The Theme Code "薄鋼板の熱処理技術" had 50 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-03-31). This is a with an decreasing trend transition of -9 filings (-15.3%) over 59 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-03-31).
The highest number of filings in 2017 with 343 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 200 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 1,492 cases in total) is 249, and the median is 284. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 249 patents |
Std Dev | 87.4 |
COV | 0.4 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 200 cases | -34.2 % |
2021 year | 304 cases | -10.85 % |
2020 year | 341 cases | +24.00 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 薄鋼板の熱処理技術[4K037] for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-11-30). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 薄鋼板の熱処理技術, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of 薄鋼板の熱処理技術 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
Patent landscaping is a visualization of the distribution of patent filings (application focus areas) for each technical keyword. Mountains and islands indicated by heatmap contours represent clusters of patent applications filed, and red areas on the heatmap indicate many patent filings relating to the keyword.
The patent landscape for 薄鋼板の熱処理技術 gives an intuitive understanding of what patent filings they have made and what technical position is to be established. By selecting filing year checkboxes and filtering, you can track their past filing trends (what technical area they have focused on).
By selecting applicant/patent holder checkboxes and filtering, you can visually grasp the technical areas of the filings for each applicant and the partnerships or alliances formed. Please use it as a guide for patent analysis and IP landscaping.
In addition, by visually representing the patent data in this manner, you can convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
In Patent Integration, you can check the specifics of a patent filing by clicking anywhere on the patent landscape screen. You can also quickly check the position of each applicant for each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. You can use it as a guide when considering hypotheses about each company's IP strategy on the IP Landscape. You can also use it for higher-grade intellectual property activities. It has reasonable pricing and a simple user interface that is easy for beginners to handle.
The following is a list of words (characteristic terms) often used in 薄鋼板の熱処理技術 patent applications. Characteristic terms with a higher importance are used in more patents/patent applications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 2,715 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The patent information of the higher applicant in the technical theme 薄鋼板の熱処理技術 is shown below. By comparing the number of patents of each company, you can check the research and development status of each company's past and present technical themes and the position of each company in the technical theme.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, JFEスチール株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 105 cases, followed by 日鉄ステンレス株式会社 with 55 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
JFEスチール株式会社 | 105 cases |
日鉄ステンレス株式会社 | 55 cases |
日本製鉄株式会社 | 31 cases |
株式会社神戸製鋼所 | 10 cases |
アルセロールミタル | 8 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, JFEスチール株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 774 cases, followed by 日本製鉄株式会社 with 627 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
JFEスチール株式会社 | 774 cases |
日本製鉄株式会社 | 627 cases |
日鉄ステンレス株式会社 | 316 cases |
アルセロールミタル | 184 cases |
ポスコホールディングスインコーポレーティッド | 161 cases |
株式会社神戸製鋼所 | 136 cases |
日新製鋼株式会社 | 8 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The patent information of the higher applicant in the technical theme 薄鋼板の熱処理技術 is shown below. By comparing the number of patents of each company, you can check the research and development status of each company's past and present technical themes and the position of each company in the technical theme.
among the top coapplicants, JFEスチール株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 105 cases, followed by 日本製鉄株式会社 with 31 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
JFEスチール株式会社 | 105 cases |
日本製鉄株式会社 | 31 cases |
株式会社神戸製鋼所 | 10 cases |
among the top coapplicants, JFEスチール株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 774 cases, followed by 日本製鉄株式会社 with 627 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
JFEスチール株式会社 | 774 cases |
日本製鉄株式会社 | 627 cases |
株式会社神戸製鋼所 | 136 cases |
日新製鋼株式会社 | 8 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 薄鋼板の熱処理技術’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 薄鋼板の熱処理技術’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
薄鋼板の熱処理技術 filed 774 joint applications with JFEスチール株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 391 cases in total) is 65.2, and the median is 66.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.24, and there have been small fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 110 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 65 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 65.2 patents |
Std Dev | 15.4 |
COV | 0.24 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 66 cases | +1.54 % |
2021 year | 65 cases | -1.52 % |
2020 year | 66 cases | -26.67 % |
薄鋼板の熱処理技術 filed 627 joint applications with 日本製鉄株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 349 cases in total) is 58.2, and the median is 69.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2020 with 107 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 22 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 58.2 patents |
Std Dev | 33.4 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 22 cases | -70.3 % |
2021 year | 74 cases | -30.8 % |
2020 year | 107 cases | +50.7 % |
薄鋼板の熱処理技術 filed 136 joint applications with 株式会社神戸製鋼所 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 30 cases in total) is 5.0, and the median is 4.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 33 cases, and their lowest number in 2020 with 3 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 5.0 patents |
Std Dev | 2.3 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 4 cases | -20.00 % |
2021 year | 5 cases | +66.7 % |
2020 year | 3 cases | -62.5 % |
薄鋼板の熱処理技術 filed 8 joint applications with 日新製鋼株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 10 years (2013 to 2023, 23 cases in total) is 2.1, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 2.2, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 8 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 2.1 patents |
Std Dev | 4.7 |
COV | 2.2 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2014 year | 8 cases | -46.7 % |
2013 year | 15 cases | - |
The following shows JP patents held by 薄鋼板の熱処理技術 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 薄鋼板の熱処理技術’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 薄鋼板の熱処理技術 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 11 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7462395 "フェライト系ステンレス鋼及びフェライト系ステンレス鋼の製造方法" (Opposition day 2024-10-04) , next is 特許7270419 "高温高サイクル疲労特性に優れたオーステナイト系ステンレス鋼板およびその製造方法ならびに排気部品" (Opposition day 2023-11-06) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7462395 | フェライト系ステンレス鋼及びフェライト系ステンレス鋼の製造方法 | 2024-10-04 |
2 | 特許7270419 | 高温高サイクル疲労特性に優れたオーステナイト系ステンレス鋼板およびその製造方法ならびに排気部品 | 2023-11-06 |
3 | 特許7252497 | 熱間圧延鋼材 | 2023-10-05 |
4 | 特許7296756 | ステンレス鋼板およびその製造方法 | 2023-08-14 |
5 | 特許7173303 | 鋼板及びその製造方法 | 2023-06-07 |
6 | 特許7099655 | 鋼板およびその製造方法 | 2023-01-12 |
7 | 特許7057766 | 硫化物系固体電池の集電体用のフェライト系ステンレス鋼板およびその製造方法 | 2022-10-18 |
8 | 特許7054078 | 二相ステンレスクラッド鋼およびその製造方法 | 2022-10-12 |
9 | 特許7054079 | 二相ステンレスクラッド鋼およびその製造方法 | 2022-10-12 |
10 | 特許7067578 | 鋼板、及び鋼板と部材の製造方法 | 2022-10-06 |
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 17 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.1 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特表2023-552978 "表面親水性及び電気伝導性に優れた燃料電池分離板用ステンレス鋼及びその製造方法" (Protest day 2024-09-13) , next is 特表2023-554116 "幅方向に沿って優れたスポット溶接性が均等に実現される高強度溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板及びその製造方法" (Protest day 2024-08-07) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特表2023-552978 | 表面親水性及び電気伝導性に優れた燃料電池分離板用ステンレス鋼及びその製造方法 | 2024-09-13 |
2 | 特表2023-554116 | 幅方向に沿って優れたスポット溶接性が均等に実現される高強度溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板及びその製造方法 | 2024-08-07 |
3 | 特表2024-500436 | 表面品質とスポット溶接性に優れた高強度溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板及びその製造方法 | 2024-08-07 |
4 | 特表2024-500850 | 表面品質とスポット溶接性に優れた高強度溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板及びその製造方法 | 2024-08-06 |
5 | 特表2024-512304 | 特に液体水素の輸送及び貯蔵のためのFe-Ni合金 | 2024-06-12 |
6 | 特表2022-537190 | 高強度冷間圧延鋼ストリップを熱処理する方法 | 2023-12-07 |
7 | 特表2022-537037 | 冷間圧延鋼ストリップを熱処理する方法 | 2023-12-07 |
8 | 特許7462439 | オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼およびNの上限値の算出方法 | 2023-09-27 |
9 | 特開2022-188481 | オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼材および水素用機器 | 2023-08-28 |
10 | 特許7433111 | 二相系ステンレス鋼板 | 2023-07-24 |
11 | 特開2023-085560 | 二相ステンレス鋼およびその製造方法 | 2023-07-14 |
12 | 特許7595454 | オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼板、オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼板の製造方法及び自動車排気系部品 | 2023-07-14 |
13 | 特表2022-514847 | 電気抵抗スポット溶接性に優れた高強度亜鉛めっき鋼板及びその製造方法 | 2023-06-15 |
14 | 特許7332859 | スラブの製造方法 | 2022-11-08 |
15 | 特許7201068 | 鋼板およびその製造方法 | 2022-06-23 |
16 | 特開2020-158816 | オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼およびその製造方法 | 2022-01-25 |
17 | 特許7057766 | 硫化物系固体電池の集電体用のフェライト系ステンレス鋼板およびその製造方法 | 2021-12-23 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 44 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.1. The most protest patent is 特許6860420 "高強度鋼板およびその製造方法" (2 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許7057766 "硫化物系固体電池の集電体用のフェライト系ステンレス鋼板およびその製造方法" (2 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6860420 | 高強度鋼板およびその製造方法 | 2 times |
2 | 特許7057766 | 硫化物系固体電池の集電体用のフェライト系ステンレス鋼板およびその製造方法 | 2 times |
3 | 特表2022-514847 | 電気抵抗スポット溶接性に優れた高強度亜鉛めっき鋼板及びその製造方法 | 2 times |
4 | 特許6493440 | 熱交換器の熱交換部用フェライト系ステンレス鋼板 | 1 times |
5 | 特開2022-188481 | オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼材および水素用機器 | 1 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 16 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.1 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特表2024-512304 "特に液体水素の輸送及び貯蔵のためのFe-Ni合金" (Inspection day 2024-07-09) , next is 特許7333901 "自動車用鋼板" (Inspection day 2024-06-20) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特表2024-512304 | 特に液体水素の輸送及び貯蔵のためのFe-Ni合金 | 2024-07-09 |
2 | 特許7333901 | 自動車用鋼板 | 2024-06-20 |
3 | 特表2022-537190 | 高強度冷間圧延鋼ストリップを熱処理する方法 | 2023-12-12 |
4 | 特表2022-537037 | 冷間圧延鋼ストリップを熱処理する方法 | 2023-12-12 |
5 | 特許7462439 | オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼およびNの上限値の算出方法 | 2023-10-17 |
6 | 特開2022-188481 | オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼材および水素用機器 | 2023-09-05 |
7 | 特開2023-085560 | 二相ステンレス鋼およびその製造方法 | 2023-08-08 |
8 | 特許7595454 | オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼板、オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼板の製造方法及び自動車排気系部品 | 2023-08-08 |
9 | 特許7433111 | 二相系ステンレス鋼板 | 2023-08-01 |
10 | 特許7332859 | スラブの製造方法 | 2022-11-17 |
11 | 特許7201068 | 鋼板およびその製造方法 | 2022-07-20 |
12 | 特開2020-158816 | オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼およびその製造方法 | 2022-02-01 |
13 | 特許7057766 | 硫化物系固体電池の集電体用のフェライト系ステンレス鋼板およびその製造方法 | 2022-01-27 |
14 | 特許7576935 | 非磁性ステンレス鋼板および機械部品用鋼材の製造方法 | 2022-01-26 |
15 | 特許7134052 | マルテンサイト系ステンレス鋼材およびその製造方法並びに摺動部材 | 2022-01-26 |
16 | 特許7090514 | メタルガスケット中間製品およびメタルガスケットの製造方法 | 2022-01-26 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 65 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.1. The most inspection patent is 特許6860420 "高強度鋼板およびその製造方法" (2 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許6515119 "強度および延性が改善された高強度被覆鋼板を製造する方法ならびに得られる鋼板" (2 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6860420 | 高強度鋼板およびその製造方法 | 2 times |
2 | 特許6515119 | 強度および延性が改善された高強度被覆鋼板を製造する方法ならびに得られる鋼板 | 2 times |
3 | 特許6875916 | 高強度鋼板およびその製造方法 | 2 times |
4 | 特許6781960 | Fe−Ni系合金薄板の製造方法及びFe−Ni系合金薄板 | 2 times |
5 | 特許7057766 | 硫化物系固体電池の集電体用のフェライト系ステンレス鋼板およびその製造方法 | 2 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 635 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.9. The most cited patent is 特許6620465 "ホットスタンプ用鋼板" (30 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6524810 "耐スポット溶接部破断特性に優れた鋼板及びその製造方法" (28 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6620465 | ホットスタンプ用鋼板 | 30 times |
2 | 特許6524810 | 耐スポット溶接部破断特性に優れた鋼板及びその製造方法 | 28 times |
3 | 特許6704995 | 耐水素遅れ破壊特性、耐剥離性、及び溶接性に優れた熱間成形用アルミニウム−鉄合金めっき鋼板、並びにそれを用いた熱間成形部材 | 26 times |
4 | 特許6536294 | 溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板、合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板、およびそれらの製造方法 | 25 times |
5 | 特開2015-193907 | 加工性、および耐遅れ破壊特性に優れた高強度合金化溶融亜鉛めっき鋼板、並びにその製造方法 | 20 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International