The Applicant / Patent Holder "MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC" had 396 patent application filings in the most recent period (2020-01-01 to 2020-03-31). This is a significantly increased of +98 filings (32.9%) over 298 they had in the same period of the previous year (2019-01-01 to 2019-03-31).
The company had their highest number of filings in 2019 with 2,022 cases, and their lowest number in 2016 with 699 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2015 to 2019, 6,494 cases in total) is 1,299, and the median is 1,191. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.4, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been increasing for the last 3 years (2017 to 2019).
|2019 year||2,022 cases||+10.98 %|
|2018 year||1,822 cases||+53.0 %|
|2017 year||1,191 cases||+70.4 %|
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the US patent database for MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC for the period of the last 10 years (2011-01-01 to 2021-11-30). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc.. He is currently a patent attorney at IPTech Patent Professional Corporation, one of Japan's leading patent firms specializing in IT and startups.
He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider. Please feel free to contact him via Twitter DM, LinkedIn, or IPTech Patent Professional Corporation.
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The following foreign patent analysis reports have been found for MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC. The trends of patent filings of MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC for each country can be found by clicking on the Applicant/Patent Holder name next to each country.
|Country||Applicant / Patent Holder|
|US||MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC|
|EP||MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC|
|PCT||MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC|
The changes in the number of patent filings of MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC over the last 20 years (US) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
Patent landscaping is a visualization of the distribution of patent filings (application focus areas) for each technical keyword. Mountains and islands indicated by heatmap contours represent clusters of patent applications filed, and red areas on the heatmap indicate many patent filings relating to the keyword.
The patent landscape for MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC gives an intuitive understanding of what patent filings they have made and what technical position is to be established. By selecting filing year checkboxes and filtering, you can track their past filing trends (what technical area they have focused on).
By selecting applicant/patent holder checkboxes and filtering, you can visually grasp the technical areas of the filings for each applicant and the partnerships or alliances formed. Please use it as a guide for patent analysis and IP landscaping.
In addition, by visually representing the patent data in this manner, you can convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
In Patent Integration, you can check the specifics of a patent filing by clicking anywhere on the patent landscape screen. You can also quickly check the position of each applicant for each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. You can use it as a guide when considering hypotheses about each company's IP strategy on the IP Landscape. You can also use it for higher-grade intellectual property activities. It has reasonable pricing and a simple user interface that is easy for beginners to handle.
The following is a list of words (characteristic terms) often used in MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC patent applications. Characteristic terms with a higher importance are used in more patents/patent applications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 12,043 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The changes in the number of patents shared with MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC’s top coapplicants are shown below.
By searching for the top coapplicants, you can discover what companies MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC is partnered with to develop technologies and use this information for R&D and intellectual property strategies.
Also, by looking at the change in the number of filings, you can see what companies MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC conducted joint research with in the past, and check the history of MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC’s alliances, partnerships, and joint research and development.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to quickly find out specifically what company they filed a joint application with and what invention it was for.
Among the top coapplicants, MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2019 to 2021) with 2 cases.
|MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY||2 cases|
Among the top coapplicants, MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2011 to 2021) with 5 cases, followed by SANDIA CORPORATION with 3 cases.
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of US patent filings by MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC’s top 6 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC filed 5 joint applications with MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY for the analysis period (2011 to 2021).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2015 to 2019, 2 cases in total) is 0.4, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.2, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The company had their highest number of filings in 2014 with 2 cases, and their lowest number in 2011 with 0 cases.
|2019 year||1 cases||-|
|2018 year||0 cases||-100 %|
|2017 year||1 cases||-|
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC filed 3 joint applications with SANDIA CORPORATION for the analysis period (2011 to 2021).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 10 years (2010 to 2019, 3 cases in total) is 0.3, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.5, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The company had their highest number of filings in 2014 with 1 cases, and their lowest number in 2012 with 0 cases.
|2014 year||1 cases||0|
|2013 year||1 cases||-|
|2012 year||0 cases||-100 %|
The following shows US patents held by MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC’s US patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2011-12-01 to 2021-11-30), 5,416 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 8.1. The most cited patent is USP8964496 "Apparatuses and methods for performing compare operations using sensing circuitry" (515 times) , and the next most cited patent is USP8971124 "Apparatuses and methods for performing logical operations using sensing circuitry" (507 times) .
|1||USP8964496||Apparatuses and methods for performing compare operations using sensing circuitry||515 times|
|2||USP8971124||Apparatuses and methods for performing logical operations using sensing circuitry||507 times|
|3||USP8446783||Digit line comparison circuits||341 times|
|4||USP9158667||Apparatuses and methods for performing logical operations using sensing circuitry||314 times|
|5||USP10825496||In-memory lightweight memory coherence protocol||313 times|
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International