspection day 2024-10-16) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2024-109665 | 皮膜除去方法および皮膜除去装置 | 2024-11-06 |
2 | 特開2023-042818 | 積層鉄心の製造装置及び製造方法 | 2024-10-16 |
3 | 特開2022-099246 | 熱間加工磁石用の押出し金型およびそれを用いた熱間加工磁石の製造方法 | 2024-05-24 |
4 | 特許7588104 | 磁気性能が改善又は回復されたND-FE-B磁石を形成するための磁石の再生 | 2023-12-22 |
5 | 特許7412484 | 焼結磁性合金及びそれから誘導される組成物の粒界工学 | 2023-12-22 |
6 | 特許7560795 | 無方向性電磁鋼板、鉄心およびモータコア、ならびに鉄心およびモータコアの製造方法 | 2023-11-21 |
7 | 特許7530393 | 合金粉末、及びその製造方法 | 2023-08-09 |
8 | 特開2023-129176 | 高温酸化処理により高濃縮の希土類永久磁石の耐腐食性を増加させる方法 | 2023-07-24 |
9 | 特許7406064 | 方向性電磁鋼板の製造方法及び巻鉄芯の製造方法 | 2023-06-06 |
10 | 特許7527378 | 回転電機、ステータの鉄心及びロータの鉄心のセット、ステータ用無方向性電磁鋼板及びロータ用無方向性電磁鋼板の製造方法、ステータ及びロータの製造方法、及び、無方向性電磁鋼板のセット | 2023-06-06 |
11 | 特開2022-018470 | 電磁鋼板積層鉄心用接着剤、および電磁鋼板積層鉄心 | 2023-05-02 |
12 | 特許7379362 | 低B含有R-Fe-B系焼結磁石及び製造方法 | 2023-03-07 |
13 | 特許7223182 | 粒界工学 | 2023-02-02 |
14 | 特許7352057 | 無方向性電磁鋼板およびその製造方法、並びにモータコアおよびその製造方法 | 2023-01-16 |
15 | 特許6462780 | 無線電力受信装置及びその製造方法 | 2022-08-12 |
16 | 特許7108545 | 焼結磁性合金及びそれから誘導される組成物の粒界工学 | 2022-07-13 |
17 | 特許7382962 | 積層コア、積層コアの製造方法、および回転電機 | 2022-06-14 |
18 | 特許7254912 | 希土類焼結磁石、希土類焼結磁石の製造方法、回転子および回転機 | 2022-06-08 |
19 | 特許7511324 | インダクタ成形用樹脂組成物および一体型インダクタ | 2022-05-30 |
20 | 特許7287037 | R-T-B系焼結磁石の表面処理方法および製造方法 | 2022-04-28 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 47 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.2. The most inspection patent is 特許6729705 "ナノ結晶合金磁心、磁心ユニットおよびナノ結晶合金磁心の製造方法" (3 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許6576652 "熱処理装置" (2 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6729705 | ナノ結晶合金磁心、磁心ユニットおよびナノ結晶合金磁心の製造方法 | 3 times |
2 | 特許6576652 | 熱処理装置 | 2 times |
3 | 特許6462780 | 無線電力受信装置及びその製造方法 | 2 times |
4 | 特開2024-109665 | 皮膜除去方法および皮膜除去装置 | 2 times |
5 | 特許6508023 | 電子部品及び電子部品の製造方法 | 2 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 959 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 3.4. The most cited patent is 特許6256360 "永久磁石およびその製造方法" (93 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特開2017-011863 "モータ鉄心用積層電磁鋼板およびその製造方法" (43 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6256360 | 永久磁石およびその製造方法 | 93 times |
2 | 特開2017-011863 | モータ鉄心用積層電磁鋼板およびその製造方法 | 43 times |
3 | 特許6561745 | インダクタ部品、パッケージ部品およびスィッチングレギュレータ | 42 times |
4 | 特開2016-197624 | インダクタ部品、インダクタ部品の製造方法、インダクタ部品を内蔵するプリント配線板 | 34 times |
5 | 特許6935343 | インダクタ部品およびその製造方法 | 32 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International