The highest number of filings in 2014 with 607 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 1,794 cases in total) is 299, and the median is 301. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.9, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 299 patents |
Std Dev | 271 |
COV | 0.9 |
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023).
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2021 year | 96 cases | -81.0 % |
2020 year | 506 cases | -14.24 % |
2019 year | 590 cases | -1.99 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for CAD技術[5B046] for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-11-30). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of CAD技術, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of CAD技術 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
Patent landscaping is a visualization of the distribution of patent filings (application focus areas) for each technical keyword. Mountains and islands indicated by heatmap contours represent clusters of patent applications filed, and red areas on the heatmap indicate many patent filings relating to the keyword.
The patent landscape for CAD技術 gives an intuitive understanding of what patent filings they have made and what technical position is to be established. By selecting filing year checkboxes and filtering, you can track their past filing trends (what technical area they have focused on).
By selecting applicant/patent holder checkboxes and filtering, you can visually grasp the technical areas of the filings for each applicant and the partnerships or alliances formed. Please use it as a guide for patent analysis and IP landscaping.
In addition, by visually representing the patent data in this manner, you can convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
In Patent Integration, you can check the specifics of a patent filing by clicking anywhere on the patent landscape screen. You can also quickly check the position of each applicant for each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. You can use it as a guide when considering hypotheses about each company's IP strategy on the IP Landscape. You can also use it for higher-grade intellectual property activities. It has reasonable pricing and a simple user interface that is easy for beginners to handle.
The following is a list of words (characteristic terms) often used in CAD技術 patent applications. Characteristic terms with a higher importance are used in more patents/patent applications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 4,101 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The patent information of the higher applicant in the technical theme CAD技術 is shown below. By comparing the number of patents of each company, you can check the research and development status of each company's past and present technical themes and the position of each company in the technical theme.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 富士通株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 311 cases, followed by 株式会社日立製作所 with 179 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
富士通株式会社 | 311 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 179 cases |
三菱電機株式会社 | 135 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 90 cases |
トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 87 cases |
株式会社リコー | 55 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 45 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 40 cases |
ルネサスエレクトロニクス株式会社 | 14 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 2 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The patent information of the higher applicant in the technical theme CAD技術 is shown below. By comparing the number of patents of each company, you can check the research and development status of each company's past and present technical themes and the position of each company in the technical theme.
among the top coapplicants, 富士通株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 311 cases, followed by 株式会社日立製作所 with 179 cases.
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by CAD技術’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by CAD技術’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
CAD技術 filed 311 joint applications with 富士通株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 103 cases in total) is 17.2, and the median is 15.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.9, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2014 with 60 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 17.2 patents |
Std Dev | 16.2 |
COV | 0.9 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2021 year | 4 cases | -85.2 % |
2020 year | 27 cases | -22.86 % |
2019 year | 35 cases | -5.41 % |
CAD技術 filed 40 joint applications with 日本電気株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 6 cases in total) is 1.0, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.4, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 13 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1.0 patents |
Std Dev | 1.4 |
COV | 1.4 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2020 year | 3 cases | - |
2019 year | 0 cases | -100 % |
2018 year | 3 cases | -72.7 % |
CAD技術 filed 179 joint applications with 株式会社日立製作所 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 79 cases in total) is 13.2, and the median is 12.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.9, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2014 with 29 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 13.2 patents |
Std Dev | 12.3 |
COV | 0.9 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2021 year | 3 cases | -86.4 % |
2020 year | 22 cases | -18.52 % |
2019 year | 27 cases | 0 |
CAD技術 filed 90 joint applications with 株式会社東芝 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 42 cases in total) is 7.0, and the median is 6.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.9, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2020 with 15 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 7.0 patents |
Std Dev | 6.1 |
COV | 0.9 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2021 year | 4 cases | -73.3 % |
2020 year | 15 cases | +7.14 % |
2019 year | 14 cases | +55.6 % |
CAD技術 filed 135 joint applications with 三菱電機株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 65 cases in total) is 10.8, and the median is 12.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.8, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2018 with 25 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 10.8 patents |
Std Dev | 9.0 |
COV | 0.8 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2021 year | 9 cases | -43.8 % |
2020 year | 16 cases | +6.67 % |
2019 year | 15 cases | -40.0 % |
The following shows JP patents held by CAD技術 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and CAD技術’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which CAD技術 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 9 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7440220 "板金加工見積作成支援装置及び板金加工見積作成支援方法" (Opposition day 2024-06-27) , next is 特許7312637 "クレーン計画支援システム" (Opposition day 2024-01-12) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7440220 | 板金加工見積作成支援装置及び板金加工見積作成支援方法 | 2024-06-27 |
2 | 特許7312637 | クレーン計画支援システム | 2024-01-12 |
3 | 特許7253355 | 電気設備設計支援システム | 2023-10-04 |
4 | 特許7067969 | 板材敷設構造、板材枚数予測方法およびプログラム | 2022-11-15 |
5 | 特許7056592 | 金属材料の製造仕様決定方法、製造方法、および製造仕様決定装置 | 2022-10-19 |
6 | 特許7001462 | 機器の耐震評価方法及び装置 | 2022-07-12 |
7 | 特許6994854 | 建物設計支援システム及び建物設計支援プログラム | 2022-06-27 |
8 | 特許6937412 | 曲げ加工時間算出装置、曲げ加工時間算出システムおよびプログラム | 2022-03-18 |
9 | 特許6914775 | 溢水影響評価装置、溢水影響評価方法およびそのための記録媒体 | 2021-12-22 |
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 19 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.1 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2022-081224 "画像生成装置及びプログラム" (Protest day 2024-05-01) , next is 特開2022-073877 "画像出力方法、画像出力システム、画像出力装置及び画像出力プログラム" (Protest day 2024-04-05) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2022-081224 | 画像生成装置及びプログラム | 2024-05-01 |
2 | 特開2022-073877 | 画像出力方法、画像出力システム、画像出力装置及び画像出力プログラム | 2024-04-05 |
3 | 特許7568427 | BIMパーツ | 2024-02-09 |
4 | 特開2021-074897 | 矯正ヘルメット製作データを生成する方法 | 2023-12-04 |
5 | 特許7576447 | タイヤ設計方法、プログラム及びタイヤ設計装置 | 2023-11-08 |
6 | 特開2022-069231 | 原価算出システム、方法及びプログラム | 2023-09-11 |
7 | 特開2021-005264 | BIMパーツ、プログラムおよび設計支援方法 | 2023-08-23 |
8 | 特開2021-152842 | BIMパーツ、プログラムおよび設計支援方法 | 2023-06-29 |
9 | 特許7499614 | 資材割付支援装置、資材割付支援方法及び資材割付支援プログラム | 2023-06-09 |
10 | 特許7476685 | タイヤのシミュレーション方法 | 2023-05-24 |
11 | 特許7439393 | タイヤのシミュレーション方法 | 2023-04-28 |
12 | 特許7352070 | データ処理方法、データ処理装置、及びプログラム | 2023-04-12 |
13 | 特許7466327 | 設計支援システム | 2023-03-14 |
14 | 特許7496695 | 設計支援システム | 2023-03-14 |
15 | 特開2021-128702 | 設計支援システム | 2023-03-14 |
16 | 特開2022-092308 | 設計支援装置、設計支援方法及び設計支援プログラム | 2023-02-21 |
17 | 特許7604871 | 設計支援装置、設計支援方法及び設計支援プログラム | 2023-02-21 |
18 | 特許7253355 | 電気設備設計支援システム | 2022-12-27 |
19 | 特許7210252 | 構造計算支援システム及びプログラム | 2022-07-22 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 40 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.1. The most protest patent is 特開2021-074897 "矯正ヘルメット製作データを生成する方法" (2 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許7253355 "電気設備設計支援システム" (2 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2021-074897 | 矯正ヘルメット製作データを生成する方法 | 2 times |
2 | 特許7253355 | 電気設備設計支援システム | 2 times |
3 | 特許6689231 | インテーク設計方法、インテーク設計プログラム及びインテーク設計装置 | 2 times |
4 | 特許6613724 | 複合材料の解析用モデルの作成方法、複合材料の解析用モデルの作成用コンピュータプログラム、複合材料のシミュレーション方法及び複合材料のシミュレーション用コンピュータプログラム | 2 times |
5 | 特許6110447 | プリント回路基板の設計装置及びその動作方法 | 1 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 29 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.2 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特許6120426 "施工体3次元モデル管理プログラム及び施工体3次元モデル管理方法" (Inspection day 2024-09-03) , next is 特開2017-123061 "出来形の可視化システム及び出来形の可視化データ生成プログラム" (Inspection day 2024-09-03) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6120426 | 施工体3次元モデル管理プログラム及び施工体3次元モデル管理方法 | 2024-09-03 |
2 | 特開2017-123061 | 出来形の可視化システム及び出来形の可視化データ生成プログラム | 2024-09-03 |
3 | 特許5806423 | 3次元モデル表示システム、3次元モデル表示方法、及び3次元モデル表示用プログラム | 2024-09-03 |
4 | 特開2022-069231 | 原価算出システム、方法及びプログラム | 2024-06-28 |
5 | 特開2022-081224 | 画像生成装置及びプログラム | 2024-06-13 |
6 | 特開2022-073877 | 画像出力方法、画像出力システム、画像出力装置及び画像出力プログラム | 2024-04-12 |
7 | 特許7568427 | BIMパーツ | 2024-02-29 |
8 | 特許7604871 | 設計支援装置、設計支援方法及び設計支援プログラム | 2024-02-15 |
9 | 特許6975568 | 施工支援方法、および、施工支援システム | 2024-02-06 |
10 | 特許6799344 | 建築用システム | 2024-02-06 |
11 | 特開2021-074897 | 矯正ヘルメット製作データを生成する方法 | 2023-12-12 |
12 | 特許7576447 | タイヤ設計方法、プログラム及びタイヤ設計装置 | 2023-12-04 |
13 | 特開2022-123579 | 情報処理装置 | 2023-09-27 |
14 | 特表2019-526111 | 幾何ファセットを使用する直接的なブーリアン演算の方法 | 2023-09-27 |
15 | 特開2021-005264 | BIMパーツ、プログラムおよび設計支援方法 | 2023-08-31 |
16 | 特許7499614 | 資材割付支援装置、資材割付支援方法及び資材割付支援プログラム | 2023-07-07 |
17 | 特開2021-152842 | BIMパーツ、プログラムおよび設計支援方法 | 2023-07-04 |
18 | 特開2022-092308 | 設計支援装置、設計支援方法及び設計支援プログラム | 2023-06-26 |
19 | 特許7476685 | タイヤのシミュレーション方法 | 2023-06-20 |
20 | 特許7439393 | タイヤのシミュレーション方法 | 2023-05-23 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 69 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.2. The most inspection patent is 特開2017-111778 "ギア金型の補正成形方法" (2 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特開2022-069231 "原価算出システム、方法及びプログラム" (2 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2017-111778 | ギア金型の補正成形方法 | 2 times |
2 | 特開2022-069231 | 原価算出システム、方法及びプログラム | 2 times |
3 | 特許6851901 | 遊星歯車セット | 2 times |
4 | 特開2022-092308 | 設計支援装置、設計支援方法及び設計支援プログラム | 2 times |
5 | 特開2018-136933 | ギアセット | 2 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 1,198 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.3. The most cited patent is 特許6283422 "治具情報設定方法及び治具情報設定装置" (52 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6490430 "画像処理装置、画像処理システム、画像処理方法、及びプログラム" (44 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6283422 | 治具情報設定方法及び治具情報設定装置 | 52 times |
2 | 特許6490430 | 画像処理装置、画像処理システム、画像処理方法、及びプログラム | 44 times |
3 | 特許6116746 | 情報処理装置、情報処理方法、及びプログラム | 34 times |
4 | 特許6655345 | 3次元物品の積層造形支援方法、コンピュータ・ソフトウェア、記録媒体および積層造形システム | 29 times |
5 | 特許6832678 | 新規物質探索方法および装置 | 19 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International