The Technical Field "泥炭" had 97 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-04-30). This is a with an decreasing trend transition of -21 filings (-17.8%) over 118 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-04-30). This report also includes technical terms related to " でい炭 ", " 草炭 ", " ピート " in the search set.
The highest number of filings in 2016 with 692 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 187 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 2,109 cases in total) is 352, and the median is 391. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 352 patents |
Std Dev | 194 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 187 cases | -45.0 % |
2022 year | 340 cases | -23.08 % |
2021 year | 442 cases | -15.81 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 泥炭 for the period of the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 泥炭, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of 泥炭 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 4,791 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 泥炭 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, JFEスチール株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2023 to 2025) with 31 cases, followed by 日本製鉄株式会社 with 10 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
JFEスチール株式会社 | 31 cases |
日本製鉄株式会社 | 10 cases |
三菱マテリアル株式会社 | 4 cases |
三菱重工業株式会社 | 2 cases |
株式会社神戸製鋼所 | 1 cases |
JFEエンジニアリング株式会社 | 1 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 日本製鉄株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2015 to 2025) with 412 cases, followed by JFEスチール株式会社 with 370 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
日本製鉄株式会社 | 412 cases |
JFEスチール株式会社 | 370 cases |
三菱マテリアル株式会社 | 189 cases |
株式会社神戸製鋼所 | 92 cases |
三菱重工業株式会社 | 43 cases |
住友電気工業株式会社 | 39 cases |
JFEエンジニアリング株式会社 | 6 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 5 cases |
井関農機株式会社 | 1 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 泥炭 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Among the top coapplicants, JFEスチール株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2023 to 2025) with 31 cases, followed by 日本製鉄株式会社 with 10 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
JFEスチール株式会社 | 31 cases |
日本製鉄株式会社 | 10 cases |
三菱マテリアル株式会社 | 4 cases |
株式会社神戸製鋼所 | 1 cases |
Among the top coapplicants, 日本製鉄株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2015 to 2025) with 412 cases, followed by JFEスチール株式会社 with 370 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
日本製鉄株式会社 | 412 cases |
JFEスチール株式会社 | 370 cases |
三菱マテリアル株式会社 | 189 cases |
株式会社神戸製鋼所 | 92 cases |
井関農機株式会社 | 1 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 泥炭’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 泥炭’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
泥炭 filed 412 joint applications with 日本製鉄株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 199 cases in total) is 33.2, and the median is 26.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.8, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2020 with 75 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 7 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 33.2 patents |
Std Dev | 27.1 |
COV | 0.8 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 7 cases | -61.1 % |
2022 year | 18 cases | -47.1 % |
2021 year | 34 cases | -54.7 % |
泥炭 filed 370 joint applications with JFEスチール株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 175 cases in total) is 29.2, and the median is 30.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 57 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 25 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 29.2 patents |
Std Dev | 12.0 |
COV | 0.4 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 25 cases | -40.5 % |
2022 year | 42 cases | +2.44 % |
2021 year | 41 cases | +36.7 % |
泥炭 filed 189 joint applications with 三菱マテリアル株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 67 cases in total) is 11.2, and the median is 11.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.7, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2015 with 41 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 4 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 11.2 patents |
Std Dev | 8.2 |
COV | 0.7 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 4 cases | -33.3 % |
2022 year | 6 cases | -62.5 % |
2021 year | 16 cases | -27.27 % |
泥炭 filed 92 joint applications with 株式会社神戸製鋼所 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 16 cases in total) is 2.7, and the median is 2.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.7, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2016 with 31 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 2.7 patents |
Std Dev | 2.0 |
COV | 0.7 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 0 cases | -100 % |
2022 year | 6 cases | +200 % |
2021 year | 2 cases | -33.3 % |
The following shows JP patents held by 泥炭 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 泥炭’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 泥炭 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 1 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 1.0 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許5585745 "ネマチック液晶組成物及びこれを用いた液晶表示素子" (Invalidation Trial day 2022-09-20) .
- | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許5585745 | ネマチック液晶組成物及びこれを用いた液晶表示素子 | 2022-09-20 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 1 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.0. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6538584 "ガス吹き込みノズル用耐火物の製造方法" (1 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6538584 | ガス吹き込みノズル用耐火物の製造方法 | 1 times |
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 20 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7470245 "焼鈍分離剤用の酸化マグネシウム、その製造方法、及びそれを用いた方向性電磁鋼板の製造方法" (Opposition day 2024-10-15) , next is 特許7470246 "焼鈍分離剤用の酸化マグネシウム、その製造方法、及びそれを用いた方向性電磁鋼板の製造方法" (Opposition day 2024-10-15) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7470245 | 焼鈍分離剤用の酸化マグネシウム、その製造方法、及びそれを用いた方向性電磁鋼板の製造方法 | 2024-10-15 |
2 | 特許7470246 | 焼鈍分離剤用の酸化マグネシウム、その製造方法、及びそれを用いた方向性電磁鋼板の製造方法 | 2024-10-15 |
3 | 特許7456560 | 焼結用炭材、焼結鉱及び焼結用炭材の製造方法 | 2024-09-10 |
4 | 特許7427849 | 水処理用活性炭 | 2024-08-02 |
5 | 特許7372615 | 天然ゴムの実由来バイオリファイナリーシステム、天然ゴムの実由来バイオリファイナリー方法及びプログラム | 2024-04-30 |
6 | 特許7364966 | 方向性電磁鋼板の製造方法 | 2024-04-11 |
7 | 特許7348466 | 高炉の操業方法及び銑鉄の製造方法 | 2024-03-19 |
8 | 特許7348467 | 高炉の操業方法及び銑鉄の製造方法 | 2024-03-19 |
9 | 特許7340045 | 方向性電磁鋼板およびその製造方法 | 2024-02-29 |
10 | 特許7315857 | 方向性電磁鋼板の製造方法 | 2024-01-22 |
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 37 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.4 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2020-117503 "経口組成物" (Protest day 2024-12-02) , next is 特開2023-028302 "変速機用軸およびそれを用いた軸受装置" (Protest day 2024-10-02) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2020-117503 | 経口組成物 | 2024-12-02 |
2 | 特開2023-028302 | 変速機用軸およびそれを用いた軸受装置 | 2024-10-02 |
3 | 特開2023-158060 | タバコ臭消臭用口腔用組成物 | 2024-09-27 |
4 | 特開2024-048351 | 飼料用組成物及びその製造方法、飼料、家畜への給餌方法、並びに家畜の飼料に対する嗜好性向上方法 | 2024-08-30 |
5 | 特開2024-114881 | 飼料用組成物及びその製造方法、飼料、家畜への給餌方法、並びに家畜の飼料に対する嗜好性向上方法 | 2024-08-30 |
6 | 特表2023-533987 | 流体からPFASを除去するための高容積ヨウ素価およびモラセス価を有する吸着剤ならびにその製造方法および使用方法 | 2024-07-25 |
7 | 特開2022-097004 | 方向性電磁鋼板及びその製造方法 | 2024-05-27 |
8 | 特表2022-513628 | クモ糸タンパク質のアルカリ精製法 | 2024-04-25 |
9 | 特表2023-508027 | 方向性電磁鋼板およびその製造方法 | 2023-12-14 |
10 | 特許7533413 | 耐疲労き裂伝播特性に優れた鋼板の製造方法 | 2023-11-30 |
11 | 特許7552545 | 耐疲労き裂伝播特性に優れた鋼板の製造方法 | 2023-11-30 |
12 | 特許7510078 | 方向性電磁鋼板の製造方法 | 2023-10-10 |
13 | 特許7506831 | 粘着剤組成物及び粘着フィルム | 2023-09-22 |
14 | 特表2022-536267 | 蒸留酒(distilled spirit)を製造するための組成物及び方法 | 2023-09-06 |
15 | 特許7340045 | 方向性電磁鋼板およびその製造方法 | 2023-07-31 |
16 | 特許7383545 | セメント製造方法 | 2023-07-28 |
17 | 特開2021-123768 | 方向性電磁鋼板の製造方法および方向性電磁鋼板、ならびに焼鈍分離剤 | 2023-07-13 |
18 | 特許7569392 | 組成物及び硬化体 | 2023-06-19 |
19 | 特表2022-514847 | 電気抵抗スポット溶接性に優れた高強度亜鉛めっき鋼板及びその製造方法 | 2023-06-15 |
20 | 特許7274519 | エアゾール型染毛剤又は毛髪脱色剤の第2剤組成物 | 2023-04-07 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 77 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.3. The most protest patent is 特許7383545 "セメント製造方法" (4 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許6739981 "ニッケルリチウム金属複合酸化物の製造方法" (4 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7383545 | セメント製造方法 | 4 times |
2 | 特許6739981 | ニッケルリチウム金属複合酸化物の製造方法 | 4 times |
3 | 特開2020-117503 | 経口組成物 | 4 times |
4 | 特許7274519 | エアゾール型染毛剤又は毛髪脱色剤の第2剤組成物 | 3 times |
5 | 特許6844110 | 一方向性電磁鋼板の製造方法及び一方向性電磁鋼板用原板の製造方法 | 2 times |
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 47 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.4 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2020-117503 "経口組成物" (Inspection day 2024-12-09) , next is 特開2023-028302 "変速機用軸およびそれを用いた軸受装置" (Inspection day 2024-11-25) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2020-117503 | 経口組成物 | 2024-12-09 |
2 | 特開2023-028302 | 変速機用軸およびそれを用いた軸受装置 | 2024-11-25 |
3 | 特開2022-147037 | (メタ)アクリル酸エステルの製造方法 | 2024-11-20 |
4 | 特開2024-090451 | ブリーディング制御方法、ソイルセメントの設計方法、埋戻し部の築造方法、埋戻し材の二酸化炭素排出量削減方法 | 2024-11-06 |
5 | 特開2021-146478 | 耐欠損性にすぐれた表面被覆切削工具 | 2024-10-22 |
6 | 特開2023-026175 | バイオマスエネルギー変換システム及びバイオマスエネルギー変換方法 | 2024-10-18 |
7 | 特開2023-158060 | タバコ臭消臭用口腔用組成物 | 2024-10-02 |
8 | 特許7383545 | セメント製造方法 | 2024-09-25 |
9 | 特表2023-533987 | 流体からPFASを除去するための高容積ヨウ素価およびモラセス価を有する吸着剤ならびにその製造方法および使用方法 | 2024-08-23 |
10 | 特表2022-536267 | 蒸留酒(distilled spirit)を製造するための組成物及び方法 | 2024-07-23 |
11 | 特許7596811 | 組成物、粘着剤、および粘着シート | 2024-06-21 |
12 | 特開2022-097004 | 方向性電磁鋼板及びその製造方法 | 2024-06-18 |
13 | 特開2024-048351 | 飼料用組成物及びその製造方法、飼料、家畜への給餌方法、並びに家畜の飼料に対する嗜好性向上方法 | 2024-05-23 |
14 | 特表2022-513628 | クモ糸タンパク質のアルカリ精製法 | 2024-04-30 |
15 | 特表2020-506708 | CO2および他のC1基質の、ビーガン栄養素、肥料、バイオスティミュラント、および土壌炭素隔離の加速のためのシステムへの微生物変換 | 2024-03-19 |
16 | 特許6684256 | ビール注出コック | 2024-03-11 |
17 | 特許7533413 | 耐疲労き裂伝播特性に優れた鋼板の製造方法 | 2023-12-05 |
18 | 特許7552545 | 耐疲労き裂伝播特性に優れた鋼板の製造方法 | 2023-12-05 |
19 | 特許6348984 | 液晶表示素子の製造方法 | 2023-11-16 |
20 | 特許7510078 | 方向性電磁鋼板の製造方法 | 2023-10-31 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 120 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.3. The most inspection patent is 特開2018-203628 "化粧料組成物又は飲食品組成物" (6 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許7383545 "セメント製造方法" (5 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2018-203628 | 化粧料組成物又は飲食品組成物 | 6 times |
2 | 特許7383545 | セメント製造方法 | 5 times |
3 | 特許6739981 | ニッケルリチウム金属複合酸化物の製造方法 | 5 times |
4 | 特許7274519 | エアゾール型染毛剤又は毛髪脱色剤の第2剤組成物 | 3 times |
5 | 特許7276797 | 繊維用表面処理剤および繊維製品 | 3 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 1,235 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.7. The most cited patent is 特許6524810 "耐スポット溶接部破断特性に優れた鋼板及びその製造方法" (28 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6492688 "液晶配向剤、液晶配向膜及びその製造方法、並びに液晶表示素子" (28 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6524810 | 耐スポット溶接部破断特性に優れた鋼板及びその製造方法 | 28 times |
2 | 特許6492688 | 液晶配向剤、液晶配向膜及びその製造方法、並びに液晶表示素子 | 28 times |
3 | 特許6364361 | 光増感化学増幅型レジスト材料及びこれを用いたパターン形成方法、並びに、半導体デバイス、リソグラフィ用マスク及びナノインプリント用テンプレートの製造方法 | 27 times |
4 | 特許6536294 | 溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板、合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板、およびそれらの製造方法 | 25 times |
5 | 特許6394898 | 高速断続切削加工で硬質被覆層がすぐれた耐チッピング性を発揮する表面被覆切削工具 | 23 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International