The Theme Code "情報検索、そのためのDB構造・FS構造技術" had 290 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-03-31). This is a significantly decreased of -73 filings (-20.1%) over 363 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-03-31).
The highest number of filings in 2017 with 3,026 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 1,284 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 9,990 cases in total) is 1,665, and the median is 1,514. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1,665 patents |
Std Dev | 747 |
COV | 0.4 |
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023).
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 1,284 cases | -15.97 % |
2021 year | 1,528 cases | +1.87 % |
2020 year | 1,500 cases | -34.2 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 情報検索、そのためのDB構造・FS構造技術[5B175] for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-11-30). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 情報検索、そのためのDB構造・FS構造技術, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of 情報検索、そのためのDB構造・FS構造技術 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 21,380 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The patent information of the higher applicant in the technical theme 情報検索、そのためのDB構造・FS構造技術 is shown below. By comparing the number of patents of each company, you can check the research and development status of each company's past and present technical themes and the position of each company in the technical theme.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 株式会社日立製作所 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 105 cases, followed by 富士通株式会社 with 72 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
株式会社日立製作所 | 105 cases |
富士通株式会社 | 72 cases |
株式会社リコー | 54 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 44 cases |
富士フイルムビジネスイノベーション株式会社 | 43 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 39 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 37 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 28 cases |
日本電信電話株式会社 | 13 cases |
ソニーグループ株式会社 | 1 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 富士通株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 1,445 cases, followed by 株式会社日立製作所 with 924 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
富士通株式会社 | 1,445 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 924 cases |
日本電信電話株式会社 | 910 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 743 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 686 cases |
富士フイルムビジネスイノベーション株式会社 | 679 cases |
株式会社リコー | 407 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 364 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 300 cases |
ソニーグループ株式会社 | 192 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 20 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The patent information of the higher applicant in the technical theme 情報検索、そのためのDB構造・FS構造技術 is shown below. By comparing the number of patents of each company, you can check the research and development status of each company's past and present technical themes and the position of each company in the technical theme.
among the top coapplicants, 株式会社日立製作所 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 105 cases, followed by 富士通株式会社 with 72 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
株式会社日立製作所 | 105 cases |
富士通株式会社 | 72 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 44 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 37 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 28 cases |
日本電信電話株式会社 | 13 cases |
ソニーグループ株式会社 | 1 cases |
among the top coapplicants, 富士通株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 1,445 cases, followed by 株式会社日立製作所 with 924 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
富士通株式会社 | 1,445 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 924 cases |
日本電信電話株式会社 | 910 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 743 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 686 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 364 cases |
ソニーグループ株式会社 | 192 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 情報検索、そのためのDB構造・FS構造技術’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 情報検索、そのためのDB構造・FS構造技術’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
情報検索、そのためのDB構造・FS構造技術 filed 743 joint applications with 日本電気株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 263 cases in total) is 43.8, and the median is 36.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.7, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2014 with 125 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 18 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 43.8 patents |
Std Dev | 29.3 |
COV | 0.7 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 24 cases | +33.3 % |
2021 year | 18 cases | -62.5 % |
2020 year | 48 cases | -45.5 % |
情報検索、そのためのDB構造・FS構造技術 filed 924 joint applications with 株式会社日立製作所 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 514 cases in total) is 85.7, and the median is 74.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2018 with 162 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 64 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 85.7 patents |
Std Dev | 42.2 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 77 cases | +20.31 % |
2021 year | 64 cases | -11.11 % |
2020 year | 72 cases | -35.7 % |
情報検索、そのためのDB構造・FS構造技術 filed 1,445 joint applications with 富士通株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 563 cases in total) is 93.8, and the median is 77.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2017 with 274 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 51 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 93.8 patents |
Std Dev | 60.1 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 51 cases | -27.14 % |
2021 year | 70 cases | -17.65 % |
2020 year | 85 cases | -42.6 % |
情報検索、そのためのDB構造・FS構造技術 filed 910 joint applications with 日本電信電話株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 297 cases in total) is 49.5, and the median is 35.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.9, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2017 with 168 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 8 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 49.5 patents |
Std Dev | 46.6 |
COV | 0.9 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 9 cases | +12.50 % |
2021 year | 8 cases | -87.1 % |
2020 year | 62 cases | -28.74 % |
情報検索、そのためのDB構造・FS構造技術 filed 364 joint applications with 株式会社東芝 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 140 cases in total) is 23.3, and the median is 22.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2014 with 61 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 17 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 23.3 patents |
Std Dev | 12.3 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 22 cases | +29.41 % |
2021 year | 17 cases | -26.09 % |
2020 year | 23 cases | -8.00 % |
The following shows JP patents held by 情報検索、そのためのDB構造・FS構造技術 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 情報検索、そのためのDB構造・FS構造技術’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 情報検索、そのためのDB構造・FS構造技術 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 1 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 1.0 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許4059802 "画像表示方法" (Invalidation Trial day 2022-08-24) .
- | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許4059802 | 画像表示方法 | 2022-08-24 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 1 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.0. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6474117 "コンピュータシステムおよびプログラム" (1 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6474117 | コンピュータシステムおよびプログラム | 1 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 4 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7445246 "データ処理システム、データ処理方法、及びデータ処理プログラム" (Opposition day 2024-08-14) , next is 特許7430437 "印刷物に印刷された文字情報を収集する方法、プログラム及び情報処理装置" (Opposition day 2024-08-05) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7445246 | データ処理システム、データ処理方法、及びデータ処理プログラム | 2024-08-14 |
2 | 特許7430437 | 印刷物に印刷された文字情報を収集する方法、プログラム及び情報処理装置 | 2024-08-05 |
3 | 特許7421740 | 分析プログラム、情報処理装置、および分析方法 | 2024-06-10 |
4 | 特許6931368 | 電子ゲームにおけるゲーム媒体自動組合せ装置、ゲーム媒体自動組合せプログラム及びゲーム媒体自動組合せ方法 | 2022-02-28 |
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 13 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.5 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特許7421740 "分析プログラム、情報処理装置、および分析方法" (Protest day 2024-08-11) , next is 特許7472078 "データ仮想化装置及び方法" (Protest day 2023-12-27) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7421740 | 分析プログラム、情報処理装置、および分析方法 | 2024-08-11 |
2 | 特許7472078 | データ仮想化装置及び方法 | 2023-12-27 |
3 | 特許7440259 | 情報処理装置、情報処理方法、プログラム | 2023-03-01 |
4 | 特許7440877 | 卵分類装置、卵分類方法及びコンピュータプログラム | 2023-03-01 |
5 | 特許7494065 | 検知装置、検知方法及び検知プログラム | 2023-02-08 |
6 | 特開2020-170416 | 情報処理装置、情報処理方法及び情報処理プログラム | 2023-01-19 |
7 | 特開2020-026631 | 湯水混合水栓 | 2023-01-10 |
8 | 特許7195182 | 施工データ管理システム | 2022-09-07 |
9 | 特許7152264 | 肌状態測定分析情報管理システムおよび肌状態測定分析情報管理方法 | 2022-04-19 |
10 | 特許7270488 | 情報処理装置、情報処理方法、及び情報処理プログラム | 2022-04-19 |
11 | 特許7206488 | 情報処理装置、クライアント端末、制御方法、及びプログラム | 2022-03-22 |
12 | 特許7328635 | セキュリティインシデント検知装置、セキュリティインシデント検知システム、セキュリティインシデント検知方法およびプログラム | 2022-03-09 |
13 | 特開2020-160970 | 法律文書データ校正システム、法律文書データ校正プログラム及び法律文書データ校正方法 | 2022-01-20 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 37 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.3. The most protest patent is 特許6587556 "情報処理装置及び情報処理方法" (5 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特開2020-026631 "湯水混合水栓" (3 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6587556 | 情報処理装置及び情報処理方法 | 5 times |
2 | 特開2020-026631 | 湯水混合水栓 | 3 times |
3 | 特許7098327 | 情報処理システム、関数作成方法および関数作成プログラム | 2 times |
4 | 特開2019-164350 | サーベイ(眺望)型ナビゲーションシステム | 2 times |
5 | 特許7440877 | 卵分類装置、卵分類方法及びコンピュータプログラム | 2 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 45 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.6 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特許7421740 "分析プログラム、情報処理装置、および分析方法" (Inspection day 2024-09-02) , next is 特許7584393 "プログラム、視聴者端末、動画配信装置、表示制御方法、動画配信方法、および、システム" (Inspection day 2024-07-04) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7421740 | 分析プログラム、情報処理装置、および分析方法 | 2024-09-02 |
2 | 特許7584393 | プログラム、視聴者端末、動画配信装置、表示制御方法、動画配信方法、および、システム | 2024-07-04 |
3 | 特許7371843 | 遺失物管理システム、及びプログラム | 2024-05-09 |
4 | 特許7430437 | 印刷物に印刷された文字情報を収集する方法、プログラム及び情報処理装置 | 2024-04-11 |
5 | 特許7428337 | 情報処理方法、情報処理装置、及びプログラム | 2024-03-12 |
6 | 特許6481787 | デバイス選択装置、データセット選択装置、デバイス選択方法及びプログラム | 2024-02-06 |
7 | 特許7472078 | データ仮想化装置及び方法 | 2024-01-11 |
8 | 特許6754811 | 情報処理装置、情報処理方法および情報処理プログラム | 2023-11-27 |
9 | 特許7104257 | 情報処理装置、情報処理方法、および情報処理プログラム | 2023-11-27 |
10 | 特許7462595 | 人材育成支援システム、連携支援システム、方法及びコンピュータプログラム | 2023-11-14 |
11 | 特許7443427 | エモーティコンの推薦方法及びエモーティコンの推薦を提供するユーザー端末 | 2023-10-20 |
12 | 特表2021-513146 | データの処理方法及び装置 | 2023-08-29 |
13 | 特表2022-548761 | 自然言語コンテンツの選択的な深い構文解析 | 2023-08-25 |
14 | 特表2022-545062 | オントロジーベースの概念埋め込みモデルを使用した自然言語処理 | 2023-07-27 |
15 | 特開2019-194853 | 情報処理装置、情報処理プログラム及び情報処理システム | 2023-06-15 |
16 | 特許4896227 | 広告媒体決定装置および広告媒体決定方法 | 2023-06-02 |
17 | 特許4827900 | アンケート結果解析支援装置およびその方法 | 2023-06-02 |
18 | 特許5292454 | 広告媒体決定装置および広告媒体決定方法 | 2023-06-02 |
19 | 特許7363187 | 情報処理装置 | 2023-05-23 |
20 | 特許7540728 | 乗り物データを管理するためのシステムおよび方法 | 2023-04-18 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 190 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.1. The most inspection patent is 特開2020-026631 "湯水混合水栓" (6 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許6587556 "情報処理装置及び情報処理方法" (4 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2020-026631 | 湯水混合水栓 | 6 times |
2 | 特許6587556 | 情報処理装置及び情報処理方法 | 4 times |
3 | 特許7440877 | 卵分類装置、卵分類方法及びコンピュータプログラム | 4 times |
4 | 特許6382359 | 個人の属性情報の集合体を利用するためのコンピュータシステム、サーバ装置およびプログラム | 3 times |
5 | 特開2017-010038 | サーベイ(眺望)型ナビゲーションシステム | 3 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 5,670 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.6. The most cited patent is 特開2016-151928 "情報処理装置、情報処理方法、及びプログラム" (131 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6416806 "コンテンツアイテムテンプレート" (63 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2016-151928 | 情報処理装置、情報処理方法、及びプログラム | 131 times |
2 | 特許6416806 | コンテンツアイテムテンプレート | 63 times |
3 | 特許6418704 | コンテンツアイテムテンプレート | 53 times |
4 | 特許6305588 | 拡張された会話理解アーキテクチャ | 46 times |
5 | 特許6490430 | 画像処理装置、画像処理システム、画像処理方法、及びプログラム | 43 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International