The Applicant / Patent Holder "THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN" had 38 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-04-30). This is a significantly decreased of -12 filings (-24.0%) over 50 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-04-30).
The highest number of filings in 2021 with 238 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 110 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 1,003 cases in total) is 167, and the median is 187. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 167 patents |
Std Dev | 58.8 |
COV | 0.4 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 110 cases | -35.3 % |
2022 year | 170 cases | -28.57 % |
2021 year | 238 cases | +13.33 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the US patent database for THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN for the period of the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN over the last 20 years (US) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
Patent landscaping is a visualization of the distribution of patent filings (application focus areas) for each technical keyword. Mountains and islands indicated by heatmap contours represent clusters of patent applications filed, and red areas on the heatmap indicate many patent filings relating to the keyword.
The patent landscape for THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN gives an intuitive understanding of what patent filings they have made and what technical position is to be established. By selecting filing year checkboxes and filtering, you can track their past filing trends (what technical area they have focused on).
By selecting applicant/patent holder checkboxes and filtering, you can visually grasp the technical areas of the filings for each applicant and the partnerships or alliances formed. Please use it as a guide for patent analysis and IP landscaping.
In addition, by visually representing the patent data in this manner, you can convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
In Patent Integration, you can check the specifics of a patent filing by clicking anywhere on the patent landscape screen. You can also quickly check the position of each applicant for each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. You can use it as a guide when considering hypotheses about each company's IP strategy on the IP Landscape. You can also use it for higher-grade intellectual property activities. It has reasonable pricing and a simple user interface that is easy for beginners to handle.
The following is a list of words (characteristic terms) often used in THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN patent applications. Characteristic terms with a higher importance are used in more patents/patent applications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 1,823 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for US patents of 0 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The changes in the number of patents shared with THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN’s top coapplicants are shown below.
By searching for the top coapplicants, you can discover what companies THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN is partnered with to develop technologies and use this information for R&D and intellectual property strategies.
Also, by looking at the change in the number of filings, you can see what companies THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN conducted joint research with in the past, and check the history of THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN’s alliances, partnerships, and joint research and development.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to quickly find out specifically what company they filed a joint application with and what invention it was for.
Among the top coapplicants, THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2023 to 2025) with 1 cases, followed by GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC with 1 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA | 1 cases |
GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC | 1 cases |
FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC | 1 cases |
Among the top coapplicants, TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA INC has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2015 to 2025) with 21 cases, followed by GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC with 15 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA INC | 21 cases |
GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC | 15 cases |
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA | 13 cases |
FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC | 13 cases |
ARM LIMITED | 9 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of US patent applications by THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN’s top 6 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of US patent filings by THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN’s top 6 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN filed 21 joint applications with TOYOTA MOTOR ENGINEERING & MANUFACTURING NORTH AMERICA INC for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 8 cases in total) is 1.3, and the median is 1.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.9, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2018 with 8 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1.3 patents |
Std Dev | 1.2 |
COV | 0.9 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 1 cases | -66.7 % |
2021 year | 3 cases | 0 |
2020 year | 3 cases | +200 % |
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN filed 9 joint applications with ARM LIMITED for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 2 cases in total) is 0.3, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 2.2, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2015 with 4 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 0.3 patents |
Std Dev | 0.7 |
COV | 2.2 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2019 year | 2 cases | +100 % |
2018 year | 1 cases | 0 |
2017 year | 1 cases | 0 |
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN filed 13 joint applications with THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 7 cases in total) is 1.2, and the median is 1.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.9, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 3 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1.2 patents |
Std Dev | 1.1 |
COV | 0.9 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 1 cases | - |
2022 year | 0 cases | -100 % |
2021 year | 3 cases | +200 % |
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN filed 15 joint applications with GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 7 cases in total) is 1.2, and the median is 0.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.5, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2019 with 5 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1.2 patents |
Std Dev | 1.8 |
COV | 1.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 1 cases | - |
2022 year | 0 cases | -100 % |
2021 year | 1 cases | - |
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN filed 13 joint applications with FORD GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 7 cases in total) is 1.2, and the median is 1.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 3 cases, and their lowest number in 2018 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1.2 patents |
Std Dev | 0.7 |
COV | 0.6 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2023 year | 1 cases | -50.0 % |
2022 year | 2 cases | 0 |
2021 year | 2 cases | +100 % |
The following shows US patents held by THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN’s US patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 643 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 6.0. The most cited patent is USP10038703 "Rating network security posture and comparing network maliciousness" (107 times) , and the next most cited patent is USP10680132 "Non-destructive wafer recycling for epitaxial lift-off thin-film device using a superlattice epitaxial layer" (107 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | USP10038703 | Rating network security posture and comparing network maliciousness | 107 times |
2 | USP10680132 | Non-destructive wafer recycling for epitaxial lift-off thin-film device using a superlattice epitaxial layer | 107 times |
3 | USP10406750 | Fiber-reinforced 3D printing | 92 times |
4 | USP9934688 | Vehicle trajectory determination | 87 times |
5 | USP10249389 | Individual and cohort pharmacological phenotype prediction platform | 76 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International