The Applicant / Patent Holder "グリー株式会社" had 12 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-04-30). This is a significantly decreased of -15 filings (-55.6%) over 27 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-04-30).
The highest number of filings in 2015 with 362 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 16 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 463 cases in total) is 77.2, and the median is 78.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.7, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 77.2 patents |
Std Dev | 56.6 |
COV | 0.7 |
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024).
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 16 cases | -81.0 % |
2022 year | 84 cases | +16.67 % |
2021 year | 72 cases | -47.8 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for グリー株式会社 for the period of the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of グリー株式会社, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of グリー株式会社 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
Patent landscaping is a visualization of the distribution of patent filings (application focus areas) for each technical keyword. Mountains and islands indicated by heatmap contours represent clusters of patent applications filed, and red areas on the heatmap indicate many patent filings relating to the keyword.
The patent landscape for グリー株式会社 gives an intuitive understanding of what patent filings they have made and what technical position is to be established. By selecting filing year checkboxes and filtering, you can track their past filing trends (what technical area they have focused on).
By selecting applicant/patent holder checkboxes and filtering, you can visually grasp the technical areas of the filings for each applicant and the partnerships or alliances formed. Please use it as a guide for patent analysis and IP landscaping.
In addition, by visually representing the patent data in this manner, you can convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
In Patent Integration, you can check the specifics of a patent filing by clicking anywhere on the patent landscape screen. You can also quickly check the position of each applicant for each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. You can use it as a guide when considering hypotheses about each company's IP strategy on the IP Landscape. You can also use it for higher-grade intellectual property activities. It has reasonable pricing and a simple user interface that is easy for beginners to handle.
The following is a list of words (characteristic terms) often used in グリー株式会社 patent applications. Characteristic terms with a higher importance are used in more patents/patent applications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 1,436 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as グリー株式会社 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 株式会社オービック has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2023 to 2025) with 102 cases, followed by 株式会社コロプラ with 74 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
株式会社オービック | 102 cases |
株式会社コロプラ | 74 cases |
株式会社カプコン | 56 cases |
任天堂株式会社 | 55 cases |
株式会社野村総合研究所 | 33 cases |
セコム株式会社 | 30 cases |
株式会社ディー・エヌ・エー | 20 cases |
グリー株式会社 | 16 cases |
メタウォーター株式会社 | 14 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 6 cases |
株式会社オプティム | 4 cases |
株式会社ぐるなび | 3 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 株式会社コロプラ has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2015 to 2025) with 1,514 cases, followed by 株式会社オービック with 1,457 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
株式会社コロプラ | 1,514 cases |
株式会社オービック | 1,457 cases |
グリー株式会社 | 1,436 cases |
株式会社カプコン | 995 cases |
任天堂株式会社 | 858 cases |
株式会社ディー・エヌ・エー | 670 cases |
株式会社野村総合研究所 | 533 cases |
セコム株式会社 | 532 cases |
株式会社ぐるなび | 435 cases |
株式会社オプティム | 351 cases |
メタウォーター株式会社 | 279 cases |
アスモ株式会社 | 86 cases |
株式会社インテリジェントシステムズ | 38 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 32 cases |
株式会社デンソー | 10 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 15 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The changes in the number of patents shared with グリー株式会社’s top coapplicants are shown below.
By searching for the top coapplicants, you can discover what companies グリー株式会社 is partnered with to develop technologies and use this information for R&D and intellectual property strategies.
Also, by looking at the change in the number of filings, you can see what companies グリー株式会社 conducted joint research with in the past, and check the history of グリー株式会社’s alliances, partnerships, and joint research and development.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to quickly find out specifically what company they filed a joint application with and what invention it was for.
Among the top coapplicants, 株式会社スクウェア・エニックス has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2015 to 2025) with 4 cases, followed by 株式会社バンダイナムコエンターテインメント with 3 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
株式会社スクウェア・エニックス | 4 cases |
株式会社バンダイナムコエンターテインメント | 3 cases |
株式会社ブイキューブ | 2 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by グリー株式会社’s top 4 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by グリー株式会社’s top 4 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
グリー株式会社 filed 4 joint applications with 株式会社スクウェア・エニックス for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 10 years (2014 to 2024, 4 cases in total) is 0.4, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 2.1, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2016 with 2 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 0.4 patents |
Std Dev | 0.8 |
COV | 2.1 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2017 year | 2 cases | 0 |
2016 year | 2 cases | - |
2015 year | 0 cases | - |
グリー株式会社 filed 3 joint applications with 株式会社バンダイナムコエンターテインメント for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 3 cases in total) is 0.5, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 2.2, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2021 with 3 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 0.5 patents |
Std Dev | 1.1 |
COV | 2.2 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2021 year | 3 cases | - |
2020 year | 0 cases | - |
2019 year | 0 cases | - |
The following shows JP patents held by グリー株式会社 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and グリー株式会社’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which グリー株式会社 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 2 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.0 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2022-160600 "情報処理システム、端末装置、プログラム、及び情報処理方法" (Protest day 2023-08-25) , next is 特許7111717 "ゲームシステム" (Protest day 2022-04-04) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2022-160600 | 情報処理システム、端末装置、プログラム、及び情報処理方法 | 2023-08-25 |
2 | 特許7111717 | ゲームシステム | 2022-04-04 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 5 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.0. The most protest patent is 特許6290472 "サーバ装置、その制御方法、プログラム、及びゲームシステム" (1 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許6122079 "コンピュータ及びコンピュータにおいて実行されるプログラム" (1 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6290472 | サーバ装置、その制御方法、プログラム、及びゲームシステム | 1 times |
2 | 特許6122079 | コンピュータ及びコンピュータにおいて実行されるプログラム | 1 times |
3 | 特許6472861 | サーバ装置、その制御方法、プログラム、及びゲームシステム | 1 times |
4 | 特開2022-160600 | 情報処理システム、端末装置、プログラム、及び情報処理方法 | 1 times |
5 | 特許7111717 | ゲームシステム | 1 times |
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 20 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.0 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2023-153317 "制御方法、コンピュータ及び制御プログラム" (Inspection day 2024-12-24) , next is 特開2023-171590 "制御プログラム、制御方法及びコンピュータ" (Inspection day 2024-12-20) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2023-153317 | 制御方法、コンピュータ及び制御プログラム | 2024-12-24 |
2 | 特開2023-171590 | 制御プログラム、制御方法及びコンピュータ | 2024-12-20 |
3 | 特開2023-112109 | サーバ装置の制御方法、サーバ装置及びプログラム | 2024-12-13 |
4 | 特許7610886 | 動画処理方法、サーバ装置及びコンピュータプログラム | 2024-12-02 |
5 | 特開2023-115342 | サーバ、通信システム、通信システムの制御方法、及びプログラム | 2024-11-25 |
6 | 特許7563793 | 制御プログラム、コンピュータ及び制御方法 | 2024-09-10 |
7 | 特許7570042 | 制御プログラム、ゲーム装置及び制御方法 | 2024-09-10 |
8 | 特許7553061 | ゲームプログラム、ゲーム制御方法及び情報処理装置 | 2024-08-13 |
9 | 特開2023-066426 | コンピュータプログラム、方法及びサーバ装置 | 2024-07-29 |
10 | 特許7517743 | コンピュータプログラム、方法及びサーバ装置 | 2024-06-20 |
11 | 特許7441448 | 情報処理システム、情報処理方法およびコンピュータプログラム | 2024-05-29 |
12 | 特開2024-086094 | 情報処理システム、情報処理方法、認証システム、及びプログラム | 2024-02-07 |
13 | 特開2021-189674 | コンピュータプログラム、サーバ装置、端末装置、及び方法 | 2024-02-07 |
14 | 特許7519046 | 情報処理システム、情報処理方法、及びプログラム | 2023-12-08 |
15 | 特許7408068 | コンピュータプログラム、サーバ装置及び方法 | 2023-12-04 |
16 | 特許7216856 | ゲームシステム、ゲーム処理方法、及びゲームプログラム | 2023-11-24 |
17 | 特許7360112 | コンピュータプログラム、サーバ装置、端末装置、及び方法 | 2023-09-05 |
18 | 特許7213763 | ゲームプログラム、ゲーム処理方法および情報処理装置 | 2022-11-24 |
19 | 特許7113065 | コンピュータプログラム、方法、及び、サーバ | 2022-03-01 |
20 | 特許7162042 | コンピュータプログラム、方法、及び、サーバ | 2022-02-24 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 228 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.3. The most inspection patent is 特許6276314 "ゲーム制御方法、ゲームサーバ、及びプログラム" (5 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許6279518 "プログラム、情報処理装置、及び情報処理装置の制御方法" (3 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6276314 | ゲーム制御方法、ゲームサーバ、及びプログラム | 5 times |
2 | 特許6279518 | プログラム、情報処理装置、及び情報処理装置の制御方法 | 3 times |
3 | 特許5797858 | サーバ装置、その制御プログラム、及び制御方法 | 3 times |
4 | 特許6228252 | ゲーム制御方法 | 3 times |
5 | 特許5813266 | ゲーム制御方法、ゲームサーバ、及びプログラム | 3 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 483 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 3.7. The most cited patent is 特許6382468 "アクターの動きに基づいて生成されるキャラクタオブジェクトのアニメーションを含む動画を配信する動画配信システム、動画配信方法及び動画配信プログラム" (53 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6491388 "配信ユーザの動きに基づいて生成されるキャラクタオブジェクトのアニメーションを含む動画をライブ配信する動画配信システム、動画配信方法及び動画配信プログラム" (50 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6382468 | アクターの動きに基づいて生成されるキャラクタオブジェクトのアニメーションを含む動画を配信する動画配信システム、動画配信方法及び動画配信プログラム | 53 times |
2 | 特許6491388 | 配信ユーザの動きに基づいて生成されるキャラクタオブジェクトのアニメーションを含む動画をライブ配信する動画配信システム、動画配信方法及び動画配信プログラム | 50 times |
3 | 特許6526898 | 動画配信システム、動画配信方法、及び動画配信プログラム | 45 times |
4 | 特許5866039 | ゲーム制御方法、コンピュータ及び制御プログラム | 42 times |
5 | 特許6543403 | 動画配信システム、動画配信方法及び動画配信プログラム | 39 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International