株式会社プロテリアル (JP Patent Analysis Report)
The Applicant / Patent Holder "株式会社プロテリアル" had 79 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-03-31). This is a significantly decreased of -46 filings (-36.8%) over 125 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-03-31).
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 672 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 332 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 2,114 cases in total) is 352, and the median is 366. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.29, and there have been small fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 352 patents |
| Std Dev | 101 |
| COV | 0.29 |
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023).
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 340 cases | +2.41 % |
| 2021 year | 332 cases | -15.31 % |
| 2020 year | 392 cases | -8.20 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 株式会社プロテリアル for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-11-30). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 株式会社プロテリアル, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
- Table of Contents
- Foreign Patent Analysis Report
- Patent Filing Summary for 株式会社プロテリアル
- Search Set (Search Formula/Analysis Patents)
- Related Patent Analysis Report
- Competitors Information
- Top coapplicant Information
- • Information on Important Patents
- Provision of patent information to the media
- About this Site
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
Introduction
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
株式会社プロテリアル, Changes in the Number of JP Patents/Patent Applications
The changes in the number of patent filings of 株式会社プロテリアル over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
Search Set (Analysis Patents)
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 4,399 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
株式会社プロテリアル
Same industry / competition company information (JP)
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 株式会社プロテリアル are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Same industry / competition company, Change in the Number of JP Patents
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 0 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
Top coapplicant information (JP)
The changes in the number of patents shared with 株式会社プロテリアル’s top coapplicants are shown below.
By searching for the top coapplicants, you can discover what companies 株式会社プロテリアル is partnered with to develop technologies and use this information for R&D and intellectual property strategies.
Also, by looking at the change in the number of filings, you can see what companies 株式会社プロテリアル conducted joint research with in the past, and check the history of 株式会社プロテリアル’s alliances, partnerships, and joint research and development.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to quickly find out specifically what company they filed a joint application with and what invention it was for.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024).
Among the top coapplicants, 株式会社プロテリアルプレシジョン has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 2 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| 株式会社プロテリアルプレシジョン | 2 cases |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2014 to 2024).
Among the top coapplicants, 株式会社プロテリアルプレシジョン has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 20 cases, followed by 東京瓦斯株式会社 with 8 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| 株式会社プロテリアルプレシジョン | 20 cases |
| 東京瓦斯株式会社 | 8 cases |
| 株式会社サンコー | 7 cases |
| 株式会社日立製作所 | 2 cases |
Top coapplicant, Change in the Number of JP Patents
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 株式会社プロテリアル’s top 6 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 株式会社プロテリアル’s top 6 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Top coapplicant Details (JP)
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 東京瓦斯株式会社
株式会社プロテリアル filed 8 joint applications with 東京瓦斯株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 10 years (2013 to 2023, 14 cases in total) is 1.3, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.4, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 3 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 1.3 patents |
| Std Dev | 1.8 |
| COV | 1.4 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 year | 1 cases | - |
| 2018 year | 0 cases | - |
| 2017 year | 0 cases | -100 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 株式会社プロテリアルプレシジョン
株式会社プロテリアル filed 20 joint applications with 株式会社プロテリアルプレシジョン for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 6 cases in total) is 1.0, and the median is 1.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2017 with 5 cases, and their lowest number in 2019 with 0 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 1.0 patents |
| Std Dev | 0.6 |
| COV | 0.6 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 year | 1 cases | 0 |
| 2021 year | 1 cases | -50.0 % |
| 2020 year | 2 cases | - |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 株式会社サンコー
株式会社プロテリアル filed 7 joint applications with 株式会社サンコー for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 10 years (2013 to 2023, 12 cases in total) is 1.1, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.5, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 3 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 1.1 patents |
| Std Dev | 1.7 |
| COV | 1.5 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2016 year | 3 cases | +200 % |
| 2015 year | 1 cases | -66.7 % |
| 2014 year | 3 cases | -40.0 % |
Information on important patents (JP)
The following shows JP patents held by 株式会社プロテリアル that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 株式会社プロテリアル’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 株式会社プロテリアル is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
Glossary
- Cited
- Indicates that the patent/patent application has been cited (by Examiners) in notices of reasons for rejection in the examination process of other (Japanese, U.S., or European) patent applications. The higher the number of citations, the more important the patent/patent application is considered to be.
- Request for invalidation trial
- Indicates that a third party has requested a procedure to invalidate the patent. It is likely to affect the business of third parties and is considered to be of high importance.
- Opposition
- Indicates that a third party has filed a petition with the Patent Office to hear the validity of the patent again. Like the trial for invalidation, it is considered to be of high importance.
- Information provision
- Indicates that a third party has provided the Patent Office with useful information for examination for the patent filed. It is usually considered to be of high importance because it is done to prevent the patent from being granted.
- Browsing request
- Indicates that a third party has requested the Patent Office to view the patent bag (a set of documents exchanged between the Patent Office and the applicant). The bag is often checked prior to trial for invalidation, opposition, and provision of information, and is considered to be a highly important patent.
Invalidationed Trial cases
List of latest Invalidationed Trial patents
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 6 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 1.0 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許6620957 "ワイヤハーネス" (Invalidation Trial day 2024-07-31) , next is 特許6839396 "ワイヤハーネス" (Invalidation Trial day 2024-07-31) .
| - | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6620957 | ワイヤハーネス | 2024-07-31 |
| 2 | 特許6839396 | ワイヤハーネス | 2024-07-31 |
| 3 | 特許6458785 | ワイヤハーネス | 2024-07-29 |
| 4 | 特許6519898 | ワイヤハーネス及び電磁波抑制部材 | 2024-07-26 |
| 5 | 特許6350769 | ワイヤハーネス及び電磁波抑制部材 | 2024-07-26 |
| 6 | 特許6311847 | ワイヤハーネス及び電磁波抑制部材 | 2024-07-24 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Invalidationed Trial
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 6 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.0. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6311847 "ワイヤハーネス及び電磁波抑制部材" (1 times) , and the next most invalidation trial patent is 特許6519898 "ワイヤハーネス及び電磁波抑制部材" (1 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6311847 | ワイヤハーネス及び電磁波抑制部材 | 1 times |
| 2 | 特許6519898 | ワイヤハーネス及び電磁波抑制部材 | 1 times |
| 3 | 特許6620957 | ワイヤハーネス | 1 times |
| 4 | 特許6350769 | ワイヤハーネス及び電磁波抑制部材 | 1 times |
| 5 | 特許6839396 | ワイヤハーネス | 1 times |
Oppositioned cases
List of latest Oppositioned patents
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 18 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7435892 "窒化珪素基板" (Opposition day 2024-08-14) , next is 特許7359033 "絶縁電線" (Opposition day 2024-04-09) .
| - | No. | Title | Opposition days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許7435892 | 窒化珪素基板 | 2024-08-14 |
| 2 | 特許7359033 | 絶縁電線 | 2024-04-09 |
| 3 | 特許7347423 | 圧力リング用異形線材 | 2024-03-18 |
| 4 | 特許7243888 | セラミックス基板、セラミックス分割基板、及びセラミックス基板の製造方法 | 2023-09-05 |
| 5 | 特許7248187 | 窒化珪素基板 | 2023-08-29 |
| 6 | 特許7272345 | リチウムイオン二次電池用正極活物質及びリチウムイオン二次電池 | 2023-08-24 |
| 7 | 特許7211549 | 窒化珪素基板 | 2023-07-20 |
| 8 | 特許7228098 | ドライアイスブラスト装置 | 2023-06-08 |
| 9 | 特許7188633 | 窒化珪素基板およびその製造方法 | 2023-06-02 |
| 10 | 特許7180532 | リチウムイオン二次電池用正極活物質及びリチウムイオン二次電池 | 2023-05-18 |
Protested cases
List of latest Protested patents
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 8 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.2 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特許7494602 "造形用金属粉末およびその製造方法" (Protest day 2024-04-02) , next is 特許7581924 "極異方性リング磁石の極位置位置決め治具、極異方性リング磁石の製造装置、極異方性リング磁石の製造方法および極異方性リング磁石を用いたローターの製造方法" (Protest day 2022-11-12) .
| - | No. | Title | Protest days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許7494602 | 造形用金属粉末およびその製造方法 | 2024-04-02 |
| 2 | 特許7581924 | 極異方性リング磁石の極位置位置決め治具、極異方性リング磁石の製造装置、極異方性リング磁石の製造方法および極異方性リング磁石を用いたローターの製造方法 | 2022-11-12 |
| 3 | 特許7294141 | 球状Ｔｉ系粉末およびその製造方法 | 2022-11-02 |
| 4 | 特許7180532 | リチウムイオン二次電池用正極活物質及びリチウムイオン二次電池 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5 | 特開2021-092312 | 管継手およびその製造方法 | 2022-06-17 |
| 6 | 特許7290268 | 可動コイル型ボイスコイルモータ | 2022-04-12 |
| 7 | 特許7287037 | Ｒ－Ｔ－Ｂ系焼結磁石の表面処理方法および製造方法 | 2022-03-31 |
| 8 | 特許7036119 | 圧延用複合ロール及びその製造方法 | 2021-12-02 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Protested
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 28 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.2. The most protest patent is 特許6729705 "ナノ結晶合金磁心、磁心ユニットおよびナノ結晶合金磁心の製造方法" (3 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許7036119 "圧延用複合ロール及びその製造方法" (2 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6729705 | ナノ結晶合金磁心、磁心ユニットおよびナノ結晶合金磁心の製造方法 | 3 times |
| 2 | 特許7036119 | 圧延用複合ロール及びその製造方法 | 2 times |
| 3 | 特許7011773 | エナメル線およびエナメル線の製造方法 | 2 times |
| 4 | 特許7294141 | 球状Ｔｉ系粉末およびその製造方法 | 2 times |
| 5 | 特許6849023 | ナノ結晶合金磁心の製造方法 | 2 times |
Inspectioned cases
List of latest Inspectioned patents
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 10 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.2 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特許7347423 "圧力リング用異形線材" (Inspection day 2023-12-11) , next is 特許7259285 "エナメル線の皮膜異常検出装置、エナメル線の製造装置、エナメル線の皮膜異常の検出方法、及びエナメル線の製造方法" (Inspection day 2023-12-04) .
| - | No. | Title | Inspection days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許7347423 | 圧力リング用異形線材 | 2023-12-11 |
| 2 | 特許7259285 | エナメル線の皮膜異常検出装置、エナメル線の製造装置、エナメル線の皮膜異常の検出方法、及びエナメル線の製造方法 | 2023-12-04 |
| 3 | 特許7581924 | 極異方性リング磁石の極位置位置決め治具、極異方性リング磁石の製造装置、極異方性リング磁石の製造方法および極異方性リング磁石を用いたローターの製造方法 | 2022-12-13 |
| 4 | 特許7294141 | 球状Ｔｉ系粉末およびその製造方法 | 2022-11-30 |
| 5 | 特許7180532 | リチウムイオン二次電池用正極活物質及びリチウムイオン二次電池 | 2022-10-11 |
| 6 | 特開2021-005734 | 樹脂被膜付き磁心 | 2022-07-13 |
| 7 | 特開2021-092312 | 管継手およびその製造方法 | 2022-06-21 |
| 8 | 特許5212772 | 靭性および高温強度に優れた熱間工具鋼 | 2022-06-15 |
| 9 | 特許7287037 | Ｒ－Ｔ－Ｂ系焼結磁石の表面処理方法および製造方法 | 2022-04-28 |
| 10 | 特許7290268 | 可動コイル型ボイスコイルモータ | 2022-04-20 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Inspectioned
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 48 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.2. The most inspection patent is 特許6729705 "ナノ結晶合金磁心、磁心ユニットおよびナノ結晶合金磁心の製造方法" (3 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許6120188 "車両用の複合ハーネス" (3 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6729705 | ナノ結晶合金磁心、磁心ユニットおよびナノ結晶合金磁心の製造方法 | 3 times |
| 2 | 特許6120188 | 車両用の複合ハーネス | 3 times |
| 3 | 特許7347423 | 圧力リング用異形線材 | 2 times |
| 4 | 特許6781960 | Ｆｅ−Ｎｉ系合金薄板の製造方法及びＦｅ−Ｎｉ系合金薄板 | 2 times |
| 5 | 特許7011773 | エナメル線およびエナメル線の製造方法 | 2 times |
Cited cases
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Cited
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 804 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.5. The most cited patent is 特許6834275 "ワイヤハーネス" (23 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6916989 "ケーブル及び医療用中空管" (22 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6834275 | ワイヤハーネス | 23 times |
| 2 | 特許6916989 | ケーブル及び医療用中空管 | 22 times |
| 3 | 特許6822362 | 窒化珪素基板の製造方法、及び窒化珪素基板 | 17 times |
| 4 | 特許6245402 | 差動信号伝送用ケーブル、多芯ケーブル、及び差動信号伝送用ケーブルの製造方法 | 17 times |
| 5 | 特許6219263 | 車両用複合ケーブル及び車両用複合ハーネス | 15 times |
Providing patent information to the media (newspapers, magazines, etc.)
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
About this Site
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
Please note the following points for use.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
Citation of patent application status and ranking information
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Graphs are image data.
Please note that the various graphs are image data, but we cannot provide them in text data.Scope of coverage for each goal/target
- Based on the description of each goal and target of the SDGs, we have set the scope of technologies to be covered based on our and e-Patent's past experience, etc. (in some cases, the search is based on social issues themselves). Therefore, please note that there is a possibility that this "SDGs Global Company Ranking from Patent Perspective" may not cover 100%.
- A population search formula is clearly indicated for each goal/target (database: Patent Integration). You may use the population search formula as it is, or you may improve it by yourself.
- This search covers patents and utility models, including both published and registered patents (design and design patents are excluded). The unit of count is the number of applications, not the number of patent families.
About the name collation and name control of applicants and right holders
- Company rankings are based on the results calculated by "Patent Integration", with Japanese organizations in Japanese and other companies in English (some are in Japanese).
- Company names may be the names of the companies at the time of application, but the results calculated by Patent Integration are used as is. Company names are used as they were at the time of application.
- Because of the fluctuation in the names of companies (i.e., applicant/right holder names in the patent information), there are cases where the same company appears more than once in the top 10. The number of applications filed by the same company in the top 10 is the total number of applications filed by the company.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
Our Commitment to Safety and Security
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to providing high-quality patent information based on the latest patent data on more than 45 million cases collected from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publication. 
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. collects the patent data from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publications to provide it widely in the form of reports so that anyone can check patent information and patent trends with confidence. 
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to various efforts to enhance the reliability of the information and to allow users to search patent information with confidence.