The Applicant / Patent Holder "株式会社ブリヂストン" had 23 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-03-31). This is a significantly decreased of -8 filings (-25.8%) over 31 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-03-31).
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 704 cases, and their lowest number in 2020 with 212 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 1,897 cases in total) is 316, and the median is 272. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 316 patents |
Std Dev | 176 |
COV | 0.6 |
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023).
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 214 cases | -35.3 % |
2021 year | 331 cases | +56.1 % |
2020 year | 212 cases | -59.9 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 株式会社ブリヂストン for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-11-30). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 株式会社ブリヂストン, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The following foreign patent analysis reports have been found for 株式会社ブリヂストン. The trends of patent filings of 株式会社ブリヂストン for each country can be found by clicking on the Applicant/Patent Holder name next to each country.
Country | Applicant / Patent Holder |
---|---|
JP | 株式会社ブリヂストン |
US | BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION |
EP | BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION |
PCT | BRIDGESTONE CORPORATION |
The changes in the number of patent filings of 株式会社ブリヂストン over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
Patent landscaping is a visualization of the distribution of patent filings (application focus areas) for each technical keyword. Mountains and islands indicated by heatmap contours represent clusters of patent applications filed, and red areas on the heatmap indicate many patent filings relating to the keyword.
The patent landscape for 株式会社ブリヂストン gives an intuitive understanding of what patent filings they have made and what technical position is to be established. By selecting filing year checkboxes and filtering, you can track their past filing trends (what technical area they have focused on).
By selecting applicant/patent holder checkboxes and filtering, you can visually grasp the technical areas of the filings for each applicant and the partnerships or alliances formed. Please use it as a guide for patent analysis and IP landscaping.
In addition, by visually representing the patent data in this manner, you can convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
In Patent Integration, you can check the specifics of a patent filing by clicking anywhere on the patent landscape screen. You can also quickly check the position of each applicant for each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. You can use it as a guide when considering hypotheses about each company's IP strategy on the IP Landscape. You can also use it for higher-grade intellectual property activities. It has reasonable pricing and a simple user interface that is easy for beginners to handle.
The following is a list of words (characteristic terms) often used in 株式会社ブリヂストン patent applications. Characteristic terms with a higher importance are used in more patents/patent applications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 4,357 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 株式会社ブリヂストン are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 住友ゴム工業株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 695 cases, followed by TOYOTIRE株式会社 with 322 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
住友ゴム工業株式会社 | 695 cases |
TOYOTIRE株式会社 | 322 cases |
横浜ゴム株式会社 | 306 cases |
株式会社ブリヂストン | 278 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 住友ゴム工業株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 6,323 cases, followed by 株式会社ブリヂストン with 4,357 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
住友ゴム工業株式会社 | 6,323 cases |
株式会社ブリヂストン | 4,357 cases |
横浜ゴム株式会社 | 4,082 cases |
TOYOTIRE株式会社 | 2,868 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 4 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The changes in the number of patents shared with 株式会社ブリヂストン’s top coapplicants are shown below.
By searching for the top coapplicants, you can discover what companies 株式会社ブリヂストン is partnered with to develop technologies and use this information for R&D and intellectual property strategies.
Also, by looking at the change in the number of filings, you can see what companies 株式会社ブリヂストン conducted joint research with in the past, and check the history of 株式会社ブリヂストン’s alliances, partnerships, and joint research and development.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to quickly find out specifically what company they filed a joint application with and what invention it was for.
Among the top coapplicants, 国立研究開発法人国立循環器病研究センター has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 10 cases, followed by トヨタ自動車株式会社 with 9 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
国立研究開発法人国立循環器病研究センター | 10 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 9 cases |
NTN株式会社 | 3 cases |
JSR株式会社 | 2 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 株式会社ブリヂストン’s top 6 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 株式会社ブリヂストン’s top 6 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
株式会社ブリヂストン filed 10 joint applications with 国立研究開発法人国立循環器病研究センター for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 10 years (2013 to 2023, 12 cases in total) is 1.1, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 2.1, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2015 with 8 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1.1 patents |
Std Dev | 2.3 |
COV | 2.1 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2016 year | 1 cases | -87.5 % |
2015 year | 8 cases | +700 % |
2014 year | 1 cases | -50.0 % |
株式会社ブリヂストン filed 9 joint applications with トヨタ自動車株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 3 cases in total) is 0.5, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.5, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2015 with 4 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 0.5 patents |
Std Dev | 0.8 |
COV | 1.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2021 year | 1 cases | - |
2020 year | 0 cases | - |
2019 year | 0 cases | -100 % |
株式会社ブリヂストン filed 3 joint applications with NTN株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 10 years (2013 to 2023, 7 cases in total) is 0.6, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 2.1, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2015 with 3 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 0.6 patents |
Std Dev | 1.4 |
COV | 2.1 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2015 year | 3 cases | - |
2014 year | 0 cases | -100 % |
2013 year | 4 cases | - |
The following shows JP patents held by 株式会社ブリヂストン that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 株式会社ブリヂストン’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 株式会社ブリヂストン is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 5 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7437909 "タイヤ" (Opposition day 2024-08-26) , next is 特許7437908 "タイヤ" (Opposition day 2024-08-26) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7437909 | タイヤ | 2024-08-26 |
2 | 特許7437908 | タイヤ | 2024-08-26 |
3 | 特許7309754 | 空気入りタイヤ | 2024-01-16 |
4 | 特許7113011 | 軟質ポリウレタンフォーム用組成物、軟質ポリウレタンフォーム並びに車両用シートパッド | 2023-01-30 |
5 | 特許7082658 | 共役ジエン-芳香族ビニル系共重合体、ゴム組成物、及び空気入りタイヤ | 2022-10-24 |
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 35 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.2 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2023-088168 "連続体の挙動解析装置、連続体の挙動解析方法、及びプログラム" (Protest day 2024-10-31) , next is 特開2023-006895 "タイヤ" (Protest day 2024-09-18) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2023-088168 | 連続体の挙動解析装置、連続体の挙動解析方法、及びプログラム | 2024-10-31 |
2 | 特開2023-006895 | タイヤ | 2024-09-18 |
3 | 特開2023-085087 | タイヤ | 2024-09-09 |
4 | 特開2023-085091 | タイヤ | 2024-09-09 |
5 | 特許7605634 | 空気入りタイヤ | 2024-08-08 |
6 | 特開2023-020716 | タイヤ | 2024-07-26 |
7 | 特開2022-120448 | タイヤ | 2024-04-25 |
8 | 特開2023-123801 | 空気入りタイヤ | 2023-12-26 |
9 | 特許7397657 | タイヤ・ホイール組立体 | 2023-05-16 |
10 | 特開2021-098384 | タイヤ・ホイール組立体 | 2023-05-16 |
11 | 特許7496673 | タイヤ・ホイール組立体及びタイヤ | 2023-04-19 |
12 | 特許7568397 | タイヤ・ホイール組立体 | 2023-04-12 |
13 | 特許7568396 | タイヤ・ホイール組立体 | 2023-04-12 |
14 | 特許7365804 | 無線受電システム、タイヤ・ホイール組立体、及び、タイヤ | 2023-04-07 |
15 | 特許7373789 | 無線給電システム、送電装置、及び受電装置 | 2023-04-05 |
16 | 特許7353902 | 空気入りタイヤ | 2023-03-14 |
17 | 特許7399679 | 空気入りタイヤ | 2023-01-06 |
18 | 特許7179460 | ホース用樹脂材料、ホース管及びホース | 2022-08-24 |
19 | 特許7167401 | 排水トラップ | 2022-08-08 |
20 | 特許7183105 | センサモジュール | 2022-08-08 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 110 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.1. The most protest patent is 特許7179460 "ホース用樹脂材料、ホース管及びホース" (5 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許6679208 "積層体及びクッション体" (3 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7179460 | ホース用樹脂材料、ホース管及びホース | 5 times |
2 | 特許6679208 | 積層体及びクッション体 | 3 times |
3 | 特許7218343 | フッ素ゴム架橋物 | 3 times |
4 | 特許6758027 | ゴム組成物、積層体、及びコンベアベルト | 3 times |
5 | 再公表2018/012325 | ゴム組成物、コンベアベルト、及びベルトコンベア | 2 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 107 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.6 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2023-006895 "タイヤ" (Inspection day 2024-10-17) , next is 特許7605634 "空気入りタイヤ" (Inspection day 2024-10-16) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2023-006895 | タイヤ | 2024-10-17 |
2 | 特許7605634 | 空気入りタイヤ | 2024-10-16 |
3 | 特開2023-085087 | タイヤ | 2024-10-09 |
4 | 特開2023-085091 | タイヤ | 2024-10-09 |
5 | 特開2023-020716 | タイヤ | 2024-08-21 |
6 | 特開2021-098384 | タイヤ・ホイール組立体 | 2024-08-08 |
7 | 特開2022-120448 | タイヤ | 2024-05-30 |
8 | 再公表2019/163870 | ゴム組成物 | 2024-02-01 |
9 | 特開2023-123801 | 空気入りタイヤ | 2024-01-24 |
10 | 特許7397657 | タイヤ・ホイール組立体 | 2023-06-15 |
11 | 特許7496673 | タイヤ・ホイール組立体及びタイヤ | 2023-05-22 |
12 | 特許7373789 | 無線給電システム、送電装置、及び受電装置 | 2023-05-22 |
13 | 特許7365804 | 無線受電システム、タイヤ・ホイール組立体、及び、タイヤ | 2023-05-15 |
14 | 特許7568397 | タイヤ・ホイール組立体 | 2023-05-15 |
15 | 特許7568396 | タイヤ・ホイール組立体 | 2023-05-15 |
16 | 特許7353902 | 空気入りタイヤ | 2023-04-11 |
17 | 特許7258673 | タイヤ | 2023-03-23 |
18 | 特許4559179 | 空気入りタイヤ | 2023-03-23 |
19 | 特許4450583 | ニューマチック型クッションタイヤ | 2023-03-23 |
20 | 特許4777768 | 空気入りタイヤ | 2023-03-23 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 114 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.3. The most inspection patent is 特許7179460 "ホース用樹脂材料、ホース管及びホース" (7 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許6679208 "積層体及びクッション体" (3 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7179460 | ホース用樹脂材料、ホース管及びホース | 7 times |
2 | 特許6679208 | 積層体及びクッション体 | 3 times |
3 | 特許7218343 | フッ素ゴム架橋物 | 3 times |
4 | 特許6812359 | タイヤ | 3 times |
5 | 特許6268119 | ポリブタジエン及びその製造方法、並びにゴム組成物及びタイヤ | 3 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 866 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.5. The most cited patent is 特許6450170 "路面状態判別方法" (21 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6703369 "タイヤ用ゴム組成物" (20 times) .
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International