自動分析、そのための試料等の取扱い技術 (JP Patent Analysis Report)
The Theme Code "自動分析、そのための試料等の取扱い技術" had 44 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-03-31). This is a significantly decreased of -73 filings (-62.4%) over 117 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-03-31).
The highest number of filings in 2017 with 742 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 372 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 2,743 cases in total) is 457, and the median is 512. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 457 patents |
| Std Dev | 184 |
| COV | 0.4 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 372 cases | -23.46 % |
| 2021 year | 486 cases | -10.83 % |
| 2020 year | 545 cases | +1.30 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 自動分析、そのための試料等の取扱い技術[2G058] for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-11-30). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 自動分析、そのための試料等の取扱い技術, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
- Table of Contents
- Foreign Patent Analysis Report
- Patent Filing Summary for 自動分析、そのための試料等の取扱い技術
- Search Set (Search Formula/Analysis Patents)
- Related Patent Analysis Report
- Competitors Information
- Top company Information
- • Information on Important Patents
- Provision of patent information to the media
- About this Site
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
Introduction
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
自動分析、そのための試料等の取扱い技術, Changes in the Number of JP Patents/Patent Applications
The changes in the number of patent filings of 自動分析、そのための試料等の取扱い技術 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
Patent Landscape ({{ld.d.db_name | country_map: 'en'}})
Patent landscaping is a visualization of the distribution of patent filings (application focus areas) for each technical keyword. Mountains and islands indicated by heatmap contours represent clusters of patent applications filed, and red areas on the heatmap indicate many patent filings relating to the keyword.
The patent landscape for 自動分析、そのための試料等の取扱い技術 gives an intuitive understanding of what patent filings they have made and what technical position is to be established. By selecting filing year checkboxes and filtering, you can track their past filing trends (what technical area they have focused on).
By selecting applicant/patent holder checkboxes and filtering, you can visually grasp the technical areas of the filings for each applicant and the partnerships or alliances formed. Please use it as a guide for patent analysis and IP landscaping.
In addition, by visually representing the patent data in this manner, you can convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
In Patent Integration, you can check the specifics of a patent filing by clicking anywhere on the patent landscape screen. You can also quickly check the position of each applicant for each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. You can use it as a guide when considering hypotheses about each company's IP strategy on the IP Landscape. You can also use it for higher-grade intellectual property activities. It has reasonable pricing and a simple user interface that is easy for beginners to handle.
Characteristic Terms (Importance)
The following is a list of words (characteristic terms) often used in 自動分析、そのための試料等の取扱い技術 patent applications. Characteristic terms with a higher importance are used in more patents/patent applications.
Search Set (Analysis Patents)
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 5,367 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
自動分析、そのための試料等の取扱い技術[2G058]
Same industry / competition company information (JP)
The patent information of the higher applicant in the technical theme 自動分析、そのための試料等の取扱い技術 is shown below. By comparing the number of patents of each company, you can check the research and development status of each company's past and present technical themes and the position of each company in the technical theme.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024).
Comparing the number of applications of each company, キヤノンメディカルシステムズ株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 53 cases, followed by 株式会社日立ハイテク with 52 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| キヤノンメディカルシステムズ株式会社 | 53 cases |
| 株式会社日立ハイテク | 52 cases |
| 株式会社島津製作所 | 28 cases |
| シスメックス株式会社 | 24 cases |
| エフホフマン-ラロシュアーゲー | 17 cases |
| ベックマンコールターインコーポレイテッド | 3 cases |
| 株式会社日立製作所 | 2 cases |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2014 to 2024).
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 株式会社日立ハイテク has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 826 cases, followed by シスメックス株式会社 with 293 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| 株式会社日立ハイテク | 826 cases |
| シスメックス株式会社 | 293 cases |
| キヤノンメディカルシステムズ株式会社 | 293 cases |
| 株式会社島津製作所 | 221 cases |
| エフホフマン-ラロシュアーゲー | 214 cases |
| ベックマンコールターインコーポレイテッド | 47 cases |
| 株式会社日立製作所 | 42 cases |
| パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 12 cases |
| 株式会社東芝 | 8 cases |
| オリンパス株式会社 | 1 cases |
| 日立アロカメディカル株式会社 | 1 cases |
Same industry / competition company, Change in the Number of JP Patents
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
Top company information (JP)
The patent information of the higher applicant in the technical theme 自動分析、そのための試料等の取扱い技術 is shown below. By comparing the number of patents of each company, you can check the research and development status of each company's past and present technical themes and the position of each company in the technical theme.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024).
among the top coapplicants, キヤノンメディカルシステムズ株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 53 cases, followed by 株式会社日立ハイテク with 52 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| キヤノンメディカルシステムズ株式会社 | 53 cases |
| 株式会社日立ハイテク | 52 cases |
| 株式会社島津製作所 | 28 cases |
| シスメックス株式会社 | 24 cases |
| ベックマンコールターインコーポレイテッド | 3 cases |
| 株式会社日立製作所 | 2 cases |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2014 to 2024).
among the top coapplicants, 株式会社日立ハイテク has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 826 cases, followed by シスメックス株式会社 with 293 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| 株式会社日立ハイテク | 826 cases |
| シスメックス株式会社 | 293 cases |
| キヤノンメディカルシステムズ株式会社 | 293 cases |
| 株式会社島津製作所 | 221 cases |
| ベックマンコールターインコーポレイテッド | 47 cases |
| 株式会社日立製作所 | 42 cases |
| 株式会社東芝 | 8 cases |
Top company, Change in the Number of JP Patents
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 自動分析、そのための試料等の取扱い技術’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 自動分析、そのための試料等の取扱い技術’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Top company Details (JP)
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 株式会社日立ハイテク
自動分析、そのための試料等の取扱い技術 filed 826 joint applications with 株式会社日立ハイテク for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 464 cases in total) is 77.3, and the median is 98.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2020 with 114 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 45 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 77.3 patents |
| Std Dev | 38.3 |
| COV | 0.5 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 45 cases | -55.4 % |
| 2021 year | 101 cases | -11.40 % |
| 2020 year | 114 cases | +18.75 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 株式会社島津製作所
自動分析、そのための試料等の取扱い技術 filed 221 joint applications with 株式会社島津製作所 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 150 cases in total) is 25.0, and the median is 25.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2018 with 46 cases, and their lowest number in 2016 with 12 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 25.0 patents |
| Std Dev | 12.4 |
| COV | 0.5 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 24 cases | +14.29 % |
| 2021 year | 21 cases | -19.23 % |
| 2020 year | 26 cases | -10.34 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 株式会社日立製作所
自動分析、そのための試料等の取扱い技術 filed 42 joint applications with 株式会社日立製作所 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 17 cases in total) is 2.8, and the median is 3.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 12 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 2 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 2.8 patents |
| Std Dev | 1.6 |
| COV | 0.6 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 2 cases | -33.3 % |
| 2021 year | 3 cases | 0 |
| 2020 year | 3 cases | -25.00 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with シスメックス株式会社
自動分析、そのための試料等の取扱い技術 filed 293 joint applications with シスメックス株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 143 cases in total) is 23.8, and the median is 20.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.7, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2018 with 61 cases, and their lowest number in 2020 with 12 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 23.8 patents |
| Std Dev | 17.7 |
| COV | 0.7 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 18 cases | -25.00 % |
| 2021 year | 24 cases | +100 % |
| 2020 year | 12 cases | -45.5 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 株式会社東芝
自動分析、そのための試料等の取扱い技術 filed 8 joint applications with 株式会社東芝 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 10 years (2013 to 2023, 25 cases in total) is 2.3, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 2.1, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 3 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 2.3 patents |
| Std Dev | 4.8 |
| COV | 2.1 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 year | 3 cases | - |
| 2016 year | 0 cases | -100 % |
| 2015 year | 2 cases | -33.3 % |
Information on important patents (JP)
The following shows JP patents held by 自動分析、そのための試料等の取扱い技術 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 自動分析、そのための試料等の取扱い技術’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 自動分析、そのための試料等の取扱い技術 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
Glossary
- Cited
- Indicates that the patent/patent application has been cited (by Examiners) in notices of reasons for rejection in the examination process of other (Japanese, U.S., or European) patent applications. The higher the number of citations, the more important the patent/patent application is considered to be.
- Request for invalidation trial
- Indicates that a third party has requested a procedure to invalidate the patent. It is likely to affect the business of third parties and is considered to be of high importance.
- Opposition
- Indicates that a third party has filed a petition with the Patent Office to hear the validity of the patent again. Like the trial for invalidation, it is considered to be of high importance.
- Information provision
- Indicates that a third party has provided the Patent Office with useful information for examination for the patent filed. It is usually considered to be of high importance because it is done to prevent the patent from being granted.
- Browsing request
- Indicates that a third party has requested the Patent Office to view the patent bag (a set of documents exchanged between the Patent Office and the applicant). The bag is often checked prior to trial for invalidation, opposition, and provision of information, and is considered to be a highly important patent.
Oppositioned cases
List of latest Oppositioned patents
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 6 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7307758 "検体分析システムの制御方法および検体分析システム" (Opposition day 2024-01-11) , next is 特許7298151 "測定誤差の低減方法" (Opposition day 2023-12-27) .
| - | No. | Title | Opposition days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許7307758 | 検体分析システムの制御方法および検体分析システム | 2024-01-11 |
| 2 | 特許7298151 | 測定誤差の低減方法 | 2023-12-27 |
| 3 | 特許7220106 | カートリッジおよび検出方法 | 2023-08-08 |
| 4 | 特許7061471 | 核酸分析装置 | 2022-10-28 |
| 5 | 特許6938149 | 検査用カバーフィルム、検査部材、および検査部材の製造方法 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6 | 特許6887562 | 分子キャラクタリゼーション方法およびシステム | 2021-12-15 |
Protested cases
List of latest Protested patents
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 1 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.0 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2023-175973 "検体分析システムの制御方法および検体分析システム" (Protest day 2024-03-29) .
| - | No. | Title | Protest days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特開2023-175973 | 検体分析システムの制御方法および検体分析システム | 2024-03-29 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Protested
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 6 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.7. The most protest patent is 特許6564849 "自動分析装置及び自動分析方法" (4 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許6346332 "検体検査システム、情報処理装置、情報処理方法、およびプログラム" (2 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6564849 | 自動分析装置及び自動分析方法 | 4 times |
| 2 | 特許6346332 | 検体検査システム、情報処理装置、情報処理方法、およびプログラム | 2 times |
| 3 | 特表2017-534859 | 位置決めメカニズム | 1 times |
| 4 | 特許6691763 | 医療検査用カセットの整列機構 | 1 times |
| 5 | 特許6117900 | 検体検査システム、情報処理装置、情報処理方法、およびプログラム | 1 times |
Inspectioned cases
List of latest Inspectioned patents
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 15 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.1 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2023-159105 "マイクロ流体を使用した治療的に活性な細胞を調製する方法" (Inspection day 2024-09-13) , next is 特許7528300 "生物学的検体の自動調製システム及び方法" (Inspection day 2024-07-25) .
| - | No. | Title | Inspection days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特開2023-159105 | マイクロ流体を使用した治療的に活性な細胞を調製する方法 | 2024-09-13 |
| 2 | 特許7528300 | 生物学的検体の自動調製システム及び方法 | 2024-07-25 |
| 3 | 特許7549358 | 熱対流生成用チップ及び反応方法 | 2024-06-19 |
| 4 | 特開2023-175973 | 検体分析システムの制御方法および検体分析システム | 2024-04-25 |
| 5 | 特許7194226 | 分析評価装置、方法、および試薬 | 2023-12-20 |
| 6 | 特開2024-061677 | 検査室機器 | 2023-11-20 |
| 7 | 特開2021-072817 | ゲルパターン化した表面 | 2023-04-06 |
| 8 | 特許7497957 | 実験室管理システムにおける在庫共有のためのシステム及び方法 | 2023-01-06 |
| 9 | 特開2023-074493 | 生物学的サンプルを処理するための自動分析システム | 2022-12-16 |
| 10 | 特許7412215 | モジュール式ポイントオブケアデバイスおよびその使用 | 2022-10-13 |
| 11 | 特許7372223 | 試料調製又は試料解析の少なくとも一方を行うため回転バルブを備えるシステム及び方法 | 2022-09-22 |
| 12 | 特許7295041 | 可撓性接続部を有するフローセル | 2022-08-18 |
| 13 | 特許7387430 | 改変された導管を有する装置 | 2022-06-01 |
| 14 | 特開2019-219416 | ポイントオブケア流体システムおよびその使用 | 2022-03-30 |
| 15 | 特開2018-141798 | 試料使用の極大化のためのシステム及び方法 | 2022-02-14 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Inspectioned
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 52 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.1. The most inspection patent is 特許6564849 "自動分析装置及び自動分析方法" (5 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特開2018-141798 "試料使用の極大化のためのシステム及び方法" (2 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6564849 | 自動分析装置及び自動分析方法 | 5 times |
| 2 | 特開2018-141798 | 試料使用の極大化のためのシステム及び方法 | 2 times |
| 3 | 特許6346332 | 検体検査システム、情報処理装置、情報処理方法、およびプログラム | 2 times |
| 4 | 特表2017-534859 | 位置決めメカニズム | 1 times |
| 5 | 特開2018-136345 | モジュール式ポイントオブケアデバイスおよびその使用 | 1 times |
Cited cases
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Cited
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 978 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.3. The most cited patent is 特許7289288 "流体輸送システム" (41 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6889520 "診断分析装置関連情報の集約方法および集約システム" (15 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許7289288 | 流体輸送システム | 41 times |
| 2 | 特許6889520 | 診断分析装置関連情報の集約方法および集約システム | 15 times |
| 3 | 特許6400630 | 試料使用の極大化のためのシステム及び方法 | 13 times |
| 4 | 特許6651709 | 試薬入りマイクロプレートおよびその製造方法 | 13 times |
| 5 | 特許6468655 | 血液検査システムおよび方法 | 12 times |
Providing patent information to the media (newspapers, magazines, etc.)
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
About this Site
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
Please note the following points for use.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
Citation of patent application status and ranking information
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Graphs are image data.
Please note that the various graphs are image data, but we cannot provide them in text data.Scope of coverage for each goal/target
- Based on the description of each goal and target of the SDGs, we have set the scope of technologies to be covered based on our and e-Patent's past experience, etc. (in some cases, the search is based on social issues themselves). Therefore, please note that there is a possibility that this "SDGs Global Company Ranking from Patent Perspective" may not cover 100%.
- A population search formula is clearly indicated for each goal/target (database: Patent Integration). You may use the population search formula as it is, or you may improve it by yourself.
- This search covers patents and utility models, including both published and registered patents (design and design patents are excluded). The unit of count is the number of applications, not the number of patent families.
About the name collation and name control of applicants and right holders
- Company rankings are based on the results calculated by "Patent Integration", with Japanese organizations in Japanese and other companies in English (some are in Japanese).
- Company names may be the names of the companies at the time of application, but the results calculated by Patent Integration are used as is. Company names are used as they were at the time of application.
- Because of the fluctuation in the names of companies (i.e., applicant/right holder names in the patent information), there are cases where the same company appears more than once in the top 10. The number of applications filed by the same company in the top 10 is the total number of applications filed by the company.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
Our Commitment to Safety and Security
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to providing high-quality patent information based on the latest patent data on more than 45 million cases collected from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publication. 
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. collects the patent data from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publications to provide it widely in the form of reports so that anyone can check patent information and patent trends with confidence. 
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to various efforts to enhance the reliability of the information and to allow users to search patent information with confidence.