The Theme Code "超音波による材料の調査、分析技術" had 46 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-03-31). This is a significantly decreased of -18 filings (-28.1%) over 64 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-03-31).
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 408 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 214 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 1,575 cases in total) is 262, and the median is 298. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.3, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 262 patents |
Std Dev | 89.5 |
COV | 0.3 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 214 cases | -23.30 % |
2021 year | 279 cases | -12.26 % |
2020 year | 318 cases | -1.24 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 超音波による材料の調査、分析技術[2G047] for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-11-30). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 超音波による材料の調査、分析技術, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of 超音波による材料の調査、分析技術 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
Patent landscaping is a visualization of the distribution of patent filings (application focus areas) for each technical keyword. Mountains and islands indicated by heatmap contours represent clusters of patent applications filed, and red areas on the heatmap indicate many patent filings relating to the keyword.
The patent landscape for 超音波による材料の調査、分析技術 gives an intuitive understanding of what patent filings they have made and what technical position is to be established. By selecting filing year checkboxes and filtering, you can track their past filing trends (what technical area they have focused on).
By selecting applicant/patent holder checkboxes and filtering, you can visually grasp the technical areas of the filings for each applicant and the partnerships or alliances formed. Please use it as a guide for patent analysis and IP landscaping.
In addition, by visually representing the patent data in this manner, you can convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
In Patent Integration, you can check the specifics of a patent filing by clicking anywhere on the patent landscape screen. You can also quickly check the position of each applicant for each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. You can use it as a guide when considering hypotheses about each company's IP strategy on the IP Landscape. You can also use it for higher-grade intellectual property activities. It has reasonable pricing and a simple user interface that is easy for beginners to handle.
The following is a list of words (characteristic terms) often used in 超音波による材料の調査、分析技術 patent applications. Characteristic terms with a higher importance are used in more patents/patent applications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 2,988 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The patent information of the higher applicant in the technical theme 超音波による材料の調査、分析技術 is shown below. By comparing the number of patents of each company, you can check the research and development status of each company's past and present technical themes and the position of each company in the technical theme.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 株式会社東芝 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 27 cases, followed by 三菱重工業株式会社 with 14 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
株式会社東芝 | 27 cases |
三菱重工業株式会社 | 14 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 7 cases |
JFEスチール株式会社 | 7 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 3 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 株式会社東芝 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 203 cases, followed by 三菱重工業株式会社 with 85 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
株式会社東芝 | 203 cases |
三菱重工業株式会社 | 85 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 59 cases |
JFEスチール株式会社 | 56 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 37 cases |
オリンパス株式会社 | 12 cases |
富士通株式会社 | 7 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 3 cases |
日立建機株式会社 | 1 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The patent information of the higher applicant in the technical theme 超音波による材料の調査、分析技術 is shown below. By comparing the number of patents of each company, you can check the research and development status of each company's past and present technical themes and the position of each company in the technical theme.
among the top coapplicants, 株式会社東芝 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 27 cases, followed by 三菱重工業株式会社 with 14 cases.
among the top coapplicants, 株式会社東芝 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 203 cases, followed by 三菱重工業株式会社 with 85 cases.
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 超音波による材料の調査、分析技術’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 超音波による材料の調査、分析技術’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
超音波による材料の調査、分析技術 filed 203 joint applications with 株式会社東芝 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 137 cases in total) is 22.8, and the median is 25.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.3, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2018 with 32 cases, and their lowest number in 2016 with 8 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 22.8 patents |
Std Dev | 7.3 |
COV | 0.3 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 17 cases | -34.6 % |
2021 year | 26 cases | -7.14 % |
2020 year | 28 cases | +16.67 % |
超音波による材料の調査、分析技術 filed 59 joint applications with 株式会社日立製作所 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 28 cases in total) is 4.7, and the median is 3.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been increasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2014 with 10 cases, and their lowest number in 2019 with 2 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 4.7 patents |
Std Dev | 2.7 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 3 cases | -70.0 % |
2021 year | 10 cases | +233 % |
2020 year | 3 cases | +50.0 % |
超音波による材料の調査、分析技術 filed 85 joint applications with 三菱重工業株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 59 cases in total) is 9.8, and the median is 10.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.3, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2019 with 14 cases, and their lowest number in 2015 with 4 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 9.8 patents |
Std Dev | 3.4 |
COV | 0.3 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 11 cases | -8.33 % |
2021 year | 12 cases | +20.00 % |
2020 year | 10 cases | -28.57 % |
超音波による材料の調査、分析技術 filed 37 joint applications with 三菱電機株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 18 cases in total) is 3.0, and the median is 3.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2016 with 6 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 3 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 3.0 patents |
Std Dev | 1.7 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 3 cases | 0 |
2021 year | 3 cases | 0 |
2020 year | 3 cases | -50.0 % |
超音波による材料の調査、分析技術 filed 12 joint applications with オリンパス株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 5 cases in total) is 0.8, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 2.2, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 5 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 0.8 patents |
Std Dev | 1.9 |
COV | 2.2 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2018 year | 5 cases | +400 % |
2017 year | 1 cases | 0 |
2016 year | 1 cases | - |
The following shows JP patents held by 超音波による材料の調査、分析技術 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 超音波による材料の調査、分析技術’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 超音波による材料の調査、分析技術 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 4 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.0 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特許7582903 "杭の損傷評価方法" (Protest day 2024-05-15) , next is 特許7575469 "品質及び効率を向上するための流体分配システムの均衡及び分配の監視" (Protest day 2024-02-22) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7582903 | 杭の損傷評価方法 | 2024-05-15 |
2 | 特許7575469 | 品質及び効率を向上するための流体分配システムの均衡及び分配の監視 | 2024-02-22 |
3 | 特許7516418 | 光音響ガスセンサデバイス | 2023-03-09 |
4 | 特許7500898 | マテハン機器の部品交換予知システム並びに部品交換予知方法 | 2022-09-27 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 9 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.0. The most protest patent is 特許7051433 "回転機械の余寿命評価方法、回転機械の余寿命評価システム、及び回転機械の余寿命評価プログラム" (1 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許7582903 "杭の損傷評価方法" (1 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7051433 | 回転機械の余寿命評価方法、回転機械の余寿命評価システム、及び回転機械の余寿命評価プログラム | 1 times |
2 | 特許7582903 | 杭の損傷評価方法 | 1 times |
3 | 特許7257748 | 杭評価方法 | 1 times |
4 | 特許6517539 | 超音波探傷装置及び方法 | 1 times |
5 | 特許7516418 | 光音響ガスセンサデバイス | 1 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 5 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.0 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2024-106662 "筒状構造物の内部構造測定装置、筒状構造物の内部構造測定方法、及び、核融合装置における冷却水配管の検査装置" (Inspection day 2024-09-12) , next is 特許7582903 "杭の損傷評価方法" (Inspection day 2024-05-23) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2024-106662 | 筒状構造物の内部構造測定装置、筒状構造物の内部構造測定方法、及び、核融合装置における冷却水配管の検査装置 | 2024-09-12 |
2 | 特許7582903 | 杭の損傷評価方法 | 2024-05-23 |
3 | 特開2021-173718 | 構造体診断装置、構造体診断方法、プログラム及び記録媒体 | 2023-05-07 |
4 | 特許7317204 | 空気調和機および空気調和機の製造方法 | 2022-11-08 |
5 | 特許6644342 | 振動評価装置、及び振動評価システム | 2022-07-28 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 11 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.0. The most inspection patent is 特許7582903 "杭の損傷評価方法" (1 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特開2020-046322 "AEセンサ用音片アレイ構造、AEセンサ、およびそれらの製造方法" (1 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7582903 | 杭の損傷評価方法 | 1 times |
2 | 特開2020-046322 | AEセンサ用音片アレイ構造、AEセンサ、およびそれらの製造方法 | 1 times |
3 | 特開2024-106662 | 筒状構造物の内部構造測定装置、筒状構造物の内部構造測定方法、及び、核融合装置における冷却水配管の検査装置 | 1 times |
4 | 特許7257748 | 杭評価方法 | 1 times |
5 | 特許6738713 | 溶解タンクにおける爆発を予測するためのアコースティックエミッションシステム及び方法 | 1 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 655 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.5. The most cited patent is 特許6263147 "浮上ロボットを用いた構造物検査装置" (41 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6648971 "構造物の点検装置" (33 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6263147 | 浮上ロボットを用いた構造物検査装置 | 41 times |
2 | 特許6648971 | 構造物の点検装置 | 33 times |
3 | 特許6451695 | 欠陥検査方法及び欠陥検査装置 | 25 times |
4 | 特許6766374 | 分類装置、分類方法、プログラム、及びパラメータ生成装置 | 15 times |
5 | 特開2018-013348 | 打音検査システムおよび打音検査方法 | 14 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International