The Applicant / Patent Holder "KYOCERA CORPORATION" had 95 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-02-28). This is a significantly increased of +17 filings (21.8%) over 78 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-02-28).
The highest number of filings in 2021 with 699 cases, and their lowest number in 2019 with 363 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 3,246 cases in total) is 541, and the median is 564. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.21, and there have been small fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 541 patents |
Std Dev | 113 |
COV | 0.21 |
The number of filings has been increasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023).
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 568 cases | -18.74 % |
2021 year | 699 cases | +24.82 % |
2020 year | 560 cases | +54.3 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the PCT patent database for KYOCERA CORPORATION for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-10-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of KYOCERA CORPORATION, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The following foreign patent analysis reports have been found for KYOCERA CORPORATION. The trends of patent filings of KYOCERA CORPORATION for each country can be found by clicking on the Applicant/Patent Holder name next to each country.
Country | Applicant / Patent Holder |
---|---|
JP | 京セラ株式会社 |
US | KYOCERA CORPORATION |
EP | KYOCERA CORPORATION |
PCT | KYOCERA CORPORATION |
The changes in the number of patent filings of KYOCERA CORPORATION over the last 20 years (PCT) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
Patent landscaping is a visualization of the distribution of patent filings (application focus areas) for each technical keyword. Mountains and islands indicated by heatmap contours represent clusters of patent applications filed, and red areas on the heatmap indicate many patent filings relating to the keyword.
The patent landscape for KYOCERA CORPORATION gives an intuitive understanding of what patent filings they have made and what technical position is to be established. By selecting filing year checkboxes and filtering, you can track their past filing trends (what technical area they have focused on).
By selecting applicant/patent holder checkboxes and filtering, you can visually grasp the technical areas of the filings for each applicant and the partnerships or alliances formed. Please use it as a guide for patent analysis and IP landscaping.
In addition, by visually representing the patent data in this manner, you can convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
In Patent Integration, you can check the specifics of a patent filing by clicking anywhere on the patent landscape screen. You can also quickly check the position of each applicant for each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. You can use it as a guide when considering hypotheses about each company's IP strategy on the IP Landscape. You can also use it for higher-grade intellectual property activities. It has reasonable pricing and a simple user interface that is easy for beginners to handle.
The following is a list of words (characteristic terms) often used in KYOCERA CORPORATION patent applications. Characteristic terms with a higher importance are used in more patents/patent applications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 5,165 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as KYOCERA CORPORATION are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for PCT patents of 0 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The changes in the number of patents shared with KYOCERA CORPORATION’s top coapplicants are shown below.
By searching for the top coapplicants, you can discover what companies KYOCERA CORPORATION is partnered with to develop technologies and use this information for R&D and intellectual property strategies.
Also, by looking at the change in the number of filings, you can see what companies KYOCERA CORPORATION conducted joint research with in the past, and check the history of KYOCERA CORPORATION’s alliances, partnerships, and joint research and development.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to quickly find out specifically what company they filed a joint application with and what invention it was for.
Among the top coapplicants, CHANG HENRY has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 37 cases, followed by KALHAN AMIT with 26 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
CHANG HENRY | 37 cases |
KALHAN AMIT | 26 cases |
FUJISHIRO MASATO | 22 cases |
Among the top coapplicants, 京セラ株式会社 KYOCERA CORPORATION has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 121 cases, followed by CHANG HENRY with 112 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
京セラ株式会社 KYOCERA CORPORATION | 121 cases |
CHANG HENRY | 112 cases |
KALHAN AMIT | 109 cases |
京セラ株式会社KYOCERACORPORATION | 65 cases |
FUJISHIRO MASATO | 57 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of PCT patent applications by KYOCERA CORPORATION’s top 6 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of PCT patent filings by KYOCERA CORPORATION’s top 6 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
KYOCERA CORPORATION filed 109 joint applications with KALHAN AMIT for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 65 cases in total) is 10.8, and the median is 12.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.3, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been increasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2019 with 16 cases, and their lowest number in 2014 with 4 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 10.8 patents |
Std Dev | 3.7 |
COV | 0.3 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 6 cases | -53.8 % |
2021 year | 13 cases | +117 % |
2020 year | 6 cases | -62.5 % |
KYOCERA CORPORATION filed 112 joint applications with CHANG HENRY for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 85 cases in total) is 14.2, and the median is 14.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.28, and there have been small fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been increasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2022 with 21 cases, and their lowest number in 2016 with 4 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 14.2 patents |
Std Dev | 4.0 |
COV | 0.28 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 21 cases | +31.2 % |
2021 year | 16 cases | +23.08 % |
2020 year | 13 cases | +62.5 % |
KYOCERA CORPORATION filed 121 joint applications with 京セラ株式会社 KYOCERA CORPORATION for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 121 cases in total) is 20.2, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 2.2, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2020 with 119 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 20.2 patents |
Std Dev | 44.2 |
COV | 2.2 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2020 year | 119 cases | +5,850 % |
2019 year | 2 cases | - |
2018 year | 0 cases | - |
KYOCERA CORPORATION filed 57 joint applications with FUJISHIRO MASATO for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 55 cases in total) is 9.2, and the median is 8.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.7, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been increasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2022 with 20 cases, and their lowest number in 2016 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 9.2 patents |
Std Dev | 6.3 |
COV | 0.7 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 20 cases | +42.9 % |
2021 year | 14 cases | +40.0 % |
2020 year | 10 cases | +233 % |
KYOCERA CORPORATION filed 65 joint applications with 京セラ株式会社KYOCERACORPORATION for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 65 cases in total) is 10.8, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 2.2, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2018 with 65 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 10.8 patents |
Std Dev | 24.2 |
COV | 2.2 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2018 year | 65 cases | - |
2017 year | 0 cases | - |
2016 year | 0 cases | - |
The following shows PCT patents held by KYOCERA CORPORATION that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and KYOCERA CORPORATION’s PCT patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which KYOCERA CORPORATION is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 1,212 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 3.5. The most cited patent is WO2017/188342 "(EN) ELASTIC WAVE ELEMENT AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE(FR) ÉLÉMENT À ONDES ÉLASTIQUES ET DISPOSITIF DE COMMUNICATION(JA) 弾性波素子および通信装置" (62 times) , and the next most cited patent is WO2016/186059 "(EN) BASE STATION AND WIRELESS TERMINAL(FR) STATION DE BASE ET TERMINAL SANS FIL(JA) 基地局及び無線端末" (29 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | WO2017/188342 | (EN) ELASTIC WAVE ELEMENT AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE(FR) ÉLÉMENT À ONDES ÉLASTIQUES ET DISPOSITIF DE COMMUNICATION(JA) 弾性波素子および通信装置 | 62 times |
2 | WO2016/186059 | (EN) BASE STATION AND WIRELESS TERMINAL(FR) STATION DE BASE ET TERMINAL SANS FIL(JA) 基地局及び無線端末 | 29 times |
3 | WO2016/174839 | (EN) ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND SYSTEM(FR) DISPOSITIF ET SYSTÈME ÉLECTRONIQUES(JA) 電子機器及びシステム | 24 times |
4 | WO2017/111126 | (EN) SERVER DEVICE, VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE, AND COMMUNICATION DEVICE(FR) DISPOSITIF SERVEUR, DISPOSITIF DE COMMANDE DE VÉHICULE, ET DISPOSITIF DE COMMUNICATION(JA) サーバ装置、車両制御装置、および通信装置 | 24 times |
5 | WO2017/146200 | (EN) COATED TOOL(FR) OUTIL REVÊTU(JA) 被覆工具 | 22 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International