ARTIENCE株式会社 (JP Patent Analysis Report)
The Applicant / Patent Holder "ARTIENCE株式会社" had 71 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-04-30). This is a significantly decreased of -18 filings (-20.2%) over 89 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-04-30).
The highest number of filings in 2017 with 399 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 182 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 1,623 cases in total) is 270, and the median is 352. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 270 patents |
| Std Dev | 128 |
| COV | 0.5 |
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024).
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 year | 182 cases | -48.7 % |
| 2022 year | 355 cases | +2.01 % |
| 2021 year | 348 cases | -2.52 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for ARTIENCE株式会社 for the period of the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of ARTIENCE株式会社, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
- Table of Contents
- Foreign Patent Analysis Report
- Patent Filing Summary for ARTIENCE株式会社
- Search Set (Search Formula/Analysis Patents)
- Related Patent Analysis Report
- Competitors Information
- Top coapplicant Information
- • Information on Important Patents
- Provision of patent information to the media
- About this Site
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
Introduction
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
ARTIENCE株式会社, Changes in the Number of JP Patents/Patent Applications
The changes in the number of patent filings of ARTIENCE株式会社 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
Search Set (Analysis Patents)
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 2,996 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
ARTIENCE株式会社
Same industry / competition company information (JP)
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as ARTIENCE株式会社 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Same industry / competition company, Change in the Number of JP Patents
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 0 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
Top coapplicant information (JP)
The changes in the number of patents shared with ARTIENCE株式会社’s top coapplicants are shown below.
By searching for the top coapplicants, you can discover what companies ARTIENCE株式会社 is partnered with to develop technologies and use this information for R&D and intellectual property strategies.
Also, by looking at the change in the number of filings, you can see what companies ARTIENCE株式会社 conducted joint research with in the past, and check the history of ARTIENCE株式会社’s alliances, partnerships, and joint research and development.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to quickly find out specifically what company they filed a joint application with and what invention it was for.
Trends in filing of joint patent applications in the last 3 years (2023 to 2025).
Among the top coapplicants, トーヨーケム株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2023 to 2025) with 16 cases, followed by トーヨーカラー株式会社 with 10 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| トーヨーケム株式会社 | 16 cases |
| トーヨーカラー株式会社 | 10 cases |
| 東洋インキ株式会社 | 7 cases |
| 東洋モートン株式会社 | 4 cases |
| TOPPANホールディングス株式会社 | 1 cases |
| 東洋ビジュアルソリューションズ株式会社 | 1 cases |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications for the target period (2015 to 2025).
Among the top coapplicants, トーヨーケム株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2015 to 2025) with 445 cases, followed by トーヨーカラー株式会社 with 404 cases.
| Name | Cases |
|---|---|
| トーヨーケム株式会社 | 445 cases |
| トーヨーカラー株式会社 | 404 cases |
| 東洋インキ株式会社 | 316 cases |
| 東洋ビジュアルソリューションズ株式会社 | 189 cases |
| 東洋モートン株式会社 | 77 cases |
| TOPPANホールディングス株式会社 | 24 cases |
Top coapplicant, Change in the Number of JP Patents
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by ARTIENCE株式会社’s top 6 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by ARTIENCE株式会社’s top 6 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Top coapplicant Details (JP)
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with トーヨーカラー株式会社
ARTIENCE株式会社 filed 404 joint applications with トーヨーカラー株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 143 cases in total) is 23.8, and the median is 24.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.8, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2021 to 2024). The highest number of filings in 2017 with 98 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 8 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 23.8 patents |
| Std Dev | 18.3 |
| COV | 0.8 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 year | 10 cases | +25.00 % |
| 2022 year | 8 cases | -83.0 % |
| 2021 year | 47 cases | +23.68 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with トーヨーケム株式会社
ARTIENCE株式会社 filed 445 joint applications with トーヨーケム株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 190 cases in total) is 31.7, and the median is 36.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.6, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2015 with 79 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 16 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 31.7 patents |
| Std Dev | 18.8 |
| COV | 0.6 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 year | 16 cases | -48.4 % |
| 2022 year | 31 cases | -43.6 % |
| 2021 year | 55 cases | +17.02 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 東洋インキ株式会社
ARTIENCE株式会社 filed 316 joint applications with 東洋インキ株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 134 cases in total) is 22.3, and the median is 26.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.7, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2015 with 53 cases, and their lowest number in 2023 with 6 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 22.3 patents |
| Std Dev | 14.7 |
| COV | 0.7 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 year | 6 cases | -70.0 % |
| 2022 year | 20 cases | -51.2 % |
| 2021 year | 41 cases | +20.59 % |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with TOPPANホールディングス株式会社
ARTIENCE株式会社 filed 24 joint applications with TOPPANホールディングス株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 6 cases in total) is 1.0, and the median is 1.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.0, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2017 with 7 cases, and their lowest number in 2020 with 0 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 1.0 patents |
| Std Dev | 1.0 |
| COV | 1.0 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 year | 1 cases | 0 |
| 2022 year | 1 cases | 0 |
| 2021 year | 1 cases | - |
Trends in filing of joint patent applications with 東洋ビジュアルソリューションズ株式会社
ARTIENCE株式会社 filed 189 joint applications with 東洋ビジュアルソリューションズ株式会社 for the analysis period (2015 to 2025).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2019 to 2024, 149 cases in total) is 24.8, and the median is 26.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.8, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2021 with 49 cases, and their lowest number in 2017 with 0 cases.
| Index | Value |
|---|---|
| Average | 24.8 patents |
| Std Dev | 21.0 |
| COV | 0.8 |
| Year | Cases | YOY |
|---|---|---|
| 2023 year | 1 cases | -91.7 % |
| 2022 year | 12 cases | -75.5 % |
| 2021 year | 49 cases | +19.51 % |
Information on important patents (JP)
The following shows JP patents held by ARTIENCE株式会社 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and ARTIENCE株式会社’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which ARTIENCE株式会社 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
Glossary
- Cited
- Indicates that the patent/patent application has been cited (by Examiners) in notices of reasons for rejection in the examination process of other (Japanese, U.S., or European) patent applications. The higher the number of citations, the more important the patent/patent application is considered to be.
- Request for invalidation trial
- Indicates that a third party has requested a procedure to invalidate the patent. It is likely to affect the business of third parties and is considered to be of high importance.
- Opposition
- Indicates that a third party has filed a petition with the Patent Office to hear the validity of the patent again. Like the trial for invalidation, it is considered to be of high importance.
- Information provision
- Indicates that a third party has provided the Patent Office with useful information for examination for the patent filed. It is usually considered to be of high importance because it is done to prevent the patent from being granted.
- Browsing request
- Indicates that a third party has requested the Patent Office to view the patent bag (a set of documents exchanged between the Patent Office and the applicant). The bag is often checked prior to trial for invalidation, opposition, and provision of information, and is considered to be a highly important patent.
Oppositioned cases
List of latest Oppositioned patents
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 28 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7495475 "カーボンナノチューブ及びその精製方法、カーボンナノチューブ分散液、バインダー組成物、電極用組成物、並びに二次電池" (Opposition day 2024-12-04) , next is 特許7489625 "包装材及び包装材の製造方法" (Opposition day 2024-11-18) .
| - | No. | Title | Opposition days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許7495475 | カーボンナノチューブ及びその精製方法、カーボンナノチューブ分散液、バインダー組成物、電極用組成物、並びに二次電池 | 2024-12-04 |
| 2 | 特許7489625 | 包装材及び包装材の製造方法 | 2024-11-18 |
| 3 | 特許7473764 | アルカリ分散型ホットメルト粘着剤組成物、該粘着剤組成物を用いてラベルが接着された容器 | 2024-10-09 |
| 4 | 特許7416313 | 蓄電デバイス包装材用接着剤、蓄電デバイス包装材、蓄電デバイス用容器及び蓄電デバイス | 2024-07-17 |
| 5 | 特許7393843 | アルカリ剥離性ホットメルト粘着剤、および容器 | 2024-06-03 |
| 6 | 特許7368675 | アルカリ剥離性ホットメルト粘着剤、および容器 | 2024-04-18 |
| 7 | 特許7354829 | 接合用ペースト、それを用いた接合体、並びに接合体の製造方法 | 2024-04-02 |
| 8 | 特許7363968 | 黒色顔料分散体、黒色塗膜形成組成物、および塗工物 | 2024-03-14 |
| 9 | 特許7342917 | 接着性樹脂シート、プリント配線板および、電子機器。 | 2024-02-19 |
| 10 | 特許7327700 | ロール状導電性接合シート、金属補強板付き配線板、および電子機器 | 2024-02-15 |
Protested cases
List of latest Protested patents
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 38 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.4 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2022-063234 "カーボンナノチューブ分散液およびその利用" (Protest day 2024-11-01) , next is 特開2022-093225 "抗菌・抗ウィルス性および防汚性を有するコーティング用組成物および塗工物" (Protest day 2024-10-29) .
| - | No. | Title | Protest days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特開2022-063234 | カーボンナノチューブ分散液およびその利用 | 2024-11-01 |
| 2 | 特開2022-093225 | 抗菌・抗ウィルス性および防汚性を有するコーティング用組成物および塗工物 | 2024-10-29 |
| 3 | 特開2023-144899 | 包装材、及びその製造方法 | 2024-10-18 |
| 4 | 特開2023-069017 | カーボンナノチューブ分散組成物、およびそれを用いた樹脂組成物、電極膜、二次電池、車両 | 2024-08-09 |
| 5 | 特開2022-085047 | 活性エネルギー線硬化性ハードコート剤、ハードコート層、光学部材および電子機器 | 2024-08-01 |
| 6 | 特許7604861 | 炭素材料およびそれを用いてなる導電性組成物、導電膜 | 2024-07-17 |
| 7 | 特開2022-088712 | 成形フィルム用導電性組成物、成形フィルム、及びその製造方法、並びに、成形体及びその製造方法 | 2024-06-28 |
| 8 | 特開2022-172506 | カラーフィルタ用着色組成物、カラーフィルタ、液晶表示装置、および固体撮像素子 | 2024-06-12 |
| 9 | 特開2023-155558 | 包装材、及びその製造方法 | 2024-05-31 |
| 10 | 特開2022-094922 | 熱硬化性樹脂組成物、およびその利用 | 2024-04-16 |
| 11 | 特許7604797 | 食品包装シート用コート剤および食品包装シート | 2024-02-06 |
| 12 | 特許7533102 | 電子材料 | 2024-01-26 |
| 13 | 特許7574619 | 感光性着色組成物、硬化膜、遮光フィルタ、カラーフィルタ、画像表示装置、固体撮像素子、及び赤外線センサ | 2023-12-27 |
| 14 | 特許7439391 | 接着剤組成物及びその製造方法、積層フィルム並びに包装体 | 2023-12-14 |
| 15 | 特開2023-126336 | ポリエステル系延伸容器用マスターバッチ、ならびにマスターバッチ、およびポリエステル系延伸容器の製造方法 | 2023-10-20 |
| 16 | 特許7512716 | 液状マスターバッチ組成物、熱可塑性樹脂組成物、および成形体 | 2023-09-15 |
| 17 | 特開2021-028940 | ノイズ抑制シートおよび積層体 | 2023-08-31 |
| 18 | 特開2020-176230 | 生分解性接着剤及びシート | 2023-08-30 |
| 19 | 特開2022-103165 | カラーフィルタ用着色組成物、カラーフィルタ、および、液晶表示装置 | 2023-07-27 |
| 20 | 特許7439428 | カーボンナノチューブ分散液およびその利用 | 2023-07-04 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Protested
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 86 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.3. The most protest patent is 特開2023-144899 "包装材、及びその製造方法" (4 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特開2020-176230 "生分解性接着剤及びシート" (4 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特開2023-144899 | 包装材、及びその製造方法 | 4 times |
| 2 | 特開2020-176230 | 生分解性接着剤及びシート | 4 times |
| 3 | 特許7439391 | 接着剤組成物及びその製造方法、積層フィルム並びに包装体 | 3 times |
| 4 | 特許6740603 | 活性エネルギー線硬化型平版印刷インキ、および印刷物 | 3 times |
| 5 | 特許6996326 | ポリ塩化ビニル用粘着剤および粘着シート | 2 times |
Inspectioned cases
List of latest Inspectioned patents
In the last 3 years (2022-01-01 ~ 2024-12-31), there were 42 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.6 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特許7604861 "炭素材料およびそれを用いてなる導電性組成物、導電膜" (Inspection day 2024-12-24) , next is 特開2022-063234 "カーボンナノチューブ分散液およびその利用" (Inspection day 2024-11-14) .
| - | No. | Title | Inspection days |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許7604861 | 炭素材料およびそれを用いてなる導電性組成物、導電膜 | 2024-12-24 |
| 2 | 特開2022-063234 | カーボンナノチューブ分散液およびその利用 | 2024-11-14 |
| 3 | 特許7342917 | 接着性樹脂シート、プリント配線板および、電子機器。 | 2024-10-18 |
| 4 | 特開2023-144899 | 包装材、及びその製造方法 | 2024-09-19 |
| 5 | 特開2023-069017 | カーボンナノチューブ分散組成物、およびそれを用いた樹脂組成物、電極膜、二次電池、車両 | 2024-08-28 |
| 6 | 特開2022-088712 | 成形フィルム用導電性組成物、成形フィルム、及びその製造方法、並びに、成形体及びその製造方法 | 2024-07-02 |
| 7 | 特開2022-172506 | カラーフィルタ用着色組成物、カラーフィルタ、液晶表示装置、および固体撮像素子 | 2024-07-02 |
| 8 | 特許6443814 | グラビアインキ、それを用いた印刷物および積層体 | 2024-06-25 |
| 9 | 特開2023-155558 | 包装材、及びその製造方法 | 2024-06-04 |
| 10 | 特開2022-094922 | 熱硬化性樹脂組成物、およびその利用 | 2024-05-09 |
| 11 | 特許7408930 | 導電性粒子、分散体及びその製造方法 | 2024-02-21 |
| 12 | 特許7533102 | 電子材料 | 2024-02-07 |
| 13 | 特許7574619 | 感光性着色組成物、硬化膜、遮光フィルタ、カラーフィルタ、画像表示装置、固体撮像素子、及び赤外線センサ | 2024-01-17 |
| 14 | 特許7439391 | 接着剤組成物及びその製造方法、積層フィルム並びに包装体 | 2023-12-21 |
| 15 | 特開2023-126336 | ポリエステル系延伸容器用マスターバッチ、ならびにマスターバッチ、およびポリエステル系延伸容器の製造方法 | 2023-11-14 |
| 16 | 特開2022-085047 | 活性エネルギー線硬化性ハードコート剤、ハードコート層、光学部材および電子機器 | 2023-11-14 |
| 17 | 特許7512716 | 液状マスターバッチ組成物、熱可塑性樹脂組成物、および成形体 | 2023-10-10 |
| 18 | 特開2021-028940 | ノイズ抑制シートおよび積層体 | 2023-09-19 |
| 19 | 特開2020-176230 | 生分解性接着剤及びシート | 2023-09-06 |
| 20 | 特開2022-103165 | カラーフィルタ用着色組成物、カラーフィルタ、および、液晶表示装置 | 2023-08-02 |
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Inspectioned
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 94 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.4. The most inspection patent is 特許7263744 "顔料分散体、およびインクジェット用インク" (6 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特開2023-144899 "包装材、及びその製造方法" (5 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許7263744 | 顔料分散体、およびインクジェット用インク | 6 times |
| 2 | 特開2023-144899 | 包装材、及びその製造方法 | 5 times |
| 3 | 特許7342917 | 接着性樹脂シート、プリント配線板および、電子機器。 | 5 times |
| 4 | 特許6996326 | ポリ塩化ビニル用粘着剤および粘着シート | 4 times |
| 5 | 特許6740603 | 活性エネルギー線硬化型平版印刷インキ、および印刷物 | 4 times |
Cited cases
Top Patents/Patent Applications with the Highest Number of Cited
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2015-01-01 to 2024-12-31), 1,243 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 3.1. The most cited patent is 特許6090521 "溶剤型ラミネート用グラビアインキ、印刷物、および積層体" (24 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6074698 "熱硬化性接着シート、およびその利用" (21 times) .
| - | No. | Title | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 特許6090521 | 溶剤型ラミネート用グラビアインキ、印刷物、および積層体 | 24 times |
| 2 | 特許6074698 | 熱硬化性接着シート、およびその利用 | 21 times |
| 3 | 特許6388131 | 水系プライマー組成物、および印刷物 | 20 times |
| 4 | 特許6014926 | 粘着剤および粘着テープ | 19 times |
| 5 | 特許6922247 | カラーフィルタ用着色組成物、およびカラーフィルタ | 19 times |
Providing patent information to the media (newspapers, magazines, etc.)
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
About this Site
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
Please note the following points for use.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
Citation of patent application status and ranking information
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Graphs are image data.
Please note that the various graphs are image data, but we cannot provide them in text data.Scope of coverage for each goal/target
- Based on the description of each goal and target of the SDGs, we have set the scope of technologies to be covered based on our and e-Patent's past experience, etc. (in some cases, the search is based on social issues themselves). Therefore, please note that there is a possibility that this "SDGs Global Company Ranking from Patent Perspective" may not cover 100%.
- A population search formula is clearly indicated for each goal/target (database: Patent Integration). You may use the population search formula as it is, or you may improve it by yourself.
- This search covers patents and utility models, including both published and registered patents (design and design patents are excluded). The unit of count is the number of applications, not the number of patent families.
About the name collation and name control of applicants and right holders
- Company rankings are based on the results calculated by "Patent Integration", with Japanese organizations in Japanese and other companies in English (some are in Japanese).
- Company names may be the names of the companies at the time of application, but the results calculated by Patent Integration are used as is. Company names are used as they were at the time of application.
- Because of the fluctuation in the names of companies (i.e., applicant/right holder names in the patent information), there are cases where the same company appears more than once in the top 10. The number of applications filed by the same company in the top 10 is the total number of applications filed by the company.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International
Our Commitment to Safety and Security
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to providing high-quality patent information based on the latest patent data on more than 45 million cases collected from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publication. 
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. collects the patent data from the Patent Offices in Japan, the U.S., Europe, and Taiwan and from PCT publications to provide it widely in the form of reports so that anyone can check patent information and patent trends with confidence. 
Patent Integration Co., Ltd. is committed to various efforts to enhance the reliability of the information and to allow users to search patent information with confidence.