The Applicant / Patent Holder "IMEC VZW" had 5 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-03-31). This is a significantly decreased of -11 filings (-68.8%) over 16 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-03-31).
The highest number of filings in 2019 with 156 cases, and their lowest number in 2014 with 67 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 762 cases in total) is 127, and the median is 128. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.17, and there have been small fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 127 patents |
Std Dev | 21.5 |
COV | 0.17 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 110 cases | -10.57 % |
2021 year | 123 cases | -6.82 % |
2020 year | 132 cases | -15.38 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the US patent database for IMEC VZW for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-11-30). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of IMEC VZW, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of IMEC VZW over the last 20 years (US) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
Patent landscaping is a visualization of the distribution of patent filings (application focus areas) for each technical keyword. Mountains and islands indicated by heatmap contours represent clusters of patent applications filed, and red areas on the heatmap indicate many patent filings relating to the keyword.
The patent landscape for IMEC VZW gives an intuitive understanding of what patent filings they have made and what technical position is to be established. By selecting filing year checkboxes and filtering, you can track their past filing trends (what technical area they have focused on).
By selecting applicant/patent holder checkboxes and filtering, you can visually grasp the technical areas of the filings for each applicant and the partnerships or alliances formed. Please use it as a guide for patent analysis and IP landscaping.
In addition, by visually representing the patent data in this manner, you can convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
In Patent Integration, you can check the specifics of a patent filing by clicking anywhere on the patent landscape screen. You can also quickly check the position of each applicant for each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. You can use it as a guide when considering hypotheses about each company's IP strategy on the IP Landscape. You can also use it for higher-grade intellectual property activities. It has reasonable pricing and a simple user interface that is easy for beginners to handle.
The following is a list of words (characteristic terms) often used in IMEC VZW patent applications. Characteristic terms with a higher importance are used in more patents/patent applications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 1,175 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as IMEC VZW are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for US patents of 0 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The changes in the number of patents shared with IMEC VZW’s top coapplicants are shown below.
By searching for the top coapplicants, you can discover what companies IMEC VZW is partnered with to develop technologies and use this information for R&D and intellectual property strategies.
Also, by looking at the change in the number of filings, you can see what companies IMEC VZW conducted joint research with in the past, and check the history of IMEC VZW’s alliances, partnerships, and joint research and development.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to quickly find out specifically what company they filed a joint application with and what invention it was for.
Among the top coapplicants, KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 32 cases, followed by UNIVERSITEIT GENT with 18 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN | 32 cases |
UNIVERSITEIT GENT | 18 cases |
KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN KU LEUVEN R&D | 8 cases |
STICHTING IMEC NEDERLAND | 6 cases |
VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL | 2 cases |
UNIVERSITEIT ANTWERPEN | 1 cases |
Among the top coapplicants, UNIVERSITEIT GENT has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 106 cases, followed by KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN with 101 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
UNIVERSITEIT GENT | 106 cases |
KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN | 101 cases |
KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN KU LEUVEN R&D | 91 cases |
STICHTING IMEC NEDERLAND | 27 cases |
VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL | 22 cases |
UNIVERSITEIT ANTWERPEN | 18 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of US patent applications by IMEC VZW’s top 6 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of US patent filings by IMEC VZW’s top 6 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
IMEC VZW filed 106 joint applications with UNIVERSITEIT GENT for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 63 cases in total) is 10.5, and the median is 11.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.3, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 18 cases, and their lowest number in 2016 with 7 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 10.5 patents |
Std Dev | 3.5 |
COV | 0.3 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 12 cases | -20.00 % |
2021 year | 15 cases | +66.7 % |
2020 year | 9 cases | -10.00 % |
IMEC VZW filed 101 joint applications with KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 73 cases in total) is 12.2, and the median is 11.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2023 with 24 cases, and their lowest number in 2015 with 2 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 12.2 patents |
Std Dev | 6.5 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 5 cases | -16.67 % |
2021 year | 6 cases | -62.5 % |
2020 year | 16 cases | +23.08 % |
IMEC VZW filed 91 joint applications with KATHOLIEKE UNIVERSITEIT LEUVEN KU LEUVEN R&D for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 38 cases in total) is 6.3, and the median is 6.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.7, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been increasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2016 with 14 cases, and their lowest number in 2020 with 2 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 6.3 patents |
Std Dev | 4.4 |
COV | 0.7 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 7 cases | +16.67 % |
2021 year | 6 cases | +200 % |
2020 year | 2 cases | -80.0 % |
IMEC VZW filed 27 joint applications with STICHTING IMEC NEDERLAND for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 22 cases in total) is 3.7, and the median is 4.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.13, and there have been small fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2018 with 4 cases, and their lowest number in 2015 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 3.7 patents |
Std Dev | 0.5 |
COV | 0.13 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 3 cases | -25.00 % |
2021 year | 4 cases | 0 |
2020 year | 4 cases | 0 |
IMEC VZW filed 22 joint applications with VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 8 cases in total) is 1.3, and the median is 1.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.9, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2016 with 5 cases, and their lowest number in 2020 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1.3 patents |
Std Dev | 1.2 |
COV | 0.9 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 1 cases | -66.7 % |
2021 year | 3 cases | - |
2020 year | 0 cases | -100 % |
The following shows US patents held by IMEC VZW that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and IMEC VZW’s US patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which IMEC VZW is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 447 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 7.5. The most cited patent is USP9287273 "Method for manufacturing a semiconductor device comprising transistors each having a different effective work function" (352 times) , and the next most cited patent is USP9984874 "Method of producing transition metal dichalcogenide layer" (226 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | USP9287273 | Method for manufacturing a semiconductor device comprising transistors each having a different effective work function | 352 times |
2 | USP9984874 | Method of producing transition metal dichalcogenide layer | 226 times |
3 | USP10204782 | Combined anneal and selective deposition process | 183 times |
4 | USP10824078 | Lithographic mask layer | 105 times |
5 | USP9991261 | Gate-all-around nanowire device and method for manufacturing such a device | 97 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International