The Applicant / Patent Holder "AGC株式会社" had 49 patent application filings in the most recent period (2023-01-01 to 2023-03-31). This is a slightly decreased of +0 filings (0.0%) over 49 they had in the same period of the previous year (2022-01-01 to 2022-03-31).
The highest number of filings in 2014 with 691 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 232 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 1,945 cases in total) is 324, and the median is 289. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 324 patents |
Std Dev | 142 |
COV | 0.4 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 232 cases | -5.31 % |
2021 year | 245 cases | -26.43 % |
2020 year | 333 cases | -28.39 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for AGC株式会社 for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-11-30). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of AGC株式会社, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of AGC株式会社 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
Patent landscaping is a visualization of the distribution of patent filings (application focus areas) for each technical keyword. Mountains and islands indicated by heatmap contours represent clusters of patent applications filed, and red areas on the heatmap indicate many patent filings relating to the keyword.
The patent landscape for AGC株式会社 gives an intuitive understanding of what patent filings they have made and what technical position is to be established. By selecting filing year checkboxes and filtering, you can track their past filing trends (what technical area they have focused on).
By selecting applicant/patent holder checkboxes and filtering, you can visually grasp the technical areas of the filings for each applicant and the partnerships or alliances formed. Please use it as a guide for patent analysis and IP landscaping.
In addition, by visually representing the patent data in this manner, you can convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
In Patent Integration, you can check the specifics of a patent filing by clicking anywhere on the patent landscape screen. You can also quickly check the position of each applicant for each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. You can use it as a guide when considering hypotheses about each company's IP strategy on the IP Landscape. You can also use it for higher-grade intellectual property activities. It has reasonable pricing and a simple user interface that is easy for beginners to handle.
The following is a list of words (characteristic terms) often used in AGC株式会社 patent applications. Characteristic terms with a higher importance are used in more patents/patent applications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 4,300 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as AGC株式会社 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, AGC株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 369 cases, followed by 日本電気硝子株式会社 with 183 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
AGC株式会社 | 369 cases |
日本電気硝子株式会社 | 183 cases |
日本板硝子株式会社 | 41 cases |
株式会社オハラ | 22 cases |
日本山村硝子株式会社 | 19 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, AGC株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 4,300 cases, followed by 日本電気硝子株式会社 with 2,636 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
AGC株式会社 | 4,300 cases |
日本電気硝子株式会社 | 2,636 cases |
日本板硝子株式会社 | 590 cases |
株式会社オハラ | 277 cases |
日本山村硝子株式会社 | 206 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 5 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The changes in the number of patents shared with AGC株式会社’s top coapplicants are shown below.
By searching for the top coapplicants, you can discover what companies AGC株式会社 is partnered with to develop technologies and use this information for R&D and intellectual property strategies.
Also, by looking at the change in the number of filings, you can see what companies AGC株式会社 conducted joint research with in the past, and check the history of AGC株式会社’s alliances, partnerships, and joint research and development.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to quickly find out specifically what company they filed a joint application with and what invention it was for.
Among the top coapplicants, AGCエスアイテック株式会社 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 23 cases, followed by エージーシーグラスユーロップ with 1 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
AGCエスアイテック株式会社 | 23 cases |
エージーシーグラスユーロップ | 1 cases |
エージーシーフラットグラスノースアメリカインコーポレイテッド | 1 cases |
Among the top coapplicants, エージーシーグラスユーロップ has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 75 cases, followed by エージーシーフラットグラスノースアメリカインコーポレイテッド with 58 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
エージーシーグラスユーロップ | 75 cases |
エージーシーフラットグラスノースアメリカインコーポレイテッド | 58 cases |
AGCエスアイテック株式会社 | 33 cases |
Below is a ranking of the number of JP patent applications by AGC株式会社’s top 6 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by AGC株式会社’s top 6 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
AGC株式会社 filed 75 joint applications with エージーシーグラスユーロップ for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 51 cases in total) is 8.5, and the median is 7.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.9, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2019 with 24 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 1 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 8.5 patents |
Std Dev | 8.1 |
COV | 0.9 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 1 cases | -80.0 % |
2021 year | 5 cases | -54.5 % |
2020 year | 11 cases | -54.2 % |
AGC株式会社 filed 58 joint applications with エージーシーフラットグラスノースアメリカインコーポレイテッド for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 44 cases in total) is 7.3, and the median is 4.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.1, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The highest number of filings in 2019 with 24 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 1 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 7.3 patents |
Std Dev | 8.2 |
COV | 1.1 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 1 cases | -75.0 % |
2021 year | 4 cases | -63.6 % |
2020 year | 11 cases | -54.2 % |
AGC株式会社 filed 33 joint applications with AGCエスアイテック株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 31 cases in total) is 5.2, and the median is 2.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.3, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been increasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The highest number of filings in 2023 with 20 cases, and their lowest number in 2017 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 5.2 patents |
Std Dev | 6.8 |
COV | 1.3 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 2 cases | +100 % |
2021 year | 1 cases | -50.0 % |
2020 year | 2 cases | +100 % |
The following shows JP patents held by AGC株式会社 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and AGC株式会社’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which AGC株式会社 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 9 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7414061 "ポリウレタンフォーム、及び車両用防音材" (Opposition day 2024-07-11) , next is 特許7234492 "組成物から作られる物品" (Opposition day 2023-09-04) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7414061 | ポリウレタンフォーム、及び車両用防音材 | 2024-07-11 |
2 | 特許7234492 | 組成物から作られる物品 | 2023-09-04 |
3 | 特許7222361 | 光学フィルタおよび撮像装置 | 2023-08-10 |
4 | 特許7163840 | 積層体、プリント基板の製造方法、プリント基板及びアンテナ | 2023-05-01 |
5 | 特許7160091 | 車両用フロントガラス | 2023-04-24 |
6 | 特許7154517 | イットリウム質保護膜およびその製造方法ならびに部材 | 2023-04-07 |
7 | 特許7031689 | 含フッ素エーテル組成物、コーティング液および物品 | 2022-09-05 |
8 | 特許6977767 | 含フッ素エーテル組成物およびその製造方法 | 2022-06-06 |
9 | 特許6969599 | 含フッ素エーテル組成物、コーティング液および物品 | 2022-05-20 |
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 29 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.4 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特許7574851 "導電膜、光電子素子及び導電膜の製造方法" (Protest day 2024-03-26) , next is 特許7520285 "高眼圧症及び緑内障を治療するための方法及び組成物" (Protest day 2023-11-28) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7574851 | 導電膜、光電子素子及び導電膜の製造方法 | 2024-03-26 |
2 | 特許7520285 | 高眼圧症及び緑内障を治療するための方法及び組成物 | 2023-11-28 |
3 | 特許7511124 | 分散液の製造方法および分散液 | 2023-07-07 |
4 | 特開2022-089966 | 光学ガラスおよび光学部品 | 2023-06-09 |
5 | 特許7415957 | 重合体、硬化性組成物、硬化物、粘着シート、積層体及びフレキシブルディスプレイ | 2023-06-07 |
6 | 特許7567794 | 基板及び金属積層板 | 2023-03-27 |
7 | 特許7476802 | 粒子の製造方法および成形体の製造方法 | 2023-03-17 |
8 | 特許7477292 | 合わせガラス | 2023-02-28 |
9 | 特許7338619 | ロールフィルム、ロールフィルムの製造方法、銅張積層体の製造方法、及びプリント基板の製造方法 | 2023-01-20 |
10 | 特許7571370 | 硬質ポリウレタンフォームの製造方法 | 2023-01-13 |
11 | 特開2022-159558 | 化学強化ガラス及びその製造方法 | 2022-12-27 |
12 | 特許7491840 | 車両用ドアガラス | 2022-12-20 |
13 | 特許7234921 | 熱プレス積層体、および、熱プレス積層体の製造方法 | 2022-12-08 |
14 | 特許7327427 | 化学強化ガラスおよびその製造方法 | 2022-11-29 |
15 | 特許7371722 | 光学ガラスおよび光学部品 | 2022-11-04 |
16 | 再公表2019/151316 | 光学ガラスおよび光学部品 | 2022-10-25 |
17 | 特許7326702 | 防汚膜付き透明基板および静電容量型インセルタッチパネル式液晶表示装置 | 2022-10-06 |
18 | 再公表2018/235725 | 光学ガラスおよび光学部品 | 2022-09-16 |
19 | 特許7358950 | 硬化性組成物、及び硬化物 | 2022-09-06 |
20 | 特許7276330 | 含フッ素ポリマーの製造方法および含フッ素イオン交換ポリマーの製造方法 | 2022-07-27 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 66 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.4. The most protest patent is 特許7234921 "熱プレス積層体、および、熱プレス積層体の製造方法" (4 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許6368944 "ガラス板" (4 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7234921 | 熱プレス積層体、および、熱プレス積層体の製造方法 | 4 times |
2 | 特許6368944 | ガラス板 | 4 times |
3 | 特許6812796 | 無アルカリガラス | 4 times |
4 | 特許7057487 | 光学装置および光学部材 | 3 times |
5 | 特許7045854 | 洗浄方法、洗浄装置の使用方法および洗浄装置 | 3 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-12-01 ~ 2024-11-30), there were 37 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.7 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2007-223883 "車両用合せガラス" (Inspection day 2024-11-11) , next is 特許7456563 "光学フィルタ用ガラス及び光学フィルタ" (Inspection day 2024-05-20) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2007-223883 | 車両用合せガラス | 2024-11-11 |
2 | 特許7456563 | 光学フィルタ用ガラス及び光学フィルタ | 2024-05-20 |
3 | 特許7574851 | 導電膜、光電子素子及び導電膜の製造方法 | 2024-04-18 |
4 | 特許7520285 | 高眼圧症及び緑内障を治療するための方法及び組成物 | 2023-12-25 |
5 | 特許7371722 | 光学ガラスおよび光学部品 | 2023-12-05 |
6 | 特許7511124 | 分散液の製造方法および分散液 | 2023-08-30 |
7 | 特許7415957 | 重合体、硬化性組成物、硬化物、粘着シート、積層体及びフレキシブルディスプレイ | 2023-07-12 |
8 | 特開2022-089966 | 光学ガラスおよび光学部品 | 2023-07-06 |
9 | 特許7567794 | 基板及び金属積層板 | 2023-04-19 |
10 | 特許7476802 | 粒子の製造方法および成形体の製造方法 | 2023-04-14 |
11 | 特許7571370 | 硬質ポリウレタンフォームの製造方法 | 2023-04-07 |
12 | 特許7477292 | 合わせガラス | 2023-03-09 |
13 | 特許7338619 | ロールフィルム、ロールフィルムの製造方法、銅張積層体の製造方法、及びプリント基板の製造方法 | 2023-02-17 |
14 | 特許7234921 | 熱プレス積層体、および、熱プレス積層体の製造方法 | 2023-01-13 |
15 | 特許7491840 | 車両用ドアガラス | 2023-01-10 |
16 | 特開2022-159558 | 化学強化ガラス及びその製造方法 | 2023-01-10 |
17 | 特許7327427 | 化学強化ガラスおよびその製造方法 | 2022-12-21 |
18 | 再公表2019/151316 | 光学ガラスおよび光学部品 | 2022-11-25 |
19 | 特開2014-133765 | 高眼圧症及び緑内障を治療するための方法及び組成物 | 2022-11-02 |
20 | 特表2011-521943 | 高眼圧症及び緑内障を治療するための方法及び組成物 | 2022-11-02 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 101 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.5. The most inspection patent is 特許7045854 "洗浄方法、洗浄装置の使用方法および洗浄装置" (8 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特許7571370 "硬質ポリウレタンフォームの製造方法" (6 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7045854 | 洗浄方法、洗浄装置の使用方法および洗浄装置 | 8 times |
2 | 特許7571370 | 硬質ポリウレタンフォームの製造方法 | 6 times |
3 | 特許6714884 | 高周波デバイス用ガラス基板と高周波デバイス用回路基板 | 5 times |
4 | 特許6812796 | 無アルカリガラス | 4 times |
5 | 特許7234921 | 熱プレス積層体、および、熱プレス積層体の製造方法 | 3 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-12-01 to 2024-11-30), 718 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 3.0. The most cited patent is 特開2016-011423 "熱サイクル用作動媒体、熱サイクルシステム用組成物および熱サイクルシステム" (39 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特開2016-027610 "パッケージ基板、パッケージ、および電子デバイス" (23 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2016-011423 | 熱サイクル用作動媒体、熱サイクルシステム用組成物および熱サイクルシステム | 39 times |
2 | 特開2016-027610 | パッケージ基板、パッケージ、および電子デバイス | 23 times |
3 | 特許6759712 | カバーガラス及びこれを備えた表示装置 | 23 times |
4 | 特許6402706 | 合わせガラス | 20 times |
5 | 特許6354616 | 熱サイクルシステム用組成物および熱サイクルシステム | 20 times |
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
All rights to the data, documents, figures and tables are reserved by e-Patent. When publishing internal documents, external reports, etc. (whether paid or free of charge), please use the following URL: https://e-patent.co.jp/.
e-Patent will not be liable for any damages or losses arising from the use of the global patent application status, ranking information, or population search formula in the "SDGs Global Company Ranking from a Patent Perspective". Items with ● in front of the target are not supported at this time (judged to be difficult to approach from the patent information analysis).
There is no problem to cite patent application status and ranking information, but please clearly indicate "Source: e-Patent Co.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International