The Technical Field "研磨" had 518 patent application filings in the most recent period (2022-01-01 to 2022-06-30). This is a significantly decreased of -163 filings (-23.9%) over 681 they had in the same period of the previous year (2021-01-01 to 2021-06-30). This report also includes technical terms related to " サンジング ", " サンディング ", " ポリッシング ", " 研ま ", " 研摩 ", " 研摩処理 ", " 研摩加工 ", " 研磨処理 ", " 研磨加工 " in the search set.
The company had their highest number of filings in 2014 with 2,187 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 774 cases.
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 7,312 cases in total) is 1,219, and the median is 1,427. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 1,219 patents |
Std Dev | 606 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 774 cases | -40.7 % |
2021 year | 1,305 cases | -15.75 % |
2020 year | 1,549 cases | -10.57 % |
This report provides the latest patent analysis information (the IP landscape, including a patent map) on the patent search results of the JP patent database for 研磨 for the period of the last 10 years (2014-01-01 to 2024-02-29). You can compare the information in this report with the trends in your competitors’ patent filings and technologies, and use it to search for important patents.
This service provides, free of charge, a patent analysis report based on the latest patent data (Japanese, U.S., European, and PCT application publications) for use in patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping. The service is offered by "Patent Integration" a firm specializing in patent search/patent analysis.
This report includes basic information to help you understand the IP strategy and management of 研磨, such as changes in the number of patents/patent applications they have filed, comparisons of the numbers of patents/patent applications filed by their peers and competitors, their top coapplicants (joint research partners, alliance partners), and their most important patents. It can be used in various intellectual property business operations such as IP landscaping, patent search/patent analysis, preparation of intellectual property business evaluation reports, selection of M&A candidates, and selection of alliance partners.
He is a patent attorney at a patent office. He specializes in invention counseling, patent filing, and intellectual property strategies for start-up companies and new businesses in the fields of software, information technology and artificial intelligence. He runs a patent course for beginners on Udemy, an online course provider.
After studying physics at the University of Tokyo as a doctoral student, he was engaged in intellectual property analysis and technology trend research as an in-house patent attorney at a precision equipment manufacturer and at Toyota Central R&D Labs. Inc..
The concept of the "IP landscape" (IPL) has been attracting attention recently.
An IP landscape is not limited to patent information, but also integrates and analyzes business information (e.g., non-patent information such as papers, news releases, stock information, and market information). Intellectual-property-based business management is realized through the analysis of intellectual property information applied to the formulation of management strategies and business strategies. This is a comprehensive approach that includes but not limited to planning of open and closed strategies, selecting M&A candidates, searching for alliance partners, and formulating intellectual property strategies, through the exploitation of intellectual property information.
IP landscaping usually includes patent search and patent analysis. In patent search and patent analysis, it is important to grasp the market position of each company and the overall technological trends and development trends for each technology. More specifically, it is important to understand what intellectual property your own company and other companies hold, what the strengths and weaknesses of other companies are, and how other companies are trying to exploit their intellectual property. In other words, it is important to understand both the business strategy and the intellectual property strategy of each company.
After reading this search report, you may be interested in more detailed patent searches and patent analysis. We offer a service called Patent Integration, which is an integrated patent search and patent analysis service. With reasonable pricing and a simple user interface such that even beginners can quickly search for and analyze patent information by company or technology from a web browser, please consider using it for detailed patent searches, patent analysis, and IP landscaping.
Patent Integration has a patent-landscaping function that can visually represent a set of tens of thousands of patents/patent applications. This allows you to convincingly show the technical positions of your company and its competitors to your management and business strategists in order to formulate management strategies and business strategies.
The changes in the number of patent filings of 研磨 over the last 20 years (JP) are shown below.
The change in the number of patents/patent applications is the most basic index in patent analysis. By examining the change in the number of patents/patent applications, you can see the status of technological development and R&D focus for each company or technology. It should be noted that since there is a one and a half year lag between the filing and the laying open of patent applications, it is not possible to analyze the situation more recently than one and half years prior to the present.
In this report, you can only see the change in the number of patents/patent applications by company or technology, whereas Patent Integration allows you to quickly compare the number of patent applications with your competitors in each technical field by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications.
This patent analysis report was created for a patent search set of 15,416 cases retrieved by applying the following search formula and analysis period to the following patent database. Patent information such as a patent analysis result, a patent map, and a patent landscape can be freely used for patent searches, analysis, and work on intellectual property strategies, including IP landscaping.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 研磨 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 株式会社荏原製作所 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 44 cases, followed by キヤノン株式会社 with 8 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
株式会社荏原製作所 | 44 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 8 cases |
セイコーエプソン株式会社 | 3 cases |
株式会社レゾナック | 3 cases |
HOYA株式会社 | 2 cases |
Comparing the number of applications of each company, 株式会社荏原製作所 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 654 cases, followed by 株式会社レゾナック with 220 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
株式会社荏原製作所 | 654 cases |
株式会社レゾナック | 220 cases |
HOYA株式会社 | 129 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 112 cases |
セイコーエプソン株式会社 | 70 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 55 cases |
富士通株式会社 | 18 cases |
ソニーグループ株式会社 | 16 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 12 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 10 cases |
日本電気株式会社 | 4 cases |
Below is a patent map showing changes in the number of applications for JP patents of 11 companies in the same industry over the past 20 years.
The number of patents and changes in the number of patents of other companies (competitors) in the same industry as 研磨 are shown below.
Comparison of changes in the number of patents with peers and competitors is an important analytical index for understanding the intellectual property strategies of each company. By checking the transition of the number of patents for each company / competitor, you can check the status of focus on technology development and R&D for each company / technology.
It should be noted that patents have a time lag of one and a half years from filing to publication, so it is not possible to analyze the situation more recent than one and a half years.
If you want to find out more information, " Patent Integration , You can compare the number of patent applications with competitors in each technical field in a short time by multiplying with other keywords and patent classifications.Please use it for more detailed patent information analysis such as selection of M&A candidate destinations and alliance destinations.
Among the top coapplicants, 株式会社荏原製作所 has the highest number of joint applications in the last in the last 3 years (2022 to 2024) with 44 cases, followed by キヤノン株式会社 with 8 cases.
Among the top coapplicants, 株式会社荏原製作所 has the highest number of joint applications in the last for the target period (2014 to 2024) with 654 cases, followed by キヤノン株式会社 with 112 cases.
Name | Cases |
---|---|
株式会社荏原製作所 | 654 cases |
キヤノン株式会社 | 112 cases |
株式会社東芝 | 55 cases |
富士通株式会社 | 18 cases |
ソニーグループ株式会社 | 16 cases |
株式会社日立製作所 | 12 cases |
パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 | 10 cases |
Below is a patent map showing the changes in the numbers of JP patent filings by 研磨’s top 7 coapplicants over the last 20 years.
研磨 filed 55 joint applications with 株式会社東芝 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 13 cases in total) is 2.2, and the median is 1.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.1, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The company had their highest number of filings in 2014 with 22 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 2.2 patents |
Std Dev | 2.5 |
COV | 1.1 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2021 year | 2 cases | - |
2020 year | 0 cases | -100 % |
2019 year | 5 cases | -16.67 % |
研磨 filed 10 joint applications with パナソニックホールディングス株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 3 cases in total) is 0.5, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.5, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The company had their highest number of filings in 2016 with 3 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 0.5 patents |
Std Dev | 0.8 |
COV | 1.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2021 year | 1 cases | - |
2020 year | 0 cases | -100 % |
2019 year | 2 cases | - |
研磨 filed 16 joint applications with ソニーグループ株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 5 cases in total) is 0.8, and the median is 0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 1.5, and there have been very big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The company had their highest number of filings in 2016 with 6 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 0 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 0.8 patents |
Std Dev | 1.2 |
COV | 1.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2019 year | 3 cases | +50.0 % |
2018 year | 2 cases | +100 % |
2017 year | 1 cases | -83.3 % |
研磨 filed 112 joint applications with キヤノン株式会社 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 49 cases in total) is 8.2, and the median is 9.5. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.7, and there have been relatively large fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The number of filings has been decreasing for the last 3 years (2020 to 2023). The company had their highest number of filings in 2015 with 20 cases, and their lowest number in 2019 with 3 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 8.2 patents |
Std Dev | 5.3 |
COV | 0.7 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 8 cases | -50.0 % |
2021 year | 16 cases | +45.5 % |
2020 year | 11 cases | +267 % |
研磨 filed 654 joint applications with 株式会社荏原製作所 for the analysis period (2014 to 2024).
The mean of the number of filings over the last 5 years (2018 to 2023, 324 cases in total) is 54.0, and the median is 64.0. The coefficient of variation (standard deviation/mean) is 0.5, and there have been big fluctuations in the number of filings from year to year.
The company had their highest number of filings in 2017 with 100 cases, and their lowest number in 2022 with 40 cases.
Index | Value |
---|---|
Average | 54.0 patents |
Std Dev | 25.5 |
COV | 0.5 |
Year | Cases | YOY |
---|---|---|
2022 year | 40 cases | -32.2 % |
2021 year | 59 cases | -14.49 % |
2020 year | 69 cases | -9.21 % |
The following shows JP patents held by 研磨 that have had an invalidation trial against them demanded or an opposition filed against them by a third party, and 研磨’s JP patents/patent applications of high importance cited by Examiners in patent examination processes.
By noting the most important patents, you can obtain knowledge of the competitive business environment in which 研磨 is placed (e.g., whether it is a fiercely competitive environment or an oligopolistic market and the like). In general, it can be understood that a company with a large number of demands for invalidation trials is developing their business in a business environment where IP disputes are common.
If you want to search for more detailed information, you can use Patent Integration to retrieve and download by company cited patents/patent applications or patents undergoing invalidation trials. You can quickly extract important patents from a patent set that includes multiple competitors by cross-referencing with other keywords and patent classifications. Please consider using it for searches for important patents/patent applications.
In the last 3 years (2021-03-01 ~ 2024-02-29), there were 1 patents Invalidation Trial from third parties. The average number of Invalidation Trial is 2.0 times. The most recently Invalidation Trial patent is 特許6015941 "食用畜肉塊の除毛装置" (Invalidation Trial day 2022-05-31) .
- | No. | Title | Invalidation Trial days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6015941 | 食用畜肉塊の除毛装置 | 2022-05-31 |
In the last 3 years (2021-03-01 ~ 2024-02-29), there were 61 patents Opposition from third parties. The average number of Opposition is 1.0 times. The most recently Opposition patent is 特許7301055 "薬液、基板の処理方法" (Opposition day 2023-12-27) , next is 特許7304186 "保持パッド及びその製造方法" (Opposition day 2023-12-27) .
- | No. | Title | Opposition days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許7301055 | 薬液、基板の処理方法 | 2023-12-27 |
2 | 特許7304186 | 保持パッド及びその製造方法 | 2023-12-27 |
3 | 特許7301472 | ウェーハの加工方法 | 2023-12-22 |
4 | 特許7298100 | 歯車研削用複層砥石 | 2023-12-18 |
5 | 特許7278336 | 電子インタフェースを備えた電子カード | 2023-11-17 |
6 | 特許7278325 | 窒化ケイ素焼結体 | 2023-11-13 |
7 | 特許7261630 | 研磨用組成物、研磨用組成物の製造方法、研磨方法、および半導体基板の製造方法 | 2023-10-20 |
8 | 特許7269062 | 保持パッド及びその製造方法 | 2023-10-18 |
9 | 特許7262864 | 合成砥石、合成砥石アセンブリ、及び、合成砥石の製造方法 | 2023-10-17 |
10 | 特許7255711 | 分散剤及び研磨剤組成物 | 2023-10-05 |
In the last 3 years (2021-03-01 ~ 2024-02-29), there were 97 patents Protest from third parties. The average number of Protest is 1.4 times. The most recently Protest patent is 特開2021-075417 "光学ガラス、プリフォーム及び光学素子" (Protest day 2024-02-19) , next is 特開2023-109834 "電子インタフェースを備えた電子カード" (Protest day 2024-02-13) .
- | No. | Title | Protest days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2021-075417 | 光学ガラス、プリフォーム及び光学素子 | 2024-02-19 |
2 | 特開2023-109834 | 電子インタフェースを備えた電子カード | 2024-02-13 |
3 | 特開2022-130226 | 積層ポリエステルフィルムの機能層除去方法 | 2024-02-08 |
4 | 特開2021-154451 | 研磨パッド、その製造方法、及び研磨加工物の製造方法 | 2024-02-07 |
5 | 特開2021-154449 | 研磨パッド、その製造方法、及び研磨加工物の製造方法 | 2024-02-07 |
6 | 特開2021-053748 | 研磨パッド及び研磨加工物の製造方法 | 2024-02-02 |
7 | 特開2022-109710 | シリカ粒子の製造方法、シリカゾルの製造方法、研磨方法、半導体ウェハの製造方法及び半導体デバイスの製造方法 | 2024-01-26 |
8 | 特開2022-109711 | シリカ粒子の製造方法、シリカゾルの製造方法、研磨方法、半導体ウェハの製造方法及び半導体デバイスの製造方法 | 2024-01-26 |
9 | 特開2023-072081 | アルミニウム形材、建具及びアルミニウム形材の製造方法 | 2024-01-17 |
10 | 特開2021-116225 | シリカ粒子の製造方法、シリカゾルの製造方法、研磨方法、半導体ウェハの製造方法及び半導体デバイスの製造方法 | 2024-01-15 |
11 | 特開2021-178769 | 薄板モールドプレス成形用フツリン酸光学ガラス、マルチプレス用フツリン酸光学ガラス、光学素子、プリフォーム及びレンズ | 2023-12-21 |
12 | 特開2023-093304 | HVPE法によるGa2O3結晶膜の蒸着方法、蒸着装置、および、これを用いて得られたGa2O3結晶膜蒸着基板 | 2023-12-20 |
13 | 特開2020-196767 | 歯磨組成物及び歯磨組成物における容器へのイソプロピルメチルフェノールの吸着抑制方法 | 2023-12-15 |
14 | 特表2023-532872 | 結合研磨物品及びそれを作製する方法 | 2023-11-20 |
15 | 特開2021-127482 | グラスライニング製品及びその製造方法 | 2023-10-18 |
16 | 特表2023-502070 | 研磨材製品及びその形成方法 | 2023-10-16 |
17 | 特開2022-048558 | 酸化マグネシウム粉末、フィラー組成物、樹脂組成物、及び放熱部品 | 2023-10-12 |
18 | 特許7441163 | シリカ微粒子分散液およびその製造方法 | 2023-10-10 |
19 | 特開2021-134098 | シリカ微粒子分散液およびその製造方法 | 2023-10-06 |
20 | 特開2023-093552 | 電子エミッタ及びそれを製作する方法 | 2023-09-25 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-03-01 to 2024-02-29), 228 patents/patent applications were protest more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of protest is 1.4. The most protest patent is 特許6611299 "光学ガラス、プリフォーム及び光学素子" (5 times) , and the next most protest patent is 特許6654380 "建材の製造方法" (5 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6611299 | 光学ガラス、プリフォーム及び光学素子 | 5 times |
2 | 特許6654380 | 建材の製造方法 | 5 times |
3 | 特許6985786 | 歯磨組成物及び歯磨組成物における容器へのイソプロピルメチルフェノールの吸着抑制方法 | 5 times |
4 | 特許7195040 | 光学ガラス、プリフォーム及び光学素子 | 4 times |
5 | 特開2020-196767 | 歯磨組成物及び歯磨組成物における容器へのイソプロピルメチルフェノールの吸着抑制方法 | 4 times |
In the last 3 years (2021-03-01 ~ 2024-02-29), there were 143 patents Inspection from third parties. The average number of Inspection is 1.5 times. The most recently Inspection patent is 特開2022-109711 "シリカ粒子の製造方法、シリカゾルの製造方法、研磨方法、半導体ウェハの製造方法及び半導体デバイスの製造方法" (Inspection day 2024-02-26) , next is 特開2022-130226 "積層ポリエステルフィルムの機能層除去方法" (Inspection day 2024-02-21) .
- | No. | Title | Inspection days |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特開2022-109711 | シリカ粒子の製造方法、シリカゾルの製造方法、研磨方法、半導体ウェハの製造方法及び半導体デバイスの製造方法 | 2024-02-26 |
2 | 特開2022-130226 | 積層ポリエステルフィルムの機能層除去方法 | 2024-02-21 |
3 | 特開2022-109710 | シリカ粒子の製造方法、シリカゾルの製造方法、研磨方法、半導体ウェハの製造方法及び半導体デバイスの製造方法 | 2024-02-20 |
4 | 特開2023-109834 | 電子インタフェースを備えた電子カード | 2024-02-16 |
5 | 特開2021-154451 | 研磨パッド、その製造方法、及び研磨加工物の製造方法 | 2024-02-15 |
6 | 特開2021-154449 | 研磨パッド、その製造方法、及び研磨加工物の製造方法 | 2024-02-15 |
7 | 特開2021-053748 | 研磨パッド及び研磨加工物の製造方法 | 2024-02-15 |
8 | 特許6885440 | 電気光学装置の製造方法、電気光学装置および電子機器 | 2024-02-06 |
9 | 特開2021-116225 | シリカ粒子の製造方法、シリカゾルの製造方法、研磨方法、半導体ウェハの製造方法及び半導体デバイスの製造方法 | 2024-02-06 |
10 | 特開2020-196767 | 歯磨組成物及び歯磨組成物における容器へのイソプロピルメチルフェノールの吸着抑制方法 | 2024-01-25 |
11 | 特開2023-072081 | アルミニウム形材、建具及びアルミニウム形材の製造方法 | 2024-01-23 |
12 | 特許7412484 | 焼結磁性合金及びそれから誘導される組成物の粒界工学 | 2023-12-22 |
13 | 特開2022-071866 | 組織サンプル切断中に外側カニューレ内に半径方向に中心位置決めされたままとなるコアコレクタを具備する生検システム | 2023-12-21 |
14 | 特許7399601 | 刃物研ぎ器 | 2023-12-11 |
15 | 特表2023-532872 | 結合研磨物品及びそれを作製する方法 | 2023-12-08 |
16 | 特開2021-127482 | グラスライニング製品及びその製造方法 | 2023-11-09 |
17 | 特許7441163 | シリカ微粒子分散液およびその製造方法 | 2023-11-06 |
18 | 特開2021-134098 | シリカ微粒子分散液およびその製造方法 | 2023-11-06 |
19 | 特表2023-502070 | 研磨材製品及びその形成方法 | 2023-11-02 |
20 | 特開2022-048558 | 酸化マグネシウム粉末、フィラー組成物、樹脂組成物、及び放熱部品 | 2023-10-26 |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-03-01 to 2024-02-29), 384 patents/patent applications were inspection more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of inspection is 1.3. The most inspection patent is 特許6654380 "建材の製造方法" (13 times) , and the next most inspection patent is 特開2020-196767 "歯磨組成物及び歯磨組成物における容器へのイソプロピルメチルフェノールの吸着抑制方法" (8 times) .
- | No. | Title | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | 特許6654380 | 建材の製造方法 | 13 times |
2 | 特開2020-196767 | 歯磨組成物及び歯磨組成物における容器へのイソプロピルメチルフェノールの吸着抑制方法 | 8 times |
3 | 特開2017-036209 | 高純度シリカゾルおよびその製造方法 | 6 times |
4 | 特許6438564 | 侵食性防汚コーティング組成物 | 5 times |
5 | 特許6831762 | 複合酸化物粒子及び該複合酸化物粒子を含む歯科用複合材料 | 4 times |
Of the patent applications filed in the last 10 years (2014-03-01 to 2024-02-29), 3,640 patents/patent applications were cited more than once in the examination process of other patent applications. The mean of the number of cited is 2.6. The most cited patent is 特許5953341 "磁気テープ" (107 times) , and the next most cited patent is 特許6318108 "磁気テープ" (64 times) .
"Patent Integration Report" is a web service provided by "Patent Integration Co., Ltd." operated by patent attorneys who are experts in intellectual property rights. Based on the latest patent data, this is one of the largest patent report services in Japan that provides information on technology trends in various companies and technology fields.
The purpose of this web service is to make intellectual property information familiar to many people, regardless of whether they have an interest in intellectual property rights, and to make use of it.
We actively provide various types of patent information that can be used in various media articles such as newspapers, magazines, and web media. Please feel free to contact us from "Inquiry form for details on the content of patent information that can be provided, conditions for provision, etc. Please contact us.
All rights related to the data, documents and charts belong to "an integrated patent search/analysis service provider, Patent Integration". Please specify the source “Patent Integration Report, URL: https://patent-i.com/report/en/" when inserting them into in-house materials, external report materials, etc., regardless of whether they are paid or free of charge.
Patent data is obtained by aggregating and analyzing the latest patent data issued by the Patent Offices of respective countries and jurisdictions and by WIPO. Although we take great care in publishing and analyzing the results, we do not guarantee the correctness of the data. We appreciate your understanding.
If you have any concerns about this service, please feel free to contact us.
Credit notation
・MeCab user dictionary for science technology term © National Bioscience Database Center licensed under CC Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International