ベクター (JP Patent Analysis Report)
The Technical Field "ベクター" had 20 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-02-28). This is a significantly decreased of -241 filings (-92.3%) over 261 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-02-28). This report also includes technical terms related to " 遺伝子ベクター ", " ベクタ " in the search set.
The highest number of filings in 2016 with 2,227 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 1,491 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 9,741 cases in total) is 1,624, and the median is 1,931. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 1,624 patents |
| Std Dev | 731 |
| COV | 0.5 |
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023).
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 1,491 cases | -26.55 % |
| 2021 year | 2,030 cases | +10.81 % |
| 2020 year | 1,832 cases | -14.07 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for ベクター for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-10-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of ベクター, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
Introduction
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
ベクター, Changes in the Number of JP Patents/Patent Applications
The changes in the number of patent filings of ベクター over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
Search Set (Analysis Patents)
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 17,601 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
ベクター
Same industry / competition company information (JP)
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as ベクター are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024).
Comparing the number of applications of each company, ザリージェンツオブザユニバーシティオブカリフォルニア has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 20 cases, followed by 国立研究開発法人産業技術総合研究所 with 8 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| ザリージェンツオブザユニバーシティオブカリフォルニア | 20 cases |
| 国立研究開発法人産業技術総合研究所 | 8 cases |
| 武田薬品工業株式会社 | 7 cases |
| ジェネンテックインコーポレイテッド | 3 cases |
| ノバルティスアーゲー | 3 cases |
| アメリカ合衆国 | 2 cases |
| 中外製薬株式会社 | 1 cases |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2014 to 2024).
Comparing the number of applications of each company, ザリージェンツオブザユニバーシティオブカリフォルニア has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 193 cases, followed by ノバルティスアーゲー with 190 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| ザリージェンツオブザユニバーシティオブカリフォルニア | 193 cases |
| ノバルティスアーゲー | 190 cases |
| ジェネンテックインコーポレイテッド | 139 cases |
| 国立研究開発法人産業技術総合研究所 | 100 cases |
| アメリカ合衆国 | 89 cases |
| 武田薬品工業株式会社 | 62 cases |
| 中外製薬株式会社 | 58 cases |
| ノボザイムスアクティーゼルスカブ | 43 cases |
| 国立研究開発法人理化学研究所 | 42 cases |
| 国立研究開発法人科学技術振興機構 | 8 cases |
| ヒューマンジノームサイエンシーズインコーポレイテッド | 2 cases |
Same industry / competition company, Change in the Number of JP Patents
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
Top company information (JP)
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as ベクター are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024).
Among the top coapplicants, 国立研究開発法人産業技術総合研究所 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 8 cases, followed by 武田薬品工業株式会社 with 7 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| 国立研究開発法人産業技術総合研究所 | 8 cases |
| 武田薬品工業株式会社 | 7 cases |
| ジェネンテックインコーポレイテッド | 3 cases |
| ノバルティスアーゲー | 3 cases |
| アメリカ合衆国 | 2 cases |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2014 to 2024).
Among the top coapplicants, ノバルティスアーゲー has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 190 cases, followed by ジェネンテックインコーポレイテッド with 139 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| ノバルティスアーゲー | 190 cases |
| ジェネンテックインコーポレイテッド | 139 cases |
| 国立研究開発法人産業技術総合研究所 | 100 cases |
| アメリカ合衆国 | 89 cases |
| 武田薬品工業株式会社 | 62 cases |
| 国立研究開発法人科学技術振興機構 | 8 cases |
| ヒューマンジノームサイエンシーズインコーポレイテッド | 2 cases |
Top company, Change in the Number of JP Patents
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by ベクター’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by ベクター’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Top company Details (JP)
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with ジェネンテックインコーポレイテッド
ベクター filed 139 joint applications with ジェネンテックインコーポレイテッド for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 33 cases in total) is 5.5, and the median is 4.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.8, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2016 with 44 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 3 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 5.5 patents |
| Std Dev | 4.2 |
| COV | 0.8 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 3 cases | -40.0 % |
| 2021 year | 5 cases | -50.0 % |
| 2020 year | 10 cases | +233 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 国立研究開発法人産業技術総合研究所
ベクター filed 100 joint applications with 国立研究開発法人産業技術総合研究所 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 42 cases in total) is 7.0, and the median is 6.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2014 with 16 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 6 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 7.0 patents |
| Std Dev | 4.2 |
| COV | 0.6 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 6 cases | -25.00 % |
| 2021 year | 8 cases | +33.3 % |
| 2020 year | 6 cases | 0 |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 武田薬品工業株式会社
ベクター filed 62 joint applications with 武田薬品工業株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 41 cases in total) is 6.8, and the median is 8.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2019 with 9 cases, and their lowest number in 2014 with 0 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 6.8 patents |
| Std Dev | 3.1 |
| COV | 0.5 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 7 cases | -22.22 % |
| 2021 year | 9 cases | +12.50 % |
| 2020 year | 8 cases | -11.11 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with ノバルティスアーゲー
ベクター filed 190 joint applications with ノバルティスアーゲー for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 70 cases in total) is 11.7, and the median is 10.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.8, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2016 with 41 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 3 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 11.7 patents |
| Std Dev | 9.1 |
| COV | 0.8 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 3 cases | -70.0 % |
| 2021 year | 10 cases | 0 |
| 2020 year | 10 cases | -54.5 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 国立研究開発法人科学技術振興機構
ベクター filed 8 joint applications with 国立研究開発法人科学技術振興機構 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 5 cases in total) is 0.8, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.8, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2019 with 4 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 0.8 patents |
| Std Dev | 1.5 |
| COV | 1.8 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2020 year | 1 cases | -75.0 % |
| 2019 year | 4 cases | - |
| 2018 year | 0 cases | - |
Information on important patents (JP)
The following shows JP patents held by ベクター that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and ベクター’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which ベクター is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
Glossary
- Cited
- Indicates that the patent/patent application has been cited (by Examiners) in notices of reasons for rejection in the examination process of other (Japanese, U.S., or European) patent applications. The higher the number of citations, the more important the patent/patent application is considered to be.
- Request for invalidation trial
- Indicates that a third party has requested a procedure to invalidate the patent. It is likely to affect the business of third parties and is considered to be of high importance.
- Opposition
- Indicates that a third party has filed a petition with the Patent Office to hear the validity of the patent again. Like the trial for invalidation, it is considered to be of high importance.
- Information provision
- Indicates that a third party has provided the Patent Office with useful information for examination for the patent filed. It is usually considered to be of high importance because it is done to prevent the patent from being granted.
- Browsing request
- Indicates that a third party has requested the Patent Office to view the patent bag (a set of documents exchanged between the Patent Office and the applicant). The bag is often checked prior to trial for invalidation, opposition, and provision of information, and is considered to be a highly important patent.
Invalidationed Trial cases
List of latest Invalidationed Trial patents
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 5 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 1.0 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許6896700 "ワクチン組成物" (Invalidation Trial day 2023-01-27) , next is 特許6203879 "配列操作のための系、方法および最適化ガイド組成物のエンジニアリング" (Invalidation Trial day 2022-09-30) .
| - | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6896700 | ワクチン組成物 | 2023-01-27 |
| 2 | 特許6203879 | 配列操作のための系、方法および最適化ガイド組成物のエンジニアリング | 2022-09-30 |
| 3 | 特許6278598 | 細胞傷害誘導治療剤 | 2022-03-31 |
| 4 | 特許6773929 | 細胞傷害誘導治療剤 | 2022-03-31 |
| 5 | 特許6692856 | ＲＮＡ依存性標的ＤＮＡ修飾およびＲＮＡ依存性転写調節のための方法および組成物 | 2022-02-25 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Invalidationed Trial
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 3 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.0. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6896700 "ワクチン組成物" (1 times) , and the next most invalidation trial patent is 特許6718561 "活性型ＧｃＭＡＦの製造方法" (1 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6896700 | ワクチン組成物 | 1 times |
| 2 | 特許6718561 | 活性型ＧｃＭＡＦの製造方法 | 1 times |
| 3 | 特許6203879 | 配列操作のための系、方法および最適化ガイド組成物のエンジニアリング | 1 times |
Oppositioned cases
List of latest Oppositioned patents
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 8 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7430358 "ＤＮＡが編集された真核細胞を製造する方法、および当該方法に用いられるキット" (Opposition day 2024-08-09) , next is 特許7413445 "一組の部品を表す複数の図面データを管理するための装置、方法及びそのためのプログラム" (Opposition day 2024-06-27) .
| - | No. | Title | Opposition days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許7430358 | ＤＮＡが編集された真核細胞を製造する方法、および当該方法に用いられるキット | 2024-08-09 |
| 2 | 特許7413445 | 一組の部品を表す複数の図面データを管理するための装置、方法及びそのためのプログラム | 2024-06-27 |
| 3 | 特許7448953 | 眼疾患のための細胞モデル及び治療関連出願への相互参照 | 2024-04-17 |
| 4 | 特許7344565 | 未分化細胞検出法 | 2024-03-13 |
| 5 | 特許7301332 | ＤＮＡが編集された真核細胞を製造する方法、および当該方法に用いられるキット | 2024-01-04 |
| 6 | 特許6933898 | 養子細胞治療製品を製造するための誘導多能性幹細胞の適用 | 2022-03-07 |
| 7 | 特許6924732 | 体細胞の再プログラム化 | 2022-02-24 |
| 8 | 特許6896700 | ワクチン組成物 | 2021-12-06 |
Protested cases
List of latest Protested patents
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 11 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.0 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特表2024-504870 "含窒素架橋複素環化合物、その調製方法及びその医薬的応用" (Protest day 2024-09-02) , next is 特開2024-028649 "ＤＮＡが編集された真核細胞を製造する方法、および当該方法に用いられるキット" (Protest day 2024-08-28) .
| - | No. | Title | Protest days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特表2024-504870 | 含窒素架橋複素環化合物、その調製方法及びその医薬的応用 | 2024-09-02 |
| 2 | 特開2024-028649 | ＤＮＡが編集された真核細胞を製造する方法、および当該方法に用いられるキット | 2024-08-28 |
| 3 | 特開2023-052694 | 悪臭調節化合物の同定方法 | 2024-02-17 |
| 4 | 特表2021-503278 | ＣａｓＺ組成物及び使用方法 | 2023-07-06 |
| 5 | 特許7524214 | 抗体コード配列をセーフハーバー遺伝子座に挿入するための方法および組成物 | 2023-03-24 |
| 6 | 特許7439108 | ヒト心筋トロポニンＩに対する組換え抗体 | 2023-02-27 |
| 7 | 特表2020-515255 | アルデヒドデヒドロゲナーゼバリアントおよび使用の方法 | 2022-11-01 |
| 8 | 特表2022-500069 | サイトカイン放出を刺激しうる新規ペプチド及びその誘導体 | 2022-09-06 |
| 9 | 特許7224021 | 人工多能性幹細胞の作製方法 | 2022-06-21 |
| 10 | 再公表2018/008770 | 末梢神経を操作する方法、脳および脊髄を除く臓器などにおいて神経細胞機能を変化させる機能を発生させる方法、および新規疾病の予防または治療方法、ならびに末梢神経投与用医薬 | 2022-03-25 |
| 11 | 特許7288892 | 細胞、脊椎動物、集団及び方法 | 2022-01-17 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Protested
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 23 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.2. The most protest patent is 特許6426567 "クリーンな味を産み出す酵素調製物" (3 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許6640267 "エンドトキシン測定剤" (2 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6426567 | クリーンな味を産み出す酵素調製物 | 3 times |
| 2 | 特許6640267 | エンドトキシン測定剤 | 2 times |
| 3 | 特表2017-535552 | アポリポタンパク質Ｃ３（ＡＰＯＣ３）ｉＲＮＡ組成物およびその使用方法 | 2 times |
| 4 | 特許6710825 | 遺伝子改変家禽卵 | 1 times |
| 5 | 特表2018-505695 | 組換えウイルス粒子の特徴付けのための分析超遠心分離法 | 1 times |
Inspectioned cases
List of latest Inspectioned patents
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 253 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.2 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特表2021-502097 "標的化ＣＲＩＳＰＲ送達プラットフォーム" (Inspection day 2024-09-17) , next is 特開2023-159105 "マイクロ流体を使用した治療的に活性な細胞を調製する方法" (Inspection day 2024-09-13) .
| - | No. | Title | Inspection days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特表2021-502097 | 標的化ＣＲＩＳＰＲ送達プラットフォーム | 2024-09-17 |
| 2 | 特開2023-159105 | マイクロ流体を使用した治療的に活性な細胞を調製する方法 | 2024-09-13 |
| 3 | 特表2024-504870 | 含窒素架橋複素環化合物、その調製方法及びその医薬的応用 | 2024-09-12 |
| 4 | 特許6738314 | ＢＣＭＡおよびＣＤ３に対する結合分子 | 2024-09-10 |
| 5 | 特表2022-500042 | 抗ＨＩＶ抗体１０−１０７４バリアント | 2024-09-06 |
| 6 | 特開2023-071635 | 分子標的薬ｎＣｏＶｓｈＲＮＡ・２ＡＣＥ２の合成方法 | 2024-09-05 |
| 7 | 特表2022-537670 | ＣＡ２の組成物および調整可能な制御方法 | 2024-09-05 |
| 8 | 特表2021-521798 | がんに対する組換え型の治療介入 | 2024-09-02 |
| 9 | 特許7430358 | ＤＮＡが編集された真核細胞を製造する方法、および当該方法に用いられるキット | 2024-08-28 |
| 10 | 特許7301332 | ＤＮＡが編集された真核細胞を製造する方法、および当該方法に用いられるキット | 2024-08-28 |
| 11 | 特開2023-002670 | 認知障害を治療または予防するためのヒト化抗体、その製造プロセス、及びそれを用いた認知障害を治療または予防するための薬剤 | 2024-08-23 |
| 12 | 特表2021-525515 | 複数種の核酸試料を処理または分析するための組成物、方法およびシステム | 2024-08-22 |
| 13 | 特表2024-511415 | 神経系障害の標的に方向づけられた機能性核酸分子 | 2024-08-21 |
| 14 | 特許7564274 | 結合剤 | 2024-08-09 |
| 15 | 特表2023-503046 | ポンペ病およびリソソーム障害を処置するための肝臓特異的プロモーターを含む治療用アデノ随伴ウイルス | 2024-08-02 |
| 16 | 特表2021-528959 | 細胞内で存続する遺伝子送達のためのベクター | 2024-07-30 |
| 17 | 特表2021-514661 | サイトカインに連結させたＥＣＭ親和性ペプチドを用いてがんを処置するための方法および組成物 | 2024-07-30 |
| 18 | 特許7547433 | ワクチンベクターとしての三セグメントピチンデウイルス | 2024-07-29 |
| 19 | 特開2022-088355 | 結合タンパク質及びその使用方法 | 2024-07-29 |
| 20 | 特開2022-160479 | ヒト補体因子Ｃ２Ｂに対する抗体及び使用方法 | 2024-07-26 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Inspectioned
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 458 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.2. The most inspection patent is 特許6426670 "真核生物細胞を改変する方法" (6 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許6402368 "真核生物細胞を改変する方法" (6 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6426670 | 真核生物細胞を改変する方法 | 6 times |
| 2 | 特許6402368 | 真核生物細胞を改変する方法 | 6 times |
| 3 | 特許6486979 | 真核生物細胞を改変する方法 | 5 times |
| 4 | 特許6426567 | クリーンな味を産み出す酵素調製物 | 4 times |
| 5 | 特表2023-547026 | 運動精子ドメイン含有タンパク質２抗体およびその使用法 | 4 times |
Cited cases
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Cited
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 2,104 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.3. The most cited patent is 特許6196343 "免疫グロブリンに特異的に結合するタンパク質および免疫グロブリン結合性アフィニティーリガンド" (36 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6395765 "配列操作のための改善された系、方法および酵素組成物のエンジニアリングおよび最適化" (35 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6196343 | 免疫グロブリンに特異的に結合するタンパク質および免疫グロブリン結合性アフィニティーリガンド | 36 times |
| 2 | 特許6395765 | 配列操作のための改善された系、方法および酵素組成物のエンジニアリングおよび最適化 | 35 times |
| 3 | 特許6538158 | ブロック共重合体 | 27 times |
| 4 | 特許6538157 | ブロック共重合体 | 27 times |
| 5 | 特許6203879 | 配列操作のための系、方法および最適化ガイド組成物のエンジニアリング | 26 times |
Providing patent information to the media (newspapers, magazines, etc.)
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
About this Site
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
Please note the following points for use.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
Citation of patent application status and ranking information
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Graphs are image data.
Please note that the various graphs are image data, but we cannot provide them in text data.Scope of coverage for each goal/target
- Based on the description of each goal and target of the SDGs, we have set the scope of technologies to be covered based on our and e-Patent's past experience, etc. (in some cases, the search is based on social issues themselves). Therefore, please note that there is a possibility that this "SDGs Global Company Ranking from Patent Perspective" may not cover 100%.
- A population search formula is clearly indicated for each goal/target (database: Patent Integration). You may use the population search formula as it is, or you may improve it by yourself.
- This search covers patents and utility models, including both published and registered patents (design and design patents are excluded). The unit of count is the number of applications, not the number of patent families.
About the name collation and name control of applicants and right holders
- Company rankings are based on the results calculated by "Patent Integration", with Japanese organizations in Japanese and other companies in English (some are in Japanese).
- Company names may be the names of the companies at the time of application, but the results calculated by Patent Integration are used as is. Company names are used as they were at the time of application.
- Because of the fluctuation in the names of companies (i.e., applicant/right holder names in the patent information), there are cases where the same company appears more than once in the top 10. The number of applications filed by the same company in the top 10 is the total number of applications filed by the company.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
Our Commitment to Safety and Security
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to providing high-quality patent information based on the latest patent data on more than 45 million cases collected from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publication. 
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. collects the patent data from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publications to provide it widely in the form of reports so that anyone can check patent information and patent trends with confidence. 
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to various efforts to enhance the reliability of the information and to allow users to search patent information with confidence.