The Technical Field "掘削" had 68 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-02-28). This is a significantly decreased of -23 filings (-25.3%) over 91 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-02-28). This report also includes technical terms related to " 掘さく ", " 掘さく作業 ", " 掘り進 ", " 掘り進め ", " 掘削作業 ", " 掘削進行 ", " 掘込 ", " 掘込み ", " 掘進 ", " 掘進め ", " 掘鑿 ", " 掘鑿作業 " in the search set.
The highest number of filings in 2016 with 765 cases, and their lowest number in 2021 with 584 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 3,407 cases in total) is 568, and the median is 608. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.27, and there have been small fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 568 patents |
Std Dev | 153 |
COV | 0.27 |
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023).
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 585 cases | +0.17 % |
2021 year | 584 cases | -7.45 % |
2020 year | 631 cases | -3.81 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 掘削 for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-10-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 掘削, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of 掘削 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 6,331 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 掘削 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 株式会社奥村組 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 49 cases, followed by 大成建設株式会社 with 48 cases.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 鹿島建設株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 345 cases, followed by 大成建設株式会社 with 295 cases.
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 掘削 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Among the top coapplicants, 株式会社奥村組 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 49 cases, followed by 大成建設株式会社 with 48 cases.
Among the top coapplicants, 鹿島建設株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 345 cases, followed by 大成建設株式会社 with 295 cases.
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by 掘削’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 掘削’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
掘削 filed 345 joint applications with 鹿島建設株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 194 cases in total) is 32.3, and the median is 33.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2018 with 54 cases, and their lowest number in 2017 with 25 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 32.3 patents |
Std Dev | 13.7 |
COV | 0.4 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 26 cases | -10.34 % |
2021 year | 29 cases | -25.64 % |
2020 year | 39 cases | +5.41 % |
掘削 filed 203 joint applications with 株式会社大林組 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 94 cases in total) is 15.7, and the median is 17.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2014 with 31 cases, and their lowest number in 2018 with 10 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 15.7 patents |
Std Dev | 5.8 |
COV | 0.4 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 20 cases | +42.9 % |
2021 year | 14 cases | -30.0 % |
2020 year | 20 cases | -13.04 % |
掘削 filed 295 joint applications with 大成建設株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 144 cases in total) is 24.0, and the median is 22.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.3, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been increasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2015 with 51 cases, and their lowest number in 2019 with 21 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 24.0 patents |
Std Dev | 8.2 |
COV | 0.3 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 37 cases | +19.35 % |
2021 year | 31 cases | +40.9 % |
2020 year | 22 cases | +4.76 % |
掘削 filed 205 joint applications with 清水建設株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 104 cases in total) is 17.3, and the median is 16.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2016 with 33 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 12 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 17.3 patents |
Std Dev | 8.4 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 12 cases | -29.41 % |
2021 year | 17 cases | +6.25 % |
2020 year | 16 cases | -38.5 % |
掘削 filed 168 joint applications with 日立建機株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 103 cases in total) is 17.2, and the median is 16.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.21, and there have been small fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2022 with 24 cases, and their lowest number in 2015 with 11 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 17.2 patents |
Std Dev | 3.5 |
COV | 0.21 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 24 cases | +60.0 % |
2021 year | 15 cases | 0 |
2020 year | 15 cases | -16.67 % |
The following shows JP patents held by 掘削 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 掘削’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 掘削 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 2 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 1.0 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許6944224 "構築物用基礎構造" (Invalidation Trial day 2022-05-11) , next is 特許4147314 "スクリューオーガ用掘削ヘッド" (Invalidation Trial day 2021-12-23) .
- | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6944224 | 構築物用基礎構造 | 2022-05-11 |
2 | 特許4147314 | スクリューオーガ用掘削ヘッド | 2021-12-23 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 1 patents/patent applications were invalidation trial more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of invalidation trial is 1.0. The most invalidation trial patent is 特許6944224 "構築物用基礎構造" (1 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6944224 | 構築物用基礎構造 | 1 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 17 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7423729 "施工位置誘導システム" (Opposition day 2024-06-21) , next is 特許7323718 "ビニルアルコール系重合体及びその用途" (Opposition day 2024-02-01) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7423729 | 施工位置誘導システム | 2024-06-21 |
2 | 特許7323718 | ビニルアルコール系重合体及びその用途 | 2024-02-01 |
3 | 特許7263288 | ショベル及びショベル用のシステム | 2023-10-20 |
4 | 特許7263289 | ショベル及びショベル用のシステム | 2023-10-20 |
5 | 特許7263290 | ショベル及びショベル用のシステム | 2023-10-20 |
6 | 特許7257357 | ショベル及びショベル用のシステム | 2023-10-11 |
7 | 特許7257356 | ショベル及びショベル用のシステム | 2023-10-11 |
8 | 特許7250671 | ショベル | 2023-10-02 |
9 | 特許7250669 | ショベル | 2023-10-02 |
10 | 特許7250670 | ショベル | 2023-10-02 |
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 26 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.4 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特表2024-520187 "トンネル掘進機用の切削ホイール" (Protest day 2024-09-09) , next is 特開2022-149045 "土留構造物" (Protest day 2024-08-13) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特表2024-520187 | トンネル掘進機用の切削ホイール | 2024-09-09 |
2 | 特開2022-149045 | 土留構造物 | 2024-08-13 |
3 | 特開2022-083108 | セグメントピース、セグメントリング及びトンネル覆工体 | 2024-07-30 |
4 | 特許7530020 | 岩盤固結用注入薬液組成物及び成形体 | 2024-07-01 |
5 | 特開2022-135339 | 継手装置、コンクリート構造体、及び、コンクリート構造体の切削方法 | 2024-06-28 |
6 | 特開2023-177519 | トンネル掘削機 | 2024-05-13 |
7 | 特許7543164 | 土留構造物 | 2024-05-02 |
8 | 特許7543170 | 鋼製土留パネル及び該鋼製土留パネルを用いた土留構造物 | 2024-05-02 |
9 | 特開2022-185959 | 杭基礎及び杭基礎の周面摩擦力の評価方法 | 2024-03-05 |
10 | 特許7566711 | トンネル掘削機およびトンネル掘削機の製造方法 | 2024-02-20 |
11 | 特許7524651 | 汚染物質吸着シートを用いた排水処理方法及び排水処理装置 | 2024-02-15 |
12 | 特許7543754 | 水質浄化シート及び当該シートを用いた水質浄化方法 | 2024-02-09 |
13 | 特開2023-114044 | 土留工設計装置、土留工設計システム、および土留工設計プログラム | 2023-11-09 |
14 | 特開2021-188258 | ショベル用のシステム | 2023-08-24 |
15 | 特許7348856 | トンネル掘削機 | 2023-06-27 |
16 | 特許7318196 | 岩盤固結用注入薬液組成物 | 2023-06-19 |
17 | 特許7409857 | コンクリート吹付厚さ管理方法及びコンクリート吹付厚さ管理システム | 2023-05-17 |
18 | 特許7423729 | 施工位置誘導システム | 2023-03-03 |
19 | 特許7420123 | ねじ継手、ねじ継手付き鋼管、構造体、構造体の構築方法、地すべり抑止杭、地すべり抑止杭の施工方法、ねじ継手の設計方法、ねじ継手の製造方法、ねじ継手付き鋼管の製造方法 | 2022-12-22 |
20 | 特許7282813 | 掘削ロッド | 2022-11-09 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 62 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.4. The most protest patent is 特許6653493 "トンネルの急速施工方法" (5 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許6783111 "地盤改良装置" (5 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6653493 | トンネルの急速施工方法 | 5 times |
2 | 特許6783111 | 地盤改良装置 | 5 times |
3 | 特許7062598 | メタンガス生産設備及びメタンガス生産方法 | 4 times |
4 | 特許7004282 | 仕切弁設置方法 | 3 times |
5 | 特開2022-083108 | セグメントピース、セグメントリング及びトンネル覆工体 | 3 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-11-01 ~ 2024-10-31), there were 38 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.3 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2024-120247 "作業機械の制御システム及び作業機械の制御方法" (Inspection day 2024-09-12) , next is 特開2022-135339 "継手装置、コンクリート構造体、及び、コンクリート構造体の切削方法" (Inspection day 2024-08-06) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2024-120247 | 作業機械の制御システム及び作業機械の制御方法 | 2024-09-12 |
2 | 特開2022-135339 | 継手装置、コンクリート構造体、及び、コンクリート構造体の切削方法 | 2024-08-06 |
3 | 特許7530020 | 岩盤固結用注入薬液組成物及び成形体 | 2024-07-30 |
4 | 特開2023-177519 | トンネル掘削機 | 2024-06-04 |
5 | 特許6219909 | 地山の排水材設置工法 | 2024-04-24 |
6 | 特開2022-185959 | 杭基礎及び杭基礎の周面摩擦力の評価方法 | 2024-03-19 |
7 | 特許7543754 | 水質浄化シート及び当該シートを用いた水質浄化方法 | 2024-02-21 |
8 | 特許7524651 | 汚染物質吸着シートを用いた排水処理方法及び排水処理装置 | 2024-02-21 |
9 | 特開2024-087519 | 変位計及び地中変位算定方法 | 2024-01-17 |
10 | 特開2021-031842 | 積込機、移動式破砕機及びベルトコンベアを用いた破砕物搬出方法に使用する破砕機運転管理方法、並びに積込機及び移動式破砕機を用いた破砕物搬出方法に使用する破砕機運転管理方法 | 2024-01-10 |
11 | 特許7260219 | 掘削機 | 2023-11-22 |
12 | 特許7543164 | 土留構造物 | 2023-11-02 |
13 | 特許7543163 | 鋼製土留パネル及び該鋼製土留パネルを用いた土留構造物 | 2023-11-02 |
14 | 特開2022-149045 | 土留構造物 | 2023-11-02 |
15 | 特許7543170 | 鋼製土留パネル及び該鋼製土留パネルを用いた土留構造物 | 2023-11-02 |
16 | 特開2022-127952 | 鋼製土留パネル及び該鋼製土留パネルを用いた土留構造物 | 2023-11-02 |
17 | 特許4709040 | 削孔装置、削孔方法及び杭の構築方法 | 2023-09-20 |
18 | 特許7318196 | 岩盤固結用注入薬液組成物 | 2023-08-30 |
19 | 特許7348856 | トンネル掘削機 | 2023-07-18 |
20 | 特許7565560 | 土壌掘削サンプリング装置及び土壌掘削サンプリング方法 | 2023-07-11 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 84 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.4. The most inspection patent is 特許7062598 "メタンガス生産設備及びメタンガス生産方法" (6 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特開2017-179691 "建物地中杭の追加杭補修工法。" (6 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7062598 | メタンガス生産設備及びメタンガス生産方法 | 6 times |
2 | 特開2017-179691 | 建物地中杭の追加杭補修工法。 | 6 times |
3 | 特許6653493 | トンネルの急速施工方法 | 6 times |
4 | 特許7124016 | トンネル施工支援システム及び方法、並びにプログラム | 4 times |
5 | 特許6783111 | 地盤改良装置 | 4 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-11-01 to 2024-10-31), 1,446 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.3. The most cited patent is 特許6285078 "圧力分散型拡大ヘッド付きアンカーロッドの施工方法及び構造" (52 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6373728 "建設機械" (35 times) .
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International